Complete genomes of alleged 'viruses' are never found, but only proteins that are claimed to be fragments of 'viruses'. The collection of proteins on the basis of a blueprint is the only thing that ultimately leads to a so-called genome.
The blueprint for the corresponding 'virus' comes from another collection of fragments that were also assembled by a computer into something that was not FOUND in reality, but CONSTRUCTED by assembly.
However, in order to determine which fragments from a collection of billions of fragments (a person sheds 50-80 billion cells per day as cell waste) belong to a 'virus', i.e. to be able to sort all FOUND fragments, separate them from each other, group them and assemble them into an object, at least once in the history of characterising a 'virus', one must have FOUND a real complete object, not altered by procedures, clearly distinguishable in its morphology from everything else, constant in its character, and demonstrably identified as the sole cause of the disease state attributed to the 'virus'.
This has never been done before, and numerous institutes around the world have put this on record.
You can construct anything with computers, even dinosaurs on the cinema screen. That is not the challenge.
Thanks again, Jamie Andrews, for your great effort.
The purported spike protein is a fragment of the purported SARS-CoV-2 virus, a fragment that has been certified to have a specific origin. Without ever having checked the origin of the protein due to the lack of the entire object. Is it clearer now?
Once again in all clarity:
Complete genomes of alleged 'viruses' are never found, but only proteins that are claimed to be fragments of 'viruses'. The collection of proteins on the basis of a blueprint is the only thing that ultimately leads to a so-called genome.
The blueprint for the corresponding 'virus' comes from another collection of fragments that were also assembled by a computer into something that was not FOUND in reality, but CONSTRUCTED by assembly.
However, in order to determine which fragments from a collection of billions of fragments (a person sheds 50-80 billion cells per day as cell waste) belong to a 'virus', i.e. to be able to sort all FOUND fragments, separate them from each other, group them and assemble them into an object, at least once in the history of characterising a 'virus', one must have FOUND a real complete object, not altered by procedures, clearly distinguishable in its morphology from everything else, constant in its character, and demonstrably identified as the sole cause of the disease state attributed to the 'virus'.
This has never been done before, and numerous institutes around the world have put this on record.
You can construct anything with computers, even dinosaurs on the cinema screen. That is not the challenge.
Thanks again, Jamie Andrews, for your great effort.
Thank you very much, your comment is actually VERY clarifying. That's why I published it in the above article. Thank you again !
Best wishes,
Suavek
Your effort is also very appreciated. We must all become multipliers of these informations.
"Complete genomes of alleged 'viruses' are never found, but only proteins that are claimed to be fragments of 'viruses'. "
Are these complete proteins?
I think you mean amino acids which are the building blocks of proteins, instead of proteins.
The purported spike protein is a fragment of the purported SARS-CoV-2 virus, a fragment that has been certified to have a specific origin. Without ever having checked the origin of the protein due to the lack of the entire object. Is it clearer now?