Dr. Yeadon forwarded someone else's post on his Telegram. The link was already there, and it's completely irrelevant. I wrote in the article: "Redirected from: /ERho." So the link shouldn't be interpreted as an advertisement. But why do you ask? Is there anything strange there? Best wishes,
got it, thanks. yes i would find it quite strange if you or Mike were somehow hijacked by fake opposition like the wellness company. glad to see that is not the case!
This nexiqua App is a useful Chat bot when it comes to health and questioning virus existence. The german Initiative "next level" and Marvin Haberland developed it to help people distinguish between real science and scientific fraud.
Everything in virology is a total scientific fraud. They inject toxic substances into plants and try to convince people that this can simulate a natural ‘infection’ pathway when this is so obviously a complete nonsense. It is even worse and obscene what they do to animals, as exemplified when they inject biological toxic junk into the brains of monkeys and then say ‘the virus did that’ when the poor monkey dies. There is a more natural and satisfactory explanation of how human biology actually works with respect to illness and disease contained in the New German Medicine. But it is not new, just forgotten and suppressed as Dr. Stefan Lanka just reminded the public about. I can’t recommend this enough because it is much more hopeful than the doom laden stuff we hear from everywhere else and even from the medical freedom ‘movement’ about what is going on in the human body.
Take your time … it’s taken me four years to get this stuff into my head and I’m still learning. The human brain is an amazing tool when you have an open mind and let it get going.
It absolutely was a milestone in virology. It demonstrated that it was possible to propose a theory of viruses without any scientific evidence and have it withstand criticism for 150 years.
If this study was done today they would just claim they found a scary virus and have AI generate a scary scary FAKE picture of it. These monsters love control so they would also be sure to tell the public that even though you can't see it, we scientists, we can see it and we're telling you it's real so you need to be afraid, very afraid. After this "success" they would already be receiving their next grant to generate, I mean "find" another one ("virus")...
How does one define the size of filter pores needed for a particle that is yet unknown, unseen, not yet characterized, a phantom? How does one check if the pore size was useful for the purpose? How to know if there was anything at all to be filtered out on a submicroscopic, invisible level, without any reference?
Thanks for this foundational "no virus" information and analysis. I will add to my archive of refruted microbiology studies.
guys, is this link above (https://nexiqa.com) simply an artefact of copy/paste from another article or something you're endorsing?
i figured if i didn't ask the question, someone else would. thanks.
My response is similar.
Dr. Yeadon forwarded someone else's post on his Telegram. The link was already there, and it's completely irrelevant. I wrote in the article: "Redirected from: /ERho." So the link shouldn't be interpreted as an advertisement. But why do you ask? Is there anything strange there? Best wishes,
Suavek
got it, thanks. yes i would find it quite strange if you or Mike were somehow hijacked by fake opposition like the wellness company. glad to see that is not the case!
This nexiqua App is a useful Chat bot when it comes to health and questioning virus existence. The german Initiative "next level" and Marvin Haberland developed it to help people distinguish between real science and scientific fraud.
*"It may be accepted for certain, that an obviously diseased plant is never a source of infection for its surroundings."*
Damn, virology has no leg to stand on. It's just 3 paraplegics in a trench coat.
“I think it is something to do with the soil”.
Kid's sounding kind of terrainish...
Clearly a child who is able to think ! And doesn’t his amazing answer apply to us all.
Everything in virology is a total scientific fraud. They inject toxic substances into plants and try to convince people that this can simulate a natural ‘infection’ pathway when this is so obviously a complete nonsense. It is even worse and obscene what they do to animals, as exemplified when they inject biological toxic junk into the brains of monkeys and then say ‘the virus did that’ when the poor monkey dies. There is a more natural and satisfactory explanation of how human biology actually works with respect to illness and disease contained in the New German Medicine. But it is not new, just forgotten and suppressed as Dr. Stefan Lanka just reminded the public about. I can’t recommend this enough because it is much more hopeful than the doom laden stuff we hear from everywhere else and even from the medical freedom ‘movement’ about what is going on in the human body.
https://open.substack.com/pub/howard366646/p/after-a-period-of-absence-dr-stefan
I followed your link . Fascinating and soooo far above my pay grade but……
Take your time … it’s taken me four years to get this stuff into my head and I’m still learning. The human brain is an amazing tool when you have an open mind and let it get going.
It absolutely was a milestone in virology. It demonstrated that it was possible to propose a theory of viruses without any scientific evidence and have it withstand criticism for 150 years.
Thank you all !
If this study was done today they would just claim they found a scary virus and have AI generate a scary scary FAKE picture of it. These monsters love control so they would also be sure to tell the public that even though you can't see it, we scientists, we can see it and we're telling you it's real so you need to be afraid, very afraid. After this "success" they would already be receiving their next grant to generate, I mean "find" another one ("virus")...
Think of Feynman and the challenger inquiry for needed systemic corrections of corrupted thinking.
Funny side Note:
How does one define the size of filter pores needed for a particle that is yet unknown, unseen, not yet characterized, a phantom? How does one check if the pore size was useful for the purpose? How to know if there was anything at all to be filtered out on a submicroscopic, invisible level, without any reference?
It's like constructing a unicorn trap.