The Arguments for “NO VIRUS”-PART 34. Dr. Mike Yeadon : "I’m sure they don’t make spike protein."
"Even a short piece of polypeptide if foreign should get expressed on cell surfaces in conjunction with MHC class II & that may be enough to trigger cell attack."
Foreword
by Suavek
I’ve dedicated myself to compiling important information, often scattered across the internet, into a single article or series of articles. The main goal is, of course, to increase comprehensibility. However, sometimes I can’t edit everything at once or publish everything quickly enough. I ask for your understanding. To date, over 370 articles have been published in this Substack, with several hundred individual pieces of saved information still waiting to be compiled into a single article, thematically appropriate. Unfortunately, the number of hours per day is limited, and of course I try to do my best. This article takes a closer look at one of the many topics that have unfortunately been waiting for publication for a while. These are predominantly statements from the end of 2024 and the beginning of 2025.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon, October 29, 2024 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/one-of-substacks-best-information/comment/74555398
Author
I’m sure they don’t make spike protein. I of course AssUMe’d they did, because we were informed that was what was encoded in the mRNA.
However, numerous analyses have confirmed we were lied to.
I’m not sure what’s in any injection but to the extent there is some mRNA & apparently lots of cDNA, the victims cells will attempt to make whatever is encoded, which presumably varies.
Even a short piece of polypeptide if foreign should get expressed on cell surfaces in conjunction with MHC class II & that may be enough to trigger cell attack.
It isn’t good, that’s for sure.
……………………………………………………
currer, November 4, 2024 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/one-of-substacks-best-information/comment/75498991
"I’m sure they don’t make spike protein"...."However, numerous analyses have confirmed we were lied to"....
Mike, how do you account for the antigen staining on histology slides being positive for spike? is this cross reacting with some other protein?. Sasha Latypova thought that the spike sequences were truncated but similar enough to spike to show up as positive.
Remember Dr Burkhardt's slides.
………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon, November 12, 2024 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/one-of-substacks-best-information/comment/76741052
Author
I account for it by pointing out that we’re only told that is what those commercial antibodies bind to.
I don’t think they do anything of the kind.
It’s easy to raise commercial antibodies to bind to whatever you immunise the source animal with.
There is no independent evaluation of these probes.
………………………………………….
Editor’s note:
During the course of the conversation, Currer made a comment, which his later deleted. Presumably because Dr. Yeadon later explained how easy it is to construct a test that detects any protein, which can be arbitrarily labeled a “spike protein” or something else. This also involves the use of biomarker dyes that can also “detect” anything, although the naming of the “something” can lead to a misclassification of the substance. Since the comment concerns the work of Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt, who may have been murdered, it cannot be ruled out that he may have been close to discovering something that could provide additional evidence for the entire “Covid” hoax. The comment offers the opportunity to shed some more light on the matter :
…………………………………..
currer, November 12, 2024 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/one-of-substacks-best-information/comment/76791161
However Burkhardt said in his evidence to Doctors for Covid Ethics, that he tested the histology tissues for Sars cov 2 nucleoside protein and it was negative. The only positives were for Sars cov 2 spike, which he interpreted to mean that these tissues had been damaged by the vaccine spike and not by a natural infection with Sars cov 2.
Not a finding the other side would want.
I suppose if there is no spike at all, and the commercial antibodies are reacting to something quite other, this could also account for this finding. But why leave this trail of evidence behind? Would it not be better to fix the nucleoside test as well - in other words all the antibody tests for Sars Cov 2?
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, January 19, 2025 :
https://substack.com/@drmikeyeadon/note/c-87105692
Not entirely.
No virus, correct.
But you can synthesise a protein which might appear in nature, from somewhere, or be entirely synthetic. Then you could call it anything you wanted to.
Spike protein, for example.
Not saying this is how it was done, but it’s plausible.
The name implies absolutely nothing about its origins or function, being arbitrary.
…………………………………………
reante, January 20, 2025 :
https://substack.com/@reante/note/c-87244772
Mike, this IS how it was done.
‘Viruses’ are, structurally, the same thing as signaling exosomes. Allopathic culture regards symptomologies as the disease, whereas terrain theory sees the symptoms as the healing protocol. Therefore the classes of signaling exosomes that signal for healings get mistaken for (or framed as) pathogenic.
What they did with the vaxxes was breed tumor signaling exosomes with particular genetics. Tumor genetics are extremely diverse, they’re discovering new ones all the time, and entering them into the BLAST database. They could easily leave out some new genetics, or do a bait and switch in the database itself, and call them spikes. And disallow all labs to genetically analyze the vials, which we all know is also what they did. Voila.
The root cause of all of the hallmark vaxx injuries and deaths are found in fibrotic disease. For the most famous example, myocarditis is just fibrotic disease of the heart wall. The fibroblasts overproduce and shear apart the wall tissue. But the list goes on. The main class of tumor signaling exosomes signal to local fibroblasts for upregulation of fibrin because tumors areafe of fibrin.
That the short version. Be happy to talk with you more about it but know that this is probably dangerous info Mike and you’re too well known, so you might just thank me and ask a question or two before chasing down this theory for yourself by diving into the research literature which is what I did.
Cheers friend.
……………..
Editor’s note:
Whether another conversation took place is unknown, as no records of it exist on the Internet.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Ella, January 10, 2025 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/global-threat-scam/comment/87293078
hei Doctor Mike YEADON, you have a lot of sources about the nanobots. I am sure you are aware of all that. Could you please give us your opininion?
……………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon, February 10, 2025 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/global-threat-scam/comment/92462479
I think they’re BS. Nothing the perpetrators are doing scares me other than injected materials and the prospects of intentional starvation.
( Editor’s note: I suspect that when Dr. Yeadon uses the word “starvation,” he means the possible consequence of bank account freezing if cash is abolished. )
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Howard Steen, June 21, 2025 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/old-sins-cast-long-shadows/comment/127889239
Damage from the known presence of toxic lipids is very real but I am not convinced at all about the spike protein production story. Given that nobody has actually directly measured spike protein in the blood (it is only ever inferred by an indirect test based on non-specific antibody detection but not the actual protein itself) I do not understand why this marketing explanation continues to be believed, particularly as we find out just how corrupted all these drug companies are and that the whole of the Corona operation was one huge criminal scam. This feels like holding on to some belief that there must be something in the ‘science’ of the vaccine makers which actually works the way they say it does.
………………………………………..
Dr. Mike Yeadon, June 21, 2025 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/old-sins-cast-long-shadows/comment/127987920
Howard, I don’t disagree and hinted strongly at that in the piece. That is, in terms of gleaning motive and intention, their own description is terminally incriminating. As to precise mechanisms of toxicity, I don’t see how we can know it / them, since we don’t know & cannot determine with what exactly people were injected.
The huge variability in injury & death rates between batches tells us it wasn’t the same material in every vial. So even if we could determine exactly what is in a particular vial, it doesn’t tell us what was in the other vials.
Best approach going forward: never allow yourself to be injected.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
UPDATE / The comments :
………………………………………………………………
currer, September 25, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-34/comment/159554363
Suavek, the anonymised comment is mine and it is fine to post it.
The Burkhardt book may help resolve some of these issues. It may be that Burkhardt had multiple ways to confirm his test for the presence of SPIKE in his histology. I doubt that he relied solely on commercial antibody products.
I remember that he was concerned by finding amyloid proteins in the tissues. We know that spike protein has multiple prion like epitopes and is converting normal fibrinogen to an amyloid clotting form. Hence all the blood clots in both vaxxed and infected people.
I think this is pretty conclusive for some working spike in transfection.
The damaged tissues cannot be due only to the toxic LNPs.
For the amyloid work see Kevin McCairn’s substack.
https://kevinwmccairnphd282302.substack.com/p/cadaver-calamari-amyloidogenic-fibrin
You may wish to buy this book, which is a summary of Arne Burkhardt’s histopathological work and has recently become available in English and German. With slides
Vaccinated – dead
Histopathological findings following COVID-19 vaccination
Ute Krüger · Walter Lang
https://www.histo-atlas.com/files/Reading-sample.pdf
It’s a memorial publication for the late Professor Arne Burkhardt containing all of the important pathology slides showing the vaccine-produced spike protein and all of damage being caused by it in the vascular system and organs such as the heart, spleen, liver, brain, lung, thyroid gland, adrenal gland, kidney, urinary bladder, testicles, prostate, pancreas, peripheral nerves, and skeletal muscles.
“A picture is worth a thousand words.” These photos prove that the Covid jabs are destructive to the entire body.
I managed to find a copy at, https://eticamedia.eu/en/product/vaccinated-dead/
………………………………………
currer, September 25, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-34/comment/159565883
This article may be of use in considering false positive antibody staining.
However, I do not believe Dr Burkhardt’s work would be mistaken. He would have been aware of these concerns and responded appropriately to the challenge.
https://hartuk.substack.com/p/the-systemic-virus-myth
The majority of these findings rely on a common laboratory tissue staining method called immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect spike protein. The stain works through using animal antibodies to bind to the spike protein specifically. Another animal antibody with stain attached is then bound to the first antibody. While IHC is a standard method in pathology, it is known to suffer from issues of specificity, especially when applied to inflammatory tissues. The second antibody can bind to human antibodies present in inflamed tissue and the inflammation can also trigger the stain independently.
The study by Matschke et al. is often cited to support the idea of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion. However, spike detection relied on a GeneTex antibody clone that has not been validated using non-covid inflammatory brain tissue. There are reports of nonspecific staining with this clone in inflamed tissue (e.g., lung, pigmented areas), including from Roden et al. Moreover, the authors themselves described positive immunohistochemistry in samples where viral RNA could not be detected by qRT-PCR, raising the possibility of false positives.
……………………………………………….
Suavek, September 25, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-34/comment/159586733
Thank you, Currer, for your very detailed clarification of the situation.
In my opinion, Prof. Arne Burkhardt didn’t make a major mistake when he adopted the term “spike” somewhat prematurely. This protein doesn’t necessarily have to originate from a “virus,” as many other foreign proteins could be involved.
This term can refer to many other foreign proteins because here it is not the form that is decisive, which we only know from artistically colored pictures, but only the toxicity is important. Furthermore, it’s not necessarily the case that every mRNA “vaccination” forces the body’s cells to express the same protein. Dr. Yeadon pointed out the differences between the batches. In other words, Burkhardt may have demonstrated the presence of a harmful protein in the tissue, but he couldn’t have known which protein it actually was. The toxicity only indicates that it was foreign to the body. In this sense, apart from the naming of the protein adopted by the “vaccine” manufacturers, he didn’t contradict Dr. Yeadon’s statements. Why do you cling so tightly to the term “spike” if it’s actually secondary? As long as we don’t know what it really is, you can call this protein whatever you want. However, the term “spike” is somewhat misleading because the manufacturers invented it as part of an alleged virus.
P.S. Thank you for the valuable tips.
Best wishes,
Suavek
PS:
Currer, why did you delete your comments back then?
…………………………………………………………………………………………
Ida, September 25, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-34/comment/159612325
Isn’t it possible that some of the so-called “vaccines” contained polymerizing agents that polymerized proteins in the blood? Because blood clots cause strokes, pulmonary embolisms, and other diseases, but those “blood clots” look more like polymerized protein strands than blood clots.
And it is clear that if there is no isolated and tested virus, there is no spike protein. However, an immune response is expected to be generated by any foreign protein - or toxin.
……………………………………………………..
Suavek, September 25, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-34/comment/159701697
Hi Ida,
The pseudo-vaccine enters the bloodstream, causing the blood vessel walls to begin expressing the synthetic proteins. Blood clotting is actually the body’s healing response, designed to prevent the endothelium/vascular wall from perforating. To cause such damage, the addition of a polymerizing agent might not have been necessary. However, I lack the necessary expertise to confirm or disprove the practical possibility of such an addition. If you receive no other answer to your question, I can only add that mRNA technology itself is sufficiently harmful by design that it should not be recommended to anyone who is not in the final stages of cancer. Research into such anti-cancer drugs is currently underway. But even with this disease, the situation remains unclear. I consider the coercion of completely healthy people to undergo such injections to be the greatest tragedy in the history of the earth to date. The numerous design-related damage mechanisms in this technology eliminate any possibility of an unintentional “error.” The manufacturers’ information regarding the ingredients has proven incomplete and unreliable. This means that many things are possible that we cannot yet know about.
Best wishes,
Suavek
P.S.
Thank you for your interesting question. A discovery like the polymerization agents you mentioned in the “vaccines” would be additional evidence of intent to cause harm. Of course, I wonder which discovery was prevented by the death of Prof. Arne Burkhardt?
………………………………..
currer, September 25, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-34/comment/159868267
In response to IDA.
Greg Harrison (a retired organic chemist) works with Dr McCairn and would agree wholeheartedly with your question. The abnormal clots do form in a way like a kind of polymerisation, and the phosphorous in the LNPs acts as a sort of catalyst.
There is a good interview on this on Cornelia’s podcast. She is a very well informed German lady, and her interviews are particularly educated and enlightening.
https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/do-mrna-covid-shots-cause-the-misfolding
………………………………………………………………
Ida, September 26, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-34/comment/160048146
Thank you for your answer, Suavek! Yes, I know the body’s self-healing mechanism, but for this “blood clot” to form, the entire vascular system had to be damaged. But then it would have remained on the vascular walls. However, these did not stick to the vascular walls, but clogged them. It is also okay that not all human bodies contain the same substances in equal proportions, since this also depends on nutrition. However, these cases have occurred worldwide.
They have been able to cure cancer since 1970, but they decided not to because there are so many of us anyway. So they just make as much money as they can – for hope – without curing it. (And the natural people have always been able to cure it. But BigPharma doesn’t need competition, so they’ve been persecuted and banned, discrediting methods that people have been using for tens of thousands of years.)
I have another problem with this mRNA. Where do they get the mRNA that they put in these venom injections? They don’t know about the “virus,” because there is no virus. mRNA - if it exists at all - is so fragile that it would die in a matter of seconds. Even in a protein shell, it would do that, since they keep it in various harsh venoms. So can’t this be just another good-sounding lie from them, like everything else? They gave it a “scientific” name that even doctors fall for, just like they believed in “virology”?
And we know that when they experimented with this, they killed every animal with it. And suddenly, hip-hop, it wasn’t poisonous anymore?
In addition to premeditated intentional assault/murder, there is sufficient evidence that there is no and never has been an isolated and tested virus.
………………………………………………………………..
Katherine Watt, September 25, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-34/comment/159748993
I haven’t had time to delve into Bechamp’s work on blood and fibrin, but after I read E. Douglas Hume’s Bechamp or Pasteur book
I started looking at Bechamp’s book The Blood and Its Third Anatomical Element
Alternative version:
Because of some of Sasha Latypova’s speculation about the role of fibrin in the clotting disorders and deaths post-vaxx,
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/hypothesis-on-mrna-injection-induced
I noted the fact that Bechamp was exploring similar subjects in his work.
These are among the subjects I think may have an opportunity to be further developed in coming years, to the extent that false hypotheses as to physiology and disease causation (exposed through examination of Covid frauds) are discredited and abandoned.
……………………………………………………………….
Binra, September 25, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-34/comment/159598668
Howard Steen translated one of the last statements of Dr Burkhardt regarding ‘spike’ protein that acknowledged an alternative causation of the staining than ‘spike’ protein. Perhaps Howard may comment here?
The little bubbles or bobbles around the main body of the assumed ‘virus’ are pictured by CGI as spikes - as part of a spiking agenda. Spiked drinks are associated with date rate. Spiked guns are rendered dysfunctional. But spikes are also used to display the severed heads of examples by which to terrorise and deter others of a like kind. My point is that it is named deliberately to serve a terror campaign.
I read of a study on effects of radiation once that used the term ‘stress’ protein for cell debris resulting from ...er stresses. That makes sense. The narratives for claimed functions of genes, viruses and other pathological gaslighting are operating as complex financial instruments for the repackaging of systemic conflicts into forms of acceptable or even virtuous sacrifice.
At root lies given protection demand sacrifice of truth - which is to say the mind is purposed to justify experience in the frame of lies or fallacies on which it is predicated to protect - on the basis that the lies or fake solutions are at a deeper level, protective against deeper fears or terrors, that trace back to formative experience prior to the development of such a mind. I often call this ‘Separation trauma’ or a split mind. I regard it as part of the human conditioning to mask a true nature under a false or forced ‘nurture’.
The capacity of the mind to create experience should not be understated or underestimated.
Lack of fact does not preclude the right or freedom to be-live a distorted or projected experience - as personal or collective ‘worldview’.
But to know and thus appreciate and share in freedom can only extend or shine from an undistorted or innocent perception.
The ‘mind’ through which we interpret reality is for the most part internalised rules and filters of terms and conditions that have never been brought to conscious revision - because we are for the most part fully engaged in the world that they give rise to as compelling.
Compulsive or driven thought and behaviours are not of a heart and mind at rest or in peace.
Yet much of who and what we identify as, is associated with projected or replayed fears - even when successfully masked by a sense of control by which fears are acted out on others.
As I see it many are be-living various identities within nested psyops of which covid has crowned a ‘re-genesis’ for life framed in lab parameters and adjustable biomarkers.
Thus I look at the function assigned, accepted or invoked for ‘masking’ greater fears in attempt to limit or mitigate sacrifice - as pain of loss of self.
A direct fact that we can easily lose sight of is integrality of being.
To be still and know - is not an appeal to the thinking mind but to know being - or be the knowing. There are no words that can encapsulate or define such knowing.
There is no defining what and who you are.
But as we give definition, so shall we receive a perspective.
In our current era - we have it backwards by assuming our collectively defined world reflection is cause to which we are mere effects.
True Cause is One with its Effects, but a split mind cannot recognise this and must seek outside itself.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Afterword
by Dr. Mike Yeadon
“Once you have apprehended that this isn’t medicine, or public health or protecting grandma, but a long-lived & evil control mechanism, you have a duty to try to explain it to as many other people as you possibly can.”
Dr. Mike Yeadon, May 8, 2025 :
https://michelchossudovsky.substack.com/p/both-the-lockdown-and-the-vaccine/comment/115420503
( The commentary has already been published here : https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-all-the-positive-results )
My understanding of the fraud has moved on a lot since the critique article of the Corman-Drosten “test”. Included in the set that is the “high proportion of false positives” arising from the design and use of the technique is that ALL the positive results are false. This is the case, since there is no scientific evidence for the existence of the claimed new virus or indeed any virus.
In addition, I now know that i didn’t then that the claim that illnesses attributed to (non-existent) viruses are contagious is a lie. Not a mistake.
In short, I now use the pseudo-mathematical formula to describe the fraud, written in such a simple and stark form that I hope it will in time have heavy impact:
VIRUS lie + CONTAGION lie = VACCINE lie.
The entire event is concocted from nothing more than misattribution of the normal range of ordinary endogenous, spontaneous illnesses from which we suffer to a non-existent cause (“viruses”) and the lie that these illnesses can easily be transmitted from person to person (“contagion”), hugely amplified by a pseudo-scientific non-diagnostic “test” & endless propaganda. Superimposed on this intentionally misleading structure of lies is the most important (to the perpetrators) lie: that by injecting you with a whiff of the pretend causative agent in the illness, your body can be “trained” to better defend itself against “infection” with the non-existent causative agent. Here is born the concept of the “vaccine”. These foul preparations have never in history prevented any disease & they are all necessarily unsafe, to varying degrees, some being overtly & deliberately harmful.
What a gloriously evil control mechanism this is! It can readily be broken out of only by taking a good look across the entire artifice, and the lack of evidence for any part of it, replete with much fakery and lazy compliance, to see it for what it is.
I say to you that, once you have apprehended that this isn’t medicine, or public health or protecting grandma, but a long-lived & evil control mechanism, you have a duty to try to explain it to as many other people as you possibly can. If together we fail to break out of this control system, I believe it will be the rocky road leading to the end of human freedom.
Given the perpetrators clearly intend to install a digital control system which can fairly be described as totalitarian, we’re not going to get a second chance to avoid enslavement. Others who have been campaigning in unrelated areas, summarized as money and permissioning, have helped me understand what we likely face. Again, I attempt to write it in easily-remembered short form:
Cashless CBDC + Mandatory digital ID = Totalitarian tyranny.
If there is only one means of payment, aka all-digital money and if every transaction has to be preceded by showing your digital ID, every transaction is subject to permissioning that can be crazily personal. You won’t even find ready allies in the digital gulag.
Why not? The extraordinary novelty of the digital ID that the perpetrators seek to install in society & impose on you is that it can be updated in real time and is “interoperable”, that is, informs the permissioning algorithm who you are, where you are, what time it is, what you’re seeking to buy (or sell, or do, or what regulated threshold you want to cross), what else you’ve recently bought, what kind of citizen you’ve been etc etc, before it renders its decision. There is to be no appeal, no recourse, no alternative, no “outside”. Your constraints will not even be the same ones as your spouse, your father, your friend or the person behind you in the queue.
And it’s not solely that such a control system could allow or deny your wish to buy a certain thing. It can & will be set up such that you can be prevented from doing anything it chooses and more horrifyingly, made to do anything it chooses. Given my history, you won’t be surprised to read that I anticipate one of those things you’ll be made to do is get injected with intentionally toxic “vaccines”.
This is the perfectly evil control system. If you fight it, you’ll go hungry. If you comply with it, you’ll be poisoned, made sick and eventually die. This is what the perpetrators want for you, your family and friends.
If you think I’ve made an error in reasoning at any point, please tell me.
Some don’t believe this control system can be made to work. For my part, I wouldn’t have believed six years ago that most of the people in the world could be fooled by lies. But they have been, and not many people know this yet. I don’t feel at all comfortable having as a strategy that the perpetrators, who’ve been planning and rehearsing components of this project over very many years, don’t know what they’re doing.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
The most reliable information on the “Covid” hoax and the deceptions of the system can be found in the statements of Dr. Mike Yeadon, at the links below :
Dr. Mike Yeadon’s Substack #1 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
( Notes : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/notes )
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
A collaborative Substack by Dr. Yeadon and Suavek ( Dr. Mike Yeadon’s Substack #2 ) :
Fraud Prevention Hotline / suavek1.substack.com
DEAR FRIENDS,
The two Substacks, Dr. Yeadon’s and Suavek’s, have merged into a single, highly informative entity. The Fraud Prevention Hotline is now officially Dr. Yeadon’s Substack No. 2. You can find his statement on this at the following link :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/my-other-substack
We urge you, if possible, to add both Substacks to your recommended list in your Substack. Thank you very much in advance,
Mike & Suavek
………………………………
The possible support goes to Suavek.
You can either do something against or for something :
I haven't had time to delve into Bechamp's work on blood and fibrin, but after I read E. Douglas Hume's Bechamp or Pasteur book
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/1923-book-hume-bechamp-or-pasteur.pdf
I started looking at Bechamp's book The Blood and Its Third Anatomical Element
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/1908-bechamp-book-the-blood-and-its-third-anatomical-element-antoine-bechamp-montague-levenson.pdf
Alternative version:
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/1908-bechamp-book-blood-third-anatomical-component-whale.to-version.pdf
Because of some of Sasha Latypova's speculation about the role of fibrin in the clotting disorders and deaths post-vaxx,
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/hypothesis-on-mrna-injection-induced
I noted the fact that Bechamp was exploring similar subjects in his work.
These are among the subjects I think may have an opportunity to be further developed in coming years, to the extent that false hypotheses as to physiology and disease causation (exposed through examination of Covid frauds) are discredited and abandoned.
VIRUS lie + CONTAGION lie = VACCINE lie.
Cashless CBDC + Mandatory digital ID = Totalitarian tyranny.
I really like the KISS method !!!
Even a child can understand and remember it, plus the C student like myself.