Historical videos by Dr. Mike Yeadon - they were a kind of Noah's Ark for many.
Namasté
Foreword
by Suavek
For many people, Dr. Yeadon's historical videos represent nothing less than their own survival story. If you don’t know what’s happening, your chances of survival decrease.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice president of Pfizer and now whistleblower, has been tirelessly warning the world about the "COVID" pseudo-vaccines since 2020. Those who believe him can survive.
Dr Mike Yeadon's narrative is not just an opinion. It is a statement whose correctness is confirmed by reality every day. The "devil" is in the design of mRNA. The mechanism of action of this genetic substance has nothing to do with medical protection. The toxicity was known before its introduction. The claim of the alleged protective effect was based, among other things, on the fact that the victims of these injections were still recorded in the statistics as "unvaccinated" for almost 1 month (usually 28 days) after their second pseudo-"vaccination". It was said that the alleged protective effect could not develop before this time. But most deaths and injuries due to this toxicity occurred within 2 weeks of each injection. The stupid claim that this could be some kind of protection is based not only, but also, on this incorrect counting method. It was a fraud that makes any reasonable person hold their breath.
Since 2020, Dr Yeadon has evaluated many scientific studies, conducted research and, as a forward-thinking researcher, has in some cases arrived at new findings that make medical fraud look even worse. Nevertheless, his warnings remain current and so do most of the findings from 2020-2023. You have information here that is of both historical and enlightenment value and that you can put to good use.
The readers of the articles published in this Substack know exactly what is currently going on in the world. But the concept of the Substack and its main idea lie in the practical possibility of sharing information in a compact form where it is necessary. My personal guiding principle is: God helps those who know how to help themselves." I wish you the best of luck with your enlightenment work.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
The famous garage video
The earliest publication I could find was from November 21, 2020.
Sources :
https://odysee.com/$/download/Mike-Yeadon-Unlocked/0ca6e66a244be97b382aaafff14be94140a422eb
https://www.aier.org/article/an-education-in-viruses-and-public-health-from-michael-yeadon-former-vp-of-pfizer/ ( published November 21, 2020 ).
https://t.me/QueueForBrain/16681
………………….
Below is a transcript of the video above:
My name is Dr Michael Yeadon.
My original training was a first-class honours degree in biochemistry and toxicology. Followed by a research-based PhD into respiratory pharmacology; and after that I’ve worked my entire life, uh, on the research side of the pharmaceutical industry – both big pharma and also biotech. My specific focus has been inflammation, immunology, allergy in the context of respiratory diseases (so the lung, but also the skin). So I would say I’m a kind of a deeply experienced inflammation, immunology, pulmonology kind of research person.
I initially became concerned about, the, our response to the coronavirus pandemic towards the middle or back end of April as early as that. It had become clear that if you look at the number of daily deaths versus the date the pandemic had turned. Really, pleasingly, already the wave was fundamentally over, and we would just watch it fall for a number of months – which is what it did. And so I became very perturbed about increasing restrictions on the behavior and movement of people in my country and I could see no reason for it then and I still don’t.
Government’s response to emergencies is guided by the scientific group who sit together under the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies or SAGE. So they should provide scientific advice to the government about what’s appropriate to do. SAGE has got several things wrong, and that has led to advice that’s inappropriate and – uh, not only has had horrible economic effects, but has had continuing medical effects in that people are no longer being treated properly.
SAGE took the view that since SARS-CoV-2 was a new virus that they believed there wouldn’t be any immunity at all in the population. So, I think that’s the first thing. I remember hearing that and I puzzled, because I already knew – because I read the scientific literature that SARS-CoV-2 was 80% similar to another virus you may have heard of called SARS that moved around the world a bit in 2003, and more than that: it’s quite similar, in pieces of it, to common cold-causing coronaviruses.
So, when I heard that there was this coronavirus moving across the world I wasn’t as worried as perhaps other people were, because I figured that since there are four common cold-causing coronaviruses, I figured that quite a lot of the population we’ve been exposed to one of those viruses, and would probably have a perhaps substantial protective immunity. And just to explain why I was so confident everybody knows the story of Edward Jenner and vaccination, and the story of cowpox and smallpox. And that the old story was that milkmaids had very, uh, clear complexions: they never suffered from things like smallpox, that if it didn’t kill you would leave your skin permanently scarred. And the reason that they had the protection was that they were exposed to a more benign, related virus called cowpox.
Edward Jenner came up with the idea that if it’s cowpox that saves the fair maid – he reasoned that if he could give another person an exposure to the cowpox, he would be able to protect them from smallpox. Now, he did an experiment that you can’t do now – and he never should have done it – but apocryphally, or really, or maybe you’re ill, we’re not sure. Edward Jenner acquired some of the liquid from a person infected with cowpox. Relatively mild pustules that then go away. And he got some of this and he – he scraped it into the skin of a small boy and a few weeks later, he obtained some liquid from some poor person that was dying of smallpox and infected the boy. And, lo and behold, the boy did not get ill and that gave birth to the whole field of what’s called vaccination. And vax, the vaccine’s “vac.” It comes from “vaccus,” the Latin name for cow. So, we are really familiar with the principle of cross immunization.
I’ve thought quite a lot about, you know, the vulnerable people in in care homes and there’s an awareness that, even though people really careful using PPE and so on, but that’s only going to go so far in a kind of, hot house environment where people are pretty close together in a care home. So the question I’ve had all year is: once one or two people, you know, got the virus in a care home, why wouldn’t almost everyone get infected? And of course the truth is, they didn’t. And one interpretation of that distinction is that a large proportion of people in the care homes had prior immunity.
At this time of year, about 1 in 30 people have a cold, caused by one of these coronaviruses. And just like the protection against smallpox provided by previous exposure to cowpox, so people exposed to having had a cold caused by one of these coronaviruses they’re now immune to SARS-CoV-2. So, 30% of the population was protected before the start. SAGE said it was zero – and I don’t understand how they could possibly have justified that. There’s a second, and equally fatal, unaccountable error that they have made in their model. The percentage of the population that SAGE asserts have been infected to date by the virus is about seven percent. I know that that’s what they believe and you can see it in a document they published in September called “Non-pharmaceutical interventions” and it says sadly more than 90% of the population is still vulnerable.
It’s unbelievably wrong. And I’m just going to explain why: they’ve based their number on the percentage of people in the country who have antibodies in their blood. And only the people who became most ill needed to actually develop and release antibodies around their body. So, it is certainly true that the people who have lots of antibodies were infected. But a very large number of people had milder symptoms, and even more people had none at all. And the best estimates that we can arrive at is that those people either made no antibodies, or so low amounts that they will have faded from now.
A recent publication on the percentage of care home residents who have antibodies to the virus very, very interesting. This time they were using high sensitivity tests for antibodies and they carefully picked out residents that never were PCR-positive: these are people who never got infected. And they found that 65% of them had antibodies to the virus; they never got infected. So I believe there was high prevalence of immunity in that population prior to the virus arriving. Big story in the media, recently, was that the percentage of people with antibodies against the virus in their blood was falling. Now, this was cast as a concern that immunity to SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t last very long. Well, you know, anyone with knowledge of immunity would – would just simply reject that. It’s not the way immunity to virus works – that would be T-cells. So, if the antibodies are falling gradually over time – which they have – from spring to present, the only plausible explanation is that the prevalence of the virus in the population is falling, and that’s why the antibody production gradually subsides.
Less than 40% of the population are susceptible. Even theoretical epidemiologists would tell you that that’s too small a number to support a consolidated and growing outbreak, community immunity, herd immunity. So, SAGE says that we’re not even close, and I’m telling you that the best science, by the best scientists in the world, published in the top peer-reviewed journals, says they’re wrong: that more than 60 of the population are now immune, and it’s simply not possible to have a large and growing pandemic.
Really good news, genuine good news, to hear that there’s data emerging from the vaccine clinical trials, and we are seeing vaccines that raise not just antibodies – but they’re also producing T-cell responses. This is great; back to proper science, proper immunology. That’s how immunity to viruses works. So, my surprise though, and it’s just annoying that when we’re talking about, uh, the percentage of the population that’s still susceptible we only talk about antibodies, like seven percent from SAGE. Why are we not talking about the 50% that have got T-cell immunity?
And so you might be thinking if Mike – and Dr Mike Yeadon is telling you these things… – or how come the pandemic isn’t over? Well, this may come as a surprise to you, but I believe fundamentally it is over. The country has experienced almost a complete cycle now of the virus sweeping through the land, and we are at the end of it. London was –was horribly affected in the spring, and somewhere in early April they were experiencing several hundred deaths per day from people dying with similar symptoms in respiratory failure and, uh, inflammation. And at the moment the number of people dying of SARS-CoV-2 in the capital is less than 10. So it’s down by 98, or something like that. And, the reason it’s down, is because there are now too few people in London susceptible to allow the virus to magnify, to amplify, to get an epidemic. And, and they would have been hit by now, because they were the first place hit in the spring. And I think what we’re seeing now in the Northeast and the Northwest would be the dying embers of the spreading out of this virus. And I’m very sorry that it is still true, that a small number of people are catching it, getting ill, and dying.
So why aren’t the media telling us that the pandemic is over? It’s not over because SAGE says it’s not. So SAGE consists of very many scientists, from a range of disciplines – mathematicians and clinicians – and there are multiple committees. But I found to my surprise – and I’m actually going to use the word – horror, that in the spring, all the way through the spring and summer, SAGE did not have on their committee someone who I would call a card-carrying immunologist; a clinical immunologist. I have to say I think that in the spring and summer SAGE was deficient in the expertise it had. They should have armed themselves, you know, with – around the table all the people required to to understand what was happening, and they didn’t do that. People asked me then, “Well Mike, if it’s, you know, if it’s fundamentally over, why are we still getting hundreds of deaths a day from SARS-CoV-2?” And I’ve thought a lot about this. There is a test that’s performed where people have their noses and tonsils swabbed, and then a test (called a PCR test) is performed on that. And what they’re looking for isn’t the virus – you might think it’s looking for the virus, but it’s not. What they’re looking for is a small piece of genetic sequence; it’s called RNA. Unfortunately, that bit of RNA will be found in people’s tonsils and nose not if they’ve just caught the virus, and they’re about to get ill, or they’re already ill. It’s also going to be found if they were infected previously weeks – or even, sometimes, a small number of months ago. Let me just explain why that is.
If you’ve been infected, and you’ve fought off the virus (which most people do), you’ll have broken, dead bits of virus. These are tiny things smaller than your cells, perhaps spread all the way through your airway, embedded in bits of mucus, maybe inside an airway lining cell. And so over a period of weeks or months you bring up cells that contain broken, dead pieces of the virus that you have conquered and killed. However, the PCR test is not able to detect whether the viral RNA has come from a living virus or a dead one (as I’ve just described). So I think a large proportion of the so-called positives are, in fact, what I call “cold” positives: they’re correctly identifying that there is some viral RNA in the sample – but it’s from a dead virus. It can’t hurt them, they’re not going to get ill, they can’t transmit it to anybody else. So they’re not infectious. So that accounts for a large number of the so-called positive cases. These are people who’ve beaten the virus. Why are we using this test that cannot distinguish between active infection and people who’ve conquered the virus?
This test has never been used in this way – and I’ve worked in this field. It’s not a suitable technique it’s a – it’s the kind of technique you would use for forensic purposes, if you were trying to do a DNA test to establish whether or not a person was at the scene of a crime. You would not be doing these tests by a windy, supermarket car parking; what looks like plastic marquee tents; on picnic tables. It’s not suitable at all – and it definitely shouldn’t be done in the way it’s been done. It’s subject to many mechanical errors, should we say, handling errors. If this was a test being used for legal purposes, for forensic purposes like a DNA identity test, the judge would throw out this evidence; would say it’s not admissible. It produces positives even when there’s no virus there at all. We call that a false positive.
As we’ve increased the number of tests done per day, so we’ve had to recruit less and less experienced laboratory staff – and now we’re using people who’ve never worked professionally in this area. What that does is it increases the frequency of mistakes, and the effect of this is that the false positive rate rises and rises. So, if you had a false positive rate of one percent – which Mr. Matt Hancock [British Secretary of State for Health and Social Care] told us was roughly the number they had in the summer – then if you tested a thousand people that had no virus ten of them would be positive, astonishingly. If the prevalence of the virus was only one in a thousand, that’s 0.1% – as the Office for National Statistics told us it was through the summer – then if you use the PCR test only one of them will be positive and genuinely so. But if the false positive rate is as low as one percent, you’ll also get 10 positives that are false.
Some people did say to me, “Well, there’ll be a higher percentage of people coming forward for testing in the community,” so-called “Pillar 2” testing, because they’ve been instructed only to come if they’ve got symptoms. But I call B.S. on that one. I don’t think that’s true. I know lots of friends and relatives who’ve been told by an employer, “Well, you’ve sat near someone who’s tested positive, and I don’t want you to come back to work until you’ve got a negative test.” I’ve seen information from many towns in the North – certainly Birmingham was one; Manchester was another; Bolton – where councils (and I really think they were trying to be helpful) were out leafleting the people of their cities saying, “We’re going to come round and swab you all because we want to track down this virus.” Now once you start testing people, more or less randomly, instead of [those] having symptoms you get the same amount of virus in the population as the Office of National Statistics found which is, at the time was, one in a thousand. And I’ve just told you Matt Hancock confirmed during the summer they had a false positive rate of about one percent. So that means out of a thousand people 10 would test positive, and it would be a false result, and only one would test positive and it was correct.
This test is monstrously unsuitable for detecting who has live virus in their airway. It’s subject to multiple distortions that are worsening as we get into the winter. As the number of tests done per day increase[s], the number of errors made by these overworked, not very experienced lab staff increase[s]. I think it’s not unreasonable to say a best guess of the false positive rate at the moment – what’s called the operational false positive rate is about five percent. Five percent of 300,000 is 15,000 positives. I think some of those positives are real; I don’t think it’s very many. Now, the problem with this false positive issue [is] it doesn’t just stop it at “cases”: it extends to people who are unwell and go to hospital. So people who go to hospital having tested positive – and it could be a false positive, and I think most of them are at the moment – if you go to hospital and you’ve tested positive previously, or you test positive in hospital, you’ll be counted now as a Covid admission.
Although there are more people in hospital now than a month ago, this is normal for autumn. Regrettably, people catch respiratory viruses and become ill, and some will die. I just don’t believe it’s got anything to do with Covid-19 anymore. There are more people in intensive care beds now than there were a month or so ago. That’s entirely normal as we move through late autumn into the early winter: those beds become used. But there aren’t more people than is normal for the time of year, and we’re not about to run out of capacity, certainly at a national level. But I think you know it is going now: if you should now die, you’ll be counted as a Covid death. But that’s not correct; these are people who might have – have gone to hospital having had a broken leg, for example, but they’ll – three percent of them will still test positive, and they’re not, they haven’t got the virus. It’s a – it’s a false positive, and if they die they’ll be called a Covid death – and they are not. They’ve died of something else.
One of the most troubling things I’ve heard this year was Mr. Johnson telling us about the “Moonshot” testing everybody often, maybe every day, is the way out of this problem. I’m telling you it’s the way to keep us in this problem: that number of tests is orders of magnitude higher than we’re already testing now, and the false positive rate (however low it is) will be far too large to accept. It will produce an enormous number of false positives.
What we should do is stop mass testing. Not only is it an affront to your liberty, it will not help at all: it will be immensely expensive and it will be a pathology all of its own. We’ll be fighting off stupid people – mostly government ministers – I’m sorry to say, who are not numerate, and do not understand statistics. If you test a million people a day with a test that produces one percent false positives, 10 000 people a day will wrongly be told they’ve got the virus. If the prevalence of the virus was say 0.1%, like the Office of National Statistics said it was in summer, then only a tenth of that number, uh, 1,000 would correctly be identified. But you can’t distinguish amongst the 11,000 who have genuinely got the virus and who are false positives. Moonshot, I think, will have a worse false positive rate. It’s not fixable, and it’s not necessary either. The pandemic – having passed through the population not only of, of the UK, but of all of Europe – and probably all of the world quite soon – it won’t return. Why won’t it return? Well, they’ve got T-cell immunity. We know this. It’s been studied by the best cellular immunologists in the world.
Sometimes people will say, “Well, it looks like the immunity is starting to fade.” You’ll sometimes see [statements] like that, and when I saw the first headline like this I remember being really quite confused, because that’s not the way immunology works. Just think about it for a moment. If that was how it worked it could kill you. When you had to fight it off, and if you had successfully done that, it somehow didn’t leave a mark in your body. Well, it does leave a mark on your body. The way you fought it off involved certain pattern recognition receptors, and has left you with – as it were – memory cells that remember what it was they fought off. And if they see that thing again it’s very easy for them to get those cells to work again in minutes or hours, and they will protect you. So the most likely explanation is it’ll last a long time.
So I read a bit more about this so-called tailing off of immunity – and I realized they were talking about antibodies. Just incorrect to – to think that antibodies, and how long they stay up, is a measure of immune protection against viruses. I mean you can tell I’m – I don’t agree with this. It says there have been some classic experiments done on people who have inborn errors in parts of their immune system, and some of them have inborn arrows that means they can’t make antibodies, and guess what: they – they are able to handle respiratory viruses the same as you and me. So, I don’t think it’s harmful to have antibodies, although some people are worried about the potential for amplifying inflammation from antibodies, but – but my view is that they’re – they’re probably neutral, and you definitely should not believe the story that because the antibody falls away you’ve lost immunity. Again, that’s just not the way the human immune system works.
The most likely duration of immunity to a respiratory virus like SARS-CoV-2 is multiple years. Why do I say that? We actually have the data for a virus that swept through parts of the world 17 years ago called SARS, and remember SARS-CoV-2 is 80% similar to SARS, so I think that’s the best comparison that anyone can provide. The evidence is clear. These very clever cellular immunologists studied all the people they could get hold of who had survived SARS 17 years ago. They took a blood sample, and they tested whether they responded or not to the original SARS, and they all did. They all have perfectly normal, robust T-cell memory. They are actually also protected against SARS-CoV-2 because it’s so similar, it’s cross-immunity. So, I would say the best data that exists is that immunity should be robust for at least 17 years. I think it’s entirely possible that it is lifelong. The style of the responses of these people’s T-cells were the same as if you’ve been vaccinated and then you come back years later to see, has that immunity been retained? And so I think the evidence is really strong that the duration of immunity will be multiple years, and possibly lifelong.
There have been but a tiny handful of people who appear to have been infected twice – now they’re very interesting, we need to know who they are and understand them very well, they’ve probably got certain rare immune deficiency syndromes. So I’m not pretending no one ever gets reinfected, but I am pointing out that it’s literally five people (or maybe 50 people), but the World Health Organization estimated some weeks ago that 750 million people have been infected so far by SARS-CoV-2. That means most people are not being reinfected, and I can tell you why that is: it’s normal. It’s what happens with viruses, respiratory viruses. Some people have – have called for “zero Covid” as if it’s some political slogan. And there are some people I’ve heard calling for it almost every day; they’re completely unqualified to tell you anything.
Something that’s really important to know is that SARS-CoV-2 – it’s an unpleasant virus. There’s no question about it, but it’s not what you were told in spring. We were originally told that it would kill perhaps three percent of people it infected – which is horrifying. That’s 30 times worse than flu. We always overestimate the lethality of new infectious diseases when we’re in the eye of the storm. I believe the true infection fatality ratio of Covid-19, the true threat to life is, the same as seasonal flu.
So there’s no reason why you would want to try and drive Covid to zero. It’s a nonsense – that’s just not how biology is. And all the means I have heard, uh, proposed, as ways to get us there are much more damaging and pathological, I would say, than than the virus itself. It’s simply not possible to get rid of every single copy of the Covid-19 virus, and the means to get you there would destroy society. Forget the cost – although it would be huge – it would destroy your liberty, you would need to not go out until you’ve been tested and have your result back. And I have described how the false positive rate would just destroy it from a statistical perspective. I don’t believe it can be done: it’s not scientifically realistic, it’s not medically realistic, and it’s not what we have ever done.
As the virus swept towards the UK in the – in the late winter and early spring I too was concerned, because at the time we were told perhaps three percent might die. So when the Prime Minister called for a lockdown I wasn’t pleased about it, but I understood that we should try this. But it’s important that you understand, that when we look at the profile of the pandemic as it passed through the population, that it was clear that the number of infections every day was falling. We’d passed the peak quite a long time before lockdown started. So we took all that pain, that locked down pain which was multiple weeks – I don’t remember exactly how many multiple weeks – we took it for nothing. If there was a really important effect of lockdown on the number of people who died, or the rate of it, you should at least be able to order them. Like, these people had locked down, and these didn’t – and you cannot. All heavily infected countries’ shapes are the same, whether they had locked down or not. They don’t work. I don’t know why anyone is allowing you, know you, to be pushed into this corner.
I don’t think we entirely know why it is that some countries were hit harder than others, but I have to say I think scientifically the smart money is on a mixture of forces. One would be this cross immunity. Although China had an awful time in Wuhan, in Hubei province, it didn’t spread elsewhere in the country, and I suspect that meant because a lot of them had this cross immunity. And I think nearby countries, in the main, had lots of cross immunity. So that’s one possibility. The other one, though, is in terms of the severity of what did the virus do to a particular population. We’ve seen devastating effects in countries like UK and in Belgium, uh, France, and maybe even in Sweden, and much smaller numbers of deaths in other countries like – like Greece and in Germany. And you might think, “Well, was that was it something that they did?” And I wish it was true, because if it was something we did we could learn from it and do it and it would work in the future. But there’s no evidence whatsoever that it was anything humans did. The passage of this virus through the human population is an entirely natural process that completely ignored our puny efforts to control it.
So there is this theory – I don’t like the name very much – but it’s called “dry tinder.” If people in a country who are vulnerable for to dying in the winter (usually of respiratory viruses), if you have a very mild winter season, like UK did – we had a very mild seasonal flu last year and the year before and so did Sweden – then what happens is there are larger number of very vulnerable people who are even older than usual, and – and I think that’s why we suffered a rather large number of deaths. It was still only 0.06% of the population, equivalent to about four weeks of normal mortality. But countries that had very severe winters recently, and Greece and Germany certainly had very lethal winter flus in the last two years. I think then, they had a smaller population of very vulnerable people, and that is the main reason why they lost fewer people. It’s not to do with locking down, it’s not to do with testing, or tracking, or tracing. I personally don’t think any of those measures have made any difference at all. So Belgium and UK and Sweden were particularly vulnerable, whereas adjacent Nordic countries – I – I get fed up with hearing about this, uh, idea that they locked down and that’s why it saved them and afraid the other Nordic countries had normal flu epidemics the last two or three years. Sweden, like UK, had very mild epidemics: you can just go and look at the number of deaths, it’s sub-normal for UK and Sweden. And now we’ve got a supra-normal, a larger-than-normal, number of deaths from Covid.
Now there may be other reasons, I’m not saying there are not but I think those two main forces – the amount of prior immunity and the so-called “dry tinder,” what vulnerable fraction of the population did you have as a result of seasonal flu being intense or not – I think that accounts for most of it. And it’s – it’s just hubristic and kind of silly that our government and advisors tell you that doing things that have never worked in the past, like lockdown are going to make any difference to the transfer of respiratory viruses. I don’t believe it for a moment. There’s no scientific evidence behind it and there are much stronger scientific hypotheses that do explain it. You might think that in terms of numbers of deaths – excess deaths – that Covid has produced such a large number that this will be an awful year for excess deaths, but surprisingly not. 2020 is lining up to be about eighth in a list since 1993.
Roughly 620,000 people die every year in this country (UK). They say in life we are also in death – and it’s true, it’s been awful for those who have been personally affected by illness and death, but it’s not particularly unusual in terms of the number of people who’ve died. So one of the things I’ve noticed has happened in – in recent years is that we almost seem to be moving, uh, you know post-science, post-fact as if – as if facts don’t matter. For someone who’s qualified and practiced as a professional scientist for 35 years I think it’s deeply distressing that, I don’t think you should listen to me if I talked about – I don’t know, the design of motorways or something – like, I don’t know anything about motorways or – or how to grow trees better, I don’t know anything about that. But I do know quite a lot about immunology, infection, inflammation, and the way infectious organisms move through a population.
I’ve no other reason for giving this interview other than I really care what happens to my country – and we have to pull ourselves out of this. And I personally believe the way forward is twofold, it’s not difficult. One, we should cease mass testing of the mostly-well in the community immediately – it only provides misleading and grey information, and yet we’re driving policy almost completely based on it. It’s definitely wrong, we should not do it. Use the tests in hospital – I’m not saying don’t test – don’t continue mass testing, and for God’s sake, don’t increase the number of tests. It is a pathology all of its own which must be stamped out by right thinking people. And I’m afraid the people on SAGE, who have provided the modeling, the predictions, the – the measures that should be taken, that their work is so badly, and obviously flawed – lethally incompetent, that you should have no more to do with these people. They should be fired immediately. And the effect of that advice has been to – have cost lots of innocent people their lives from non-Covid causes, they should be dismissed and reconstituted using an appropriate group of skilled individuals – especially avoiding any who might even have the suggestion of a conflict of interest. I think we’re right at the edge of the precipice. I really hope that we can pull back.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon - Covid death shots is medical murder
VIDEO : https://alethonews.com/2022/11/13/dr-mike-yeadon-covid-death-shots-is-medical-murder/
An anonymous comment under the video :
Just the sheer volume of “news”(Propaganda) that we were bombarded with was an indicator that something wasn’t right with this “Pandemic”.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon : Toxic by design :
Full title :
Dr. Mike Yeadon Interview - Pfizer's “Covid-19” mRNA “vaccines” are toxic by design.
VIDEO :
Linked to this video are the following two articles that Dr. Yeadon published on his Substack :
My letter to PC Ben Bates
Evidence of criminal activity re: the rollout of the Covid ‘vaccine’
Dr Mike Yeadon
Mar 17, 2024
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/my-letter-to-pc-ben-bates
Statement by Mike Yeadon
Apr 19, 2024
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/statement-by-mike-yeadon
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon - The Horrible Truth and The Answer
VIDEO : https://rumble.com/v2nndpe-dr.-mike-yeadon-the-horrible-truth-and-the-answer.html?e9s=rel_v1_b
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr Mike Yeadon - Medical Fraud, Fear and, Herd Mentality
Recorded July 21, 2022.
VIDEO :
Source 2 : https://rumble.com/v24dlfw-dr-mike-yeadon-medical-fraud-fear-and-herd-mentality.html?e9s=rel_v1_b
Source 3 : https://odysee.com/@MaajidNawaz:d/EP8-Radical:9
We are always told to trust the science and listen to the experts.
If only our governments had listened to our guest this episode, Dr Mike Yeadon, whose credentials are impressive.
His time as Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer at Pfizer along with his PhD in respiratory research should make everyone sit up and take notice of what he says.
In this discussion Dr Yeadon gives an overview of where we are with this so-called ‘pandemic’ and shares his view on how we have been lied to, how fear has been used to control us and how herd mentality has shut down debate and conversation.
It is an honour to have Mike join Hearts of Oak to share his wisdom and insight.
Please share this interview widely.
Dr. Michael Yeadon is an Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert with over 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry. He trained as a biochemist and pharmacologist, obtaining his PhD from the University of Surrey (UK) in 1988.
Dr. Yeadon then worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO, COX, PAF, NO and lung inflammation. With colleagues, he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers.
Joining Pfizer in 1995, he was responsible for the growth and portfolio delivery of the Allergy & Respiratory pipeline within the company. He was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008.
Under his leadership the research unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered multiple positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD. He led productive collaborations such as with Rigel Pharmaceuticals (SYK inhibitors) and was involved in the licensing of Spiriva and the acquisition of the Meridica (inhaler device) company.
Dr. Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and now consults and partners with a number of biotechnology companies. Before working with Apellis, Dr. Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer (Allergy & Respiratory Research) with Pfizer.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
DR. MIKE YEADON’S ADDRESS TO THE MEMBERS OF UK PARLIAMENT ( 4 DECEMBER 2023 )
Mike Yeadon: Address to parliamentary special meeting 4/12/2023 :
https://rumble.com/v3zq2jj-mike-yeadon-address-to-parliamentary-special-meeting-4122023.html
With German Subtitle :
Mike Yeadon: Ansprache an britische Abgeordnete :
https://rumble.com/v3zvs2a-mike-yeadon-ansprache-an-britische-abgeordnete.html
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon`s warning to the Croatian Parliament
December 1, 2023 ( published : December 4, 2024 ).
VIDEO :
https://rumble.com/v3zywlj-the-saborski-address-english.html
Subtitles in Croatian :
The Saborski Address Obraćanje Saboru
https://rumble.com/v402h2p-the-saborski-address-obraanje-saboru.html
Subtitles in Croatian :
Mike Yeadon: Obraćanje britanskim zastupnicima
https://rumble.com/v3zwbtp-mike-yeadon-obraanje-britanskim-zastupnicima.html
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon - “There is an Ultimate Goal To Kill Large Number of People”
First published on July 28th, 2023.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon & James Delingpole
July 7, 2023
VIDEO : https://rumble.com/v2v487s-dr.-michael-yeadon.html?e9s=rel_v1_b
other Links : https://rumble.com/v2yogyq-dr.-mike-yeadon-former-pfizer-vice-president.html?e9s=rel_v1_b
https://www.bitchute.com/video/X6g6JyLyGb6S/
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon in different languages ( & 1 transcript ):
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-urgent-warning-in
Dr. Mike Yeadon: Urgent warning in several languages about converting all vaccinations to mRNA technology. This should be taken very seriously !
English World leading scientists speak to UK Members of Parliament - 4th December 2023 - Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://rumble.com/v40wqyt-world-leading-scientists-speak-to-uk-members-of-parliament-4th-december-202.html DR YEADON: “VACCINE DESIGN HAS NO OTHER PURPOSE THAN INJURE AND KILL! (FULL PRESENTATION) :
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Mike Yeadon AKA Mr Sparkle at MD4CEI - Study Hall - 3/21/2024, 5:28:24 PM
Source : https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/s6WJZC5KE1aZJ2o22RhXc6
March 21, 2024.
NOTE : When I click on the link, the censorship warnings appear. To get to the video, I just click through and ignore the warnings.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Michael Yeadon warning about vaccination
In English : https://biggeesblog.cymru/
English, subtitles in Spanish :
https://rumble.com/v1y50bo-michael-yeadon-warning-about-vaccination.html?e9s=rel_v1_b
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. 'Michael Yeadon' "The 'UN' & Their Evil 'Agenda 2030'. Scientist 'Michael Yeadon' Interview
March 10, 2023
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon: Why The Depopulation Agenda Is Real & What We Can Do About It
November 21, 2022.
On November 21st 2022, Dr Mike Yeadon took part in a ‘World Council For Health’ General Assembly Meeting in which he revealed why the depopulation agenda is real and what we can do to stop it.
VIDEO :
Source 2 : https://www.bitchute.com/video/o0nK2uXX1FbN/
Watch the rest of the meeting :
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/general-assembly-meeting-66-2/
An article on this topic :
https://expose-news.com/2022/12/13/mike-yeadon-depopulation-agenda-is-real/
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Mike Yeadon: The Case Against Big Pharma Engaging In Systematic, Premeditated, Criminal Fraud
VIDEO :
https://onevsp.com/watch/65zhlZIlhEfngWY
Links below the Rumble video :
Mike Yeadon Videos:
Mike Yeadon: The Case Against Big Pharma Engaging In Systematic, Premeditated, Criminal Fraud
https://rumble.com/v24hh6g-mike-yeadon-the-case-against-big-pharma-engaging-in-systematic-premeditated.html
Dr. Mike Yeadon: Why The Depopulation Agenda Is Real & What We Can Do About It
https://rumble.com/v1wpqfi-dr.-mike-yeadon-why-the-depopulation-agenda-is-real-and-what-we-can-do-abou.html
Dr. Mike Yeadon: "I'm Ashamed That I Was Pro-Vaccine. I Didn't Do My Homework."
https://rumble.com/v1wqfgc-dr.-mike-yeadon-im-ashamed-that-i-was-pro-vaccine.-i-didnt-do-my-homework..html
Maajid Nawaz Interviews Pfizer's Former Global Head Of Respiratory Diseases, Dr. Mike Yeadon
https://rumble.com/v1dl4lb-maajid-nawaz-interviews-pfizers-former-global-head-of-respiratory-diseases-.html
How Some COVID Vaccines Were Intentionally Manufactured To Be More Dangerous Than Others
https://rumble.com/vsa650-how-some-covid-vaccines-were-intentionally-manufactured-to-be-more-dangerou.html
Dr. Yeadon, former CEO of Pfizer talks with Dr Jane Ruby
https://rumble.com/v13o7s7-dr.-yeadon-former-ceo-of-pfizer-talks-with-dr-jane-ruby.html
( On Rumble you will also find links to videos from other freedom fighters ).
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
How Some COVID Vaccines Were Intentionally Manufactured To Be More Dangerous Than Others
April 29, 2024.
Dr. Mike Yeadon: Corona vaccines batch scandal
The U.S. vaccine error reporting system VAERS recently published a set of tables showing which Covid 19 vaccine batch caused damage reports and at what frequency. According to ex-Pfizer vice chairman Dr. Michael Yeadon, there can only be strategic intent here, not mishap or even coincidence. Conclusion: vaccination must be stopped immediately with united forces.
The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) recently published a set of tables showing which Covid 19 vaccine batch has caused adverse event reports and how often. According to ex-Pfizer vice chairman Dr. Michael Yeadon, there can only be calculated intent here, not mishap or even coincidence. Take the time to listen to Yeadon's highly significant assessments, here a 30-minute excerpt. Dr. Michael Yeadon is not alone in his assessment. Now politics, media and public prosecutors are called on to enforce an immediate Covid 19 vaccination stop until the facts and suspicions mentioned are transparent and completely clarified for everyone. But since experience shows that the previously mentioned groups will not get off the ground without massive pressure from the public, it is up to you, dear viewer, to build that pressure. Call your constituency representative(s). Or call on the public prosecutor's office to take action. In the links shown here you will find more information about this. You will also find the links below. Above all: Forward this broadcast to your media-deceived fellow citizens. Take action and build the pressure that will get long overdue changes rolling.
Other links to the same video :
https://rumble.com/v13iryz-michael-yeadon-corona-vaccines-batch-scandal-www.kla.tv22390.html
An article about this interview with further links on this topic :
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/premeditated-mass-murder-alarming
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Yeadon, former CEO of Pfizer talks with Dr Jane Ruby.
"Who And What Are Powering The Global Covid Lies?"
VIDEO : https://rumble.com/v13o7s7-dr.-yeadon-former-ceo-of-pfizer-talks-with-dr-jane-ruby.html
The date must be added later. I'm sorry.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
“ They are lying to you about the reason for needing it.”
“ They are lying to you about the reason for needing it. ”
Dr Mike Yeadon, ex VP of Pfizer speaking to the crowd at Truth Be Told in London on 25th March 2023.
Do not take anything with the word 'vaccine' on it. Especially if it comes with 'emergency' or 'mRNA'. DON'T TAKE IT! They are lying to you about the reason for needing it.'
Source :
https://x.com/CoviLeaks/status/1639975146470400004
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon's interview with Mark Devlin
GOOD VIBRATIONS PODCAST, VOL. 253: MIKE YEADON - THE DRUGS DON’T WORK
Podcast published on June 9, 2024.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, June 10, 2024 :
Source : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1443
I respect Mark Devlin enormously. He took exceptional risks when he realised the business he was working in was corrupted beyond belief.
I’m very pleased to be in touch and to have recorded this exchange.
Best wishes
Mike
Ps: please consider subscribing to Mark’s YouTube channel. It’s free and helps amplify his wider message about the world of “culture”.
Linked in above post :
VIDEO / Source : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wS-TgdVNeCY
If YouTube deletes the podcast, please look here :
https://player.fm/series/good-vibrations-podcast/gvp-253-mike-yeadon-the-drugs-dont-work
NOTE : In the first 2 minutes you will only hear music.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon :
Klaus Schwab Has Infiltrated The Governments Of The World.
Published on 08 May, 2023
Source :
https://t.me/QueueForBrain/15355
https://onevsp.com/watch/cI3dKoN9TvJifQ1
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr Mike Yeadon DROPPING TRUTH BOMBS
Published on 09 May, 2023
Source : https://t.me/QueueForBrain/15354
https://onevsp.com/watch/asbykBJsd5GcZ4W
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon Issues Dire Warning
Published on 19 May, 2023
Source :
https://t.me/QueueForBrain/15353
https://onevsp.com/watch/7NSCq2PJ96A8rLN
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Former Pfizer VP Dr. Mike Yeadon: ‘COVID Jabs Were Designed—Intentionally—to Harm, Maim & Kill, And Reduce Human Fertility’
Video recording date : October 20,2023.
The speech was delivered last year in London on Oct. 20, 2023, where 15 MPs including Andrew Bridgen also called out the excess deaths in the UK, attributing them to the jabs.
Source :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-toxic-by-design-part-4a5
https://x.com/PBDsPodcast/status/1800902625145340217
The Covid jabs are intended to “harm, maim and kill people,” warned ex-Pfizer Vice President Dr. Michael Yeadon.
“If you’ve followed me, you’ll know I’ve over 30 years in research in the pharmaceutical industry and biotech,” Dr. Yeadon said speaking at a vaccine awareness event.
“That gives me the credentials to stand as it were in the shoes of the designers of these vaccines and answer the question: ‘What were you thinking when you made these design decisions?'”
Dr. Yeadon went on to sound the alarm over the vaccine scheme, saying he’s “sure” of it, “not slightly, but sure.”
“These materials were designed. intentionally to harm, maim and kill, and to reduce human fertility. That is my verdict.”
Dr. Yeadon added, “If you add together the lies, the economic destruction, the murder and the intentional harm from the injectables, I’m afraid the only conclusion I come to is [that] somebody up there wants to reduce the population.”
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Published on December 15, 2023
By Vigilant Fox
NOTE:
Dr. Yeadon now has a different opinion regarding Ivermectin. The drug has a negative effect on the reproductive system. Therefore, he recommends keeping a closer eye on the drug and upcoming scientific studies.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, June 16, 2024 :
Source : https://conspiracysarah.substack.com/p/perhaps-the-most-important-work-of/comment/59194322
Isn’t that odd?
Almost as if someone wanted people to take a specific drug.
A drug that, by sheer coincidence that heavily & adversely affects fertility.
Watch this space.
I cannot adequately explain how angry I am at this realisation.
Especially at the pushers of ivermectin.
Text under the video by Vigilant Fox :
The world was subjected to thought control by big tech, big media, big pharma, academia, and big government.
“If you want a study to fail, that’s dead easy.”
And that’s how the message got out that ivermectin was an ineffective “horse dewormer.”
“If you look at these innumerable failed policies, there’s only one way to understand them. They are literally written by pharmaceutical companies. They can design trials to fail to disprove the use of cheap medicines, and they can make things appear that they don’t work,” testified Dr. Pierre Kory.
Source : https://t.me/VigilantFox/10331
Watch the Full Documentary, The War on Ivermectin, below:
https://vigilantnews.com/post/why-ivermectin-had-to-be-destroyed/
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Placeholder for future updates
The article will soon be supplemented with more videos.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
A biography that testifies to astonishing expert knowledge
Dr. Mike Yeadon is an Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert in the pharmaceutical industry. He trained as a biochemist and pharmacologist, obtaining his PhD from the University of Surrey (UK) in 1988.
Dr. Yeadon then worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO, COX, PAF, NO and lung inflammation. With colleagues, he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers.
As Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory, he spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired ( Author's note : the link leads to assumptions by Dr. Yeadon, most of which are no longer current. It has now become clear that there was neither a "novel SARS-CoV-2 virus" nor the alleged "Covid" disease. There were merely misleading PCR test results ). from the pharmaceutical giant with “the most senior research position” in his field.
Joining Pfizer in 1995, he was responsible for the growth and portfolio delivery of the Allergy & Respiratory pipeline within the company. He was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008.
Under his leadership the research unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered multiple positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD. He led productive collaborations such as with Rigel Pharmaceuticals ( SYK inhibitors ) and was involved in the licensing of Spiriva and acquisition of the Meridica (inhaler device) company.
Dr. Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and now consults and partners with a number of biotechnology companies. Before working with Apellis, Dr. Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer (Allergy & Respiratory Research) with Pfizer.
Source : https://alethonews.com/2020/11/22/dr-michael-yeadon-unlocked/
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
A thank you from CatsRule2023, February 15, 2024 :
Source : https://truthforhealthfoundation.substack.com/p/bombshell-report-on-random-garbage/comment/49606788
Dear Dr. Yeadon,
This is a bit off topic, but I wanted to thank you for your early warnings about the jibby jabs.
The information you provided enabled me to politely push back when my doctor heavily pressured me to take the shot in early 2021. My family history includes heart disease and a clotting disorder, and my refusal of the jab likely saved my life - thanks to you.
Also, I see from your recent interviews that you believe your message is not reaching a wide audience, and sometimes you seem sad about that possibility. But I believe you've reached many more people than you know. My circle of friends/family (a large circle) follows you closely, shares links to your interviews, and works daily to inform others of potential harms.
You have educated many, and saved many lives. Thank you!
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Afterword
by Suavek
Thoughts on the difficult art of persuasion
Dr. Yeadon expresses himself with astonishing precision. Nevertheless, he is often misquoted, in many cases even intentionally. Communicating vital information is made much more difficult by thousands upon thousands of young, well-paid journalists. Compared to the experts they try to defame using scripts, they are best compared to illiterates. It is not uncommon to find real school dropouts among them who cannot know anything about medicine. They therefore get their "opinion" from real, corrupt doctors, of which there are plenty. The truth about the toxicity of mRNA and the fate of other people do not seem to play a role in collecting the money. People who are supposed to be enlightened have never before had to deal with such powerful and well-paid propaganda. The constantly repeated slogans of the pharmaceutical lobbyists often lead to a person believing the voices of strangers more than the loved one they have always been able to rely on. The difficulties also come partly from the naive person who cannot believe in anything that he has never experienced. However, "not wanting to research" can cost one's own life and the lives of one's children.
In order to maintain the old, false and naive understanding of the world, people operate with all kinds of arguments, which are often based on incomplete information or on the slogans of propaganda. What we observe, not without surprise, is that the personal understanding of the world and everything that a person believes in is an important part of his personality. I had no idea about this before 2020. Only afterwards did it become clear to me why the struggle to maintain one's own beliefs can be so important. For some people, being right and keeping it means nothing less than letting their own personality survive and protect it. This is a very poor basis for being able to absorb new information. In such cases, there is a risk that your enlightenment work, which is too intensive, can lead to psychological self-destruction. It took me a very long time to learn to dose my strength a little better and to accept the limits of my effectiveness. If your willpower cannot always have the desired effect, then this is not necessarily due to a lack of strength or stupidity. I think that stupidity is more related to not being able to perceive and accept my own limits and the limits of another person. In my opinion, linking one's own performance too closely with self-esteem is often a basis on which an illness can develop. Difficult work does not necessarily have to be self-destructive.
I hope that the precise information that Dr. Mike Yeadon offers can help you to be just as precise with your argumentative skills. If things get particularly difficult, you can simply send a link to this article and hope for the best. I wish you the best of luck.
Suavek
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Saving Substack videos
Someone told me that:
Saving Substack videos is very easy, if you do the following :
1) Use Firefox;
2) Install the "Allow Right-Click" extension;
3) Enable that extension and Right-click on the video screenshot;
4) Choose the "Save Video As..." option;
5) Name the video and Choose where to Save it.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
The most reliable information on the “Covid” hoax and the deceptions of the system can be found in the statements of Dr. Mike Yeadon, at the links below :
Dr. Mike Yeadon's Substack #1 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
( Notes : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/notes )
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
A collaborative Substack by Dr. Yeadon and Suavek ( Dr. Mike Yeadon's Substack #2 ) :
Fraud Prevention Hotline / suavek1.substack.com
DEAR FRIENDS,
The two Substacks, Dr. Yeadon's and Suavek's, have merged into a single, highly informative entity. The Fraud Prevention Hotline is now officially Dr. Yeadon's Substack No. 2. You can find his statement on this at the following link :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/my-other-substack
We urge you, if possible, to add both Substacks to your recommended list in your Substack. Thank you very much in advance,
Mike & Suavek
………………………………
The possible support goes to Suavek.
You can either do something against or for something :
Beautiful. Poignant.
Can't remember which video it was, but Doctor Yeadon got visibly emotional and I likewise.
A very modest man with the integrity that most cannot emulate.
Yes, a valuable resource for posterity. Thanks for your efforts and those of Mike of course. Beacons of Light.