The dysfunction can be highly contagious, especially in the upper, middle, and lower regions.
Furthermore, a micro-thrombosis can make it impossible to distinguish between the front and back sides. Confusion is then inevitable. If this affects only one spouse, and not both at the same time, then it could be particularly embarrassing. This seems to be intentional, and not a "side effect," right?
Why distract Mike? If you're genuinely interested, roll up your sleeves, investigate, then present what you find, help us all take actions to survive. Re: 'Simian Virus', many realize the virus fraud now, but didn't know way back when, as most didn't. And here's my tip: on the 'Simian' part, chatted informally a few years back with a doc on vax topic, he shared that he was once at a big cancer conference, lotsa docs there, folks puzzled by the enigma of simian kidney cells in a case cancer patient's cancer cells. Realized that a polio vax shot 30 years prior, cultivated with simian kidney cells, was the only source, as AMERICANS DON'T EAT MONKEYS. Light went on. Woke up. But all the other docs? They kept partying, schmoozing, grabbing deals with pharma sales reps. How it goes.
Blimey I only asked, I’m a property developer not a scientist. So I gather it’s monkey cells and probably not viruses, obviously something very bad in the jabs to be killing people, but I’m still unsure and would like to know, and what better source than Mike if that’s possible. If nothing more than to share some facts with the doubters. Any links would be appreciated and thanks for your reply.
Hi Steve, apologies for the somewhat kneejerk attitude. Just what came out at the moment. Yes, Mike has become a good source for understanding. Sources, well, there are still online collections, for a while. John in the UK: http://whale.to/ Ken in LA area: https://educate-yourself.org/. In print, can hunt down Eustace Mullins's books. In Australia, an online free library, Steve runs it: https://soilandhealth.org/
Steve, I can add my own amateur speculation, research, brainstorming. It was the Bavarian Stefan Lanka who did the deep legwork uncovering virus theory origins, its essential fraud, its propagation. http://whale.to/a/lanka_h.html And the origins of inoculations were well questioned more than a century ago. http://whale.to/vaccine/articles.html Famously, George Bernard Shaw saw them as elements of witchcraft. http://whale.to/v/shaw1.html (Shaw is marvelous, isn't he? Those quotes will make anyone smile.) And so what causes ills? Two things: 1. toxins/poisons; 2. malnutrition. Toxins in air, water, soil, food supply. https://nospray.org/ Jim West has interesting data. http://whale.to/a/west_h.html What can one do? Study old-time natural cures, grow your own, raise your own food, live away from pollution, get sunshine, develop some spiritual awareness, and last, enjoy each day!
Welcome. Thanks for the interest. Lots more, also lots more positive, uplifting actions one can take. Can pass along a few more links when time permits. But basically, any kind of health challenge, difficulty is also an opportunity to learn more, improve how you live now.
There's a central database that identifies the samples. I suspect that apart from this database, no one can say what SV40 actually is. Unfortunately, there's no public oversight of this database, and therefore this is one of the examples I call important missing links in the evidence for the existence of viruses. As long as only the perpetrators have the power to verify and identify the samples, and microscope images can't assess the actual activity of the observed entities, the "virus" narrative has real problems. Since it became known that there is no evidence for viruses, your question could be asked in relation to a thousand other things. I'm fairly certain that only the people who run this database could theoretically answer your question. However, I tend to believe it's a nest of lies from which no truthful information can be obtained. If SV40 is carcinogenic, then it would presumably be a protein foreign to humans. There are a thousand possibilities here. I don't consider myself qualified enough to answer such questions. I'm only doing so you won't be disappointed if Dr. Mike Yeadon overlooks your question. Regarding the spike protein, he said almost the same thing: that it's some kind of foreign protein. Because it's produced/expressed unnaturally by the body's own cells, it's considered synthetic. Apart from the perpetrators, no one knows what it is. Interesting, however, is the pathological work of the late (I assume: murdered) Prof. Arne Burkhardt. He claimed to be able to see the spike proteins in the cadaver samples under the microscope.
But a virus should normally be larger than its component. Why has no pathologist been able to detect a "virus" under the microscope? This logical contradiction, in my opinion, represents a kind of evidential argument. I should add that if Dr. Yeadon had answered your question, the answer might be somewhat different.
Thank you Suavek for sharing your thoughts on this, what you say makes a lot of sense, the perpetrators of the “Vaccine” have probably had decades to work on this technology . I wouldn’t be surprised if the vaccine is just one part of a chain reaction, when you think what they spray over us and surreptitiously put into the food it’s anyone’s guess how it all comes together, we really are dealing with an Evil the world has never witnessed before.
Vaccines are assaults of toxic material a physiology must assign energy and resources to remove.
It’s like running your hand over a cactus plant, now your body has to do its best to dislodge the tiny spines that have embedded themselves into the flesh.
Neither scenario prepares the body for a future assault.
The linked article sounds like an unintentional joke that tries to downplay the toxicity of mRNA. If any researchers raise "potential concerns" about mRNA technology (as the article states), then, in my opinion, they are not real researchers, but rather people whose job it is to steer the discussion in the desired direction. Real researchers already knew in 2020 that mRNA technology is based on toxic waste. Real researchers don't have concerns, nor "potential concerns," they just already know. Has anyone missed the boat? I have to write this now to rule out the possibility that anyone might take the linked article seriously.
#128
The dysfunction can be highly contagious, especially in the upper, middle, and lower regions.
Furthermore, a micro-thrombosis can make it impossible to distinguish between the front and back sides. Confusion is then inevitable. If this affects only one spouse, and not both at the same time, then it could be particularly embarrassing. This seems to be intentional, and not a "side effect," right?
All venomous creatures 'know' that directly injecting poison bypasses all front line defence systems of the body. Pharma calls these 'vaccines'.
Mike I remember you telling us about the SV40 (Simian Virus) found in the jab, can you elaborate more on that if viruses don’t exist.
PS not a trick question I’m genuinely interested.
Why distract Mike? If you're genuinely interested, roll up your sleeves, investigate, then present what you find, help us all take actions to survive. Re: 'Simian Virus', many realize the virus fraud now, but didn't know way back when, as most didn't. And here's my tip: on the 'Simian' part, chatted informally a few years back with a doc on vax topic, he shared that he was once at a big cancer conference, lotsa docs there, folks puzzled by the enigma of simian kidney cells in a case cancer patient's cancer cells. Realized that a polio vax shot 30 years prior, cultivated with simian kidney cells, was the only source, as AMERICANS DON'T EAT MONKEYS. Light went on. Woke up. But all the other docs? They kept partying, schmoozing, grabbing deals with pharma sales reps. How it goes.
Blimey I only asked, I’m a property developer not a scientist. So I gather it’s monkey cells and probably not viruses, obviously something very bad in the jabs to be killing people, but I’m still unsure and would like to know, and what better source than Mike if that’s possible. If nothing more than to share some facts with the doubters. Any links would be appreciated and thanks for your reply.
Hi Steve, apologies for the somewhat kneejerk attitude. Just what came out at the moment. Yes, Mike has become a good source for understanding. Sources, well, there are still online collections, for a while. John in the UK: http://whale.to/ Ken in LA area: https://educate-yourself.org/. In print, can hunt down Eustace Mullins's books. In Australia, an online free library, Steve runs it: https://soilandhealth.org/
Thanks Duncan, you can’t get better than that, I really appreciate you taking the time to reply, you are a thoroughly decent chap.
Steve, I can add my own amateur speculation, research, brainstorming. It was the Bavarian Stefan Lanka who did the deep legwork uncovering virus theory origins, its essential fraud, its propagation. http://whale.to/a/lanka_h.html And the origins of inoculations were well questioned more than a century ago. http://whale.to/vaccine/articles.html Famously, George Bernard Shaw saw them as elements of witchcraft. http://whale.to/v/shaw1.html (Shaw is marvelous, isn't he? Those quotes will make anyone smile.) And so what causes ills? Two things: 1. toxins/poisons; 2. malnutrition. Toxins in air, water, soil, food supply. https://nospray.org/ Jim West has interesting data. http://whale.to/a/west_h.html What can one do? Study old-time natural cures, grow your own, raise your own food, live away from pollution, get sunshine, develop some spiritual awareness, and last, enjoy each day!
☝️🙏🏻 lots of interesting stuff there Duncan. Thank you and sound advice to boot. Simply wonderful.
Welcome. Thanks for the interest. Lots more, also lots more positive, uplifting actions one can take. Can pass along a few more links when time permits. But basically, any kind of health challenge, difficulty is also an opportunity to learn more, improve how you live now.
There's a central database that identifies the samples. I suspect that apart from this database, no one can say what SV40 actually is. Unfortunately, there's no public oversight of this database, and therefore this is one of the examples I call important missing links in the evidence for the existence of viruses. As long as only the perpetrators have the power to verify and identify the samples, and microscope images can't assess the actual activity of the observed entities, the "virus" narrative has real problems. Since it became known that there is no evidence for viruses, your question could be asked in relation to a thousand other things. I'm fairly certain that only the people who run this database could theoretically answer your question. However, I tend to believe it's a nest of lies from which no truthful information can be obtained. If SV40 is carcinogenic, then it would presumably be a protein foreign to humans. There are a thousand possibilities here. I don't consider myself qualified enough to answer such questions. I'm only doing so you won't be disappointed if Dr. Mike Yeadon overlooks your question. Regarding the spike protein, he said almost the same thing: that it's some kind of foreign protein. Because it's produced/expressed unnaturally by the body's own cells, it's considered synthetic. Apart from the perpetrators, no one knows what it is. Interesting, however, is the pathological work of the late (I assume: murdered) Prof. Arne Burkhardt. He claimed to be able to see the spike proteins in the cadaver samples under the microscope.
But a virus should normally be larger than its component. Why has no pathologist been able to detect a "virus" under the microscope? This logical contradiction, in my opinion, represents a kind of evidential argument. I should add that if Dr. Yeadon had answered your question, the answer might be somewhat different.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Thank you Suavek for sharing your thoughts on this, what you say makes a lot of sense, the perpetrators of the “Vaccine” have probably had decades to work on this technology . I wouldn’t be surprised if the vaccine is just one part of a chain reaction, when you think what they spray over us and surreptitiously put into the food it’s anyone’s guess how it all comes together, we really are dealing with an Evil the world has never witnessed before.
Thanks again for your input.
You may be interested in this summary by a good critical thinker. https://substack.com/@revealedeye/note/c-103388890?r=1ju6v5
Dear Mike,
Thank you very much, I really need links like these that I can use in the articles.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Most welcome. 👍
Vaccines don’t work, the whole premise is wrong.
Vaccines are assaults of toxic material a physiology must assign energy and resources to remove.
It’s like running your hand over a cactus plant, now your body has to do its best to dislodge the tiny spines that have embedded themselves into the flesh.
Neither scenario prepares the body for a future assault.
Not so fast:
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/a-scientist-offers-a-simple-fascinating?
The linked article sounds like an unintentional joke that tries to downplay the toxicity of mRNA. If any researchers raise "potential concerns" about mRNA technology (as the article states), then, in my opinion, they are not real researchers, but rather people whose job it is to steer the discussion in the desired direction. Real researchers already knew in 2020 that mRNA technology is based on toxic waste. Real researchers don't have concerns, nor "potential concerns," they just already know. Has anyone missed the boat? I have to write this now to rule out the possibility that anyone might take the linked article seriously.