TOXIC BY DESIGN - PART-1 : A statement by Pfizer's former Vice President Dr. Mike Yeadon. With video. ( A greatly expanded/updated article ).
No injected vaccines can protect humans from acute respiratory diseases.
Apr 19, 2024
Source : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/statement-by-mike-yeadon
1. I, Mike Yeadon will say as follows. I have training in biochemistry and toxicology (1st class joint honours) followed by a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology. I then worked at increasingly senior levels in biopharmaceutical R&D (new medicines) and was vice president and worldwide head of allergy and respiratory at Pfizer. A position I left in 2011.After leaving my employment at Pfizer I took on work as a consultant to over 30 biotechnology companies and was very highly regarded both by investors and management. More recently I founded and led as CEO a biotech which was acquired by Novartis (2017).
2. I have a wide knowledge of the pharmaceutical industry, including all aspects of new medicine design, research, and development. In particular I have an in-depth knowledge of custom and practise in designing molecules likely to be safe, as well as of immunology and respiratory.
3. I provide the above outline of my credentials as evidence that as a senior former pharmaceutical company research executive I have the expertise and knowledge to make me a credible witness in speaking out about the grave concerns I have (concerns which are shared by others) about the alleged pandemic & countermeasures, especially the gene-based injections.
4. I have been raising these concerns now for a period of around for 3.5 years to date.
5. Overall it is my expert opinion that the injections purporting to be vaccines against an alleged virus (I say alleged, as no evidence has ever been provided of an isolated SARS-CoV-2 virus) are intentionally harmful, and as such must immediately be withdrawn from the market.
6. Below I will provide a short summary, which I have sought to make substantially non-technical, in explanation for why I have formed my opinion that that the injections as intentionally harmful and that as such they should be immediately withdrawn from the market.
7. However, before presenting my summary I will first make the following point, which I can substantiate.
8. In my view, the backdrop to this alleged “pandemic” is not a matter of medical and scientific issues, but a global crime scene of unprecedented scale and nature.
9. Claim 1: Choosing to invent, develop and manufacture a new vaccine is unquestionably the wrong response to a pandemic, even had the narrative presented to us not been false.
10. Given I have had an over 30-year career in “big pharma” and biotech, I knew that it was impossible to create a vaccine in under 5-6 years if they were going to demonstrate clinical safety and hone manufacturing to yield the customarily high-quality manufacturing necessary to produce tightly defined final drug product.
11. If this was not done, the product would be highly variable, and this is inherently dangerous. This is what has happened and the resulting variability of the product has completely invalidated any data obtained during toxicology and clinical development. In brief, the effect of overly expeditious development is that the product injected into literally billions of innocent men, women and children is not the same product as was used in the clinical trials.
12. No honest expert would even contemplate running a research program to bring forward a vaccine, because no pandemic in history has lasted a fraction of the minimum time necessary to create a safe and effective new vaccine. This timeline cannot be much shortened because a number of activities are performed in a stepwise manner, each step depending on the outcome of the preceding step.
13. In addition, we must consider the clinical context. We have been told of a public health emergency of international concern, where anyone could catch the virus and the elderly and already sick were particularly at risk of death. I believe this to be a deliberate deception, but even if we accept it, its vital to understand two things.
14. One, injected vaccines cannot and do not protect humans against acute respiratory illnesses believed to be due to respiratory viruses landing in the airways. This is because the immune response is primarily to stimulate the production of antibodies which circulate in the blood.
Antibodies are very large molecules and they are not able to leave the circulation and appear on the air side of the respiratory tract. In short, the product of the immune response to the vaccine and the virus itself do not meet, as they are in different bodily “compartments.”
15. Two, the very people we were told are particularly at risk, the elderly and sick, are in part, in this vulnerable state because their senescent immune systems respond poorly to new infectious disease threats. Why would anyone expect a good response to an injected vaccine? This is said to mimic a new infectious disease threat. It is important to note something very little known by the public but injected “flu vaccines” do not work. They do not reduce hospitalisation or death in the elderly. Yet flu vaccines have been promoted as a vital public health measure for decades and are paid for by taxpayers. Furthermore, even flu vaccines can lead to adverse events, sometimes serious, but this is not compensated by an expectation of protection against a threat to health, namely influenza. Now you know this, you may find it rather less difficult to believe that this industry is willing to lie and deceive in order to reach its objectives.
16. I have outlined why it is impossible to produce a safe and effective vaccine in much less than 5-6years, yet we are asked to accept that this has been accomplished in less than one year. I have also described why it is that an injected vaccine could not work, even if it was safe, in the setting we are told exists. Yet they went ahead. This is malevolent, as I will show.
17. Claim 2: Gene-based vaccines were advanced as the exclusive solution, but was a means to misuse the reduced regulatory hurdles for conventional vaccines in order to push gene therapies onto the market.
18. Vaccines have been developed and used against an increasing range of infectious disease targets rather widely since the middle of the 20th century and some are much older. Every vaccine until the covid pandemic era has involved taking a sample of the disease-causing agent and formulating it for injection or instillation into the airway. This has the advantage that the amount of pathogen is known and fixed. In many ways, this process mimics what we are told is a similar process to when we are infected by the wild pathogen. Many vaccines have been developed and marketed and over many decades, the makers, the regulators, doctors, and the public have acquired a common understanding of what kind of product these are and how to evaluate them. This is the background that has led to the regulatory pathway for their development. In certain
regards, it has been appropriate to truncate or not even to study certain properties of “conventional vaccines” because they are uninformative and do not contribute anything to evaluation of the agent.
19. The preparations called vaccines in this alleged pandemic are in no way like these older products. Instead, these are gene-based agents, which commandeer the recipients’ cells to manufacture whatever is encoded in the gene sequence. This is a crucial difference, as I will exemplify later. But it is important to understand that there are additional steps in the biological response to gene- based agents as compared to old-style vaccines. Old style vaccines do not travel far from the injection site. The materials injected are suspensions, small pieces of cells and killed or weakened infectious agents. Our bodies are well-adapted to recognise that foreign materials have arrived and have evolved to respond appropriately to this event. The gene-based injections, by contrast, can and do travel all over the body, prompted to make foreign proteins in anatomical locations where the pathogen would be unable to reach, such as the brain.
20. Gene-based treatments are often called by a slang term “gene therapies.” This is an imprecise term and causes much argument, since it is often stated that they do not modify ones’ genes. That is not relevant. What is relevant is that it is a gene that is at the heart of the treatment. A gene is simply a code for the manufacture of a protein. These mRNA-based agents ARE, however, classified by their manufacturers as “gene therapies” for the purpose of describing to investors the nature of the development and commercial risks being run. Rightly so, for none of these products had reached the market by 2020, though there had been a number of unsuccessful attempts.
21. I first encountered the idea of mRNA-based therapeutics in the late-1990s, when I led respiratory research for Pfizer. I could see a potential clinical utility only in life-threatening, inoperable cancers that were unresponsive to chemotherapeutics and radiotherapy. Somewhat of a niche opportunity only.
22. The reason they were perceived to have some use in this narrow but important application is vital to understand, if I am to explain clearly why I am so sure that these are wholly inappropriate to protect against an alleged respiratory virus. The original idea was that a piece of genetic code coupled to something else that would enable the preparation to travel to and be taken up by the
remote tumour. The cells making up that tumour would copy the genetic code and make whatever protein was encoded. Because that protein was foreign, and not normally made by humans, our immune systems would recognise that we had something foreign inside us and this would stimulate a lethal attack upon every cell that had taken up and followed the genetic instructions. This is a branch of what is called “immunooncology” and a number of companies have tried to develop such “gene therapies” as anti-cancer agents, so far without success. The crucial point to remember is that these preparations were expected to work by precipitating lethal immune attack on every cell that had taken it up.
23. Returning to the development pathway for these agents. Because they are new and unprecedented, the medicines regulators around the world have laid down onerous conditions for their development. Obviously, they are potentially very potent medicines and being new, great care was to be taken to avoid predicted as well as unanticipated harms. With new types of medical treatment, while some potential harms can be anticipated and characterised properly, other harms may arise which were not expected. This is why the development pathway for new types of powerful medical interventions are given especially tough review.
24. I now make an important point. In 2020, we are told that at least four biopharmaceutical companies decided to develop gene-based vaccines. As I explained earlier, conventional vaccines are given a somewhat easier time of it in relation to developmental obligations. Despite classifying to the financial markets their own products as “gene therapies” & subject to lengthy and expensive development obligations, they persuaded the medical regulators (and deceived the public) to classify them as “vaccines”. This was improper and was accompanied by bodies such as WHO and even dictionary makers to change the definition of the word vaccine to facilitate this deception.
25. Deception matters not because of mere naming conventions, but because the manufacturers knew that vaccines are much lighter in terms of development obligations. Even given this improper advantage, the makers of the gene-based vaccines failed to meet all, of even the relatively light development obligations. The end result has been billions of people being injected with mis-classified and inadequately tested gene-therapies. The adverse effect profiles and
deaths as a consequence are extraordinary yet are being ignored by multiple bodies tasked with vigilance in patient safety. None of this can be constructed as accidental or inadvertent.
26. Claim 3: The design choices made in constructing the gene-based agents purporting to be vaccines are evidence of intentional harms.
27. Medicinal preparations contain molecules that were chosen by its designers. Nothing is in them that was not thoughtfully included. My career has been wholly within the sphere of endeavour called “rational drug discovery” or “rational drug design”. My main responsibility was to select biological targets for intervention with a chemical or a biological molecule, the latter usually being designed by more than one person. I was part of the design teams for decades. Our objective was to reach and interact with the molecular target, hoping to bring about desirable effects in patients, and to do so without inducing unacceptable unwanted effects, taking into account the seriousness of the illness at issue.
28. My contention is that, by close examination of the products of such design teams, I can, at least in part, deduce the intentions of the designers. It gives me no pleasure to lay out below several features of the design of the mRNA “vaccines” from Pfizer / BioNTech and from Moderna, ALL of which predictably give rise to toxicity. The features of interest are common to both products. There is no reasonable conclusion to this analysis other than that the designers intentionally created products which would be expected to cause harms including death and sterility.
29. Designed-in toxicity 1: axiomatic induction of “autoimmune” responses, regardless of what the genetic sequence codes for. As described earlier about how immunooncology was considered the leading application, when our bodies manufacture a foreign or non-self-protein, our immune system recognises this as a threat and mounts a lethal attack on every cell performing the genetic instruction. In short, wherever in the body these materials travel after injection into the upper arm, the immune system will destroy those cells and tissues. I believe it is very likely that the reported extensive range of adverse effects is due to this common process, autoimmune destruction, occurring in all kinds of tissues around the body. This is expected. Anyone with a basic knowledge of immunology knows this.
30. Designed-in toxicity 2: The next was choice of the gene chosen. I believe selecting the spike protein of the alleged coronavirus is irrational, because it was highly likely to be directly toxic. These surface proteins are known from comparison to related pathogens to be toxic to blood, initiating blood clots and damaging the function of nerve cells. Not only is it very dangerous to force human bodies to manufacture a pro-coagulant protein, it was unnecessary. There are several alternative genes that a safety-orientated designer would choose from.
31. In addition to the toxicity of spike protein, spike is, we are informed, subject to the most rapid mutation (so a vaccine might lose efficacy quickly) and also it is the least different from human proteins (and so might trigger bystander attacks on even somewhat similar self-proteins).
32. Yet all four leading players chose spike protein as their genetic coded antigen. What a coincidence! If I had been in one of the roles leading these efforts, I would ’have called up my peers in the other companies to ensure we did not do that. That is because from a strategic standpoint, it would be highly undesirable to have common risks to all programs.
33. Designed-in toxicity 3: On formulation, the teams developing mRNA-based products both selected lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to encapsulate their genetic message. Yet there was industry knowledge that these not only travel all over the body including into the brain but that they accumulate in the ovaries. Yet, knowing this, the companies and regulators went ahead and then others compounded the toxicity risk by recommending these injections in pregnant women and children.
34. This is not an exhaustive list and I am aware of further toxicity liabilities. I felt three was an adequate number to exemplify my concerns. Remember, please, that these agents are not expected to yield benefits as explained earlier and have been developed at a pace completely inconsistent with normal practise, absolutely required to result in a consistent product.
35. I am very confident of this conclusion. I have said so in more than 100 video interviews which have been viewed millions of times, despite the obvious efforts of censors. If these claims were completely wrong, I expected to have been corrected years ago and at least injuncted not to repeat the claims.
36. I know all the companies are aware of my views, because I sadly know three of the four individuals responsible for R&D on vaccines and I have written to them laying out my concerns. Not one replied, though one resigned a few months later without giving a reason, which is extraordinarily uncommon, because it results in forfeiture of very substantial deferred compensation.
37. Claim 4: The evolution of the target population, from initially only the elderly, eventually to everyone is confirmatory evidence of intentional harm.
38. This is simple to explain, but it is worth laying out. Recall at first, we were told that those most at risk from this alleged virus were the elderly who were already sick. Consistent with this, the first cohorts of the public invited to receive these injections were the over 60s.
39. Over a period of months, the threshold age for receiving the injections fell and continued to fall until healthy youngsters were being pressurised to get injected even though they had essentially no risk of death from the alleged virus.
40. Along the way, and outside of medical practise of 60 years standing, pregnant women were encouraged to get injected, too. There is no evidence that they were at risk. Even if they had been, it has been policy NEVER to expose pregnant women to novel medical treatments, because of the risks to the developing baby. The watershed event was thalidomide and this awful event set a firm, never breached red line not to allow risky interventions in pregnancy. Until 2021, when this red line was driven right over without comment. The manufacturers had not then even completed regulatory reproductive toxicology. They had absolutely no information, yet women were told it was safe, when in fact it was not.
41. Finally, children were called to be injected, even though the authorities had previously told us that children were at no risks from the alleged virus.
42. In conclusion there are several, completely obvious safety issues built into these products. This is intentional.
43. I was still slow to piece together all this evidence of carefully thought-out harms. But eventually I got there are and have been speaking in what many regard as extreme terms ever since.
Source :
Source : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/statement-by-mike-yeadon
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Here you can also find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
Due to censorship, Mike Yeadon's videos are best found in the Yandex browser :
Other important statements from Dr. Mike Yeadon on his Substack :
Treaty of lies. Pandemic of lies. Whistleblowers of truth.
Two important recent speeches and an introduction from myself.
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/treaty-of-lies-pandemic-of-lies-whistleblowers
My letter to PC Ben Bates
Evidence of criminal activity re: the rollout of the Covid ‘vaccine’
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/my-letter-to-pc-ben-bates
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon : Toxic by design :
( The videos are a little older than the statement published above ).
Full title :
Dr. 'Mike Yeadon' Interview - 'Pfizer's 'Covid-19' 'mRNA' Vaccines Are Toxic By Design"
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon comments on a video on his Telegram channel and on Rumble
The comment on Telegram :
I stumbled upon this & it just happened to play in the background while I pretended to read something else (this never works, and I usually end up retaining no useful information!).
I’d not heard anyone explain so clearly, though without any apparent awareness that her statements (that the injections were causing the body to manufacture toxic spike protein) show that the injections were explicitly intended to harm people.
This is #2 of three top design choices that completely prove intentionality. #1 was causing our bodies to make something foreign, axiomatically triggering lethal autoimmune attack. #3 was using LNP formulations, long known to drive accumulation of this warhead of an mRNA sequence into the ovaries. This one, #2, is causing the body to make a toxin, which has both direct & indirect toxic effects.
It’s unfortunate, but presumably planned, that the host failed to say, “Wait, what? Did you just say that spike proteins were known to be toxic!? So please explain to me why ALL the jab manufacturers made this error?”
Pierre Kory features & there’s no need to comment further in his actions.
I wrote in comments a brief descriptive summary of some practicalities of faking a pandemic
Best wishes
Mike.
( Video linked in the post : )
https://rumble.com/v4nzg3i-the-vaccine-covid-clots-a-full-measure-town-hall....html
Source : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1040?single , April 8, 2024.
Mike Yeadon's comment below the video on Rumble :
There isn’t an illness called covid19. A diagnosis of “Covid19” only happens if a diagnostic test, based on the PCR technique, is positive. However, the Nobel prize winner, Dr Kary Mullis, repeatedly said & explained why his reaction was always unsuitable as a clinical diagnostic. Without the planned misuse of PCR, the faked pandemic wouldn’t have been possible. Covid19 is a misattribution of a range of pre-existing conditions, made by misuse of a lab technique. The deaths which most people think were caused by “the pandemic virus” were in fact caused by heavily modified medical procedures, which replaced normal procedures, internationally, at the same time, almost everywhere. It’s a deliberate Iatrogenesis, though I don’t accuse all medical staff of doing it consciously. Some did know, most didn’t, I believe. In hospitals, completely inappropriately, sedation, intubation and ventilation was used hugely. This is almost never appropriate in patients with an unobstructed airway and intact chest wall. Instead they should have been given an oxygen mask. Ventilation + remdesivir = death (& when done knowingly = murder). In care homes, residents in huge numbers were injected with midazolam + morphine. This combination led to respiratory arrest. It’s two of the three parts of capital punishment by lethal injection. Absolutely not appropriate. Again, Midazolam + morphine + nil by mouth = death & when done knowingly = murder. In community, doctors were given an edict to minimise prescriptions for antibiotics, on the facile grounds that “You cannot treat a respiratory viral illness with antibiotics”. This fails to recognize that the typical path to death is incipient bacterial pneumonia. I know a family doctor personally who knew what she was being instructed to do was wrong, but was threatened with loss of licence if she prescribed more antibiotics than others. These deaths in aggregate were “the pandemic”. Prof Denis Rancourt has written 30+ papers on this mess
Source : https://rumble.com/v4nzg3i-the-vaccine-covid-clots-a-full-measure-town-hall....html ( In the comments section , ca. April 10, 2024 ).
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Mike Yeadon recommends Dr. Paul Alexander's articles
I salute Dr Paul Alexander being so direct and unequivocal.
Here’s my main post. None of it will be a surprise to any of you.
But, despite repetition, I urge you to at least scan read it so that the main objections to what went on & may well be largely repeated are fresh and at your fingertips.
It’s no exaggeration to say that how effectively you’re able to use these arguments (& your own, if superior for those you’re trying to reach) is pivotal on all our futures.
As I’ve said before, I can only reach you. Those you love, who are not here, I will never reach, nor will media do other than to lie and frighten them. The only one coming to save us is you, the collective you.
Best wishes
Mike
Linked in the post above : https://open.substack.com/pub/palexander/p/there-was-no-pandemic-no-covid-pandemic
Source : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1220
A comment from Mike Yeadon under the article linked above and below (see source) :
I thank Paul for his directness and I agree, it is ALL a fake construction designed to terrorise people into giving up what’s left of their freedoms and all their medical autonomy.
Let me remind you, as someone who spent my entire professional career in & around biopharmaceutical R&D (with just enough contact with the extraordinary difficulties of mass manufacturing of complex biological products) that it is formally absolutely impossible to design, test, develop, mass produce and gain authorization for ANY product of this industry in less than SEVERAL YEARS.
If someone comes at you with an mRNA based injection that they claim to have taken under a year doing, from start to safety-assured completion & billions of doses, run as fast as you can.
If they tell you they’ve done it in 100 days, laugh openly in their faces and tell the Mike Yeadon & Hedley Reece understand this industry and this is both a deception and dangerous.
Source : https://open.substack.com/pub/palexander/p/there-was-no-pandemic-no-covid-pandemic , Comment section, May 6, 2024.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon: Anything with mRNA written on it is designed to be harmful
By Rhoda Wilson on May 8, 2024
Source : https://expose-news.com/2024/05/08/anything-with-mrna-is-designed-to-be-harmful/
With a video : Geoff Buys Cars: Geoff Buys Cars and Mike Yeadon Interview, 11 April 2024 / 52 mins ( https://rumble.com/v4oz3qe-geoff-buys-cars-and-mike-yeadon-interivew.html ).
A fragment of the article :
The harm covid injections are causing is intentional, Dr. Yeadon said. “It was known beforehand and designed in.”
“Every synthetic drug contains molecules, atoms, structures or formulations because someone chose them to be in the bottle or tablet. Every single thing is there because someone has decided to put it in there,” he explained. “And they put it in there to serve a function … Everything is in there for a purpose.” He continued:
“When I look at the design [of the covid “vaccine”], [and with my experience] I’m virtually looking over the shoulder of the designer thinking ‘What was in your mind, what did you intend from these structures and these characteristics?’
“And I came to the conclusion there are multiple, independent and, for people like me, obvious ways to harm people. At least three separate obvious ways of doing it … and they can’t arise by luck because not only is everything in a synthetic medicine there by choice but … people examine these things every which way because the worst thing you want is for your product to fail for a predictable and obvious toxicity.
“If I gave that [covid injection] structure to 10 of my former colleagues … and I showed them that and said, ‘Can you all go off into your separate corners and peruse this molecule and then in a couple of hours come back and tell me [if there are] any points of concern’ … In order to believe this is accidental you’d have to think all 10 of those people would have said, ‘No it’s alright guv, not seen anything’, whereas I think they’d all get at least two of them.”
Further proof that it was intentional is that as soon as things really started going wrong, the government started censoring it “really, really hard.” Dr. Yeadon added. “And they’re still doing it.”
Anything with mRNA written on it, without exception, is designed to be harmful, he said, so “don’t take any more of these bl**dy jabs.”
Mega factories are being built to mass manufacture these products, Dr. Yeadon warned. Several countries have already announced that they have already had terms of an agreement to acquire the next injection. “I’ve looked it up and it’s enough jabs for 10 [injections per person],” he said.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Slightly older news with statements from Dr. Yeadon, which are still considered valid. You can also find further links and a video here :
Dr Mike Yeadon: Covid Injections Are Toxic by Design, They Were Always Going to Harm People
Rhoda Wilson on January 10, 2022
Source : https://expose-news.com/2022/01/10/mike-yeadon-covid-injections-are-toxic/
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Suavek's afterword :
There was no pandemic or global excess mortality in 2020, and yet this toxic Pfizer soup was never taken off the market later. The advertising agencies hired by the WHO continue to pay agents and automated chatbots to pose as humans on the Internet to maintain the narratives that have long been exposed as lies. Without knowing the contents of the toxin sprayed on billions of people, it would also be difficult to believe that the shortening of human life was not intentional. Anyone who entrusts their children to an industry that makes money off people's illnesses is crazy. In addition, this pharmaceutical industry is now controlled and directed by the military.
P.S.
The compulsion to undergo the pseudo-“vaccination” was never to be seen as normal and a respiratory illness in connection with a ( of course a wrong ) PCR test was, “completely by chance”, not taken into account as a proven natural immunity.
There are also very simple questions that qualify to find out the truth :
What was the censorship used for ? And : Why does this censorship continue to exist when the alleged “pandemic” should already be over ?
All of these facets, which even a layperson could perceive, create a clear picture that 100% supports Dr Yeadon's statement.
Source : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/statement-by-mike-yeadon/comments ( My comment under the article by Dr. Yeadon on his Substack from April 30, 2024.).
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….