"Even a short piece of polypeptide if foreign should get expressed on cell surfaces in conjunction with MHC class II & that may be enough to trigger cell attack."
Thank you for your reply and added advice which we will take to heart.
Also wanted you to know that my wife and I have been heeding your warnings from the very beginning and we appreciate you and what you’ve done and have been doing for us all !!!
"...lie + ...lie = ...lie... end of human freedom."
The biggest lie of all is that we had it to lose.
God took on flesh, in Christ, "that through death He might render powerless him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, and might free those who through fear of death were subject to SLAVERY all their lives." (Hebrews 2:14-15) "Truly, truly," says Jesus (John 8:34-36) "everyone who commits sin is the SLAVE of sin. The SLAVE does not remain in the house forever; the son does remain forever. So if the Son makes you free, you will be free indeed."
Corollary: those who think they can obtain freedom (from sin, fear (of judgment), and the wages of sin, i.e., death, and the second death), any way other than The Son (Christ Jesus, the singular God-man) is deluded, especially if he asserts he is already free. And lest that interpretation seem a stretch, the Pharisees' response to Jesus' authoritative, true, loving assertion validates how deep the original (garden) lie goes. Basically: who are you to tell us we're not free? (um, God) we've never been slaves! (false); look how free we are! (still caught in the big lie).
"[Only] Perfect Love casts out [perfect/totalizing] fear." (1st John 4:18)
That Perfect Love was expressed by Jesus on the cross.
I apologize in advance for not always being diplomatic when I see the terms "devil" and "love" in a comment. The topic gives me a strange "input" that I can hardly resist.
In the early Middle Ages, the Bible was largely mistranslated, primarily by Greek monks, and later never, or hardly, truly corrected. A deceased German priest, however, took great pains to discover several translation errors. According to this, Christ was a much wiser man than the Bible portrays him to be. For example, he never spoke about hell, which the Church later used to frighten people. Christ evidently already knew the difference between effective pedagogy and the dark pedagogy that only began to be considered false in the 20th century. He was actually able to win over many appreciative listeners because his teachings were not based on fearmongering or occult ideas. Even then, there were probably contacts between Jews and Indian Buddhism, because such contacts between Egyptians and Indians at that time are verifiable. The Buddhist way of thinking can best be sensed in the Gospel of Thomas, which was unfortunately discarded and never found its way into the Bible. However, the fragments of it were published outside the Bible.
The cross is an instrument of torture. If I search very briefly, I find much better expressions of love than that. Where people are made to feel by the oft-repeated term "devil," there is more fear than love. I find tender sex a better expression of love than any torture instruments or images of the devil, which is really just a synonym for the lack of light, i.e., stupidity. Unfortunately, it is the case that sometimes we are too often preoccupied with evil, which is natural given the current situation. I suggest we talk about TRUE love instead, and throw the devil into the dustbin of medieval superstition. I think that "evil" can be completely explained by stupidity, a kind of failed problem-solving. Furthermore, I think that no human being is inherently stupid, but at most uninformed. When will you finally write about the true God, who can be felt during wonderful sex, in the happiness hormones of two loving people? There are indeed such moments when one loses the feeling for Time loses itself, as if all the clocks have stopped. I think this is a sign of love. And now I'll stop, because I know that the more you write or talk about love, the further you distance yourself from it. I think the same applies to some other concepts. Either you feel the love or you don't. But when you write about it, you probably don't.
This is how I understand spirituality as a Zen Buddhist, and I personally make it a point not to limit it with concepts. As long as it remains connected to logic, everything is fine. But if it is dominated by pure logic and, for example, constrained by a narrow corset of written texts, then, in my opinion, love cannot be felt. My emotional world, of course, applies only to me, and I don't want to impose my concepts on anyone, because there are many paths to spirituality. Christianity is one of them. However, I find the term "devil" somewhat obstructive in any free spirituality.
"The topic gives me a strange "input" that I can hardly resist."
Exactly. Slavery is like that. You view the cross--an instrument of torture, yes!--as the very opposite of what it is, the ultimate expression and clock-ticking-while-you're-still-breathing offer of love for we undeserving sinners (read 1st Corinthians 18-25 & Romans 1:16-32) b/c you miss the vital fact that you and I, as slaves to sin, our minds bent so badly that we think we're top dawg, fully deserve to be on it... forever.
Your unsourced fables pooh-poohing the superlatively unique nature, origin, veracity, inerrancy, sufficiency, contents, history, completeness, interrelatedness, perspicuity, authorship, manuscript proliferation, canonical coalescence, positive influence, and jaw-dropping beauty of Scripture as it reveals Jesus, unbent by late-to-the-party fake portrayals (that any responsible historian would reject on their face) remind me of the ignorant views I once held as I pursued various eastern mystical things that made me feel good about myself.
I urge you to actually read and accept Jesus' view of it as expressed in Luke 24, among other places. (Btw, depending on which of several Greek words one translates as hell, Jesus red-letter spoke of it at least 12 times. His meaning, in context, is clear.)
I agree with you that it's very impractical and counterproductive to count yourself among the best. After all, we all have intellectual gaps (I call it "island intelligence"), and no one has yet achieved complete, all-encompassing education.
However, some things can be viewed from a practical perspective as follows.
The idea of hell and the devil can at best be suitable for frightening naughty village children, but I consider the effectiveness of such black pedagogy to be rather questionable. If we cannot approach others with love, then we try to make them fear hell so that they become "good" and do what we want. The most that can emerge from this is a mask of goodness that will fall off at the next opportunity. Therefore, I advocate not fear as a means of education, but rather the heart. The real goodness comes from the heart and from the experience of love, but cannot arise from the fear of hell. The history of religions shows that this cannot work. The religiously motivated oppression of non-believers, to whom devilish qualities have been attributed, exposes the error of black, fear-based pedagogy. Why should I divide energy into good and evil and name different origins of the various energies? Isn't what we do with our energy what can determine the outcome? The consequences of our actions are real, but they do not come in the form of hell, which can only be understood in a metaphorical sense. What many people call "the devil" can only command as much energy as we give him by failing to do good. This breeds something we don't welcome, but I can't call it "the devil" at all. At most, I would call it "stupidity" or "a sin of omission." This also includes wasting time in senseless ways.
Best wishes,
Suavek
P.S.
Perhaps this is also one of the several expressions of healthy spirituality, when someone laughs at the idea of the devil instead of being afraid of this idea, or attributing to it his own personality traits and "evil" instincts that he has split off from his consciousness?
The cross is "impractical" from a worldly perspective for sure, but as you & Mike have so well documented (and thank you, btw), this world is bust. Evil breaks out. We don't have the weapons to fight this war and win. But Jesus. The cross is the ultimate assertion of real authoritative, ultimate justice meeting real authoritative, ultimate mercy. Jesus the God-man's self-humiliation on it--and His authoritative (backed by His being Creator and Sustainer of everything) assertion (unlike your sadly ungrounded ones) that one cannot get to God without picking up one's own proverbial cross in self-humiliation (proclaiming His), trusting His "impractical" singular Way in the fear of the Lord, the very *beginning* (starting-line) of true wisdom. Without such authoritative grounding in what "healthy" means (*eternal* life, peace, and joy, not just the fleeting ones we mortals vainly clutch at) its all just so much philosophical debate as we count down to worm food.
Mine is that Jesus was telling the truth when he said: “I AM The Way, and The Truth, and The Life, no one comes to the Father but through Me.” (John 14:6)
Your superlative claim hinges on Him being a liar.
Be as sad as you like; my sincere hope is to keep you, when you face Him in judgment, from hearing the unappealable verdict that brings eternal sadness.
Suavek, the anonymised comment is mine and it is fine to post it.
The Burkhardt book may help resolve some of these issues. It may be that Burkhardt had multiple ways to confirm his test for the presence of SPIKE in his histology. I doubt that he relied solely on commercial antibody products.
I remember that he was concerned by finding amyloid proteins in the tissues. We know that spike protein has multiple prion like epitopes and is converting normal fibrinogen to an amyloid clotting form. Hence all the blood clots in both vaxxed and infected people.
I think this is pretty conclusive for some working spike in transfection.
The damaged tissues cannot be due only to the toxic LNPs.
For the amyloid work see Kevin McCairn's substack.
You may wish to buy this book, which is a summary of Arne Burkhardt's histopathological work and has recently become available in English and German. With slides
Vaccinated – dead
Histopathological findings following COVID-19 vaccination
It's a memorial publication for the late Professor Arne Burkhardt containing all of the important pathology slides showing the vaccine-produced spike protein and all of damage being caused by it in the vascular system and organs such as the heart, spleen, liver, brain, lung, thyroid gland, adrenal gland, kidney, urinary bladder, testicles, prostate, pancreas, peripheral nerves, and skeletal muscles.
"A picture is worth a thousand words." These photos prove that the Covid jabs are destructive to the entire body.
This article may be of use in considering false positive antibody staining.
However, I do not believe Dr Burkhardt's work would be mistaken. He would have been aware of these concerns and responded appropriately to the challenge.
The majority of these findings rely on a common laboratory tissue staining method called immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect spike protein. The stain works through using animal antibodies to bind to the spike protein specifically. Another animal antibody with stain attached is then bound to the first antibody. While IHC is a standard method in pathology, it is known to suffer from issues of specificity, especially when applied to inflammatory tissues. The second antibody can bind to human antibodies present in inflamed tissue and the inflammation can also trigger the stain independently.
The study by Matschke et al. is often cited to support the idea of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion. However, spike detection relied on a GeneTex antibody clone that has not been validated using non-covid inflammatory brain tissue. There are reports of nonspecific staining with this clone in inflamed tissue (e.g., lung, pigmented areas), including from Roden et al. Moreover, the authors themselves described positive immunohistochemistry in samples where viral RNA could not be detected by qRT-PCR, raising the possibility of false positives.
Thank you, Currer, for your very detailed clarification of the situation.
In my opinion, Prof. Arne Burkhardt didn't make a major mistake when he adopted the term "spike" somewhat prematurely. This protein doesn't necessarily have to originate from a "virus," as many other foreign proteins could be involved.
This term can refer to many other foreign proteins because here it is not the form that is decisive, which we only know from artistically colored pictures, but only the toxicity is important. Furthermore, it's not necessarily the case that every mRNA "vaccination" forces the body's cells to express the same protein. Dr. Yeadon pointed out the differences between the batches. In other words, Burkhardt may have demonstrated the presence of a harmful protein in the tissue, but he couldn't have known which protein it actually was. The toxicity only indicates that it was foreign to the body. In this sense, apart from the naming of the protein adopted by the "vaccine" manufacturers, he didn't contradict Dr. Yeadon's statements. Why do you cling so tightly to the term "spike" if it's actually secondary? As long as we don't know what it really is, you can call this protein whatever you want. However, the term "spike" is somewhat misleading because the manufacturers invented it as part of an alleged virus.
P.S. Thank you for the valuable tips.
Best wishes,
Suavek
PS:
Currer, why did you delete your comments back then?
Isn't it possible that some of the so-called "vaccines" contained polymerizing agents that polymerized proteins in the blood? Because blood clots cause strokes, pulmonary embolisms, and other diseases, but those "blood clots" look more like polymerized protein strands than blood clots.
And it is clear that if there is no isolated and tested virus, there is no spike protein. However, an immune response is expected to be generated by any foreign protein - or toxin.
The pseudo-vaccine enters the bloodstream, causing the blood vessel walls to begin expressing the synthetic proteins. Blood clotting is actually the body's healing response, designed to prevent the endothelium/vascular wall from perforating. To cause such damage, the addition of a polymerizing agent might not have been necessary. However, I lack the necessary expertise to confirm or disprove the practical possibility of such an addition. If you receive no other answer to your question, I can only add that mRNA technology itself is sufficiently harmful by design that it should not be recommended to anyone who is not in the final stages of cancer. Research into such anti-cancer drugs is currently underway. But even with this disease, the situation remains unclear. I consider the coercion of completely healthy people to undergo such injections to be the greatest tragedy in the history of the earth to date. The numerous design-related damage mechanisms in this technology eliminate any possibility of an unintentional “error.” The manufacturers' information regarding the ingredients has proven incomplete and unreliable. This means that many things are possible that we cannot yet know about.
Best wishes,
Suavek
P.S.
Thank you for your interesting question. A discovery like the polymerization agents you mentioned in the "vaccines" would be additional evidence of intent to cause harm. Of course, I wonder which discovery was prevented by the death of Prof. Arne Burkhardt?
My opinion is that the excellence of Burkhardt's work threatened the perpetrators. Burkhardt had just started to investigate the amyloid white clots. These abnormal clots are the one piece of evidence that cannot be dismissed. So he must be silenced.
Have a look at this impressive talk he gave. RIP he will be remembered.
Prof. Arne Burkhardt - 2nd Conference on Vaccine Adverse Events Sept 18 2022 -
Thank you for your answer, Suavek! Yes, I know the body's self-healing mechanism, but for this "blood clot" to form, the entire vascular system had to be damaged. But then it would have remained on the vascular walls. However, these did not stick to the vascular walls, but clogged them. It is also okay that not all human bodies contain the same substances in equal proportions, since this also depends on nutrition. However, these cases have occurred worldwide.
They have been able to cure cancer since 1970, but they decided not to because there are so many of us anyway. So they just make as much money as they can – for hope – without curing it. (And the natural people have always been able to cure it. But BigPharma doesn’t need competition, so they’ve been persecuted and banned, discrediting methods that people have been using for tens of thousands of years.)
I have another problem with this mRNA. Where do they get the mRNA that they put in these venom injections? They don't know about the "virus," because there is no virus. mRNA - if it exists at all - is so fragile that it would die in a matter of seconds. Even in a protein shell, it would do that, since they keep it in various harsh venoms. So can't this be just another good-sounding lie from them, like everything else? They gave it a "scientific" name that even doctors fall for, just like they believed in "virology"?
And we know that when they experimented with this, they killed every animal with it. And suddenly, hip-hop, it wasn't poisonous anymore?
In addition to premeditated intentional assault/murder, there is sufficient evidence that there is no and never has been an isolated and tested virus.
Greg Harrison (a retired organic chemist) works with Dr McCairn and would agree wholeheartedly with your question. The abnormal clots do form in a way like a kind of polymerisation, and the phosphorous in the LNPs acts as a sort of catalyst.
There is a good interview on this on Cornelia's podcast. She is a very well informed German lady, and her interviews are particularly educated and enlightening.
Thank you! Astra Zeneka is also a "blood clot"-forming "vaccine", just like the Chinese and Russian ones. Both are joint developments with Astra Zeneka. In China, it was not possible to talk about it at all, and in Russia they call the vaccine an "anticoagulation vaccine". The excess mortality was 970 thousand. Here in Hungary, many people received it, and many died from it. Of course, everything in Hungary is classified, so no news could have leaked from there! There were websites where hundreds of thousands of "vaccination" victims complained about the "side effects", many even published photos of them.
Currer, why did you delete your comments back then?
As far as I can remember I did not delete this comment but was blocked by Tim who ran Dr Yeadon's substack page. Tim was rather rude to another commenter and I remonstrated with him, and Tim blocked my posts as a response.
Howard Steen translated one of the last statements of Dr Burkhardt regarding 'spike' protein that acknowledged an alternative causation of the staining than 'spike' protein. Perhaps Howard may comment here?
The little bubbles or bobbles around the main body of the assumed 'virus' are pictured by CGI as spikes - as part of a spiking agenda. Spiked drinks are associated with date rate. Spiked guns are rendered dysfunctional. But spikes are also used to display the severed heads of examples by which to terrorise and deter others of a like kind. My point is that it is named deliberately to serve a terror campaign.
I read of a study on effects of radiation once that used the term 'stress' protein for cell debris resulting from ...er stresses. That makes sense. The narratives for claimed functions of genes, viruses and other pathological gaslighting are operating as complex financial instruments for the repackaging of systemic conflicts into forms of acceptable or even virtuous sacrifice.
At root lies given protection demand sacrifice of truth - which is to say the mind is purposed to justify experience in the frame of lies or fallacies on which it is predicated to protect - on the basis that the lies or fake solutions are at a deeper level, protective against deeper fears or terrors, that trace back to formative experience prior to the development of such a mind. I often call this 'Separation trauma' or a split mind. I regard it as part of the human conditioning to mask a true nature under a false or forced 'nurture'.
The capacity of the mind to create experience should not be understated or underestimated.
Lack of fact does not preclude the right or freedom to be-live a distorted or projected experience - as personal or collective 'worldview'.
But to know and thus appreciate and share in freedom can only extend or shine from an undistorted or innocent perception.
The 'mind' through which we interpret reality is for the most part internalised rules and filters of terms and conditions that have never been brought to conscious revision - because we are for the most part fully engaged in the world that they give rise to as compelling.
Compulsive or driven thought and behaviours are not of a heart and mind at rest or in peace.
Yet much of who and what we identify as, is associated with projected or replayed fears - even when successfully masked by a sense of control by which fears are acted out on others.
As I see it many are be-living various identities within nested psyops of which covid has crowned a 're-genesis' for life framed in lab parameters and adjustable biomarkers.
Thus I look at the function assigned, accepted or invoked for 'masking' greater fears in attempt to limit or mitigate sacrifice - as pain of loss of self.
A direct fact that we can easily lose sight of is integrality of being.
To be still and know - is not an appeal to the thinking mind but to know being - or be the knowing. There are no words that can encapsulate or define such knowing.
There is no defining what and who you are.
But as we give definition, so shall we receive a perspective.
In our current era - we have it backwards by assuming our collectively defined world reflection is cause to which we are mere effects.
True Cause is One with its Effects, but a split mind cannot recognise this and must seek outside itself.
I noted the fact that Bechamp was exploring similar subjects in his work.
These are among the subjects I think may have an opportunity to be further developed in coming years, to the extent that false hypotheses as to physiology and disease causation (exposed through examination of Covid frauds) are discredited and abandoned.
VIRUS lie + CONTAGION lie = VACCINE lie.
Cashless CBDC + Mandatory digital ID = Totalitarian tyranny.
I really like the KISS method !!!
Even a child can understand and remember it, plus the C student like myself.
Thank you, John!
Go to the top of the class (& use only cash!)
Thank you for your reply and added advice which we will take to heart.
Also wanted you to know that my wife and I have been heeding your warnings from the very beginning and we appreciate you and what you’ve done and have been doing for us all !!!
"...lie + ...lie = ...lie... end of human freedom."
The biggest lie of all is that we had it to lose.
God took on flesh, in Christ, "that through death He might render powerless him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, and might free those who through fear of death were subject to SLAVERY all their lives." (Hebrews 2:14-15) "Truly, truly," says Jesus (John 8:34-36) "everyone who commits sin is the SLAVE of sin. The SLAVE does not remain in the house forever; the son does remain forever. So if the Son makes you free, you will be free indeed."
Corollary: those who think they can obtain freedom (from sin, fear (of judgment), and the wages of sin, i.e., death, and the second death), any way other than The Son (Christ Jesus, the singular God-man) is deluded, especially if he asserts he is already free. And lest that interpretation seem a stretch, the Pharisees' response to Jesus' authoritative, true, loving assertion validates how deep the original (garden) lie goes. Basically: who are you to tell us we're not free? (um, God) we've never been slaves! (false); look how free we are! (still caught in the big lie).
"[Only] Perfect Love casts out [perfect/totalizing] fear." (1st John 4:18)
That Perfect Love was expressed by Jesus on the cross.
“ ( Um , God ) “ 🤣
Hi Art,
I apologize in advance for not always being diplomatic when I see the terms "devil" and "love" in a comment. The topic gives me a strange "input" that I can hardly resist.
In the early Middle Ages, the Bible was largely mistranslated, primarily by Greek monks, and later never, or hardly, truly corrected. A deceased German priest, however, took great pains to discover several translation errors. According to this, Christ was a much wiser man than the Bible portrays him to be. For example, he never spoke about hell, which the Church later used to frighten people. Christ evidently already knew the difference between effective pedagogy and the dark pedagogy that only began to be considered false in the 20th century. He was actually able to win over many appreciative listeners because his teachings were not based on fearmongering or occult ideas. Even then, there were probably contacts between Jews and Indian Buddhism, because such contacts between Egyptians and Indians at that time are verifiable. The Buddhist way of thinking can best be sensed in the Gospel of Thomas, which was unfortunately discarded and never found its way into the Bible. However, the fragments of it were published outside the Bible.
The cross is an instrument of torture. If I search very briefly, I find much better expressions of love than that. Where people are made to feel by the oft-repeated term "devil," there is more fear than love. I find tender sex a better expression of love than any torture instruments or images of the devil, which is really just a synonym for the lack of light, i.e., stupidity. Unfortunately, it is the case that sometimes we are too often preoccupied with evil, which is natural given the current situation. I suggest we talk about TRUE love instead, and throw the devil into the dustbin of medieval superstition. I think that "evil" can be completely explained by stupidity, a kind of failed problem-solving. Furthermore, I think that no human being is inherently stupid, but at most uninformed. When will you finally write about the true God, who can be felt during wonderful sex, in the happiness hormones of two loving people? There are indeed such moments when one loses the feeling for Time loses itself, as if all the clocks have stopped. I think this is a sign of love. And now I'll stop, because I know that the more you write or talk about love, the further you distance yourself from it. I think the same applies to some other concepts. Either you feel the love or you don't. But when you write about it, you probably don't.
This is how I understand spirituality as a Zen Buddhist, and I personally make it a point not to limit it with concepts. As long as it remains connected to logic, everything is fine. But if it is dominated by pure logic and, for example, constrained by a narrow corset of written texts, then, in my opinion, love cannot be felt. My emotional world, of course, applies only to me, and I don't want to impose my concepts on anyone, because there are many paths to spirituality. Christianity is one of them. However, I find the term "devil" somewhat obstructive in any free spirituality.
Best wishes,
Suavek
"The topic gives me a strange "input" that I can hardly resist."
Exactly. Slavery is like that. You view the cross--an instrument of torture, yes!--as the very opposite of what it is, the ultimate expression and clock-ticking-while-you're-still-breathing offer of love for we undeserving sinners (read 1st Corinthians 18-25 & Romans 1:16-32) b/c you miss the vital fact that you and I, as slaves to sin, our minds bent so badly that we think we're top dawg, fully deserve to be on it... forever.
Your unsourced fables pooh-poohing the superlatively unique nature, origin, veracity, inerrancy, sufficiency, contents, history, completeness, interrelatedness, perspicuity, authorship, manuscript proliferation, canonical coalescence, positive influence, and jaw-dropping beauty of Scripture as it reveals Jesus, unbent by late-to-the-party fake portrayals (that any responsible historian would reject on their face) remind me of the ignorant views I once held as I pursued various eastern mystical things that made me feel good about myself.
I urge you to actually read and accept Jesus' view of it as expressed in Luke 24, among other places. (Btw, depending on which of several Greek words one translates as hell, Jesus red-letter spoke of it at least 12 times. His meaning, in context, is clear.)
Dear Art,
I agree with you that it's very impractical and counterproductive to count yourself among the best. After all, we all have intellectual gaps (I call it "island intelligence"), and no one has yet achieved complete, all-encompassing education.
However, some things can be viewed from a practical perspective as follows.
The idea of hell and the devil can at best be suitable for frightening naughty village children, but I consider the effectiveness of such black pedagogy to be rather questionable. If we cannot approach others with love, then we try to make them fear hell so that they become "good" and do what we want. The most that can emerge from this is a mask of goodness that will fall off at the next opportunity. Therefore, I advocate not fear as a means of education, but rather the heart. The real goodness comes from the heart and from the experience of love, but cannot arise from the fear of hell. The history of religions shows that this cannot work. The religiously motivated oppression of non-believers, to whom devilish qualities have been attributed, exposes the error of black, fear-based pedagogy. Why should I divide energy into good and evil and name different origins of the various energies? Isn't what we do with our energy what can determine the outcome? The consequences of our actions are real, but they do not come in the form of hell, which can only be understood in a metaphorical sense. What many people call "the devil" can only command as much energy as we give him by failing to do good. This breeds something we don't welcome, but I can't call it "the devil" at all. At most, I would call it "stupidity" or "a sin of omission." This also includes wasting time in senseless ways.
Best wishes,
Suavek
P.S.
Perhaps this is also one of the several expressions of healthy spirituality, when someone laughs at the idea of the devil instead of being afraid of this idea, or attributing to it his own personality traits and "evil" instincts that he has split off from his consciousness?
The cross is "impractical" from a worldly perspective for sure, but as you & Mike have so well documented (and thank you, btw), this world is bust. Evil breaks out. We don't have the weapons to fight this war and win. But Jesus. The cross is the ultimate assertion of real authoritative, ultimate justice meeting real authoritative, ultimate mercy. Jesus the God-man's self-humiliation on it--and His authoritative (backed by His being Creator and Sustainer of everything) assertion (unlike your sadly ungrounded ones) that one cannot get to God without picking up one's own proverbial cross in self-humiliation (proclaiming His), trusting His "impractical" singular Way in the fear of the Lord, the very *beginning* (starting-line) of true wisdom. Without such authoritative grounding in what "healthy" means (*eternal* life, peace, and joy, not just the fleeting ones we mortals vainly clutch at) its all just so much philosophical debate as we count down to worm food.
I find it a bit sad that you exclude the other paths to God that are favored by other religions. I wish you all the best,
Suavek
All faith systems make superlative truth claims.
Mine is that Jesus was telling the truth when he said: “I AM The Way, and The Truth, and The Life, no one comes to the Father but through Me.” (John 14:6)
Your superlative claim hinges on Him being a liar.
Be as sad as you like; my sincere hope is to keep you, when you face Him in judgment, from hearing the unappealable verdict that brings eternal sadness.
Things are tough, but we have the opportunity for redemption and salvation.
Spiritually, that remains regardless of horrible behaviour by tyrants.
Along the way, though, I’d like to retain our current freedoms.
These can be so easily lost.
Let’s not enable this.
Amen. And His name is Jesus.
There is no redemption or salvation in anyone or anything else.
Suavek, the anonymised comment is mine and it is fine to post it.
The Burkhardt book may help resolve some of these issues. It may be that Burkhardt had multiple ways to confirm his test for the presence of SPIKE in his histology. I doubt that he relied solely on commercial antibody products.
I remember that he was concerned by finding amyloid proteins in the tissues. We know that spike protein has multiple prion like epitopes and is converting normal fibrinogen to an amyloid clotting form. Hence all the blood clots in both vaxxed and infected people.
I think this is pretty conclusive for some working spike in transfection.
The damaged tissues cannot be due only to the toxic LNPs.
For the amyloid work see Kevin McCairn's substack.
https://kevinwmccairnphd282302.substack.com/p/cadaver-calamari-amyloidogenic-fibrin
You may wish to buy this book, which is a summary of Arne Burkhardt's histopathological work and has recently become available in English and German. With slides
Vaccinated – dead
Histopathological findings following COVID-19 vaccination
Ute Krüger · Walter Lang
https://www.histo-atlas.com/files/Reading-sample.pdf
It's a memorial publication for the late Professor Arne Burkhardt containing all of the important pathology slides showing the vaccine-produced spike protein and all of damage being caused by it in the vascular system and organs such as the heart, spleen, liver, brain, lung, thyroid gland, adrenal gland, kidney, urinary bladder, testicles, prostate, pancreas, peripheral nerves, and skeletal muscles.
"A picture is worth a thousand words." These photos prove that the Covid jabs are destructive to the entire body.
I managed to find a copy at, https://eticamedia.eu/en/product/vaccinated-dead/
This article may be of use in considering false positive antibody staining.
However, I do not believe Dr Burkhardt's work would be mistaken. He would have been aware of these concerns and responded appropriately to the challenge.
https://hartuk.substack.com/p/the-systemic-virus-myth
The majority of these findings rely on a common laboratory tissue staining method called immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect spike protein. The stain works through using animal antibodies to bind to the spike protein specifically. Another animal antibody with stain attached is then bound to the first antibody. While IHC is a standard method in pathology, it is known to suffer from issues of specificity, especially when applied to inflammatory tissues. The second antibody can bind to human antibodies present in inflamed tissue and the inflammation can also trigger the stain independently.
The study by Matschke et al. is often cited to support the idea of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion. However, spike detection relied on a GeneTex antibody clone that has not been validated using non-covid inflammatory brain tissue. There are reports of nonspecific staining with this clone in inflamed tissue (e.g., lung, pigmented areas), including from Roden et al. Moreover, the authors themselves described positive immunohistochemistry in samples where viral RNA could not be detected by qRT-PCR, raising the possibility of false positives.
Thank you, Currer, for your very detailed clarification of the situation.
In my opinion, Prof. Arne Burkhardt didn't make a major mistake when he adopted the term "spike" somewhat prematurely. This protein doesn't necessarily have to originate from a "virus," as many other foreign proteins could be involved.
This term can refer to many other foreign proteins because here it is not the form that is decisive, which we only know from artistically colored pictures, but only the toxicity is important. Furthermore, it's not necessarily the case that every mRNA "vaccination" forces the body's cells to express the same protein. Dr. Yeadon pointed out the differences between the batches. In other words, Burkhardt may have demonstrated the presence of a harmful protein in the tissue, but he couldn't have known which protein it actually was. The toxicity only indicates that it was foreign to the body. In this sense, apart from the naming of the protein adopted by the "vaccine" manufacturers, he didn't contradict Dr. Yeadon's statements. Why do you cling so tightly to the term "spike" if it's actually secondary? As long as we don't know what it really is, you can call this protein whatever you want. However, the term "spike" is somewhat misleading because the manufacturers invented it as part of an alleged virus.
P.S. Thank you for the valuable tips.
Best wishes,
Suavek
PS:
Currer, why did you delete your comments back then?
Isn't it possible that some of the so-called "vaccines" contained polymerizing agents that polymerized proteins in the blood? Because blood clots cause strokes, pulmonary embolisms, and other diseases, but those "blood clots" look more like polymerized protein strands than blood clots.
And it is clear that if there is no isolated and tested virus, there is no spike protein. However, an immune response is expected to be generated by any foreign protein - or toxin.
Hi Ida,
The pseudo-vaccine enters the bloodstream, causing the blood vessel walls to begin expressing the synthetic proteins. Blood clotting is actually the body's healing response, designed to prevent the endothelium/vascular wall from perforating. To cause such damage, the addition of a polymerizing agent might not have been necessary. However, I lack the necessary expertise to confirm or disprove the practical possibility of such an addition. If you receive no other answer to your question, I can only add that mRNA technology itself is sufficiently harmful by design that it should not be recommended to anyone who is not in the final stages of cancer. Research into such anti-cancer drugs is currently underway. But even with this disease, the situation remains unclear. I consider the coercion of completely healthy people to undergo such injections to be the greatest tragedy in the history of the earth to date. The numerous design-related damage mechanisms in this technology eliminate any possibility of an unintentional “error.” The manufacturers' information regarding the ingredients has proven incomplete and unreliable. This means that many things are possible that we cannot yet know about.
Best wishes,
Suavek
P.S.
Thank you for your interesting question. A discovery like the polymerization agents you mentioned in the "vaccines" would be additional evidence of intent to cause harm. Of course, I wonder which discovery was prevented by the death of Prof. Arne Burkhardt?
My opinion is that the excellence of Burkhardt's work threatened the perpetrators. Burkhardt had just started to investigate the amyloid white clots. These abnormal clots are the one piece of evidence that cannot be dismissed. So he must be silenced.
Have a look at this impressive talk he gave. RIP he will be remembered.
Prof. Arne Burkhardt - 2nd Conference on Vaccine Adverse Events Sept 18 2022 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLJXL3YlHKE
https://odysee.com/@LongXXvids:c/Prof-Arne-Burkhardt---2nd-Vax-Injury-Conference---Part-1:1?&sunset=lbrytv
Thank you for your answer, Suavek! Yes, I know the body's self-healing mechanism, but for this "blood clot" to form, the entire vascular system had to be damaged. But then it would have remained on the vascular walls. However, these did not stick to the vascular walls, but clogged them. It is also okay that not all human bodies contain the same substances in equal proportions, since this also depends on nutrition. However, these cases have occurred worldwide.
They have been able to cure cancer since 1970, but they decided not to because there are so many of us anyway. So they just make as much money as they can – for hope – without curing it. (And the natural people have always been able to cure it. But BigPharma doesn’t need competition, so they’ve been persecuted and banned, discrediting methods that people have been using for tens of thousands of years.)
I have another problem with this mRNA. Where do they get the mRNA that they put in these venom injections? They don't know about the "virus," because there is no virus. mRNA - if it exists at all - is so fragile that it would die in a matter of seconds. Even in a protein shell, it would do that, since they keep it in various harsh venoms. So can't this be just another good-sounding lie from them, like everything else? They gave it a "scientific" name that even doctors fall for, just like they believed in "virology"?
And we know that when they experimented with this, they killed every animal with it. And suddenly, hip-hop, it wasn't poisonous anymore?
In addition to premeditated intentional assault/murder, there is sufficient evidence that there is no and never has been an isolated and tested virus.
In response to IDA.
Greg Harrison (a retired organic chemist) works with Dr McCairn and would agree wholeheartedly with your question. The abnormal clots do form in a way like a kind of polymerisation, and the phosphorous in the LNPs acts as a sort of catalyst.
There is a good interview on this on Cornelia's podcast. She is a very well informed German lady, and her interviews are particularly educated and enlightening.
https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/do-mrna-covid-shots-cause-the-misfolding
Thank you! Astra Zeneka is also a "blood clot"-forming "vaccine", just like the Chinese and Russian ones. Both are joint developments with Astra Zeneka. In China, it was not possible to talk about it at all, and in Russia they call the vaccine an "anticoagulation vaccine". The excess mortality was 970 thousand. Here in Hungary, many people received it, and many died from it. Of course, everything in Hungary is classified, so no news could have leaked from there! There were websites where hundreds of thousands of "vaccination" victims complained about the "side effects", many even published photos of them.
Currer, why did you delete your comments back then?
As far as I can remember I did not delete this comment but was blocked by Tim who ran Dr Yeadon's substack page. Tim was rather rude to another commenter and I remonstrated with him, and Tim blocked my posts as a response.
Read twice slowly while watching the sun rise.
Restacked of course .
So impressive SUAVEK ..
Thank you all.
Howard Steen translated one of the last statements of Dr Burkhardt regarding 'spike' protein that acknowledged an alternative causation of the staining than 'spike' protein. Perhaps Howard may comment here?
The little bubbles or bobbles around the main body of the assumed 'virus' are pictured by CGI as spikes - as part of a spiking agenda. Spiked drinks are associated with date rate. Spiked guns are rendered dysfunctional. But spikes are also used to display the severed heads of examples by which to terrorise and deter others of a like kind. My point is that it is named deliberately to serve a terror campaign.
I read of a study on effects of radiation once that used the term 'stress' protein for cell debris resulting from ...er stresses. That makes sense. The narratives for claimed functions of genes, viruses and other pathological gaslighting are operating as complex financial instruments for the repackaging of systemic conflicts into forms of acceptable or even virtuous sacrifice.
At root lies given protection demand sacrifice of truth - which is to say the mind is purposed to justify experience in the frame of lies or fallacies on which it is predicated to protect - on the basis that the lies or fake solutions are at a deeper level, protective against deeper fears or terrors, that trace back to formative experience prior to the development of such a mind. I often call this 'Separation trauma' or a split mind. I regard it as part of the human conditioning to mask a true nature under a false or forced 'nurture'.
The capacity of the mind to create experience should not be understated or underestimated.
Lack of fact does not preclude the right or freedom to be-live a distorted or projected experience - as personal or collective 'worldview'.
But to know and thus appreciate and share in freedom can only extend or shine from an undistorted or innocent perception.
The 'mind' through which we interpret reality is for the most part internalised rules and filters of terms and conditions that have never been brought to conscious revision - because we are for the most part fully engaged in the world that they give rise to as compelling.
Compulsive or driven thought and behaviours are not of a heart and mind at rest or in peace.
Yet much of who and what we identify as, is associated with projected or replayed fears - even when successfully masked by a sense of control by which fears are acted out on others.
As I see it many are be-living various identities within nested psyops of which covid has crowned a 're-genesis' for life framed in lab parameters and adjustable biomarkers.
Thus I look at the function assigned, accepted or invoked for 'masking' greater fears in attempt to limit or mitigate sacrifice - as pain of loss of self.
A direct fact that we can easily lose sight of is integrality of being.
To be still and know - is not an appeal to the thinking mind but to know being - or be the knowing. There are no words that can encapsulate or define such knowing.
There is no defining what and who you are.
But as we give definition, so shall we receive a perspective.
In our current era - we have it backwards by assuming our collectively defined world reflection is cause to which we are mere effects.
True Cause is One with its Effects, but a split mind cannot recognise this and must seek outside itself.
I haven't had time to delve into Bechamp's work on blood and fibrin, but after I read E. Douglas Hume's Bechamp or Pasteur book
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/1923-book-hume-bechamp-or-pasteur.pdf
I started looking at Bechamp's book The Blood and Its Third Anatomical Element
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/1908-bechamp-book-the-blood-and-its-third-anatomical-element-antoine-bechamp-montague-levenson.pdf
Alternative version:
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/1908-bechamp-book-blood-third-anatomical-component-whale.to-version.pdf
Because of some of Sasha Latypova's speculation about the role of fibrin in the clotting disorders and deaths post-vaxx,
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/hypothesis-on-mrna-injection-induced
I noted the fact that Bechamp was exploring similar subjects in his work.
These are among the subjects I think may have an opportunity to be further developed in coming years, to the extent that false hypotheses as to physiology and disease causation (exposed through examination of Covid frauds) are discredited and abandoned.
Thank you, Katherine. I'll publish your comment in the article for readers. All the best,
Suavek