If enough people were informed about this in a timely manner, it could be avoided. Unfortunately, people only want to believe what suits them. The invention of the plandemic probably had, among other things, the purpose of being able to justify this robbery "because the plandemic cost so much".
I'm sorry this frustrates you. Many of the people insulting you are paid trolls. The rest are those who share the trolls' opinions. Unfortunately, they subscribe to the opinion of an artificially created "majority," and out of laziness and a lack of willingness to research deeper, they don't realize that they themselves form this artificial "majority." It's like a sticky fly trap. After a long flight in uncertain space, it can be very tempting to finally find a comfortable seat among the majority of fellow conspecifics. This quickly resolves the problem of agonizing insecurity. The gullibility is frightening. At a certain point, the whole thing becomes self-perpetuating.
This is an excellent point. I see many campaigners proclaiming victory, freedom, whatever, while taking little or no effective actions which could head off or insulate themselves from immediate consequences of eg financial/economic tyranny.
At any moment, systemic bank failures could be announced and this will mark the permanent separation of you from your money, savings, investments, all the things you planned to depend upon.
Now you’re entirely in the hands of the state. You will literally starve if you don’t comply, to the letter, with any conditions that are set. Even if you see clearly that the consequences will be severe, even fatal, you have absolutely no recourse.
Permanent loss of access to your own money might mean the end of that sovereign currency, and in due course, it almost certainly will mark the date that happened. But I expect transactions involving sterling (or your local currency) will continue, or else the plot will be immediately revealed.
In that eventuality, you will be glad you took out a stock of cash.
Additionally, some “prepping” is essential. Otherwise you are trusting that you’ll always be able to obtain what you need or want. That’s unwise.
Precious metals are also important, no matter how little you have. Uniquely, of all assets, it has no counterparty risk.
I'm thinking about the recent massive slump and massive 7% surge in the stock market, in the space of days, all hinging on the seemingly rash and illegal pronouncements of the president.
What if one were an admin insider or a sponsor of such an insider? I dunno...someone with many billions, maybe with a hedge-fund or internet pay system...someone who could buy and sell by complex proxy arrangements...
Almost as good as having those pigeons after Waterloo, wouldn't you say?
Not saying there's no long-term villainy. But sometimes there's much gained just short-term. When seven (not two!) buildings, all part of the one complex, fell behind a pall of smoke, some suddenly new proprietors got a very fat insurance payout. This did not exclude any long-term goals, like...I dunno...like the general enslavement of the human race.
I think a US president only says what the owners of the Fed want. One or more billionaires who have nothing to do with power have no chance of influencing anything. The power lies in the hands of the trillionaires.
I was thinking more of insider knowledge, regardless of who was making policy. I doubt that the likes of Trump or Vance could find the Red Sea or Persian Gulf on a map, let alone make any decisions about anything. Still, a word to a buddy...
And maybe those Fed owners wouldn't mind picking up a few of the better apples from the cart they themselves have upset. They may be masterminds, but they are also shallow, shabby misers, driven by a boredom so colossal that a moment's sincere contemplation would crush them. So they grub about like the lowest of beasts...which they are.
Now that I understand your comment better, I no longer rule out anything; I agree with you. Regarding the genius of these elites, I believe that anyone could be just as brilliant if a swarm of corrupt scientists gave them tips on how to shape the world's future according to their own wishes. Don't you agree that malice and greed preclude genius?
This psy-op of a 'reset' or a NWO has blinded everyone to what's going on.
The old world order, ie the oil/animal ag/pharma money, is desperate to maintain primacy over the world. They can't bear that 'Chinese peasants' are doing better than they are. They, of course, oppose the rise of renewable energy (which offers indepedence from their hegemony). They, of course, oppose environmentalism, global equity and the rise of veganism. So off the back of their plandemic they invented an evil cabal who (counterintuitively) wish to force us into dairy free 15 minute cities. It has been documented how they did this. https://jowaller.substack.com/p/what-is-the-heartland-institute?utm_source=publication-search
The present round of tariffs against China are part of a campaign to weaken her, who they see as their biggest rival. Any price rises and discontent among the US public will be blamed on China and used to sell a hot war over Taiwan (part of China).
All the while you listen to controlled opposition like Fitts, Ed Dowd, Malone, Desmet and dive into black nobilities and resets- the deep state has you exactly where they want you; tilting at windmills.
I am grateful to many people for sharing valuable information with the public. This also applies to Catherine Austin Fitts. However, there will always be a few points that strike me as ambiguous. For example, I don't know the basis for Catherine's claim that the US dollar is safe. The Chinese tariffs imposed on the US in retaliation mean nothing other than the impending inflation of the US dollar. On the other hand, she has already shown that she has been able to revise her opinion on other things. As for Ed Dowd, I find his statistical data very insightful. Unfortunately, he still doesn't know that there was never a "COVID." I also found Professor Desmet's work very valuable, although I missed a certain balance regarding the emergence of mass psychosis. Coincidentally, I can talk about the topic of "systemic fraud" because I have been interested in it for decades and have invested a lot of time in it. So, I didn't have to relearn the psychology of propaganda from scratch in 2020. My modesty naturally compels me to always expect that I've overlooked some point, because my perspective is also based on a limited, subjective perception.
Your statement that I supposedly listen to Robert Malone seems completely incomprehensible to me. I think this man does far more harm than good to the public. Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt called him "spokesperson for the Pentagon." As for black nobility, I've never dealt with this topic because I didn't have time for it.
It's not clear from your article linked above what you think about alleged climate change. There, you only write about environmental pollution. Or have I missed something? So I know what you are criticizing, but I have no idea what your point of view is and what you would like to suggest.
Yes, I invite you to offer a positive critique, for example, recommending something, or saying which statements from which people you like to listen to and why.
Malone is of course known to most, but not all, as controlled opposition, and Desmet is thick as thieves with him. Throwing him under the bus doesn't prove anyone else's credentials as independent.
At this time I don't trust anyone. I think most of the freedom movement has been controlled from the start.
You found a study that disputes the claim that Scandinavia wasn't warmer in the Middle Ages than it is today? That surprises me greatly, since the name "Greenland" comes from the Middle Ages, and there are ancient texts that actually describe this country as green back then.
Here are 2 fragments of your article :
" ( ... ) and even in England and other areas in the northern hemisphere it was not warmer than ‘today’ ie 2024."
and :
" ‘Twentieth-century Scandinavian warming is relatively small compared with most other Northern Hemisphere high-latitude regions’. It does not show that it was globally hotter than ‘today’ in the Medieval period."
That's just one example.
You don't mention that the "elites" in the 1960s and 1970s tried to scare us with a supposedly impending cold-period catastrophe. I won't comment further on your article because I'd rather do something useful during this time than to decipher the propaganda. I apologize for this. To err is, of course, typically human, and I'm not immune to it either. But it would be nice if the loud and already excessively frequent propaganda left at least a few small Substack websites "untainted."
I agree with you that the freedom movement was controlled from the beginning, which is why the "Covid" narrative is still widely spread today, even though this disease never existed.
Best wishes,
Suavek
P.S.
Regarding the alleged climate change, it occurred to me afterwards that you make it surprisingly easy for a reader of your article to refute your claim. I think I could do it even if I were illiterate. That surprises me. I think you've based your opinion on the wrong studies.
I am astounded by your comment. Yes a small part of the south west coast of Greenland was green but the majority of it was still covered in ice. It was called Greenland to trick people into emigrating there. The sea levels, as well as all the ice core and tree ring data show it wasn't warmer there, or in Scandinavia as a whole, or in England, than it is now. You're just clinging to the talking points you've been fed and haven't actually looked into anything. Which surprises me. I thought you wanted to get away from the scientically illiterate reputation of health freedom, which you are reinforcing.
I do mention the supposed cooling in the 60s and 70s it was a very small number of scientists who predicted it though it was over represented in the media. The 'elites' are now using it to discredit climate science as a whole. You have no discernment to speak of.
Basing my opinion on the 'wrong studies'? There are no studies that show the medieval period as being warmer. The studies that 'do' have been misrepresented and taking the weight of the evidence (the basis of science) also shows that they don't.
'The past 2025 years - i.e. everything AD - are referred to by archaeologists as the Common Era (CE). Decades ago, long before the refinements and data-coverage of modern science, the CE was divided into a series of climate epochs. Among these were the 'Mediaeval Warm Period' (MWP), from around 800-1200 CE and the 'Little Ice-Age', from 1200-1850 CE.
Each of these epochs has the origin of its name in older paleoclimatic evidence from the Northern Hemisphere and particularly Europe. But things have moved on. We now know that unlike modern global warming, the MWP was regional in its nature. A particularly warm region was the Northern Atlantic, including southern Greenland.
Icelandic sagas tell how, in 982 CE, Erik the Red was sentenced to exile from Iceland for three years. He had been involved in an escalated dispute with a neighbour that had culminated in several deaths. With a band of fellow Vikings, he set sail towards Greenland. Erik's party landed and settled near the mouth of Tunulliarfik Fjord, which has the modern Innuit settlement of Narsarsuaq at its head. This part of Greenland is a largely ice-free enclave today, situated in the SW part of the island, some 200 km from its southern tip. Legend tells how Erik came up with the name, 'Greenland', in order to attract further settlers. Apparently the ploy worked.
With hundreds of settlers arriving in the SW of Greenland, a mixed economy developed. It was based on combined pastoral farming, hunting and fishing. Livestock were kept mostly for milk, cheese and butter. Meat instead came mostly from hunting, both locally and in seasonal expeditions further north. These longer forays visited areas in which walrus, narwhal and polar bears were abundant. Hides and ivory became export commodities, allowing maritime trade with the rest of Europe, in return for iron, timber and other essentials.
A few centuries into this colonisation, the regional climate deteriorated. Ice-sheets readvanced. Recent research has also shown that sea-levels rose, too. It may seem counter-intuitive, but when ice sheets grow, nearby coasts often drown. Two things work together to cause this: the larger gravitational pull of all the extra ice on the sea surface and the subsidence of Earth's crust due to the added weight of that ice. One recent study has suggested over 200 square kilometres of coastal land - where the settlers would have had many of their farms - were lost. Geophysics has detected remains of some of the settlements, now beneath the waves.
Progressive sea-level rise, likely in tandem with social and environmental factors such as famines, epidemics and harsher weather, took its toll. The Inuit, who had arrived in around 1200 CE, remained in Greenland through the severe cold of the Little Ice Age but by around 1500 CE, the Vikings had vanished for good. Climate change drove them out.
That's what happened to the Vikings. But regional and global climate change are different things. Regional historic change has little bearing on the global events that are happening right now.
Suavek, the papers that I have 'found' are the ones proporting to show that England was warmer in the medieval period than today (ie 2025). I looked at them for this reason. The two 'fragments' you quote are me showing how they in fact do not show this. There is no evidence in the last 10,000 years that it's been warmer in England nor warmer in global composites than in 2025. And even if it was warmer in England, ie regionally, that is irrelevant and why global averages are taken. Even if it. was warmer globally, which is wasn't, that doesn't show that co2 levels are not hugely influencing the temperature. People have always been murdered, doesn't mean that people aren't being murdered now. That would be illogicial.
But somehow you could refute this data even if you were illiterate?
EXC – Trump to Declare ‘I Will Never Allow Central Bank Digital Currency’ in New Hampshire Speech.
President Donald J. Trump is expected to denounce Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) in an address in New Hampshire on Wednesday evening.
In from his New York trial for the second day running, Trump is expected to tell the crowd in Portsmouth, “Tonight, I am also making another promise to protect Americans from government tyranny.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
“As your president, I will never allow the creation of a Central Bank Digital Currency. Such a currency would give the federal government absolute control over your money. This would be a dangerous threat to freedom – and I will stop it from coming to America. We are also going to put in place strong protections to stop banks and regulators from trying to de-bank you for your political beliefs. That will never happen while I am your president.”
The comments are believed to be the first time the 45th President has intervened on the subject of CBDCs – a digital currency issued by a nation’s central bank, such as the Federal Reserve. The news comes one day after Trump shared the stage with Vivek Ramaswamy, who has been increasingly vocal on the subject.
I remember one president promising that the US dollar would remain pegged to gold reserves, and Nixon rescinded that promise in seconds. The reduction of staff positions in federal authorities remains a mere window dressing as long as there is no reduction in spending on the military-industrial complex. Annual budget : $1 trillion. Besides, why should I believe a man who allowed toxic "vaccines" to be used against a nonexistent disease? He even faked this "disease" himself. I don't believe an actor.
But according to those who watch executive orders, he signed onto various centralised token systems that serve precisely the same purpose. Imagine instead of us being forced to bank with the central bank in our country, we continue to bank with which institutions we use today. Initially, tokens can be used that aren’t real time updated that might look and feel like current digital use of GBP. Maybe your account will show eGBP and you notice no other differences. Except that, in a few months time, you’re warned that your maximum balance is to be set to £3000 as from next month. Any excess will be taken. You desperately try to withdraw cash, but your daily limit makes it impossible to do more than make a dent in your savings. You try to move it, but all other accounts have the same impending limit, meaning you cannot move more than £3000 per transaction. Your bank also limits your daily transaction amount. It’s terrifying, isn’t it?
Cannot happen? It certainly can. At some point, I think in the next few years, it will happen. The perpetrators will not tolerate individuals existing independently of their control.
Oh dear. There is no Great Reset. It was invented by US special interests, (big oil, pharma, animal ag (pharma's biggest client by far), banking and tech) to spread climate crisis misinformation, sinophobia and fear of left wing communist control to deflect from the fact that these US special interests already control us, already control the food supply, already watch our every move and already control the UK government.
I agree with you that the Great Rest is not what we're being told. First and foremost, it's a theft of public property, and of the property of citizens. I suspect that the perpetrators may be pushing two contradictory narratives that contradict each other. However, they are pushing one of these narratives more strongly. That makes sense : If they do something about supposed climate change, they're distracting from the fact that they're the ones who want to dictate the climate change narrative. Have you ever thought about this? We're not dealing with an easily understandable "either/or" propaganda, but with a "both/and" one. Nothing here is either black or white. There are all sorts of shades of gray in between that are difficult to discern.
Hi Suavek, I'm blocked from commenting on Mike Yeadon's posts (I think because I called him out over the existence of the greenhouse effect on earth; without which it would be as cold as it is on the moon) so I can't respond to the spurious comments about T Campbell and the China Study, which has never been debunked nor discredited in any way in the peer review. Unlike the unscientific claims of the industry funded Weston a Price foundation.
If Mike is indeed about freedom and scientific debate with peers please ask him to unblock me.
When Jesus told His disciples to store up treasure in heaven, where moth and rust don't destroy and thieves don't break in, He--being God, outside of time, making and sustaining everything--was fully aware and in control of both this *type* of great-taking power play and of this *specific* one, in our time. Rest in Him... and thus in that sure promise. There is no rest anywhere else.
Hi Elusive1,
If enough people were informed about this in a timely manner, it could be avoided. Unfortunately, people only want to believe what suits them. The invention of the plandemic probably had, among other things, the purpose of being able to justify this robbery "because the plandemic cost so much".
Best wishes,
Suavek
I'm sorry this frustrates you. Many of the people insulting you are paid trolls. The rest are those who share the trolls' opinions. Unfortunately, they subscribe to the opinion of an artificially created "majority," and out of laziness and a lack of willingness to research deeper, they don't realize that they themselves form this artificial "majority." It's like a sticky fly trap. After a long flight in uncertain space, it can be very tempting to finally find a comfortable seat among the majority of fellow conspecifics. This quickly resolves the problem of agonizing insecurity. The gullibility is frightening. At a certain point, the whole thing becomes self-perpetuating.
This is an excellent point. I see many campaigners proclaiming victory, freedom, whatever, while taking little or no effective actions which could head off or insulate themselves from immediate consequences of eg financial/economic tyranny.
At any moment, systemic bank failures could be announced and this will mark the permanent separation of you from your money, savings, investments, all the things you planned to depend upon.
Now you’re entirely in the hands of the state. You will literally starve if you don’t comply, to the letter, with any conditions that are set. Even if you see clearly that the consequences will be severe, even fatal, you have absolutely no recourse.
Permanent loss of access to your own money might mean the end of that sovereign currency, and in due course, it almost certainly will mark the date that happened. But I expect transactions involving sterling (or your local currency) will continue, or else the plot will be immediately revealed.
In that eventuality, you will be glad you took out a stock of cash.
Additionally, some “prepping” is essential. Otherwise you are trusting that you’ll always be able to obtain what you need or want. That’s unwise.
Precious metals are also important, no matter how little you have. Uniquely, of all assets, it has no counterparty risk.
Just a side-note or incidental...
I'm thinking about the recent massive slump and massive 7% surge in the stock market, in the space of days, all hinging on the seemingly rash and illegal pronouncements of the president.
What if one were an admin insider or a sponsor of such an insider? I dunno...someone with many billions, maybe with a hedge-fund or internet pay system...someone who could buy and sell by complex proxy arrangements...
Almost as good as having those pigeons after Waterloo, wouldn't you say?
Not saying there's no long-term villainy. But sometimes there's much gained just short-term. When seven (not two!) buildings, all part of the one complex, fell behind a pall of smoke, some suddenly new proprietors got a very fat insurance payout. This did not exclude any long-term goals, like...I dunno...like the general enslavement of the human race.
Hi Robert,
I think a US president only says what the owners of the Fed want. One or more billionaires who have nothing to do with power have no chance of influencing anything. The power lies in the hands of the trillionaires.
Best wishes,
Suavek
I was thinking more of insider knowledge, regardless of who was making policy. I doubt that the likes of Trump or Vance could find the Red Sea or Persian Gulf on a map, let alone make any decisions about anything. Still, a word to a buddy...
And maybe those Fed owners wouldn't mind picking up a few of the better apples from the cart they themselves have upset. They may be masterminds, but they are also shallow, shabby misers, driven by a boredom so colossal that a moment's sincere contemplation would crush them. So they grub about like the lowest of beasts...which they are.
Now that I understand your comment better, I no longer rule out anything; I agree with you. Regarding the genius of these elites, I believe that anyone could be just as brilliant if a swarm of corrupt scientists gave them tips on how to shape the world's future according to their own wishes. Don't you agree that malice and greed preclude genius?
This psy-op of a 'reset' or a NWO has blinded everyone to what's going on.
The old world order, ie the oil/animal ag/pharma money, is desperate to maintain primacy over the world. They can't bear that 'Chinese peasants' are doing better than they are. They, of course, oppose the rise of renewable energy (which offers indepedence from their hegemony). They, of course, oppose environmentalism, global equity and the rise of veganism. So off the back of their plandemic they invented an evil cabal who (counterintuitively) wish to force us into dairy free 15 minute cities. It has been documented how they did this. https://jowaller.substack.com/p/what-is-the-heartland-institute?utm_source=publication-search
The present round of tariffs against China are part of a campaign to weaken her, who they see as their biggest rival. Any price rises and discontent among the US public will be blamed on China and used to sell a hot war over Taiwan (part of China).
All the while you listen to controlled opposition like Fitts, Ed Dowd, Malone, Desmet and dive into black nobilities and resets- the deep state has you exactly where they want you; tilting at windmills.
Hi Jo,
I am grateful to many people for sharing valuable information with the public. This also applies to Catherine Austin Fitts. However, there will always be a few points that strike me as ambiguous. For example, I don't know the basis for Catherine's claim that the US dollar is safe. The Chinese tariffs imposed on the US in retaliation mean nothing other than the impending inflation of the US dollar. On the other hand, she has already shown that she has been able to revise her opinion on other things. As for Ed Dowd, I find his statistical data very insightful. Unfortunately, he still doesn't know that there was never a "COVID." I also found Professor Desmet's work very valuable, although I missed a certain balance regarding the emergence of mass psychosis. Coincidentally, I can talk about the topic of "systemic fraud" because I have been interested in it for decades and have invested a lot of time in it. So, I didn't have to relearn the psychology of propaganda from scratch in 2020. My modesty naturally compels me to always expect that I've overlooked some point, because my perspective is also based on a limited, subjective perception.
Your statement that I supposedly listen to Robert Malone seems completely incomprehensible to me. I think this man does far more harm than good to the public. Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt called him "spokesperson for the Pentagon." As for black nobility, I've never dealt with this topic because I didn't have time for it.
It's not clear from your article linked above what you think about alleged climate change. There, you only write about environmental pollution. Or have I missed something? So I know what you are criticizing, but I have no idea what your point of view is and what you would like to suggest.
Yes, I invite you to offer a positive critique, for example, recommending something, or saying which statements from which people you like to listen to and why.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Well here is my work on Ed Dowd's cancer stats for starters https://jowaller.substack.com/p/update-on-excess-deaths-and-depopulation?utm_source=publication-search He is pushing the depopulation psy-op by misleading us over the numbers.
Here's where i stand on the very well evidenced climate crisis https://jowaller.substack.com/p/climate-change-hasnt-been-debunked?utm_source=publication-search
Malone is of course known to most, but not all, as controlled opposition, and Desmet is thick as thieves with him. Throwing him under the bus doesn't prove anyone else's credentials as independent.
At this time I don't trust anyone. I think most of the freedom movement has been controlled from the start.
https://jowaller.substack.com/p/the-anti-woke-free-speech-and-health?utm_source=publication-search
Hi Jo,
You found a study that disputes the claim that Scandinavia wasn't warmer in the Middle Ages than it is today? That surprises me greatly, since the name "Greenland" comes from the Middle Ages, and there are ancient texts that actually describe this country as green back then.
Here are 2 fragments of your article :
" ( ... ) and even in England and other areas in the northern hemisphere it was not warmer than ‘today’ ie 2024."
and :
" ‘Twentieth-century Scandinavian warming is relatively small compared with most other Northern Hemisphere high-latitude regions’. It does not show that it was globally hotter than ‘today’ in the Medieval period."
That's just one example.
You don't mention that the "elites" in the 1960s and 1970s tried to scare us with a supposedly impending cold-period catastrophe. I won't comment further on your article because I'd rather do something useful during this time than to decipher the propaganda. I apologize for this. To err is, of course, typically human, and I'm not immune to it either. But it would be nice if the loud and already excessively frequent propaganda left at least a few small Substack websites "untainted."
I agree with you that the freedom movement was controlled from the beginning, which is why the "Covid" narrative is still widely spread today, even though this disease never existed.
Best wishes,
Suavek
P.S.
Regarding the alleged climate change, it occurred to me afterwards that you make it surprisingly easy for a reader of your article to refute your claim. I think I could do it even if I were illiterate. That surprises me. I think you've based your opinion on the wrong studies.
I am astounded by your comment. Yes a small part of the south west coast of Greenland was green but the majority of it was still covered in ice. It was called Greenland to trick people into emigrating there. The sea levels, as well as all the ice core and tree ring data show it wasn't warmer there, or in Scandinavia as a whole, or in England, than it is now. You're just clinging to the talking points you've been fed and haven't actually looked into anything. Which surprises me. I thought you wanted to get away from the scientically illiterate reputation of health freedom, which you are reinforcing.
I do mention the supposed cooling in the 60s and 70s it was a very small number of scientists who predicted it though it was over represented in the media. The 'elites' are now using it to discredit climate science as a whole. You have no discernment to speak of.
Basing my opinion on the 'wrong studies'? There are no studies that show the medieval period as being warmer. The studies that 'do' have been misrepresented and taking the weight of the evidence (the basis of science) also shows that they don't.
Seeing as you're obsessed with Greenland.
'The past 2025 years - i.e. everything AD - are referred to by archaeologists as the Common Era (CE). Decades ago, long before the refinements and data-coverage of modern science, the CE was divided into a series of climate epochs. Among these were the 'Mediaeval Warm Period' (MWP), from around 800-1200 CE and the 'Little Ice-Age', from 1200-1850 CE.
Each of these epochs has the origin of its name in older paleoclimatic evidence from the Northern Hemisphere and particularly Europe. But things have moved on. We now know that unlike modern global warming, the MWP was regional in its nature. A particularly warm region was the Northern Atlantic, including southern Greenland.
Icelandic sagas tell how, in 982 CE, Erik the Red was sentenced to exile from Iceland for three years. He had been involved in an escalated dispute with a neighbour that had culminated in several deaths. With a band of fellow Vikings, he set sail towards Greenland. Erik's party landed and settled near the mouth of Tunulliarfik Fjord, which has the modern Innuit settlement of Narsarsuaq at its head. This part of Greenland is a largely ice-free enclave today, situated in the SW part of the island, some 200 km from its southern tip. Legend tells how Erik came up with the name, 'Greenland', in order to attract further settlers. Apparently the ploy worked.
With hundreds of settlers arriving in the SW of Greenland, a mixed economy developed. It was based on combined pastoral farming, hunting and fishing. Livestock were kept mostly for milk, cheese and butter. Meat instead came mostly from hunting, both locally and in seasonal expeditions further north. These longer forays visited areas in which walrus, narwhal and polar bears were abundant. Hides and ivory became export commodities, allowing maritime trade with the rest of Europe, in return for iron, timber and other essentials.
A few centuries into this colonisation, the regional climate deteriorated. Ice-sheets readvanced. Recent research has also shown that sea-levels rose, too. It may seem counter-intuitive, but when ice sheets grow, nearby coasts often drown. Two things work together to cause this: the larger gravitational pull of all the extra ice on the sea surface and the subsidence of Earth's crust due to the added weight of that ice. One recent study has suggested over 200 square kilometres of coastal land - where the settlers would have had many of their farms - were lost. Geophysics has detected remains of some of the settlements, now beneath the waves.
Progressive sea-level rise, likely in tandem with social and environmental factors such as famines, epidemics and harsher weather, took its toll. The Inuit, who had arrived in around 1200 CE, remained in Greenland through the severe cold of the Little Ice Age but by around 1500 CE, the Vikings had vanished for good. Climate change drove them out.
That's what happened to the Vikings. But regional and global climate change are different things. Regional historic change has little bearing on the global events that are happening right now.
Suavek, the papers that I have 'found' are the ones proporting to show that England was warmer in the medieval period than today (ie 2025). I looked at them for this reason. The two 'fragments' you quote are me showing how they in fact do not show this. There is no evidence in the last 10,000 years that it's been warmer in England nor warmer in global composites than in 2025. And even if it was warmer in England, ie regionally, that is irrelevant and why global averages are taken. Even if it. was warmer globally, which is wasn't, that doesn't show that co2 levels are not hugely influencing the temperature. People have always been murdered, doesn't mean that people aren't being murdered now. That would be illogicial.
But somehow you could refute this data even if you were illiterate?
Is this sardonic humor?
____
https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/01/17/exc-trump-to-declare-i-will-never-allowed-central-bank-digital-currency-in-new-hampshire-speech/
January 17, 2024
Raheem J. Kassam
Election 2024
EXC – Trump to Declare ‘I Will Never Allow Central Bank Digital Currency’ in New Hampshire Speech.
President Donald J. Trump is expected to denounce Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) in an address in New Hampshire on Wednesday evening.
In from his New York trial for the second day running, Trump is expected to tell the crowd in Portsmouth, “Tonight, I am also making another promise to protect Americans from government tyranny.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
“As your president, I will never allow the creation of a Central Bank Digital Currency. Such a currency would give the federal government absolute control over your money. This would be a dangerous threat to freedom – and I will stop it from coming to America. We are also going to put in place strong protections to stop banks and regulators from trying to de-bank you for your political beliefs. That will never happen while I am your president.”
The comments are believed to be the first time the 45th President has intervened on the subject of CBDCs – a digital currency issued by a nation’s central bank, such as the Federal Reserve. The news comes one day after Trump shared the stage with Vivek Ramaswamy, who has been increasingly vocal on the subject.
I remember one president promising that the US dollar would remain pegged to gold reserves, and Nixon rescinded that promise in seconds. The reduction of staff positions in federal authorities remains a mere window dressing as long as there is no reduction in spending on the military-industrial complex. Annual budget : $1 trillion. Besides, why should I believe a man who allowed toxic "vaccines" to be used against a nonexistent disease? He even faked this "disease" himself. I don't believe an actor.
He says he’s excluding specifically CBDCs.
But according to those who watch executive orders, he signed onto various centralised token systems that serve precisely the same purpose. Imagine instead of us being forced to bank with the central bank in our country, we continue to bank with which institutions we use today. Initially, tokens can be used that aren’t real time updated that might look and feel like current digital use of GBP. Maybe your account will show eGBP and you notice no other differences. Except that, in a few months time, you’re warned that your maximum balance is to be set to £3000 as from next month. Any excess will be taken. You desperately try to withdraw cash, but your daily limit makes it impossible to do more than make a dent in your savings. You try to move it, but all other accounts have the same impending limit, meaning you cannot move more than £3000 per transaction. Your bank also limits your daily transaction amount. It’s terrifying, isn’t it?
Cannot happen? It certainly can. At some point, I think in the next few years, it will happen. The perpetrators will not tolerate individuals existing independently of their control.
Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.
Beware the Noahide Laws !
What I particularly like about these laws is that they prohibit animal abuse. Thank you for your comment!
Tongue in cheek …..so often my down fall !
Yo the youlnowwhos , we are the animals.
Oh dear. There is no Great Reset. It was invented by US special interests, (big oil, pharma, animal ag (pharma's biggest client by far), banking and tech) to spread climate crisis misinformation, sinophobia and fear of left wing communist control to deflect from the fact that these US special interests already control us, already control the food supply, already watch our every move and already control the UK government.
https://jowaller.substack.com/p/the-wef-agenda-of-depopulation-and
I agree with you that the Great Rest is not what we're being told. First and foremost, it's a theft of public property, and of the property of citizens. I suspect that the perpetrators may be pushing two contradictory narratives that contradict each other. However, they are pushing one of these narratives more strongly. That makes sense : If they do something about supposed climate change, they're distracting from the fact that they're the ones who want to dictate the climate change narrative. Have you ever thought about this? We're not dealing with an easily understandable "either/or" propaganda, but with a "both/and" one. Nothing here is either black or white. There are all sorts of shades of gray in between that are difficult to discern.
I for one find it very easy to understand. Follow the (old) money to understand the NWO psy-op.
Hi Suavek, I'm blocked from commenting on Mike Yeadon's posts (I think because I called him out over the existence of the greenhouse effect on earth; without which it would be as cold as it is on the moon) so I can't respond to the spurious comments about T Campbell and the China Study, which has never been debunked nor discredited in any way in the peer review. Unlike the unscientific claims of the industry funded Weston a Price foundation.
If Mike is indeed about freedom and scientific debate with peers please ask him to unblock me.
Thank you, Jo, now I know why it's just as cold where I live as it is on the moon.
Haha. It's 22 degrees here how do you explain thatt?
I must conclude that you are both clowns- not serious people at all.
Good luck with your circus act, I'm not the least bit interested in trying to explain basic physics to you.
When Jesus told His disciples to store up treasure in heaven, where moth and rust don't destroy and thieves don't break in, He--being God, outside of time, making and sustaining everything--was fully aware and in control of both this *type* of great-taking power play and of this *specific* one, in our time. Rest in Him... and thus in that sure promise. There is no rest anywhere else.
This is a little gem. Or a big one. Thank you very much.
Anyone interested in the medieval warm period
where was it warmer and was it warmer than today?
is a warm world a good thing?
and are we even asking the right question?
will love this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0LDDjewZVE