Jessica has a hypothesis about NYC Spring 2020 deaths which she has not proven. Until she finds proof it’s just a hypothesis. Nothing more, nothing less. I doubt it can be proven without analysing death certificates. The RealCdC managed to get hold of death certificates for Massachusetts and Connecticut and wrote a book about his findings. Maybe he can help in this research.
The statements by Prof. Rancourt quoted by Jessica sounded more like a general criticism of the data. Can you please explain to me which of Jessica's claims you are referring to specifically? I would be happy to correct any errors I made as soon as possible. Thank you in advance and best regards,
I don’t think you’ve made any errors. I think you have accurately summarised the positions of Jessica and Denis. There were spikes in mortality in Spring 2020 in many countries around the world and NYC was particularly sharp. Analysis by Joel Smalley, John Dee among others on substack have shown that the majority of these deaths were iatrogenic rather than Covid-related. Jessica goes a step further by suggesting the NYC mortality stats are fraudulent and that therefore the recorded deaths are higher than the actual deaths and that this was arranged by the authorities to bolster the narrative of a deadly virus. This is a hypothesis which could be true but without data to back it up it remains a hypothesis. I think the only way to prove it is to obtain all the death certificates. As far as I understand it, this has not been possible for NYC.
Thank you, Alan, for the quick clarification. I now interpret the matter as meaning that I wrote an article about a matter of little relevance that is hardly worth mentioning. I consider this to be my mistake because I overestimated the importance of the problem. It is now clear to many people that we have been lied to pretty much from A to Z. There is also no question that the death certificates were actually faked (as "Covid") worldwide. The number of deaths in NY was a terrible thing, but as proof of fraud, that is secondary in my opinion. Because the causes and circumstances of death were falsified ( several iatrogenic deaths ), the officially stated number of deaths no longer plays a major role in history and cannot be used as evidence of the "pandemic". However, the numbers do serve as evidence of the perpetrators’ criminal activities. Thank you again !
I’m sure you’re perfectly correct, taking the problem scientifically & statistically.
I too use the scientific method whenever I can, because at its best it’s a powerful way to distinguish whether something is likely to be true or likely to be false.
However, I find myself often looking at the wider picture differently than I did in earlier times. Back then, I thought of the situation as a medical & scientific problem. Now, based on numerous data sets, I look at it as a crime scene. I already have established in other dimensions that humanity is under severe, general assault. The intentional toxicity of the injections passes the cop test, regardless of whether people agree with me or not about my assessment of the design of the injections.
I’m not bound by statistical probabilities & arbitrary 5% confidence limits. I use any approach that helps us, acting more like proper police officers than scientists, to evaluate what we’ve been told. When I do that, I’m confident that we’ve been lied to in relation to NYC.
No, and we probably agree here, that we cannot go much further if at all in making more nuanced claims about the data.
I know it's anecdotal but at the start of the mayhem, I remember the news showed how a key NYC hospital was full of people lined up outside etc.
Only a few days later, someone did a video where he showed that there was no more line outside and the inside of the emergency area had only a few people, much less than normal.
It's not too hard to manipulate data, especially knowing that COVID was primarily a military operation and the numerous laws written after 911 gave them license to do crazy things...
Jessica had a great article on Pierre Kory's new York experience and made a great point that they brought in doctors from other areas that were isolated from local people as they were quarantined in their hotel and in a separate wing of the hospital.
This was run by the military and it's not too hard to mess with the numbers. That's why every foia Jessica tried was delayed or ignored. I recall she tried to ask about ambulance records which also she couldn't get after delay and excuses.
Pierre Kory, to this day, still talks like COVID was a super deadly disease. He forgets that even his own patients were mostly around the age of life expectancy and had multiple comorbidities.
If you have diseases and then "catch" COVID or the flu and die, you didn't die from the flu or COVID.
Same with cancer, but that's an even bigger scam. Die from the chemo toxic crap, get called a cancer death.
Ohh, I was citing it in terms of the mass acceptance. It's obviously rebadged illnesses and poisoning with remdesevir and other crap. When a "disease" kills around the average age of life expectancy, it means nothing changed.
Please don't be offended by what I say. But would you mind writing "Covid" in quotation marks? I just want to be considerate of the new subscribers to my Substack so that they don't misunderstand anything and avoid confusion as much as possible. Would that be okay with you?
I very much appreciate your work, suavek, as I cannot follow yeadon on telegram, but I hope you put thhe important links here. Finding information I need is taking longer and longer 😒
Thank you Currer for your appreciation. I try to make EVERYTHING understandable by bringing the topics together. I consider Dr. Yeadon's statements to be the most important. Please note that sometimes I add minor additions to the older articles instead of writing new ones. However, the most essential new information appears in the new articles.
Jessica has a hypothesis about NYC Spring 2020 deaths which she has not proven. Until she finds proof it’s just a hypothesis. Nothing more, nothing less. I doubt it can be proven without analysing death certificates. The RealCdC managed to get hold of death certificates for Massachusetts and Connecticut and wrote a book about his findings. Maybe he can help in this research.
https://therealcdc.substack.com/
The statements by Prof. Rancourt quoted by Jessica sounded more like a general criticism of the data. Can you please explain to me which of Jessica's claims you are referring to specifically? I would be happy to correct any errors I made as soon as possible. Thank you in advance and best regards,
Suavek
I don’t think you’ve made any errors. I think you have accurately summarised the positions of Jessica and Denis. There were spikes in mortality in Spring 2020 in many countries around the world and NYC was particularly sharp. Analysis by Joel Smalley, John Dee among others on substack have shown that the majority of these deaths were iatrogenic rather than Covid-related. Jessica goes a step further by suggesting the NYC mortality stats are fraudulent and that therefore the recorded deaths are higher than the actual deaths and that this was arranged by the authorities to bolster the narrative of a deadly virus. This is a hypothesis which could be true but without data to back it up it remains a hypothesis. I think the only way to prove it is to obtain all the death certificates. As far as I understand it, this has not been possible for NYC.
Thank you, Alan, for the quick clarification. I now interpret the matter as meaning that I wrote an article about a matter of little relevance that is hardly worth mentioning. I consider this to be my mistake because I overestimated the importance of the problem. It is now clear to many people that we have been lied to pretty much from A to Z. There is also no question that the death certificates were actually faked (as "Covid") worldwide. The number of deaths in NY was a terrible thing, but as proof of fraud, that is secondary in my opinion. Because the causes and circumstances of death were falsified ( several iatrogenic deaths ), the officially stated number of deaths no longer plays a major role in history and cannot be used as evidence of the "pandemic". However, the numbers do serve as evidence of the perpetrators’ criminal activities. Thank you again !
Suavek
I’m sure you’re perfectly correct, taking the problem scientifically & statistically.
I too use the scientific method whenever I can, because at its best it’s a powerful way to distinguish whether something is likely to be true or likely to be false.
However, I find myself often looking at the wider picture differently than I did in earlier times. Back then, I thought of the situation as a medical & scientific problem. Now, based on numerous data sets, I look at it as a crime scene. I already have established in other dimensions that humanity is under severe, general assault. The intentional toxicity of the injections passes the cop test, regardless of whether people agree with me or not about my assessment of the design of the injections.
I’m not bound by statistical probabilities & arbitrary 5% confidence limits. I use any approach that helps us, acting more like proper police officers than scientists, to evaluate what we’ve been told. When I do that, I’m confident that we’ve been lied to in relation to NYC.
No, and we probably agree here, that we cannot go much further if at all in making more nuanced claims about the data.
I know it's anecdotal but at the start of the mayhem, I remember the news showed how a key NYC hospital was full of people lined up outside etc.
Only a few days later, someone did a video where he showed that there was no more line outside and the inside of the emergency area had only a few people, much less than normal.
It's not too hard to manipulate data, especially knowing that COVID was primarily a military operation and the numerous laws written after 911 gave them license to do crazy things...
Jessica had a great article on Pierre Kory's new York experience and made a great point that they brought in doctors from other areas that were isolated from local people as they were quarantined in their hotel and in a separate wing of the hospital.
This was run by the military and it's not too hard to mess with the numbers. That's why every foia Jessica tried was delayed or ignored. I recall she tried to ask about ambulance records which also she couldn't get after delay and excuses.
Pierre Kory, to this day, still talks like COVID was a super deadly disease. He forgets that even his own patients were mostly around the age of life expectancy and had multiple comorbidities.
If you have diseases and then "catch" COVID or the flu and die, you didn't die from the flu or COVID.
Same with cancer, but that's an even bigger scam. Die from the chemo toxic crap, get called a cancer death.
From your previous comments I could conclude that you know that "Covid" never existed. What is going on now?
What do you mean "what is going on now?"
You write about "Covid" as if this disease actually existed ?
Ohh, I was citing it in terms of the mass acceptance. It's obviously rebadged illnesses and poisoning with remdesevir and other crap. When a "disease" kills around the average age of life expectancy, it means nothing changed.
Please don't be offended by what I say. But would you mind writing "Covid" in quotation marks? I just want to be considerate of the new subscribers to my Substack so that they don't misunderstand anything and avoid confusion as much as possible. Would that be okay with you?
I very much appreciate your work, suavek, as I cannot follow yeadon on telegram, but I hope you put thhe important links here. Finding information I need is taking longer and longer 😒
Thank you Currer for your appreciation. I try to make EVERYTHING understandable by bringing the topics together. I consider Dr. Yeadon's statements to be the most important. Please note that sometimes I add minor additions to the older articles instead of writing new ones. However, the most essential new information appears in the new articles.
All the best,
Suavek