Suavek you may wish to look at the substack from Dr John Dee - his "almanack"
Ex government scientist, statistics obsessive, did very complex statistical work on the pandemic and found that flu diagnoses and covid were interlinked - as flu went down "covid" went up. No evidence of any pandemic in the UK death statistics, just a mislabelling of flu.
However, I do not personally rule out the possibility of a new agent of some kind, just a mild infection that is no more lethal than flu, and so might show up in anecdotal reports of strange sicknesses ( which were anecdotally reported) BUT NOT AFFECT THE DEATH STATISTICS. (So statistically invisible) I believe that introducing a strange infection would be militarily necessary to convince doctors of the reality of a new disease. I say this because I know a number of people who did report a strange illness in 2020, enough to make me unconvinced by Mike's dismissal of this likelihood.
Bioweapons are impractical as they cannot be targeted any more than gas attacks in WW1. So the perpetrators would know not to employ a lethal agent, simply from military historical knowledge.
"So there we have it – a two part series inspired by my grapple with La Grippe that reveals just what can be achieved by fiddling with coding at a strategic level and setting the global healthcare system down a path such that a (non-lethal) pandemic can be conjured numerically at will when the conditions are right."
Yes, Dr Yeadon knows this group. He thought at the time that these people would accept his polite suggestions, but then he got a bit of a cold shower. He reads all my articles and will know how the conversations published here went.
I am suggesting that you refer Dr Yeadon to the Dee substack, an English writer and a retired government scientist and NHS statistician whose work backs up Yeadon's interpretations.
He has recently unpaywalled his archive. It is very thorough.
No, I don't follow Arkmedic. I am tired of all the repetitive statistical interpretation using doubtful initial data. It renders the conclusion meaningless.
If there was anything NEW, then it would be pointless to delete the flu, ILI and other respiratory diseases from the statistics. The fraudulent PCR test, together with new treatment protocols, was completely sufficient for the doctors. If there was anything "new", then the ominous "something" would not stop at the city limits, and there would be excess mortality in Germany. But there was a DEEP under-mortality rate, and the alleged overcrowding of hospital beds was proven to be a fraud.
Have you ever experienced the flu being pushed aside? GoF was the best possible propaganda for scaremongering. I couldn't have come up with anything better. In addition, the so-called "Covid" deaths in Germany and Austria were on average 1 year older than the statistical lifespan, and all had several comorbidities. There was NOTHING NEW. 100% ! The scam was well prepared and had been tested and tried for over 20 years.
I'm sorry please think again. I am not speaking of death statistics. That comment was about the anecdotal reports of an illness with strange symptoms that DID NOT KILL.
This is how you can frighten people ( with unusual symptoms, thus validating your claim of a new GOF virus hither to unknown) BUT you cannot release a lethal virus because it would be militarily uncontainable.
I think you are getting stuck in a false dichotomy. There is no need for either/or reasoning.
The point I am making is that there was a Sars_cov-2 virus released but it was not LETHAL and was STATISTICALLY invisible in the all cause mortality statistics.
Also Latypova's suggestion of toxin release in certain areas is worth considering, especially as they were able to target John O'Looney with something that put him in hospital unable to breathe.
Please think of the Chinese people dropping dead on the streets because of "Covid". THAT ALONE can be enough to know the truth. Add to that the sleeping travel workers who were declared "corpses" by the filmmakers. I have already wasted too much time on my research to spend another sixth year reading the pseudo-evidence. I have researched an average of 16 hours a day for 5 years and informed people. Even the "comedy" with the PCR tests can be enough to know the truth. How much more evidence does a person need to know that everything was a lie from A to Z?
As for John O'Looney, the fear of being killed is enough to cause a psychosomatic illness. There are no statistics to support any poisons.
I have already published several articles about "strange symptoms". It's all nonsense. Everyone has different symptoms because immune systems are never the same. It's that simple. And with the alleged “Covid” there was not a single new symptom, but only those that were already known from common respiratory diseases. If a person had certain symptoms for the first time in their life, it does not necessarily mean that these symptoms were new in general. Subjective thinking through the prism of propaganda and a corresponding, subjective misinterpretation of one's own illness was of course new. The fear of death that crept into the psyche of some people as a result of the media's spread of panic certainly had a psychosomatic effect. It is known that anxiety and stress reduce the effectiveness of the immune system.
I cannot agree with this widespread scepticism of accumulated scientific knowledge and protocols.
Although science is being corrupted, it has not always been so. You do not need to throw all accepted methods for validating experiments out. Spike protein can be detected in cells directly using DNA probes.
See this video, 23.00. DNA probes are even more accurate than using antibody assays.
I differ from many people in believing that there was a Sars virus release, but I believe the death numbers were inflated using other methods as the sars virus was not lethal.
Viral bioweapons cannot be used militarily as they are indiscriminate.
However to fool the research medics a sars virus would need to be detected in patients, otherwise the scam would be rapidly detected.
Forensic medicine would soon realise there was nothing to the pandemic if each tissue they looked at had no evidence of the alleged causal agent. Of course there would need to be a Sars virus there, just not as the cause of all the deaths attributed to it.
The antibody tests for virus in tissues come from the original Sars-Cov-1 viral tests and also work on Sars--Cov-2. The DNA probes are specific for viral proteins of Sars Cov 2.
I just thought of another argument for "No SARS-CoV-2 Virus" in the form of a rhetorical question. In Africa, 14 high-ranking state officials were murdered because they tested the "COVID" PCR test and published the results as ridiculous.
The question is:
Do more murders have to happen before everyone understands that there was no new health threat and that everything was a lie from A to Z? In other words, if the "Covid" disease had actually existed, these murders would have been completely senseless for the perpetrators.
Thank you Suavek, although we might disagree (I'm still not sure because I'm still not sure what your argument it but I will try to understand it) I think what you have done here is transparent and I can't see any attempt to misrepresent our replies in this part 1.
Syed comes across as such a smug, arrogant wanker. I'm glad I stopped reading him. He starts with a fake premise and will defend it at all costs. He disingenously conflates 'no pandemic' with 'no accountability', even though it is generally agreed the real 'pandemic' has been a great homicide, to which we want to hold everyone involved accountable.
You raise an important point. I found this strange connection to accountability quite contrived and completely disingenuous. Thank you for reminding me of this point. Have a great Sunday!
As a side issue, if anyone is interested in how an individual and an organisation can become captured over a period of time, I would refer people to two reports by Jon Snow of Channel 4 News. I had been familiar, for several years, with the C4 News report where Jon Snow exposed the 2009 swine flu 'pandemic' as a complete fraud, on the basis of the efforts of Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, who famously (to us, anyway) demonstrated, at the Council of Europe, that it was a perfectly normal flu season.
Then, quite recently, I accidentally came across the same Mr Snow, again on Channel 4, this time during 'covid', presenting a documentary of all his experiences of 'pandemics'. It was a fearmongering piece, as you'd expect, so I waited with interest to see if he'd miss out 2009. You can find the relevant section a little after 11 minutes in the clip below. He has completely 'forgotten' (a) that it was established to be a complete hoax, with governments in turmoil, trying to get pharma to refund them for millions of unneeded doses of Tamiflu, and (b) that it was HIS SCOOP.
Dear Sheila, please accept a very warm hug! I urgently need such information. Yes, it was mainly Dr Wolfgang Wodarg who proved and ended the swine flu hoax. The alleged "bird flu pandemic" in 2007 was similar. It was the preparations for today's "Covid". I cannot understand why Dr Syed talks about MERS and SARS-1 instead of classifying these two plandemics as pure fraud. The perpetrators have learned something from their mistakes back then, and this time, in 2020, the fraud has worked very well.
Thank you, Jessica, for reminding me of this connection. Your statement can be recast into a compelling argument: First comes the plandemic, then the "vaccine". People who try to prove otherwise are not seeking the truth.
Good luck in the New Year to you and your loved ones!
Suavek you may wish to look at the substack from Dr John Dee - his "almanack"
Ex government scientist, statistics obsessive, did very complex statistical work on the pandemic and found that flu diagnoses and covid were interlinked - as flu went down "covid" went up. No evidence of any pandemic in the UK death statistics, just a mislabelling of flu.
https://jdee.substack.com/p/an-enigma-transmission-of-epidemic
However, I do not personally rule out the possibility of a new agent of some kind, just a mild infection that is no more lethal than flu, and so might show up in anecdotal reports of strange sicknesses ( which were anecdotally reported) BUT NOT AFFECT THE DEATH STATISTICS. (So statistically invisible) I believe that introducing a strange infection would be militarily necessary to convince doctors of the reality of a new disease. I say this because I know a number of people who did report a strange illness in 2020, enough to make me unconvinced by Mike's dismissal of this likelihood.
Bioweapons are impractical as they cannot be targeted any more than gas attacks in WW1. So the perpetrators would know not to employ a lethal agent, simply from military historical knowledge.
https://jdee.substack.com/p/flip-flop-flu-who-rule-3-and-the-40b?r=zhsds
This is the relevant article. Third graph down.
"So there we have it – a two part series inspired by my grapple with La Grippe that reveals just what can be achieved by fiddling with coding at a strategic level and setting the global healthcare system down a path such that a (non-lethal) pandemic can be conjured numerically at will when the conditions are right."
I am sorry Arkmedic cannot even be polite to you. This reflects badly on him. And the ad hominems..tut tut.
Are Yeadon and Dee aware of each other's work?
Yes, Dr Yeadon knows this group. He thought at the time that these people would accept his polite suggestions, but then he got a bit of a cold shower. He reads all my articles and will know how the conversations published here went.
Are you referring to Dee or arkmedic?
I do not think Dee works in a group.
Arkmedic
I am suggesting that you refer Dr Yeadon to the Dee substack, an English writer and a retired government scientist and NHS statistician whose work backs up Yeadon's interpretations.
He has recently unpaywalled his archive. It is very thorough.
You didn't read part 1 of this article?
https://www.arkmedic.info/p/actuaries-inc/comment/65965909
No, I don't follow Arkmedic. I am tired of all the repetitive statistical interpretation using doubtful initial data. It renders the conclusion meaningless.
Dee does not get distracted in that way.
Who is Dee?
I have put the links in my earlier comment.
I hope substack is not shadow banning my comments here there seems to be a lot of misunderstanding in your responses.
Dear Currer,
If there was anything NEW, then it would be pointless to delete the flu, ILI and other respiratory diseases from the statistics. The fraudulent PCR test, together with new treatment protocols, was completely sufficient for the doctors. If there was anything "new", then the ominous "something" would not stop at the city limits, and there would be excess mortality in Germany. But there was a DEEP under-mortality rate, and the alleged overcrowding of hospital beds was proven to be a fraud.
Have you ever experienced the flu being pushed aside? GoF was the best possible propaganda for scaremongering. I couldn't have come up with anything better. In addition, the so-called "Covid" deaths in Germany and Austria were on average 1 year older than the statistical lifespan, and all had several comorbidities. There was NOTHING NEW. 100% ! The scam was well prepared and had been tested and tried for over 20 years.
I'm sorry please think again. I am not speaking of death statistics. That comment was about the anecdotal reports of an illness with strange symptoms that DID NOT KILL.
This is how you can frighten people ( with unusual symptoms, thus validating your claim of a new GOF virus hither to unknown) BUT you cannot release a lethal virus because it would be militarily uncontainable.
I think you are getting stuck in a false dichotomy. There is no need for either/or reasoning.
The point I am making is that there was a Sars_cov-2 virus released but it was not LETHAL and was STATISTICALLY invisible in the all cause mortality statistics.
Also Latypova's suggestion of toxin release in certain areas is worth considering, especially as they were able to target John O'Looney with something that put him in hospital unable to breathe.
Please think of the Chinese people dropping dead on the streets because of "Covid". THAT ALONE can be enough to know the truth. Add to that the sleeping travel workers who were declared "corpses" by the filmmakers. I have already wasted too much time on my research to spend another sixth year reading the pseudo-evidence. I have researched an average of 16 hours a day for 5 years and informed people. Even the "comedy" with the PCR tests can be enough to know the truth. How much more evidence does a person need to know that everything was a lie from A to Z?
As for John O'Looney, the fear of being killed is enough to cause a psychosomatic illness. There are no statistics to support any poisons.
I have already published several articles about "strange symptoms". It's all nonsense. Everyone has different symptoms because immune systems are never the same. It's that simple. And with the alleged “Covid” there was not a single new symptom, but only those that were already known from common respiratory diseases. If a person had certain symptoms for the first time in their life, it does not necessarily mean that these symptoms were new in general. Subjective thinking through the prism of propaganda and a corresponding, subjective misinterpretation of one's own illness was of course new. The fear of death that crept into the psyche of some people as a result of the media's spread of panic certainly had a psychosomatic effect. It is known that anxiety and stress reduce the effectiveness of the immune system.
I cannot agree with this widespread scepticism of accumulated scientific knowledge and protocols.
Although science is being corrupted, it has not always been so. You do not need to throw all accepted methods for validating experiments out. Spike protein can be detected in cells directly using DNA probes.
See this video, 23.00. DNA probes are even more accurate than using antibody assays.
https://rumble.com/v6498ls-sars-cov-2-and-its-role-in-the-pandemic.html
I differ from many people in believing that there was a Sars virus release, but I believe the death numbers were inflated using other methods as the sars virus was not lethal.
Viral bioweapons cannot be used militarily as they are indiscriminate.
However to fool the research medics a sars virus would need to be detected in patients, otherwise the scam would be rapidly detected.
Forensic medicine would soon realise there was nothing to the pandemic if each tissue they looked at had no evidence of the alleged causal agent. Of course there would need to be a Sars virus there, just not as the cause of all the deaths attributed to it.
The antibody tests for virus in tissues come from the original Sars-Cov-1 viral tests and also work on Sars--Cov-2. The DNA probes are specific for viral proteins of Sars Cov 2.
I just thought of another argument for "No SARS-CoV-2 Virus" in the form of a rhetorical question. In Africa, 14 high-ranking state officials were murdered because they tested the "COVID" PCR test and published the results as ridiculous.
The question is:
Do more murders have to happen before everyone understands that there was no new health threat and that everything was a lie from A to Z? In other words, if the "Covid" disease had actually existed, these murders would have been completely senseless for the perpetrators.
Good night, friends!
Thank you Suavek, although we might disagree (I'm still not sure because I'm still not sure what your argument it but I will try to understand it) I think what you have done here is transparent and I can't see any attempt to misrepresent our replies in this part 1.
I look forward to part 2.
Syed comes across as such a smug, arrogant wanker. I'm glad I stopped reading him. He starts with a fake premise and will defend it at all costs. He disingenously conflates 'no pandemic' with 'no accountability', even though it is generally agreed the real 'pandemic' has been a great homicide, to which we want to hold everyone involved accountable.
You raise an important point. I found this strange connection to accountability quite contrived and completely disingenuous. Thank you for reminding me of this point. Have a great Sunday!
As a side issue, if anyone is interested in how an individual and an organisation can become captured over a period of time, I would refer people to two reports by Jon Snow of Channel 4 News. I had been familiar, for several years, with the C4 News report where Jon Snow exposed the 2009 swine flu 'pandemic' as a complete fraud, on the basis of the efforts of Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, who famously (to us, anyway) demonstrated, at the Council of Europe, that it was a perfectly normal flu season.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs-DBOFWCpc
Then, quite recently, I accidentally came across the same Mr Snow, again on Channel 4, this time during 'covid', presenting a documentary of all his experiences of 'pandemics'. It was a fearmongering piece, as you'd expect, so I waited with interest to see if he'd miss out 2009. You can find the relevant section a little after 11 minutes in the clip below. He has completely 'forgotten' (a) that it was established to be a complete hoax, with governments in turmoil, trying to get pharma to refund them for millions of unneeded doses of Tamiflu, and (b) that it was HIS SCOOP.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwiOOFXRQIk
(Epidemics through the decades: Jon Snow on 50 years reporting on the viruses that changed the world)
I'm surprised the original news report is still on YouTube. Perhaps someone more techy than me could save it!
Dear Sheila, please accept a very warm hug! I urgently need such information. Yes, it was mainly Dr Wolfgang Wodarg who proved and ended the swine flu hoax. The alleged "bird flu pandemic" in 2007 was similar. It was the preparations for today's "Covid". I cannot understand why Dr Syed talks about MERS and SARS-1 instead of classifying these two plandemics as pure fraud. The perpetrators have learned something from their mistakes back then, and this time, in 2020, the fraud has worked very well.
Thank you very much again,
Suavek
Haha - you're welcome, Suavek, and thanks for the hug!
Because it is all vaccine/shot related and people are trying to pretend otherwise.
Thank you, Jessica, for reminding me of this connection. Your statement can be recast into a compelling argument: First comes the plandemic, then the "vaccine". People who try to prove otherwise are not seeking the truth.
Good luck in the New Year to you and your loved ones!