If viruses were real there would be intensive examination of the air between humans, would there not? I mean, if the tiny nasties are floating, wriggling or jumping through the air to get from you to me or from me to you, that air must be a veritable zoo of viruses. Who's running about filling test tubes with supermarket air? Or bus air? Or train air?
But no. We just kinda pick it up, that flu. We kinda "catch" it . From each other, kinda. From being near, or thereabouts, kinda.
Really, Stefan Lanka has said almost everything which needed to be said but is no longer an activist and fortunately Jamie Andrew’s has taken over the baton and is chasing after this nonsense which has got entrenched in the field of genetics.
Thank you very much, of course I immediately added your comment to the article. I thought your work, which can be found at the link, was great. It will certainly be very useful to many people.
I looked up the historical definition of "virus" some time ago and saw that originally it meant "poison". This makes much more sense to me than some kind of microscopic mystery "bug" floating around in the air. I'm certainly not an expert on any of this stuff by any means, but I can't imagine that there are scary things floating around in the air that we can "catch" at any moment. The whole "virus" phenomenon is just a false justification used by the "vaccine" industry. Maybe some day we'll find out what's really going on but, until then, what's wrong with just saying, "we're not sure why some people get sick and others don't?"
"The so-called transmission experiments that virologists carry out to prove the transmissibility and pathogenicity of the suspected viruses disprove the whole of virology. It is quite obviously the experiments themselves that trigger the symptoms that are passed off in animal experiments as proof of the existence and effect of the presumed viruses. Again, there is a lack of any control experiments in which the exact same thing is done, only with non-infected or sterilised materials."
Key point for all those who point to the ferret experiments at Erasmus and the UW-Madison companion as evidence of transmissibility and of "gain"
Thank you, Jessica, for your attention and for sharing this information ❤️.
The toxic "soup" injected into an animal (sometimes even directly into the brain) must obviously cause illness or death. Doing this to a living being in order to "prove" something completely negates any "human" instincts. For this reason alone, it's no wonder such people can't be trusted.
Thank you for the first video interview of Stefan Lanka, which is informative and good. Question for anyone who knows: What was the name of the scientist whom Dr. Lanka met and talked with who had knowledge of psychosomatic illnesses? Dr. "Hamer or Hammer" or some other name?" The closed captions could not properly spell the name. Thanks.
Dr Lanka is certainly aware of the historical lies and deception perpetrated by fake scientists and "virologists" since the earliest times; what he often describes from both his research and personal experimenting is the complete lack of using the scientific method and control experiments; but this has been the exact deliberate strategy of such false gods as Pasteur and which Antoine Bechamp exposed in t he mid 19th century; Bechamp disproved "germ theory, in particular, through his meticulous use of the scientific method over a period of many decades and left an enormous body of work and discoveries that have gone unacknowledged for the most part; a great deal of Lanka's revelations are exactly what Bechamp discovered and described repeatedly and sadly, Lanka (along with many other experts in his field) does not give nearly enough acknowledgment and credit to Bechamp's genius which remains not only ahead of its time but deliberately forgotten and buried to the point where real science does not exist anymore and has been rarely practised in the last 150 years.
The omission of a dead scientist could perhaps be considered a strategy. The dead are not very good at defending themselves against propaganda defamation. Stefan Lanka can, and perhaps that's why he doesn't mention Antoine Béchamp.
A weak apology on behalf of Lanka; Bechamp's work and genius will survive and live long past both the historical and present day efforts to discredit him and his accomplishments; and he doesn't need Lanka's voice to speak for him; in fact I don't believe Lanka has fully recognized all of Bechamp's real genius such as discovering that microzymas are the basic unit of all life beyond the cell.
That's a rather weak and apologetic response! Bechamp's work is very much alive and Lanka (admittedly or not) is repeating what Bechamp discovered, only in somewhat different language; real scientists acknowledge and honor the accomplishments of colleagues (whether dead or alive) which is what Bechamp never failed to do even though his genius far surpassed scientists of his day and even today; Lanka's objective analyses and criticism of "virology" as it has been practised and continues to be are very much needed and welcome but mistakes of the past must be revealed...especially when they were not mistakes but deliberate manipulations of the truth for which we all suffer to this day.
Your statement was very convincing, thank you very much for that. If you think an article about Béchamp is necessary on this Substack, I would be happy to write it, or at least link to some information about him. If you already have links to important articles about Béchamp saved on your computer and can send them to me, I would certainly be able to significantly speed up the publication of this article. In the persuasive work that I enjoy doing, I am of course very grateful for any useful advice.
If viruses were real there would be intensive examination of the air between humans, would there not? I mean, if the tiny nasties are floating, wriggling or jumping through the air to get from you to me or from me to you, that air must be a veritable zoo of viruses. Who's running about filling test tubes with supermarket air? Or bus air? Or train air?
But no. We just kinda pick it up, that flu. We kinda "catch" it . From each other, kinda. From being near, or thereabouts, kinda.
Or sorta...kinda.
Yes! Exactly! Viruses don’t exist. It was invented to scare people.
And get them to voluntarily inject poison into themselves and their loved ones.
Interesting, I have just this morning produced this (English language voiceover but using an AI voice clone for Lanka)
https://odysee.com/@shortXXvids:e/Lanka-Summary---Stop-Virology-Nonsense:4
Really, Stefan Lanka has said almost everything which needed to be said but is no longer an activist and fortunately Jamie Andrew’s has taken over the baton and is chasing after this nonsense which has got entrenched in the field of genetics.
Hi Howard,
Thank you very much, of course I immediately added your comment to the article. I thought your work, which can be found at the link, was great. It will certainly be very useful to many people.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Yep, there's only two words needed to define our subject 'Stefan' and 'Lanka'!
I looked up the historical definition of "virus" some time ago and saw that originally it meant "poison". This makes much more sense to me than some kind of microscopic mystery "bug" floating around in the air. I'm certainly not an expert on any of this stuff by any means, but I can't imagine that there are scary things floating around in the air that we can "catch" at any moment. The whole "virus" phenomenon is just a false justification used by the "vaccine" industry. Maybe some day we'll find out what's really going on but, until then, what's wrong with just saying, "we're not sure why some people get sick and others don't?"
"The so-called transmission experiments that virologists carry out to prove the transmissibility and pathogenicity of the suspected viruses disprove the whole of virology. It is quite obviously the experiments themselves that trigger the symptoms that are passed off in animal experiments as proof of the existence and effect of the presumed viruses. Again, there is a lack of any control experiments in which the exact same thing is done, only with non-infected or sterilised materials."
Key point for all those who point to the ferret experiments at Erasmus and the UW-Madison companion as evidence of transmissibility and of "gain"
Thank you, Jessica, for your attention and for sharing this information ❤️.
The toxic "soup" injected into an animal (sometimes even directly into the brain) must obviously cause illness or death. Doing this to a living being in order to "prove" something completely negates any "human" instincts. For this reason alone, it's no wonder such people can't be trusted.
Thank you for the first video interview of Stefan Lanka, which is informative and good. Question for anyone who knows: What was the name of the scientist whom Dr. Lanka met and talked with who had knowledge of psychosomatic illnesses? Dr. "Hamer or Hammer" or some other name?" The closed captions could not properly spell the name. Thanks.
Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer
https://www.amazon.de/dp/3850522997?tag=track-id-bing-de-277021-21&linkCode=osi&th=1&psc=1&ascsubtag=bnSEPcbwajmdrgcyek
Thank you Suavek!
Hi Rider,
I have changed and added my answer.
Dr Lanka is certainly aware of the historical lies and deception perpetrated by fake scientists and "virologists" since the earliest times; what he often describes from both his research and personal experimenting is the complete lack of using the scientific method and control experiments; but this has been the exact deliberate strategy of such false gods as Pasteur and which Antoine Bechamp exposed in t he mid 19th century; Bechamp disproved "germ theory, in particular, through his meticulous use of the scientific method over a period of many decades and left an enormous body of work and discoveries that have gone unacknowledged for the most part; a great deal of Lanka's revelations are exactly what Bechamp discovered and described repeatedly and sadly, Lanka (along with many other experts in his field) does not give nearly enough acknowledgment and credit to Bechamp's genius which remains not only ahead of its time but deliberately forgotten and buried to the point where real science does not exist anymore and has been rarely practised in the last 150 years.
The omission of a dead scientist could perhaps be considered a strategy. The dead are not very good at defending themselves against propaganda defamation. Stefan Lanka can, and perhaps that's why he doesn't mention Antoine Béchamp.
A weak apology on behalf of Lanka; Bechamp's work and genius will survive and live long past both the historical and present day efforts to discredit him and his accomplishments; and he doesn't need Lanka's voice to speak for him; in fact I don't believe Lanka has fully recognized all of Bechamp's real genius such as discovering that microzymas are the basic unit of all life beyond the cell.
That's a rather weak and apologetic response! Bechamp's work is very much alive and Lanka (admittedly or not) is repeating what Bechamp discovered, only in somewhat different language; real scientists acknowledge and honor the accomplishments of colleagues (whether dead or alive) which is what Bechamp never failed to do even though his genius far surpassed scientists of his day and even today; Lanka's objective analyses and criticism of "virology" as it has been practised and continues to be are very much needed and welcome but mistakes of the past must be revealed...especially when they were not mistakes but deliberate manipulations of the truth for which we all suffer to this day.
Tony,
Your statement was very convincing, thank you very much for that. If you think an article about Béchamp is necessary on this Substack, I would be happy to write it, or at least link to some information about him. If you already have links to important articles about Béchamp saved on your computer and can send them to me, I would certainly be able to significantly speed up the publication of this article. In the persuasive work that I enjoy doing, I am of course very grateful for any useful advice.
Best wishes,
Suavek