"In entirety, it amounts to unreasonable censorship of a healthy consensus on reality. In its place, Big Lies are laid, led by elite arrogance, armed with a compass of sociopathic immorality and engineered wokeness funded by our taxation. We pay for our cage."
Indeed we do pay for our cage ... and for everything else from the public health officials who tell us natural immunity isn't good enough, to the research and development of the jabs, to their marketing on every media platform, to the doctor or pharmacist who puts them in the arms of victims, to the after care of the victims. Meanwhile, big pharma makes billions.
The censorship of reality is what tipped me off initially that we were in big trouble. On the up side, at least we had some platforms where we could unite around the truth. Imagine if this were the last century, pre-Internet, when there would have been no way to find the truth or likeminded people!
Back then, I thought about what would happen if we couldn't communicate on the internet. The thought was terrible, so I quickly rejected it. My relatives, for example, don't watch this Substack. Neither do the neighbours ("Not much time for it at the moment"). One of my two half-brothers lied to me back then and only pretended to believe me. He even did that perfectly. I didn't think he would get "vaccinated" later. I'll guess what would happen if the internet hadn't been working since 2020... I think that many people would have gone crazy, or become violent. Or both. People have to be able to see at least some of themselves reflected in other people. On the other hand, there was no internet back then, and people could somehow inform each other. The leaflets already existed in the 16th century, during the time of the church reformation and the peasant uprisings (which I only know from the history of German-speaking countries).
I have included your comment in the article. I hope this is okay with you ? You can summarize your thoughts beautifully. If you allow me, I will do the same with your comment from yesterday...? I still don't know how to respond to yesterday's comment... But I haven't forgotten. See you soon and thank you very much.
One only needs to see the cascade of liberty limiting legislation that US governments enacted since the 1980's to understand how we "suddenly" became captured by mandates created by an "emergency". All they need was a virus - it had to be novel so they found a bat virus and modified it to compliment a wonderful "life saving vaccine". Now the media had a new headline to broadcast - the naive public took the bait and big Pharma's dream business case came true. The population was oppressed and became depressed. The rest is (Australian) history.
There was no virus, just propaganda. There are no waves of virus spread. Or have you ever seen a graphic representation of such propagation waves? And there are no numbers to prove the existence of an ADDITIONAL, new disease. The deaths only started with the introduction of the WHO hospital protocols on March 11, 2020. On this day, the terrorist organization WHO declared a "pandemic". The day before, there were no deaths that would have been visible in the statistics. You hardly read the articles on this Substack, right?
I read a lot of articles, including yours, on Substack and other platforms and have become highly critical of the "official Covid-19 narrative" particularly as more condemning facts are revealed that vindicate what was originally downplayed as conspiracy.. Didn't you notice my lapse into cynicism?
I would be very happy if the majority of readers would realize that everything from A to Z was a lie, and not just some facts. There were no "exaggerations of measures" or "mistakes", but rather it was a blatant fraud and every health risk (both SARS-CoV-2 and "Covid") was invented. There was also no abuse of the special circumstances, as there were no circumstances that would have indicated a particular risk to health. I've done some work to make the key evidence on this topic understandable in a Substack.
Unfortunately, it often happens that criticism of the official narrative refers to an "abuse of the pandemic situation" and not to the blatant, long-planned fraud in which everything was invented and lied about. The facts were not abused, but simply invented, and the statistics were doctored.
In other words, I see any criticism as misguided as long as the fraud is not clearly identified. This can of course lead to certain misunderstandings because no one knows what the other person really thinks and what they are actually "criticizing".
If my answer was not properly related to the meaning of your statement, then I apologize. I noticed your irony, but I often come across statements that describe political measures in the face of an alleged "virus threat" as "flawed" rather than "fraudulent". The films that showed the alleged "Covid" sufferers suddenly dropping dead on the streets of China have been prematurely forgotten. I think that it is enough to remember these films to know that there was no "Wuhan virus" that took over the world. Please forgive me for developing an allergy to the alleged SARS-CoV-2 stories after several years, after previously publishing 250 articles full of contrary evidence from the best scientists in the world. I admit that I misinterpreted your comment as meaning that you continue to believe in the existence of the "fear-inducing SARS-CoV-2 virus" despite the contrary evidence. In fact, many people forget that there was a proven "bird flu" fraud as early as 2007, and that in 2009/2010 Dr Wodarg exposed, proved and, as an EU politician, ended the fraud with the alleged "swine flu". People often act as if they had never heard anything about it. In Germany, where I live, the alleged overcrowding of hospital beds in 2020 was also clearly proven to be a fraud, based on the official data. In 2020, there was a clear under-mortality in Germany, and the alleged "Covid" deaths were on average 1 year older than their statistical lifespan would normally have been. I don't understand why the "novel virus" issue should still play any role. Okay, I understand that you meant this issue ironically too. Again, I ask you to forgive me for this misunderstanding.
Thank you for the information. It is clear to me that along with the pseudo-"vaccinations" the human population is also being reduced. The negative impact of lipid nanoparticles on the reproductive system was already known before 2021. There is an intention behind everything we have experienced since 2020, which contradicts any narrative about "failures", "omissions", "administrative negligence" or "mistakes".
Thank you for sharing your perspective. It’s clear you’ve given deep thought to these issues, and I appreciate your insights. The evidence and events of the past few years certainly raise valid concerns about the intentions behind certain decisions. Critical thinking and questioning official narratives are essential in seeking truth. Wishing you all the best as well.
AI and Robotics is advancing at a rapid pace (this was all forecast years/decades in advance) and us peasants are becoming increasingly economically obsolete (we already are they are just delaying the roll out of actual advanced AI and robotics until the control grid is fully in place). They need to downsize the pool of Human Resources as quickly as possible without spooking the herd (lest we rise up and put their power and control at risk). Hence the scamdemic. Hence the death and sterility jabs. Hence MAID and other end of life programs. Hence the opt in sterilisation via trans indoctrination. Hence the 15 minute cities. Hence the cameras on every street corner or on traffic lights. Hence the attempts to normalise eating insects and lab grown meat and cheap soy slop (they don't want to waste any more resources than necessary on us useless eaters). We know their end game (approx 7 billion fewer humans and all the remaining ones in highly controlled 15 minute cities). Continuing to focus exclusively on the last big attack will get us killed.
This is a very good summary! I wanted to point out re inclusion of "NSA" now in many social media places referring to this topic - the NSA were involved as all of the military-intelligence agencies were, however, they are not identified as THE head of the mass kill program "covid pandemic and response". The mention of "NSA" was originally from an interview by RFK Jr, where he was speaking partially about the information about covid as a military op that he and I had discussed on his podcast and also in private. He misspoke, the correct body was NSC - the National Security Council which was in charge of covid policy (not just NSA, which is part of the NSC). He actually called me after that interview to clarify. So, that's where the mention of NSA came from.
Dear Sasha, thank you for the clarification. Are you sure that this is not some kind of Freudian slip by RFK Jr.? Perhaps he was only later pressured from outside to make this correction? Did he correct himself after publication, or before? Sorry for this perhaps unnecessary and petty probing.
Suavek. My humble plan is to make the best music i can do at volume and slowly pick up fans. They will be lead to my substack. My substack and songs mention by name Yeadon, Watt, Latypova, Fullmich amongst others. Ive been a dissident my whole life having been involved in permaculture. Large centralised systems eat and kill the margins so here we are. Back to the land and small scale is the best strategy I know.
The term bioweapon is used loosely equivalent to 'organic weapon' vs. an inorganic weapon, I suppose b/c the former includes such organic material. The terms have never been nailed down. There's dead vs still living organic material. There's also chemically modified organic material vs not modified. This will be one important as AI dives deeper into our physiology.
With a bit of irony, I can imagine that it will later be unimportant to the “vaccinated” person whether he has become a biological-chemical or just a biological cyborg. I'm already observing a strange lack of interest among the "vaccinated" people in uncovering the truth. Thank you for your food for thought.
You sort of do have to die, at least socially, to leave the herd behind-- when 95% of your family and friends are in that cult. But I found new friends and a new place to live that's much better than that old way.
I hope you all are into grounding cause what comes next with the Sat-to-Device EMF onslaught is going to wreck many people.
"In entirety, it amounts to unreasonable censorship of a healthy consensus on reality. In its place, Big Lies are laid, led by elite arrogance, armed with a compass of sociopathic immorality and engineered wokeness funded by our taxation. We pay for our cage."
Indeed we do pay for our cage ... and for everything else from the public health officials who tell us natural immunity isn't good enough, to the research and development of the jabs, to their marketing on every media platform, to the doctor or pharmacist who puts them in the arms of victims, to the after care of the victims. Meanwhile, big pharma makes billions.
The censorship of reality is what tipped me off initially that we were in big trouble. On the up side, at least we had some platforms where we could unite around the truth. Imagine if this were the last century, pre-Internet, when there would have been no way to find the truth or likeminded people!
Hi Bird's Brain,
Back then, I thought about what would happen if we couldn't communicate on the internet. The thought was terrible, so I quickly rejected it. My relatives, for example, don't watch this Substack. Neither do the neighbours ("Not much time for it at the moment"). One of my two half-brothers lied to me back then and only pretended to believe me. He even did that perfectly. I didn't think he would get "vaccinated" later. I'll guess what would happen if the internet hadn't been working since 2020... I think that many people would have gone crazy, or become violent. Or both. People have to be able to see at least some of themselves reflected in other people. On the other hand, there was no internet back then, and people could somehow inform each other. The leaflets already existed in the 16th century, during the time of the church reformation and the peasant uprisings (which I only know from the history of German-speaking countries).
I have included your comment in the article. I hope this is okay with you ? You can summarize your thoughts beautifully. If you allow me, I will do the same with your comment from yesterday...? I still don't know how to respond to yesterday's comment... But I haven't forgotten. See you soon and thank you very much.
Suavek
Thanks and sure that would be fine
Appreciation and blessings from Sydney Australia.
One only needs to see the cascade of liberty limiting legislation that US governments enacted since the 1980's to understand how we "suddenly" became captured by mandates created by an "emergency". All they need was a virus - it had to be novel so they found a bat virus and modified it to compliment a wonderful "life saving vaccine". Now the media had a new headline to broadcast - the naive public took the bait and big Pharma's dream business case came true. The population was oppressed and became depressed. The rest is (Australian) history.
There was no virus, just propaganda. There are no waves of virus spread. Or have you ever seen a graphic representation of such propagation waves? And there are no numbers to prove the existence of an ADDITIONAL, new disease. The deaths only started with the introduction of the WHO hospital protocols on March 11, 2020. On this day, the terrorist organization WHO declared a "pandemic". The day before, there were no deaths that would have been visible in the statistics. You hardly read the articles on this Substack, right?
I read a lot of articles, including yours, on Substack and other platforms and have become highly critical of the "official Covid-19 narrative" particularly as more condemning facts are revealed that vindicate what was originally downplayed as conspiracy.. Didn't you notice my lapse into cynicism?
Dear Mediocrates,
I would be very happy if the majority of readers would realize that everything from A to Z was a lie, and not just some facts. There were no "exaggerations of measures" or "mistakes", but rather it was a blatant fraud and every health risk (both SARS-CoV-2 and "Covid") was invented. There was also no abuse of the special circumstances, as there were no circumstances that would have indicated a particular risk to health. I've done some work to make the key evidence on this topic understandable in a Substack.
Unfortunately, it often happens that criticism of the official narrative refers to an "abuse of the pandemic situation" and not to the blatant, long-planned fraud in which everything was invented and lied about. The facts were not abused, but simply invented, and the statistics were doctored.
In other words, I see any criticism as misguided as long as the fraud is not clearly identified. This can of course lead to certain misunderstandings because no one knows what the other person really thinks and what they are actually "criticizing".
If my answer was not properly related to the meaning of your statement, then I apologize. I noticed your irony, but I often come across statements that describe political measures in the face of an alleged "virus threat" as "flawed" rather than "fraudulent". The films that showed the alleged "Covid" sufferers suddenly dropping dead on the streets of China have been prematurely forgotten. I think that it is enough to remember these films to know that there was no "Wuhan virus" that took over the world. Please forgive me for developing an allergy to the alleged SARS-CoV-2 stories after several years, after previously publishing 250 articles full of contrary evidence from the best scientists in the world. I admit that I misinterpreted your comment as meaning that you continue to believe in the existence of the "fear-inducing SARS-CoV-2 virus" despite the contrary evidence. In fact, many people forget that there was a proven "bird flu" fraud as early as 2007, and that in 2009/2010 Dr Wodarg exposed, proved and, as an EU politician, ended the fraud with the alleged "swine flu". People often act as if they had never heard anything about it. In Germany, where I live, the alleged overcrowding of hospital beds in 2020 was also clearly proven to be a fraud, based on the official data. In 2020, there was a clear under-mortality in Germany, and the alleged "Covid" deaths were on average 1 year older than their statistical lifespan would normally have been. I don't understand why the "novel virus" issue should still play any role. Okay, I understand that you meant this issue ironically too. Again, I ask you to forgive me for this misunderstanding.
All the best,
Suavek
Well, I’ve certainly done my 1500 hrs and what you have stated, on balance, is true. Here is one of my contributors to exposing some of the truth… https://oxgmcxo.substack.com/p/the-truth-about-covid-19-shots?r=pf0i9 and here is another (given the thumbs up by Dr Yeadon https://oxgmcxo.substack.com/p/flash-back-15?r=pf0i9
Thank you for the information. It is clear to me that along with the pseudo-"vaccinations" the human population is also being reduced. The negative impact of lipid nanoparticles on the reproductive system was already known before 2021. There is an intention behind everything we have experienced since 2020, which contradicts any narrative about "failures", "omissions", "administrative negligence" or "mistakes".
Thanks again and all the best,
Suavek
Thank you for sharing your perspective. It’s clear you’ve given deep thought to these issues, and I appreciate your insights. The evidence and events of the past few years certainly raise valid concerns about the intentions behind certain decisions. Critical thinking and questioning official narratives are essential in seeking truth. Wishing you all the best as well.
Okay okay, point taken, but here's why you should still get your booster:
https://www.newworldhumor.com/p/7e18da16-44c1-4978-b5af-c1506b77d312
Read it. Loved it. LOL
AI and Robotics is advancing at a rapid pace (this was all forecast years/decades in advance) and us peasants are becoming increasingly economically obsolete (we already are they are just delaying the roll out of actual advanced AI and robotics until the control grid is fully in place). They need to downsize the pool of Human Resources as quickly as possible without spooking the herd (lest we rise up and put their power and control at risk). Hence the scamdemic. Hence the death and sterility jabs. Hence MAID and other end of life programs. Hence the opt in sterilisation via trans indoctrination. Hence the 15 minute cities. Hence the cameras on every street corner or on traffic lights. Hence the attempts to normalise eating insects and lab grown meat and cheap soy slop (they don't want to waste any more resources than necessary on us useless eaters). We know their end game (approx 7 billion fewer humans and all the remaining ones in highly controlled 15 minute cities). Continuing to focus exclusively on the last big attack will get us killed.
I like the 'HR' term stripped of any pretenses !
Excellent resources! Thank you.
Your reply is greatly appreciated, as are all of your posts. No apology needed!! We are on the same page.
This is a very good summary! I wanted to point out re inclusion of "NSA" now in many social media places referring to this topic - the NSA were involved as all of the military-intelligence agencies were, however, they are not identified as THE head of the mass kill program "covid pandemic and response". The mention of "NSA" was originally from an interview by RFK Jr, where he was speaking partially about the information about covid as a military op that he and I had discussed on his podcast and also in private. He misspoke, the correct body was NSC - the National Security Council which was in charge of covid policy (not just NSA, which is part of the NSC). He actually called me after that interview to clarify. So, that's where the mention of NSA came from.
Dear Sasha, thank you for the clarification. Are you sure that this is not some kind of Freudian slip by RFK Jr.? Perhaps he was only later pressured from outside to make this correction? Did he correct himself after publication, or before? Sorry for this perhaps unnecessary and petty probing.
Sasha,
When I asked for the date of his correction, I of course meant YOUR publication, not mine.
Suavek. My humble plan is to make the best music i can do at volume and slowly pick up fans. They will be lead to my substack. My substack and songs mention by name Yeadon, Watt, Latypova, Fullmich amongst others. Ive been a dissident my whole life having been involved in permaculture. Large centralised systems eat and kill the margins so here we are. Back to the land and small scale is the best strategy I know.
Great idea. Please link me to the song when it's finished. All the best,
Suavek.
This one mentions Yeadon and others
https://open.substack.com/pub/thumbnailgreen/p/good-germans?r=nv8me&utm_medium=ios
This one covers the evil banks behind it all a few years old now
https://open.substack.com/pub/thumbnailgreen/p/coming-soon?r=nv8me&utm_medium=ios
This one is a rant.
https://open.substack.com/pub/thumbnailgreen/p/i-wont-shut-up?r=nv8me&utm_medium=ios
Theres more on my substack and one coming dedicated to Katherine Watts work
What about Dr Bryan Ardis' assertion that the jabs contain snake venom?
Get the book COVID-19 Lies
The term bioweapon is used loosely equivalent to 'organic weapon' vs. an inorganic weapon, I suppose b/c the former includes such organic material. The terms have never been nailed down. There's dead vs still living organic material. There's also chemically modified organic material vs not modified. This will be one important as AI dives deeper into our physiology.
Hi Stephen,
With a bit of irony, I can imagine that it will later be unimportant to the “vaccinated” person whether he has become a biological-chemical or just a biological cyborg. I'm already observing a strange lack of interest among the "vaccinated" people in uncovering the truth. Thank you for your food for thought.
Best regards,
Suavek
You sort of do have to die, at least socially, to leave the herd behind-- when 95% of your family and friends are in that cult. But I found new friends and a new place to live that's much better than that old way.
I hope you all are into grounding cause what comes next with the Sat-to-Device EMF onslaught is going to wreck many people.