Discussion about this post

User's avatar
follow the silenced's avatar

Once again in all clarity:

Complete genomes of alleged 'viruses' are never found, but only proteins that are claimed to be fragments of 'viruses'. The collection of proteins on the basis of a blueprint is the only thing that ultimately leads to a so-called genome.

The blueprint for the corresponding 'virus' comes from another collection of fragments that were also assembled by a computer into something that was not FOUND in reality, but CONSTRUCTED by assembly.

However, in order to determine which fragments from a collection of billions of fragments (a person sheds 50-80 billion cells per day as cell waste) belong to a 'virus', i.e. to be able to sort all FOUND fragments, separate them from each other, group them and assemble them into an object, at least once in the history of characterising a 'virus', one must have FOUND a real complete object, not altered by procedures, clearly distinguishable in its morphology from everything else, constant in its character, and demonstrably identified as the sole cause of the disease state attributed to the 'virus'.

This has never been done before, and numerous institutes around the world have put this on record.

You can construct anything with computers, even dinosaurs on the cinema screen. That is not the challenge.

Thanks again, Jamie Andrews, for your great effort.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts