Dr. Mike Yeadon about reproductive damage - Part 4 : When poisoning pregnant women became a business. -Dr. Yeadon's expert opinion. And : The naked truth.
Nurse-SCIENCE : "We will be here at the bedside when you wake up."
“The truth rises from the well” ( Original title : “La Vérité sortant du puits”). An oil painting by Jean-Léon Gérôme, 1896. For further information see the article.
Dr Mike Yeadon, November 29, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/2183
Please share widely.
I have no idea if the presenter is aware of what he was involved in. Quite possibly not.
By now, though, he’ll presumably know he was used (or was knowingly lying).
He’s welcome to get in touch, though he won’t. He’ll be too frightened to do that.
Best wishes
Mike
……………………………………………………………..
Linked in the post above :
A promotional video for the "Covid" vaccination on YouTube that fakes the science ( The paid "Fact-Checkers" ) :
Title :
Mike Yeadon: Fact Checked (again)
Editor's note : The text below the video is, in my opinion, evidence of a crime. Here you can judge for yourself (You can find a statement about these claims from the expert Dr. Yeadon below, behind the fact-checker text) :
2040 subscribers
95,577 views September 17, 2021 ( Editor's note : Information as of November 29, 2024 ).
🔍 Our sources 👉 fullfact.org/health/Mike-Yeadon-video A widely shared post on social media includes a video featuring the former Pfizer scientist Mike Yeadon. The video includes lots of misleading or incorrect information about the Covid-19 vaccines. We haven’t fact checked every single claim, but they include dismissal of the dose range finding studies conducted, false claims about vaccines and fertility and pregnancy and incorrect information about the right to refuse Covid 19 vaccines.
⚪ Dose range finding studies WERE performed on Covid-19 vaccines Mr Yeadon claimed that dose range finding studies were not performed on the vaccines. This is not true. Dose range finding studies are usually conducted in the early stages of clinical trials, to try to find the best dose to trial at scale. This will take into account the best dose to achieve the desired effect, but also which doses are safest or best tolerated. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines underwent phase one and two studies which included different dosing regimens. In the early phases, the AstraZeneca vaccine also trialled two different dosing regimens (one or two doses of vaccine), while the later trial compared the impact of a half or full initial dose.
⚪ Evidence to date suggests that vaccines are safe in pregnancy and prior to pregnancy In the video, Mr Yeadon says that there haven’t been any studies done to characterise the safety of Covid-19 vaccines in pregnancy or prior to pregnancy. It is true that pregnant women were not included in the original vaccine studies, and long term data on babies born to women who had the vaccine during pregnancy is awaited. There is now increasing real world data to inform health professionals about the safety of Covid-19 vaccines in pregnancy. Currently, in America, over 150,000 women who reported they were pregnant have been vaccinated to date. In England, over 60,000 women who reported that they were pregnant or could be pregnant at the time of vaccination have received at least one dose of vaccine. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) which is the professional association of pregnancy, childbirth, and women's reproductive and sexual health says that there is “no evidence” to date to suggest that the Covid-19 vaccines affect fertility. It also states that there is no biologically plausible mechanism by which the vaccine would cause fertility problems. Similar statements have been issued by the British Fertility Association, the NHS and Public Health England. Based on the available evidence, organisations such as RCOG say that “The vaccine is considered to be safe and effective at any stage of pregnancy”.
⚪ People do have the option to refuse the vaccines Mr Yeadon claims that people are not being given the option to refuse a Covid-19 vaccine “most of the time”, and suggests that “eventually they'll come around and injection [sic] you”. Public health guidance around giving Covid-19 vaccines states that an individual must consent to the vaccine being given (or particular procedures must be followed for individuals who lack capacity to consent). There are increasing examples of events, travel restrictions or certain job roles where vaccination may be required. However, the decision to have a vaccine still lies with the individual.
⚪ For the full fact check and to see all our sources, visit the Full Fact website.
Source : https://youtu.be/0YAmFmMGVPI
………………………………………………………………………..
A comment by Dr. Yeadon under the linked article, (now deleted from YouTube, but saved by Dr. Yeadon as a precaution), under a nickname ( A transcript of the screenshot from his Telegram channel ) :
( Editor's note: Dr Yeadon's comment on the article represents a scientific expertise. As the highest ranking top scientist ever to discuss the details of the design of this pseudo-vaccine, his statements should not be viewed as ordinary comments, but as a type of expert opinion. This fact cannot be changed by any attempt by the perpetrators, through propaganda or their enterprising lackeys. The only thing that propaganda can change is the perception of the naive and gullible reader. However, the facts always remain the same. )
GT380man
So, you’re claiming that "safety in pregnancy" was determined by giving it to pregnant woman.
This alone tells you that the law was breached severely.
Since thalidomide, this is NEVER done.
First, you need a full reproductive toxicology package is generated, which takes many months. This was NEVER done.
There has to be no observations of concern.
Even then, you don’t start dosing pregnant woman. You initially rely on adventitious administration outcomes (there are inevitably occasions where a woman didn’t know she was pregnant or became pregnant shortly after administration, to form the evidence base on safety in pregnancy).
I wasn’t wrong to be concerned. I was correct that breaches of conventions of 60 years were cast aside.
Unfortunately, I was also correct that there were adverse consequences. The young man may have been a straight shooter, but the information he cites is false.
Oh, and on DRF (dose range finding) studies? It’s not enough merely to give 2 or 3 different doses. The point of these is to establish the best dose or doses to take into Phase 3. They never even ran a formal Phase 3, because these are always much longer than the longest studied period (minimum of six months and the same again on long term follow up). These studies were halted & all those on placebo were offered the injection, thus destroying the not-dosed control group and therefore the entire study, which will never be replicated.
NEVER rely upon what "fact-checkers" tell you. This field is among the fastest growing sectors in media. I wonder if it’s coincidence that alongside this change, governments everywhere have stepped up the amount of lying to citizens ?
………………………
Editor's note: no comments were visible to me in Germany :
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Who funded the deadly "Fact Checker" video ?
Jennifer, November 29, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/2183?comment=139702
Here’s a list of some of their funders on their own website … :
https://fullfact.org/about/funding/
……………………
John222, November 29, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/2183?comment=139710
A simple search of the Internet archives (waybackmachine) reveals the opportunism of this organization.
…………………….
Jennifer, November 29, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/2183?comment=139713
Indeed, Marit Mohn (Trustee & founder), belongs to one of Norway‘s wealthiest families. Follow the money…
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon, spring 2020. The text came from one of his earliest films :
“This idea, for example, that you can be ill, even though you have no symptoms, and you can be a respiratory virus threat to someone else even if you have no symptoms – that’s also invented in 2020. There’s simply no history of it and it defies common sense as well.”
Source : https://suavek1.substack.com/p/historical-videos-by-dr-mike-yeadon ( “The Garage Video" ).
Editor's note:
Similar statements are made in other videos by Dr. Mike Yeadon. The so-called "asymptomatic infection" turned out to be a complete lie. It was this obvious nonsense that first made many doctors and scientists realize the inconsistencies in the official narrative. At the time, some low-quality studies were even funded so that propaganda could cite them and spread the lie of asymptomatic infection.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Tony Porcaro, November 30, 2024 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-about-reproductive-ae0/comment/79457260
These so-called "fact checkers" have their precedent in the history of medical science at least since the 19th century, especially during the epoch of Pasteur in the mid 1800s; lies, deception and falsifying real science for the sake of ego, fame ,fortune and political favor became the norm for charlatans such as Pasteur(the Fauci of his time) and, of course, continues unabated to this day; we now have Pasteur's own lab notes and records which confirm that he falsified the results of his own experiments while plagiarizing genuine scientific results from contemporaries who were the real geniuses such as Antoine Bechamp; germ theory was proven and known to be false even then by much greater minds than Pasteur and it remains false 150 years later but big money was to be made in "vaccine" development and non-stop "treatments" and not in keeping people healthy in the first place.
………………….
Tony Porcaro, November 30, 2024 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/from-the-spanish-flu-to-covid-a-statement/comment/79466316
We are destined to be ruled by the lies of the past until we acknowledge the SOURCES of those lies and how and why they were perpetrated; but the cognitive dissonance and collective stupidity of the masses continue to prevent such critical analysis and honesty; not to mention the enormous number of stakeholders and those complicit in maintaining that we continue to worship at the altar of LIES; it has been about human hubris and ego since the Garden and the false quest to be our own gods with knowledge and truth as the first sacrificial victims
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
About the cover image of the article : “The truth rises from the well” ( Original title : “La Vérité sortant du puits”. An oil painting by Jean-Léon Gérôme, 1896.
The truth and the lie meet on the way. The lie says, "Today is a wonderful day!" The truth looks to heaven and sighs, because the day was really beautiful.
You come to a well. The lie says: "The water is very beautiful, let's bathe together!" The truth tests the water and agrees.
They take off their clothes and start bathing. Suddenly the lie rises out of the water, puts on the clothes of truth and runs away. Truth rises from the well and seeks the lie to get her clothes back.
The world, seeing the truth naked, averts its gaze with contempt and anger. Poor Truth shamefully returns to the well and disappears forever. Since then, the lie has travelled around the world - disguised as truth - and satisfied the needs of society. Because the world has absolutely no desire to encounter the naked truth.
The motif comes from the translation of an aphorism by the philosopher Democritus ( 460 or 459 in Abdera in Thrace ; † around 370 BC ) : "We know nothing about the truth, because the truth lies deep in the well" (literally: "In truth we know nothing, because the truth lies in unreachable depths").
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Have you read the article yet?
Here are some of the mechanisms of toxicity. It may be worth remembering the content of the article. We want to have good arguments in discussions. An intact memory can work wonders later.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, April 19, 2024 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/statement-by-mike-yeadon
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/statement-by-pfizers-former-vice
( … )
I now make an important point. In 2020, we are told that at least four biopharmaceutical companies decided to develop gene-based vaccines. As I explained earlier, conventional vaccines are given a somewhat easier time of it in relation to developmental obligations. Despite classifying to the financial markets their own products as “gene therapies” & subject to lengthy and expensive development obligations, they persuaded the medical regulators (and deceived the public) to classify them as “vaccines”. This was improper and was accompanied by bodies such as WHO and even dictionary makers to change the definition of the word vaccine to facilitate this deception.
25. Deception matters not because of mere naming conventions, but because the manufacturers knew that vaccines are much lighter in terms of development obligations. Even given this improper advantage, the makers of the gene-based vaccines failed to meet all, of even the relatively light development obligations. The end result has been billions of people being injected with mis-classified and inadequately tested gene-therapies. The adverse effect profiles and deaths as a consequence are extraordinary yet are being ignored by multiple bodies tasked with vigilance in patient safety. None of this can be constructed as accidental or inadvertent.
26. Claim 3: The design choices made in constructing the gene-based agents purporting to be vaccines are evidence of intentional harms.
27. Medicinal preparations contain molecules that were chosen by its designers. Nothing is in them that was not thoughtfully included. My career has been wholly within the sphere of endeavour called “rational drug discovery” or “rational drug design”. My main responsibility was to select biological targets for intervention with a chemical or a biological molecule, the latter usually being designed by more than one person. I was part of the design teams for decades. Our objective was to reach and interact with the molecular target, hoping to bring about desirable effects in patients, and to do so without inducing unacceptable unwanted effects, taking into account the seriousness of the illness at issue.
28. My contention is that, by close examination of the products of such design teams, I can, at least in part, deduce the intentions of the designers. It gives me no pleasure to lay out below several features of the design of the mRNA “vaccines” from Pfizer / BioNTech and from Moderna, ALL of which predictably give rise to toxicity. The features of interest are common to both products. There is no reasonable conclusion to this analysis other than that the designers intentionally created products which would be expected to cause harms including death and sterility.
29. Designed-in toxicity 1: axiomatic induction of “autoimmune” responses, regardless of what the genetic sequence codes for. As described earlier about how immunooncology was considered the leading application, when our bodies manufacture a foreign or non-self-protein, our immune system recognises this as a threat and mounts a lethal attack on every cell performing the genetic instruction. In short, wherever in the body these materials travel after injection into the upper arm, the immune system will destroy those cells and tissues. I believe it is very likely that the reported extensive range of adverse effects is due to this common process, autoimmune destruction, occurring in all kinds of tissues around the body. This is expected. Anyone with a basic knowledge of immunology knows this.
( … )
Full article :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/statement-by-mike-yeadon
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/statement-by-pfizers-former-vice
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Nurse-SCIENCE, June 7, 2024 :
https://www.aussie17.com/p/just-in-furious-malaysians-unite/comment/58442218
There it is! I believe we’re going to see a lot of these “tail between the legs” displays. They took money for collecting patients who are vaccinated, and the higher the number of vaxxed, the more you got paid. If you didn’t get enough, you didn’t get paid. So I don’t want to hear it from the doctors that took the money. They should’ve known what was up. Offering fried chicken and ice cream for people who took the vaccine? Filling up cards with vaccinations and offering homeless people getting shots $100 for a full card! Homeless people were getting more vaccines just to fill up cards for money. What a brilliant way to kill off that population, eh? .Why all the coercion?! Don’t let the doctors fool you. They knew exactly what the hell they were doing. At least they should’ve known when the government told him to shut up or they’ll lose their license, that’s how you know you’re involved in a conspiracy. Now they wanna lick their wounds in public so everybody can see? Please! Not every doctor sold their soul, but the number that did is appalling. There goes everybody’s faith in the healthcare system! And certainly in the government, and the WHO! They will NOT gain 1 inch.
…………………………………….
Nurse-SCIENCE introduces herself in her Substack as follows :
https://substack.com/@nursescience
News is interesting. If you can figure out what's real, what's false and what's feasible. Why would our government ever do anything to harm us? We will be here at the bedside when you wake up.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Related articles :
……………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon about reproductive damage - PART 1 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-about-reproductive?utm_source=publication-search
…
Dr. Mike Yeadon about reproductive damage - Part 2 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-about-reproductive-f0e?utm_source=publication-search
…
Dr. Mike Yeadon about reproductive damage - Part 3 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-about-reproductive-e24
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
For the most reliable information about the "Covid" scam and deceptions of the system, read Dr. Mike Yeadon's daily statements :
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr. Yeadon's videos only two browsers are recommended :
Yandex :
and Mojeek :
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
Many statements and videos from Dr. Mike Yeadon can also be found on Suavek's Substack, which is recommended by Dr. Yeadon on the main page of his Substack.
Both links lead to Suavek`s Substack :
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
These so-called "fact checkers" have their precedent in the history of medical science at least since the 19th century, especially during the epoch of Pasteur in the mid 1800s; lies, deception and falsifying real science for the sake of ego, fame ,fortune and political favor became the norm for charlatans such as Pasteur(the Fauci of his time) and, of course, continues unabated to this day; we now have Pasteur's own lab notes and records which confirm that he falsified the results of his own experiments while plagiarizing genuine scientific results from contemporaries who were the real geniuses such as Antoine Bechamp; germ theory was proven and known to be false even then by much greater minds than Pasteur and it remains false 150 years later but big money was to be made in "vaccine" development and non-stop "treatments" and not in keeping people healthy in the first place.