I am a lay person. But from what I learned studying cancer made me skeptical of medical treatments, including vaccines. The scientific method described herein and its reliance on mathematical models applies to other scientific disciplines as well. Even Machio Kaku said on camera that scientists are liars because they don't adhere strictly to the scientific method.
The heliocentric model is heavily promoted, and the geocentric competing model is ridiculed and ignored in institutions of public indoctrination.
The global warming fraud is another example of scientific mumbo jumbo. Carbon credits is nothing but wealth transfer for no evident purpose, except to enrich those on the receiving end.
I edit this Substack, which is Dr. Mike Yeadon's Substack #2, ( it can also be called a shared Substack. ) but I am not Mike Yeadon.
I am publishing some statements by Dr. Yeadon that would otherwise be unavailable or difficult to locate, and organizing them thematically into series of articles that are as understandable as possible. Some evidence of political-medical fraud published here also comes from other scientists or physicians.
To me, it's quite ridiculous to call representatives of a non-existent/proven "science" "scientists" who have spent practically their entire lives - and their income comes from this - spreading lies and causing as much harm as possible to people who believe in them. And also to those who don't believe in them, but are given mandatory toxic "vaccinations" from infancy. In fact, some of them have even received Nobel Prizes in recognition of their "work". That's why I always say that the only way to fight lies is to tell the whole truth, because if we only tell some truths and give room for some parts of the lie, then we ourselves become allies of the lie.
I deeply appreciate all of the work that has gone into tackling the "virus conundrum"...I've learned a lot and I've been waiting for someone else, with credentials, to introduce the idea that "viruses" may be synthetically created entities, are not natural, are non-molecular (have no mass), something like an "energy", like perhaps a frequency. The use of specific frequencies have been used to cause a range symptoms (of dis-ease) in physical life forms, even acute death, and are used as military weapons and in law enforment i.e. crowd control. Different frequencies at varying intensity result in manifesting specific symptoms (eg. "flu-like") and non-specific ones like malaise, fatigue, nausea, depression etc. I'm sure there exists a plethora of "dark" reseach into the use of energy frequencies and of course we're all aware of their use to assist with healing. It wouldn't surprise me if one day soon,it will become common knowledge that every so-called disease is related to one or more frequencies that cause a biology to express signs of dis-ease (symptoms) as an attempt to "throw off" an attacking frequency interloper...so "they" made up the "virus/germs tale" to distract humanity from discovering the real cause for dis-ease "symptoms"...frequencies.
The Deep State has, apparently, been utilizing frequencies to cause both physical and mental/psychological harms as part of their contol manipulations of humans. This frequency technology has, apparently, been on earth for a very long time, way before the "virus" debue. To me the whole virus "thing", along with the "germ theory", has the "mark of the beast" all over it.
I understood a fair share of this article concerning Platonism and vitrus superstition. I do not contest that virologists--whatever they are--subscribe to Plato's muddled philosophy. I'm not trying to be cute; Plato waas one confused character. His allegory of the cave---woo hooo wooo....with hierogliphics and inscrutable brush strokes displayed on the walls---wooo wooo hooo hooo--is nonsense.
In plain talk, here's what Platos wanted us all to sign onto. Consciousness is logically prior, meaning philosophically antecedant, to existence. That's what the cave nonsense is all about; enter the hidden realm in one's mind, accessible only to spiritual wise men and "leaders", ("oohmm, oohmm, oohmm") and thereby discover ultimate truth and resolve ultimate issues of philosophy and the human mind. In other words, the answers are already held (somewhere) IN MIND, which means one must not study the world...that's so plodding and Aristotelian. One must simply "seek wisdom" and persist in self reflection to wordlessly intuit the precious truth available only to The Wise. In their Minds.
People who like Plato of course may be annoyed at my contempt for the guy. Fine. But to subscribe to Plato is to renounce logical coherence just like a good obedient Post Modern. Here is why. For someone to be conscious, one must first exist; and there must be something that exists to be conscious of. Pretty simple stuff that Platonists evade, equivocate about, sneer at...I have seen this again and again.
Consciousness is logically subseqeunt to existence, obviously. Existence is antecedent to consciousness, which is an aspect of existence, not its source.
Of course,none of what I wrote here makes any sense to virus enthusiasts and "Scientists", who dream stuff up and then try to convince award makers they've discovered profoundly important scribbles of hierogliphics on the cave wall. You have to be trained in the science and art of reading and interpreting hierogliphics to get this stuff, so mundaanes must be dismissed with their plodding logic and shallow demands for evidence.
This stuff makes me mad, I got swept away too long.
An attentive reader like you can, of course, see that the author, like the virologists, has fallen into a kind of tunnel vision, which in Bernd Lukoschnik's case is due to his own epistemological and philosophical education. However, I don't know of any other author who has taken the trouble to question the virologists' thinking and, in doing so, produced a fairly successful summary of the problem. If I had written such an article, I would probably have psychologized too much and taken too little account of the economic and financial system. Everyone starts from what they know best. In the year the article was first published, the author wasn't yet aware that it was an old, pure fraud. He wasn't familiar with the work of Katherine Watt, which we know. I agree with you that the author has delved a little too deeply into the history of epistemology. However, in my opinion, he has correctly presented the essential points of the issue. I certainly couldn't have done this as well, but I wanted to provide readers with the best I could. The answer to the question of how so many virologists can be wrong was essential to my persuasive efforts. That's why I'm very happy to have found the article (far too late) and to be able to publish it.
Thank you for your comment. I was expecting a similar critique, but yours was especially valuable.
Thanks for your kind reply to my mostly incoherent rant against Plato-ism. My obsession with "the cave" is because that to Plato was a metaphor for the mind, which he believed was the source of existence and therefore of realization. People who chirp "How are things in your world today?" are his unwitting (and often witless) followers. So are the faithful among virus believers and other seecular and religious faiths. I was raised in a Plato-ist household that believed in Christian Science. I figured out that was nonsense when I was 10. I figured out God was nonsense when I was 14.
There's a point to my stump speech, which is people who cling to false beliefs do not do so because they reasoned themselves to such belief with careful wary thinking, but for reasons of their own. Sometimes they know the reason, and want to keep it under wraps; but other times, and most often, they do not know consciously.
Such irrational behavior can only be tolerated and encouraged when people are indoctrinated into the (broadly) Platonic world view, wherein facts and contradictions do not matter, except if they align with approved talking points. They do not matter, because "responsible belief " is felt by Plato-ists to require group validation and official endorsement. They want evidence of authority, because they doubt their own ability to figure out what is not true. Doubt is the product of belief that reason is flawed and likely to mislead, which is taught from the commanding heights everywhere. People so taught do not struggle to learn to think and question critically. When an issue like virology comes along, they feel helpless to assess truth versus falsehood and resent the challenge as an unfair burden.
End of rant, thanks for translating and posting the article Suavek!
In case anyone cares, which is not likely, atheism does not amount to a renunciation of morality, meaning objective moral values and principles of ethics. Those are logically spun out from man's nature, which requires "obedience" to principles of thinking and behaving in pursuit of a morally good life, one natural to a human, in other words to individual flourishing. I mention this because people often equate theism with morality, which is the reverse of what's true, actually.
Excellent comment Rider. I completely agree that "being must come before thinking". Descartes was a poor metaphysician in saying "I think therefore I am." Platonic epistemology/metaphysics provides a poor foundation for empirical science because as you say, it minimizes the importance of information derived from sense data, without which, empirical science is impossible.
I ascribe to the metaphysics of Aristotle whose formulation takes proper account of sense data in deriving a correct understanding of the physical world and therefore, the empirical processes necessary in achieving good physical and biological science.
Virology as a discipline, has many deficiencies not the least of which are its Neo-Platonic underpinnings and lack of proper (scientific) empirical methodology (e.g., complete failure to adhere to Koch's postulates) and logically incoherent set of assumptions regarding the nature/characteristics of what virologists refer to as viruses. For more details see, Do Viruses Physically Exist? at, https://akajshannon.substack.com/p/do-viruses-physically-exist.
Knowledge is a hierarchy of concepts based on the evidence of the senses and integrated logically into increasingly abstract ideas. The senses ground reasoning in realism, logic exposes contradictions ("impossibilities") and the result should be logical coherance and discovery of truth. The quest for truth is always open ended, subject to new discoveries and therefore to revising and discarding bad ideas. Glad to encounter another Aristotelian. Thanks.
Such a frustrating time to be alive. I noticed the author brought up "testing" with a PCR test for "covid" and it gave me a bit of PTSD as I remembered so many people I know who said they had a sniffle or a cough went and got "tested" and were told they had "COVID". It took everything in my power not to start shaking them in an attempt to wake them up to the insanity. I would often mention, "um... when you used to get a sniffle or a cough, did you rush down to get "tested"?" The answer was always no, but it didn't click for them. Then I would ask, "how does "knowing" you have " (fake)COVID" change the way you are going to live your life or treat yourself?" The answer would usually be a dumbfounded look and/or crickets. How in the world can we be tested for something that hasn't even been identified? Sigh.
One thing that has been identified and we can point to, is a well thought out psychological mind-screwing that started with the masking and distancing, then moved on to the "testing" and "contact tracing" (to instill irrational fear in the public), finally ending with the mRNA gene editing bio-weapon injection being called a "vaccine". I knew from the very beginning that all of it was to sell a new "miracle" to the public but, and more importantly, to also sell a "new normal" and to see how many people would go along with it, as they implement their evil dystopia. As I always say, sadly, it worked like a charm. Most people fell for it... and will again as long as they believe that there are scary scary scary viruses that are out to "get them" at any moment and that the only protection from these invisible enemies is to reach out to the real enemy for a "cure": government and "the (fake) science".
Being diagnosed for covid changes their lives because then they're in the in-group of the victims. They can receive all the accalades of disability and suffering. Misery loves company, and company loves misery.
Despite Bill Gates attempting to claim a Dutch court has no jurisdiction over him, the court case against him and 16 other defendants went ahead on Wednesday.
If you read the link is says that the case has nevertheless gone ahead with His partner Peter Stassen leading the prosecution.
You need to read down a little way, the latest news is below a recapitulation of past events.
If van Kessel’s arrest was meant to intimidate Stassen, it did the opposite. As if he felt he had nothing left to lose, Stassen did all but mince his words, [he took the bull by] the horns and named the defendants’ crimes for what they are: biowarfare, genocide, mass murder, deceit and assault.
Although the team of lawyers for the defendants are esteemed within the judiciary, Stassen dwarfed their presentations single-handedly. In addition, the defendants’ framing of the suggested witnesses as “conspiracy theorists” and “unqualified” had lost all its magic on an audience tired of five years of lies, abuse of trust, physical harm and excess deaths.
“None of the defendants’ lawyers have responded to the content of my plea. They foolishly repeat the official narrative – which is the prerequisite for being chosen as executors by the defendants. The Dutch State’s lawyer even has the nerve to repeat ‘safe and effective’ here again, while facts and data have long since overtaken the official narrative,” Stassen concluded.
The judgement will follow in six weeks’ time, so the 20th of August, at the latest.
I am a lay person. But from what I learned studying cancer made me skeptical of medical treatments, including vaccines. The scientific method described herein and its reliance on mathematical models applies to other scientific disciplines as well. Even Machio Kaku said on camera that scientists are liars because they don't adhere strictly to the scientific method.
The heliocentric model is heavily promoted, and the geocentric competing model is ridiculed and ignored in institutions of public indoctrination.
The global warming fraud is another example of scientific mumbo jumbo. Carbon credits is nothing but wealth transfer for no evident purpose, except to enrich those on the receiving end.
Deception knows no boundaries.
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if all of the medical and scientific organizations could get on the side of facts and truth.
We can only imagine what could really be accomplished if that were the case !!!
Who is Sauvek? Is it Mike Yeadon’s “pen-name”
Hi LWB,
I edit this Substack, which is Dr. Mike Yeadon's Substack #2, ( it can also be called a shared Substack. ) but I am not Mike Yeadon.
I am publishing some statements by Dr. Yeadon that would otherwise be unavailable or difficult to locate, and organizing them thematically into series of articles that are as understandable as possible. Some evidence of political-medical fraud published here also comes from other scientists or physicians.
Best wishes,
Suavek
PS.
Dr. Mike Yeadon's Substack #1 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
To me, it's quite ridiculous to call representatives of a non-existent/proven "science" "scientists" who have spent practically their entire lives - and their income comes from this - spreading lies and causing as much harm as possible to people who believe in them. And also to those who don't believe in them, but are given mandatory toxic "vaccinations" from infancy. In fact, some of them have even received Nobel Prizes in recognition of their "work". That's why I always say that the only way to fight lies is to tell the whole truth, because if we only tell some truths and give room for some parts of the lie, then we ourselves become allies of the lie.
I deeply appreciate all of the work that has gone into tackling the "virus conundrum"...I've learned a lot and I've been waiting for someone else, with credentials, to introduce the idea that "viruses" may be synthetically created entities, are not natural, are non-molecular (have no mass), something like an "energy", like perhaps a frequency. The use of specific frequencies have been used to cause a range symptoms (of dis-ease) in physical life forms, even acute death, and are used as military weapons and in law enforment i.e. crowd control. Different frequencies at varying intensity result in manifesting specific symptoms (eg. "flu-like") and non-specific ones like malaise, fatigue, nausea, depression etc. I'm sure there exists a plethora of "dark" reseach into the use of energy frequencies and of course we're all aware of their use to assist with healing. It wouldn't surprise me if one day soon,it will become common knowledge that every so-called disease is related to one or more frequencies that cause a biology to express signs of dis-ease (symptoms) as an attempt to "throw off" an attacking frequency interloper...so "they" made up the "virus/germs tale" to distract humanity from discovering the real cause for dis-ease "symptoms"...frequencies.
The Deep State has, apparently, been utilizing frequencies to cause both physical and mental/psychological harms as part of their contol manipulations of humans. This frequency technology has, apparently, been on earth for a very long time, way before the "virus" debue. To me the whole virus "thing", along with the "germ theory", has the "mark of the beast" all over it.
"The same thing happened in 2020. There was no scenario that predicted the situation correctly. And yet, politicians relied on computers!"
Where is the depiction of the correct situation?
I understood a fair share of this article concerning Platonism and vitrus superstition. I do not contest that virologists--whatever they are--subscribe to Plato's muddled philosophy. I'm not trying to be cute; Plato waas one confused character. His allegory of the cave---woo hooo wooo....with hierogliphics and inscrutable brush strokes displayed on the walls---wooo wooo hooo hooo--is nonsense.
In plain talk, here's what Platos wanted us all to sign onto. Consciousness is logically prior, meaning philosophically antecedant, to existence. That's what the cave nonsense is all about; enter the hidden realm in one's mind, accessible only to spiritual wise men and "leaders", ("oohmm, oohmm, oohmm") and thereby discover ultimate truth and resolve ultimate issues of philosophy and the human mind. In other words, the answers are already held (somewhere) IN MIND, which means one must not study the world...that's so plodding and Aristotelian. One must simply "seek wisdom" and persist in self reflection to wordlessly intuit the precious truth available only to The Wise. In their Minds.
People who like Plato of course may be annoyed at my contempt for the guy. Fine. But to subscribe to Plato is to renounce logical coherence just like a good obedient Post Modern. Here is why. For someone to be conscious, one must first exist; and there must be something that exists to be conscious of. Pretty simple stuff that Platonists evade, equivocate about, sneer at...I have seen this again and again.
Consciousness is logically subseqeunt to existence, obviously. Existence is antecedent to consciousness, which is an aspect of existence, not its source.
Of course,none of what I wrote here makes any sense to virus enthusiasts and "Scientists", who dream stuff up and then try to convince award makers they've discovered profoundly important scribbles of hierogliphics on the cave wall. You have to be trained in the science and art of reading and interpreting hierogliphics to get this stuff, so mundaanes must be dismissed with their plodding logic and shallow demands for evidence.
This stuff makes me mad, I got swept away too long.
Hi Rider,
An attentive reader like you can, of course, see that the author, like the virologists, has fallen into a kind of tunnel vision, which in Bernd Lukoschnik's case is due to his own epistemological and philosophical education. However, I don't know of any other author who has taken the trouble to question the virologists' thinking and, in doing so, produced a fairly successful summary of the problem. If I had written such an article, I would probably have psychologized too much and taken too little account of the economic and financial system. Everyone starts from what they know best. In the year the article was first published, the author wasn't yet aware that it was an old, pure fraud. He wasn't familiar with the work of Katherine Watt, which we know. I agree with you that the author has delved a little too deeply into the history of epistemology. However, in my opinion, he has correctly presented the essential points of the issue. I certainly couldn't have done this as well, but I wanted to provide readers with the best I could. The answer to the question of how so many virologists can be wrong was essential to my persuasive efforts. That's why I'm very happy to have found the article (far too late) and to be able to publish it.
Thank you for your comment. I was expecting a similar critique, but yours was especially valuable.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Thanks for your kind reply to my mostly incoherent rant against Plato-ism. My obsession with "the cave" is because that to Plato was a metaphor for the mind, which he believed was the source of existence and therefore of realization. People who chirp "How are things in your world today?" are his unwitting (and often witless) followers. So are the faithful among virus believers and other seecular and religious faiths. I was raised in a Plato-ist household that believed in Christian Science. I figured out that was nonsense when I was 10. I figured out God was nonsense when I was 14.
There's a point to my stump speech, which is people who cling to false beliefs do not do so because they reasoned themselves to such belief with careful wary thinking, but for reasons of their own. Sometimes they know the reason, and want to keep it under wraps; but other times, and most often, they do not know consciously.
Such irrational behavior can only be tolerated and encouraged when people are indoctrinated into the (broadly) Platonic world view, wherein facts and contradictions do not matter, except if they align with approved talking points. They do not matter, because "responsible belief " is felt by Plato-ists to require group validation and official endorsement. They want evidence of authority, because they doubt their own ability to figure out what is not true. Doubt is the product of belief that reason is flawed and likely to mislead, which is taught from the commanding heights everywhere. People so taught do not struggle to learn to think and question critically. When an issue like virology comes along, they feel helpless to assess truth versus falsehood and resent the challenge as an unfair burden.
End of rant, thanks for translating and posting the article Suavek!
In case anyone cares, which is not likely, atheism does not amount to a renunciation of morality, meaning objective moral values and principles of ethics. Those are logically spun out from man's nature, which requires "obedience" to principles of thinking and behaving in pursuit of a morally good life, one natural to a human, in other words to individual flourishing. I mention this because people often equate theism with morality, which is the reverse of what's true, actually.
Excellent comment Rider. I completely agree that "being must come before thinking". Descartes was a poor metaphysician in saying "I think therefore I am." Platonic epistemology/metaphysics provides a poor foundation for empirical science because as you say, it minimizes the importance of information derived from sense data, without which, empirical science is impossible.
I ascribe to the metaphysics of Aristotle whose formulation takes proper account of sense data in deriving a correct understanding of the physical world and therefore, the empirical processes necessary in achieving good physical and biological science.
Virology as a discipline, has many deficiencies not the least of which are its Neo-Platonic underpinnings and lack of proper (scientific) empirical methodology (e.g., complete failure to adhere to Koch's postulates) and logically incoherent set of assumptions regarding the nature/characteristics of what virologists refer to as viruses. For more details see, Do Viruses Physically Exist? at, https://akajshannon.substack.com/p/do-viruses-physically-exist.
Knowledge is a hierarchy of concepts based on the evidence of the senses and integrated logically into increasingly abstract ideas. The senses ground reasoning in realism, logic exposes contradictions ("impossibilities") and the result should be logical coherance and discovery of truth. The quest for truth is always open ended, subject to new discoveries and therefore to revising and discarding bad ideas. Glad to encounter another Aristotelian. Thanks.
Good article thanks.
Appreciation and blessings from Sydney Australia.
Such a frustrating time to be alive. I noticed the author brought up "testing" with a PCR test for "covid" and it gave me a bit of PTSD as I remembered so many people I know who said they had a sniffle or a cough went and got "tested" and were told they had "COVID". It took everything in my power not to start shaking them in an attempt to wake them up to the insanity. I would often mention, "um... when you used to get a sniffle or a cough, did you rush down to get "tested"?" The answer was always no, but it didn't click for them. Then I would ask, "how does "knowing" you have " (fake)COVID" change the way you are going to live your life or treat yourself?" The answer would usually be a dumbfounded look and/or crickets. How in the world can we be tested for something that hasn't even been identified? Sigh.
One thing that has been identified and we can point to, is a well thought out psychological mind-screwing that started with the masking and distancing, then moved on to the "testing" and "contact tracing" (to instill irrational fear in the public), finally ending with the mRNA gene editing bio-weapon injection being called a "vaccine". I knew from the very beginning that all of it was to sell a new "miracle" to the public but, and more importantly, to also sell a "new normal" and to see how many people would go along with it, as they implement their evil dystopia. As I always say, sadly, it worked like a charm. Most people fell for it... and will again as long as they believe that there are scary scary scary viruses that are out to "get them" at any moment and that the only protection from these invisible enemies is to reach out to the real enemy for a "cure": government and "the (fake) science".
Being diagnosed for covid changes their lives because then they're in the in-group of the victims. They can receive all the accalades of disability and suffering. Misery loves company, and company loves misery.
https://indepnews.org/en/court-case-against-bill-gates-in-nl-continues/
Despite Bill Gates attempting to claim a Dutch court has no jurisdiction over him, the court case against him and 16 other defendants went ahead on Wednesday.
If you read the link is says that the case has nevertheless gone ahead with His partner Peter Stassen leading the prosecution.
You need to read down a little way, the latest news is below a recapitulation of past events.
If van Kessel’s arrest was meant to intimidate Stassen, it did the opposite. As if he felt he had nothing left to lose, Stassen did all but mince his words, [he took the bull by] the horns and named the defendants’ crimes for what they are: biowarfare, genocide, mass murder, deceit and assault.
Although the team of lawyers for the defendants are esteemed within the judiciary, Stassen dwarfed their presentations single-handedly. In addition, the defendants’ framing of the suggested witnesses as “conspiracy theorists” and “unqualified” had lost all its magic on an audience tired of five years of lies, abuse of trust, physical harm and excess deaths.
“None of the defendants’ lawyers have responded to the content of my plea. They foolishly repeat the official narrative – which is the prerequisite for being chosen as executors by the defendants. The Dutch State’s lawyer even has the nerve to repeat ‘safe and effective’ here again, while facts and data have long since overtaken the official narrative,” Stassen concluded.
The judgement will follow in six weeks’ time, so the 20th of August, at the latest.
https://rumble.com/v6vyais-advocaat-maakt-korte-metten-met-voorkeursrealiteit-in-rechtszaak-tegen-oa-m.html
In English an interview with Stassen.
Also X
https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1942572550879338964