The hospital protocols of death - PART 6 : NYC again. Are the official data from NYC reliable ? Not really.
A disagreement between Jessica Hockett and Prof. Denis Rancourt is not a real disagreement.
Foreword
by Suavek
The purpose of the article below is to prevent any confusion that may arise regarding the data from NYC. What is really going on is best explained to us by Jessica Hockett herself in this article :
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/more-dialogue-with-denis-rancourt
Whether other views of Jessica Hockett are compatible with the narrative of this Substack is not the subject of this article.
UPDATE :
Jessica Hockett has temporarily hidden her article behind a pay bar. Before this happens again, so that you cannot read the meaning of her article yourself, I will explain it here in a few words to be on the safe side :
Prof. Denis Rancourt said the official death data from New York were correct ( https://substack.com/@denisrancourt/note/c-71049347 ), so Jessica Hockett was forced to provide additional explanations for her claims. She had previously claimed the opposite and was able to substantiate this very well. This is how she came to write her article in which she was able to successfully justify herself.I wrote my article about this article of hers, which has since been hidden, and you can read it below.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Are the official data from NYC reliable ? Not really …
Are the official data from NYC reliable? Not really. But that is what the conversation between Jessica Hockett and Denis Rancourt is about. But it is probably a misunderstanding that lies only on a semantic level.
The accuracy is good. The number of deaths is actually very difficult to fake. But the questions to Jessica can sometimes be worth more than simply establishing the accuracy. In my opinion, Prof. Rancourt's statement is compatible with Jessica Hockett's statements. Nobody has made any mistakes, but nobody can say everything at once in a short Substack article. This leads to completely unnecessary misunderstandings that can be resolved by asking questions. This always leads to misunderstandings that can be resolved by asking questions. Jessica has done a wonderful job. Now she adds the additional explanations about the results of her valuable and time-consuming research.
Here is an example of what she is saying now:
From her article ( https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/more-dialogue-with-denis-rancourt ) :
"( ... )
The NYC EVENT I believe is completely staged, which does not mean "extra" people didn't die. Please do not misrepresent my position.
( ... )
I am saying the curve is fraudulent if the number of people who are claimed to have died on each day in the settings/places claimed is false.
( ... )."
From her comment ( https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/more-dialogue-with-denis-rancourt/comments ) :
"Literally importing patients from other jurisdictions would mean differences in county of Occurrence vs County Residence data that are HIGHER in the county of Occurrence side in Hospitals."
My own conclusion:
Even if death figures are difficult to falsify, they can be manipulated both in terms of location (place of residence of the deceased) and time (e.g.: time shift depending on the date of death and the date of registration with the authorities). Ironically, even if the "bare" death data is reliable, the data can still be wrong and misleading. On the surface, these are two statements that cannot be reconciled. But appearances are deceptive. This is a typical error of observation at the semantic level. It may sound paradoxical, but in reality both statements complement each other, even though they are formulated as opposites. Jessica Hockett has now explained this very well in her additional Substack article.
Please note that the mere assignment of the death data to the non-existent "Covid" disease is enough to classify these data as incorrect. The number of deaths does not play the most important role at all. Iatrogenic deaths also distort these data.
My 2c, anyway !
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Jessica Hockett writes to Dr Mike Yeadon, August 21, 2024 :
https://substack.com/@jessicahockett/note/c-66156619
“ ( … )
Like you, I reject the idea that there was a new cause of death/illness on the science, caused by a respiratory pathogen, in 2020, so the “special treatments” conversation is moot.
( … ).”
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-hospital-protocols-of-death-part-2af/comment/71341357
Jessica has a hypothesis about NYC Spring 2020 deaths which she has not proven. Until she finds proof it’s just a hypothesis. Nothing more, nothing less. I doubt it can be proven without analysing death certificates. The RealCdC managed to get hold of death certificates for Massachusetts and Connecticut and wrote a book about his findings. Maybe he can help in this research.
https://therealcdc.substack.com/
………………………….
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-hospital-protocols-of-death-part-2af/comment/71342540
Author
The statements by Prof. Rancourt quoted by Jessica sounded more like a general criticism of the data. Can you please explain to me which of Jessica's claims you are referring to specifically? I would be happy to correct any errors I made as soon as possible. Thank you in advance and best regards,
Suavek
…………………………………………..
And here the matter becomes clear :
…………………………………………..
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-hospital-protocols-of-death-part-2af/comment/71343514
I don’t think you’ve made any errors. I think you have accurately summarised the positions of Jessica and Denis. There were spikes in mortality in Spring 2020 in many countries around the world and NYC was particularly sharp. Analysis by Joel Smalley, John Dee among others on substack have shown that the majority of these deaths were iatrogenic rather than Covid-related. Jessica goes a step further by suggesting the NYC mortality stats are fraudulent and that therefore the recorded deaths are higher than the actual deaths and that this was arranged by the authorities to bolster the narrative of a deadly virus. This is a hypothesis which could be true but without data to back it up it remains a hypothesis. I think the only way to prove it is to obtain all the death certificates. As far as I understand it, this has not been possible for NYC.
…………………………………….
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-hospital-protocols-of-death-part-2af/comment/71344335
Author
Thank you, Alan, for the quick clarification. I now interpret the matter as meaning that I wrote an article about a matter of little relevance that is hardly worth mentioning. I consider this to be my mistake because I overestimated the importance of the problem. It is now clear to many people that we have been lied to pretty much from A to Z. There is also no question that the death certificates were actually faked (as "Covid") worldwide. The number of deaths in NY was a terrible thing, but as proof of fraud, that is secondary in my opinion. Because the causes and circumstances of death were falsified ( several iatrogenic deaths ), the officially stated number of deaths no longer plays a major role in history and cannot be used as evidence of the "pandemic". However, the numbers do serve as evidence of the perpetrators’ criminal activities. Thank you again !
Suavek
…………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon Dr Yeadon answers Alan Richards ( see the comments below this article ), September 5, 2024 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-hospital-protocols-of-death-part-2af/comment/71440831
I’m sure you’re perfectly correct, taking the problem scientifically & statistically.
I too use the scientific method whenever I can, because at its best it’s a powerful way to distinguish whether something is likely to be true or likely to be false.
However, I find myself often looking at the wider picture differently than I did in earlier times. Back then, I thought of the situation as a medical & scientific problem. Now, based on numerous data sets, I look at it as a crime scene. I already have established in other dimensions that humanity is under severe, general assault. The intentional toxicity of the injections passes the cop test, regardless of whether people agree with me or not about my assessment of the design of the injections.
I’m not bound by statistical probabilities & arbitrary 5% confidence limits. I use any approach that helps us, acting more like proper police officers than scientists, to evaluate what we’ve been told. When I do that, I’m confident that we’ve been lied to in relation to NYC.
No, and we probably agree here, that we cannot go much further if at all in making more nuanced claims about the data.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Afterword
by Suavek
Conclusion:
Jessica Hockett's statements were largely correct. We were lied to and there were many iatrogenic deaths in New York. Only in the case of the number of death certificates is there no evidence yet. However, we know that these documents were falsified in terms of the content, in relation to the cause of death. "Covid" never existed. The number of death certificates is difficult to falsify, but it is theoretically possible to incorrectly assign them to an area. If new evidence emerges later, I will keep you updated and add to this article.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
For the most reliable information about the "Covid" scam and deceptions of the system, read Dr. Mike Yeadon's daily statements :
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr. Yeadon's videos only two browsers are recommended:
Yandex :
and Mojeek :
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
Many statements and videos from Dr. Mike Yeadon can also be found on Suavek's Substack, which is recommended by Dr. Yeadon on the main page of his Substack.
Both links lead to Suavek`s Substack :
I very much appreciate your work, suavek, as I cannot follow yeadon on telegram, but I hope you put thhe important links here. Finding information I need is taking longer and longer 😒
Jessica has a hypothesis about NYC Spring 2020 deaths which she has not proven. Until she finds proof it’s just a hypothesis. Nothing more, nothing less. I doubt it can be proven without analysing death certificates. The RealCdC managed to get hold of death certificates for Massachusetts and Connecticut and wrote a book about his findings. Maybe he can help in this research.
https://therealcdc.substack.com/