“Alleen bij totale onwetendheid en een blind vertrouwen in de staatsautoriteiten die de vaccins ‘testen’ en goedkeuren kan dit worden omschreven als een klein onschuldig prikje”
is Dutch and I'm pretty sure Stefan Lanka does not speak Dutch.
The correct translation is:
.
"Only in total nescience and blind faith in the state authorities who are 'testing' and approving the vaccines this can be described as a small innocent prick"
.
onwetendheid = nescience = not knowing (due to not having the knowledge)
In English this word seems to be almost lost and ignorance is often used instead incorrectly as ignorance means ignoring something and that is not what is said here.
"...i believe some of those speaking out possibly understand there may not be a virus but also understand the impossible task of trying to convince the public..."
Who says it is impossible? I find this position to be arrogant, and as condescending of their fellow human beings, as the eugenicists themselves.
The issue mostly is getting past the cognitive dissonance of decades of social programming from the "entertainment" (actually social engineering) industry. Once one does that and has a look at the wide variety of material available - it's not rocket science.
All you really need to understand is the scientists actually killed the cells themselves, and claimed it was evidence of a "virus". As Mike points out, the cells would have died anyway, without the introduction of the alleged "virus" containing foreign matter.
It is extremely condescending to think the majority of the public are unable to grasp that. It would kill a lot of cash cows though...
I sometimes observe that two particular comments are taken to be opposing positions. Only when you look closely can you discover that sometimes this is not necessarily the case. I find Steven's statement somewhat ironic because I imagine the wide eyes of a virus believer who hears the "no-virus" claim for the first time. It always depends on who is making the claim and how credible he appears to his conversation partner. Without medical training, it can be difficult to invite people to do further research. I think that at this point, you can both be right. In a discussion that is intended to convince someone, it always depends on who is the speaker and who is the listener. You know that with regard to the "vaccinations" alone, it was difficult enough to convey the truth to people. However, I can very well imagine that your point of view alone can be very helpful to you in this matter. You can certainly achieve some success with it. I admit that without hopeful enthusiasm, no progress would be possible. That's exactly why I came up with the idea of this Substack.
Well I was one of those “wide-eyed virus believers”. When I first encountered the information, my first instinct was to reject it, because I had (like everyone else) been conditioned to believe the authorities.
Even after the covid psyop began, I thought they were exaggerating the seasonal flu.
Then I saw the no virus argument. The Drs Bailey have done a lot of work on this, and I have followed much of that. Through their work, I realised that this argument has been going on for as long as they hypothesis has, and learned of the work of Dr Stefan Lanka, The Perth Group and others.
You don’t need medical training to understand that the experiments and conclusions reached were anti-science.
Interestingly, since I stopped believing in “viruses”, I stopped getting sick. Oh I still have the occasional (and I mean occasional detox event) but:
I haven’t needed, nor used antibiotics in over 2 years.
I haven’t needed, nor used any asthma inhalers for 18 months.
I do try and get the best quality whole foods I can. I don’t buy processed off the shelf non-food.
Just as well, because I have no trust in the “medical industry” anymore, and avoid them totally.
Dr. Lanka gives us a lesson in the use of the scientific method which we haven't seen in more than 150 years of medical science; and we have always known the reasons because the evidence has always existed in the historical records which continue to be ignored; we live in a pseudo-world based upon false science and fake paradigms for many of the reasons Dr Lanka outlines with all of its lies, deception and propaganda designed to keep us in FEAR of imaginary disease pathogens; germ theory was fraudulent and known to be so even in the time of that charlatan, Pasteur, but still promoted during an epoch of political and economic instability because France needed a national and international hero at any cost; and that cost meant bequeathing to the world the lies that became the foundation of allopathic medicine and the false belief that "vaccines" could cure any and all diseases; it soon became to be all about money and power and the use of strategies to silence real scientists such as Antoine Bechamp whose enormous achievements are still buried and deliberately so; the unproven science and belief in "viruses" must continue because it is based upon the same "false religion" and faith that perpetuates "germ theory" and all of science to this day; there will have to be life-threatening "viruses" to maintain fear and control over the masses and justify gene therapies and "vaccines" which do nothing but destroy our natural immune systems; there can never be a future where the pursuit of truth in science will be seen again unless all of the FRAUD, both past and present, is exposed, along with the psychopathy and genuine EVIL which made it possible.
The title on the video say"Demo 2021", so i guess its from 2021. The original durch text is from 22 may 2021.
Dear Erik,
Thanks to you I was able to add it. Thank you and all the best,
Suavek
No problem. Of course i should have written "dutch text" instead of "durch text", it was just to early in the morning.
The Quote
“Alleen bij totale onwetendheid en een blind vertrouwen in de staatsautoriteiten die de vaccins ‘testen’ en goedkeuren kan dit worden omschreven als een klein onschuldig prikje”
is Dutch and I'm pretty sure Stefan Lanka does not speak Dutch.
The correct translation is:
.
"Only in total nescience and blind faith in the state authorities who are 'testing' and approving the vaccines this can be described as a small innocent prick"
.
onwetendheid = nescience = not knowing (due to not having the knowledge)
In English this word seems to be almost lost and ignorance is often used instead incorrectly as ignorance means ignoring something and that is not what is said here.
Thank you, Gerben !
Best wishes,
Suavek
Hilarious, it's like a ritual, alchemy, stirring up stuff in jars, and then......behold....some...'green' 😆
Try getting ordinary Joe to read and understand this - and therein lies the problem.
"...i believe some of those speaking out possibly understand there may not be a virus but also understand the impossible task of trying to convince the public..."
Who says it is impossible? I find this position to be arrogant, and as condescending of their fellow human beings, as the eugenicists themselves.
The issue mostly is getting past the cognitive dissonance of decades of social programming from the "entertainment" (actually social engineering) industry. Once one does that and has a look at the wide variety of material available - it's not rocket science.
All you really need to understand is the scientists actually killed the cells themselves, and claimed it was evidence of a "virus". As Mike points out, the cells would have died anyway, without the introduction of the alleged "virus" containing foreign matter.
It is extremely condescending to think the majority of the public are unable to grasp that. It would kill a lot of cash cows though...
I sometimes observe that two particular comments are taken to be opposing positions. Only when you look closely can you discover that sometimes this is not necessarily the case. I find Steven's statement somewhat ironic because I imagine the wide eyes of a virus believer who hears the "no-virus" claim for the first time. It always depends on who is making the claim and how credible he appears to his conversation partner. Without medical training, it can be difficult to invite people to do further research. I think that at this point, you can both be right. In a discussion that is intended to convince someone, it always depends on who is the speaker and who is the listener. You know that with regard to the "vaccinations" alone, it was difficult enough to convey the truth to people. However, I can very well imagine that your point of view alone can be very helpful to you in this matter. You can certainly achieve some success with it. I admit that without hopeful enthusiasm, no progress would be possible. That's exactly why I came up with the idea of this Substack.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Well I was one of those “wide-eyed virus believers”. When I first encountered the information, my first instinct was to reject it, because I had (like everyone else) been conditioned to believe the authorities.
Even after the covid psyop began, I thought they were exaggerating the seasonal flu.
Then I saw the no virus argument. The Drs Bailey have done a lot of work on this, and I have followed much of that. Through their work, I realised that this argument has been going on for as long as they hypothesis has, and learned of the work of Dr Stefan Lanka, The Perth Group and others.
You don’t need medical training to understand that the experiments and conclusions reached were anti-science.
Interestingly, since I stopped believing in “viruses”, I stopped getting sick. Oh I still have the occasional (and I mean occasional detox event) but:
I haven’t needed, nor used antibiotics in over 2 years.
I haven’t needed, nor used any asthma inhalers for 18 months.
I do try and get the best quality whole foods I can. I don’t buy processed off the shelf non-food.
Just as well, because I have no trust in the “medical industry” anymore, and avoid them totally.
Dr. Lanka gives us a lesson in the use of the scientific method which we haven't seen in more than 150 years of medical science; and we have always known the reasons because the evidence has always existed in the historical records which continue to be ignored; we live in a pseudo-world based upon false science and fake paradigms for many of the reasons Dr Lanka outlines with all of its lies, deception and propaganda designed to keep us in FEAR of imaginary disease pathogens; germ theory was fraudulent and known to be so even in the time of that charlatan, Pasteur, but still promoted during an epoch of political and economic instability because France needed a national and international hero at any cost; and that cost meant bequeathing to the world the lies that became the foundation of allopathic medicine and the false belief that "vaccines" could cure any and all diseases; it soon became to be all about money and power and the use of strategies to silence real scientists such as Antoine Bechamp whose enormous achievements are still buried and deliberately so; the unproven science and belief in "viruses" must continue because it is based upon the same "false religion" and faith that perpetuates "germ theory" and all of science to this day; there will have to be life-threatening "viruses" to maintain fear and control over the masses and justify gene therapies and "vaccines" which do nothing but destroy our natural immune systems; there can never be a future where the pursuit of truth in science will be seen again unless all of the FRAUD, both past and present, is exposed, along with the psychopathy and genuine EVIL which made it possible.