6 Comments
User's avatar
Brandon is not your bro's avatar

How about … a little pregnant 😮. Good article, thank u

Expand full comment
Original Lisa's avatar

🙏

Expand full comment
Tom Karnes's avatar

What exactly does the whole truth look like, maybe you are expendable in service to the .001% stealing the world's key resources

Expand full comment
Suavek's avatar

Hi Tom,

I think your question, exactly as you have formulated it, is completely legitimate. The point is that people can only fight back against tyranny if they know what has been done to them. There was never "Covid". At least 6 different respiratory diseases were renamed "Covid" back then using PCR tests. As long as this remains unknown and does not appear in major, alternative media, a false narrative is created that says that mistakes were made. In this case, people will remain as naive as they were before because they continue to trust the authorities, and no one will be able or willing to fight back against the deadly, past and future fraud. The planned transformation of society into a digital dictatorship, with no way to reverse it, is then an easy game.

Do you want your children to live as slaves in a digital neo-feudalistic system? Time is short, but many people believe they can enlighten the world by telling the truth only sometimes, or only half the truth out of consideration for their own interests. Unfortunately, from a strategic point of view, this assumption is completely wrong. Everyone decides for themselves what they do or do not do, but I can also decide to express my opinion. I cannot remain idle when the wrong solutions are applied. I do not believe that we can achieve the most important goals if we pay too much attention to our own interests at the same time. Either way, we will not come out of this story unscathed. Nevertheless, I believe that the enlightenment work of Dr. Jonathan Engler so far deserves special recognition. Unfortunately, Substack readers are not as numerous as some alternative media, such as TCW Defending Freedom. What was not mentioned in this internet magazine was publicly added by Dr Yeadon.

With my article, I wanted to provide food for thought in a somewhat humorous way. If, for example, the truth is only announced on the first Friday of the month, then we have no chance of prevailing against the all-powerful and well-paid propaganda.

Best wishes,

Suavek

Expand full comment
Tinu's avatar

Most probably you are seen as an experimental livestock with a unique genetic information some crazy rich and powerful crazy people are trying to exploit for gaining insight for their endeavour to create a long life for them on this earth. They are experimenting on us, and they want our genetic information to feed their machines with.

If you did not take part in their last global experiment, you were seen as the enemy. Maybe the messaging was as powerful as it was because it was done with genuin intentions by the ones who have the power to tell the mass media what to tell to the crowd..

This is how I see it.

Expand full comment
Suavek's avatar

Hi Tinu,

Your comment came at a time when I was working on an article about "WHY?" In it, I mention all the options about what was, or could have been, useful in the fake pandemic and for whom. Your option is also there. Here is a fragment of the text from the unfinished article:

The mass tests were, among other things, an opportunity to collect a large data set of genetic information from citizens. However, this cannot have been the reason for the high toxicity in the development of the pseudo-vaccine. The genetic information can also be obtained without such injections. One of the possibilities, however, is that the perpetrators wanted to find out how person A with genetic code B reacts to injection C, and how long this person can live after the injection. The high differences between the batches could be an indication that such experiments did indeed take place. Knowledge about the connection of the genetic code with the body's respective resistance to the toxic substances could have been obtained in this way. Although the basis of the plandemic fraud is not only pseudo-medical but also political-economic in nature, now this possibility of a terrible experiment must also be taken into account, because it has never been refuted. As far as I remember, this option was first mentioned publicly by Jonathan J. Couey, PhD. He accused the perpetrators of wanting to research how to achieve longevity.

Best wishes,

Suavek

Expand full comment