Other MPs elected in 2024 who have been on LFI delegations include Danny Beales (Uxbridge and South Ruislip), Kevin Bonavia (Stevenage), Greame Downie (Dunfermline and Dollar), Melanie Onn (Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes, previously an MP between 2015-2019), Jon Pearce (High Peak), Jo Platt (Leigh and Atherton, previously an MP between 2015-2019), Mike Reader (Northampton South), Jake Richards (Rother Valley), Jessica Toale (Bournemouth West) and Dan Tomlinson (Chipping Barnet).
Some people are seeing digital currency and digital ID as two separate entities. They are not. They will be totally dependent on each other for the control to be secured and effective. Once they get control of your money, it's all over. Thank you again Mike Yeadon. A warrior as always who is trying to help us all. Be also aware of that Blackbelt Barrister account on youtube. He is currently in China and subtly trying to push how lovely and convenient digital ID will be because the Chinese gov made it work like a dream. He's suspect in my opinion and has recently taken his channel more into politics. Who's to say he hasn't been recruited to push the narrative? He is planting seeds in people's minds, but I think a lot of his subcribers have already latched on that he could be questionable in character
Felt there was something controlling his output from the start. At least now he’s out in the open. Dropped him sometime ago, got a bad feeling even through a screen.
They try to evolve slowly to the point that they gain trust, then they change direction when they are comfy enough and feel secure enough. His wife is Chinese. She could be a member of the CCP for all we know. We have no idea about his connections
It has always been about what BIS wants, BIS gets. Its the bankers banker, and the insurers insurance.
And now and in the foreseeable future, BIS wants human beings tokenised. Whether it is in paper, oil, bonds, crypto, CBDCs, or next iteration of nano-tokens (aka nanotechnology/biotech). Its all essentially about cataloguing and tokenising humanity for profit. Why? Because once removed from tangible currency, to non-tangible, it's able to be manipulated without transparency. Its an endless blank check with no visible ledger.😉🤦♀️ ultimately they will even tokenise the one true wealth that so far has remained relatively "unobtainable"- actual time. They have managed to get nature on the ledger, but not time yet...
Everything else, the Starlink grid, the weather manipulation, the 5th gen war games, the "nudge"programs, panoptican surveillance, toxic food,water,air supplies, eugenic programs, medical and media warefare, it's all for profit for various groups with various causes and reasoning, but ultimately it all ends up at BIS.😐🤨
It will be very important (and already is) for people to keep in mind that they are not the ID that has been assigned to them, whether it's a driver's license, health card, or whatever. Nowadays, any time I communicate with "government" or a corporation such as a bank or insurance company that refers to an allcaps name, I sign as "Christine, agent (not surety or trustee) of" the name (i.e. CHRISTINE MASSEY). And we are not parties to any acts, code, statues, so we cannot violate them.
Dear Christine, thank you very much for this idea. You certainly know more about legal matters than most readers. Could you be so kind as to write a short explanation ("operating instructions") in a few sentences? Thanks again, and all the best,
I’ve made a note to do this. One limitation is that increasingly, one’s interactions with government are solely electronic (or physical alternatives made so inconvenient that virtually nobody uses them).
The modus operandi of the BIS is a travesty of democracy. We've all seen the Fat Controller explaining quite overtly how CBDCs will give him and his minions complete control over and surveillance of all transactions. And yet he and said minions could be roasting babies on their premises and not a single legal official has the right to enter their hallowed portals to stop them. They are demonic, not democratic.
First, the observation about US and globalist policies being designed primarily to benefit billionaires is only partly true. There are some billionaires who oppose such tyranny and not only Elon Musk. The primary beneficiaries of various tyrannical plots, extortion schemes, indoctrination schemes, extermination schemes and wars are political players of various stripes and colors. They all enrich themselves by means of their various malevolent behaviors, which they rationalize with the "virtue" of sacrificing some particular others for the latest fashionable collectivist crusade. When some are forced to sacrifice values, some particular others collect those values for themselves.
Republicans with their stupid head bobbing thank military people, including "verterans" for "Your Service". (I always politely respond "I didn't volunteer, I was drafted, so don't thank me.") Democrats are always demanding that people sacrifice their independence for the latest "urgent" cause threatening to end all life on earth. (Except for the war with Russia, which defends "Democracy").
Look at the wealthy political players--more numerous than anyone could count. Nancy Pelosi, Dennis Hastert (who profited handsomely from land he bought in the pathway of a highway project he ushered into law), the Clintons, the Bushes (GHW Bush's Zapata Oil was funded by the CIA, and his father, Prescott Bush, US Senator and investment banker maintained long term lucrative government-banking connections), $2 billion recently handed to Stacey Abrams of Georgia, Dick Cheney and his CEO position with Haliberton awarded to him after he retired from the US House, having been selected to head this huge business due to his extensive experience in the oil business (meaning "oiling" political deals) and many others. Endlessly. This is why Washington DC is home to fabulous wealth and loot.
Second point, which won't win kudos but is true anyway. "Democracy" is a word that is a toxic package deal, almost never unbundled for examination. It has long meant, in code, "the imposition of leftist tyrannical policies, by whatever means necessary." (Rightwing tyranny, justified by tradition, nationalism, and tribal appeals, doesn't call for Democracy, but is toxic and dangerous too). Appeals to Democracy feature stolen elections (not just in the US, but in Europe and places like Brazil), locking up political rivals (France most recently), overturning elections (Romania most recently) and so forth.
Democracy is like any other code word expropirated by tyrants to herd and control gullible people. It reminds me of "viral asympotmatic infections". Consider the name-format favored by various communist dictatorships: The Democratic People's Republic of Korea, The Lao People's Democratic Republic, The People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, and the many "People's Republics" imposed throughout the bloody 20th century. "Democracy is all about the Will of The People" (as interpreted by the Deciders). End of speech.
Among the collection of terms hijacked and reversed by the globalists, I also include the term "The Left." There is no real leftist party that works for big business and dispossesses the working class. Many people fall for this false label because the mainstream media reports it this way. These media outlets have been the 5th column installed by the globalists long ago. Please don't believe the slogans repeated by the media. The real left cannot work against the real, "leftist ideals." The terms "old and new left" used by the real left are also false because they only cement the deception. The indoctrination in such semantic areas is so strong that I don't like to talk about it. US-Americans in particular can't understand it and always say, "But...". The party platforms in the USA were deliberately designed so that each of the two major parties incorporates elements of left-wing and right-wing ideology. This is how people are misled. Historically, the term "The Left" originated from the term "The Democrats." It was always big business that tried to convince people that democracy was wrong. And why? Because big business has always wanted to govern and control the people. We are now dealing with the culmination of this problem. Please look at who is behind today's tyranny—that is, who is paying these strange people, not what the press calls them.
People who talk about the flaws of democracy are never able to say which system would be better or propose something constructive, because they are only working (consciously or unconsciously) to wrest power from the people and place it in the hands of big business. Much blood has already been shed throughout history to prevent this from happening. Please don't fall for this "democracy is bad" trick.
The semantically unadulterated terms can be identified by the goals each group of people is striving for. The left works for the interests of the working class. The right works for the interests of capital. Both groups have their legitimate interests, which they want to defend. A democratically elected government has the task of finding a compromise between the two groups that both groups can live with. At least that’s what the theory sounds like.
We are currently learning who wants to abolish democracy, or government, as a meaningful institution. The WEF is one example. The globalists want to introduce stakeholder capitalism, which is nothing other than a fascist tyranny.
This spectacle is already underway in Europe: First, tyrannical puppets, falsely labelled "leftists," were installed in governments. These people are rightly accused of poisoning (and killing) their populations with pseudo-vaccines. Then, the governments are declared dysfunctional because they were actually harmful. The trick, however, is that the government itself, -I mean the INSTITUTION we call government,- as the highest authority of state is also declared useless. Finally, stakeholder capitalism is being hailed as a "necessary lifesaver" by people suffering from "vaccine"-induced micro-thrombosis in their brains. A bit of free CBDC "helicopter money" from globalists will make the idea of the new system palatable to some healthy people as well. All as planned.
A Google search immediately reveals the globalists' goal. It's probably a ludicrous AI response if you google the term "stakeholder capitalism":
"Stakeholder capitalism is proving to be a groundbreaking model for a sustainable economy, opening up new perspectives, especially for women. The empirical evidence of its positive effects is compelling and demonstrates that this approach is not only ethically imperative but also economically sound. November 7, 2024"
Tyrants are good at wrapping their lies up so they sound completely harmless, aren't they?
I can identify a political system that's benevolent and productive and which enables everyone to use their own intelligence and efforts to sustain and advance their lives. Individual freedom, including economic freedom, which require a limited nightwatchman government. There is no power in such a limited government for any big business or political player to capture. With no special privileges granted to any person or entity, people always retain their right to say, "No."
Such a political system not only defends the right of every individual to keep what they earn and own, but is the prerequisite to rationality--the individual pursuit of understanding, proof and therefore of truth. The quest for truth requires that thinkers enjoy the freedom to discriminate between good and bad reasoning Rationality protects individuals from the tyranny and insanity of Correct Doctine imposed by big government Brothers, Nannies and state-business alliances.
Unfortunately, I don't see much to agree with in your comment this time, Suavek, except "Best wishes". I concur! Thank you for showcasing Dr. Yeadon and others!
I simply forgot to write that I agree with you on everything else because I got stuck in a mental tunnel and only got stuck on one topic. I'm making up for it here, because I agree with you on everything else. I apologize for not writing it down right away.
Please forgive me, but there is one exception :
By the way, I consider the downsizing of a government, in most cases, to be an intermediate step toward its abolition. First, they show us how bad a government is, with the "bad" parts being controlled by the globalists, then they reduce everything, and finally, they abolish it altogether. With my limited perception, I also perceive the narrative of downsizing / reducing the size of the government as deliberate media propaganda. It has always been the case that both too much and too little are inherently bad.
I believe that the size of a government does not determine its power. Throughout history, there have often been individuals who wielded absolute power.
Incidentally, I am not aware of any reduction in the military-industrial complex in the United States (annual budget nearly a trillion dollars!). Therefore, reducing government seems to me to be propaganda window dressing.
You write that you prefer a government whose power is limited and controlled by the people (and not the other way around), and I, for one, thought that was wonderful.
One more funny thing to end with: Unfortunately, it's usually the case that you find more points in longer comments that you see differently than in shorter ones. But I didn't invent that. It was already like this before. It's 5.00 a.m. in Germany right now, and I've been working all night. If someone runs out of coffee in such a situation, they are happy to contradict.
Well, your point is true that the Trump efforts to reduce spending are surely not guaranteed to reduce much spending. Incidentally, Trump just bragged the other day about his one trillion dollar "defense" budget. ("Defense"--hijacked).
I want to see government coercion slashed and eliminated--not just the fat, but the lean. I won't see that happen in my lieftime.
What prompted me to revisit your site tonight was my realization that I should stop writing essays about my political-philosophical convictions and posting them to your substack. That's an abuse of my privilege to read and sometimes comment on your site's posted content. If I'm burning to write, I should get serious and publish on my own channel. So I am ending unsolicited essays.
Thanks Suavek for your publishing Mike Yeadon's excellent commentary and others. That is a great public service.
Rider, you haven't abused anything, and I'm genuinely happy to be talking to you. However, the topic of "The Left" is my weak point, because I've discussed it so many times without making any difference. We're being misled by the changing definitions. When it gets very late, and I see how almost everyone has fallen for the "evil left" narrative, I wake up and can't help but respond. We're in a class struggle, in which the (real) right (i.e., the capitalist class) is trampling on the interests of the working class (i.e., the interests of the real left). And that's why I couldn't concentrate on the points where I obviously agree with you. I apologize for that. Good night, Rider !
Thanks also for featuring Dr. Yeadon’s writings. I find them useful and inspiring.
I’m not sure I understand what you’re saying about the “true left”, except as a theoretical construct. In practice, for the last 100+ years, the left has been about taking and holding power, not advancing the interests of the average person. That was true of all the communists and as far as I know all the socialists. AOC was shown during the George Floyd riots with a diagram explaining that revolution needed a “triggering event” and that this was to serve that purpose.
Perhaps people like her have persuaded themselves that atrocities like the Green New Deal are sound policy but as you point out, they are in reality just shills for NWO tyranny.
I wouldn’t personally label advocating for rights of the common man as Right, or Left.
Jake Richards MP:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jake_Richards_(politician)
https://www.thejc.com/news/politics/new-labour-mps-reveal-how-trips-to-israel-made-the-horror-of-war-hit-home-auhsu6xb
Other MPs elected in 2024 who have been on LFI delegations include Danny Beales (Uxbridge and South Ruislip), Kevin Bonavia (Stevenage), Greame Downie (Dunfermline and Dollar), Melanie Onn (Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes, previously an MP between 2015-2019), Jon Pearce (High Peak), Jo Platt (Leigh and Atherton, previously an MP between 2015-2019), Mike Reader (Northampton South), Jake Richards (Rother Valley), Jessica Toale (Bournemouth West) and Dan Tomlinson (Chipping Barnet).
Every time.
Some people are seeing digital currency and digital ID as two separate entities. They are not. They will be totally dependent on each other for the control to be secured and effective. Once they get control of your money, it's all over. Thank you again Mike Yeadon. A warrior as always who is trying to help us all. Be also aware of that Blackbelt Barrister account on youtube. He is currently in China and subtly trying to push how lovely and convenient digital ID will be because the Chinese gov made it work like a dream. He's suspect in my opinion and has recently taken his channel more into politics. Who's to say he hasn't been recruited to push the narrative? He is planting seeds in people's minds, but I think a lot of his subcribers have already latched on that he could be questionable in character
Hi Debbie,
You raise an important point. That's why I've taken the liberty of publishing your comment at the end of the article. Thank you,
Suavek
Felt there was something controlling his output from the start. At least now he’s out in the open. Dropped him sometime ago, got a bad feeling even through a screen.
They try to evolve slowly to the point that they gain trust, then they change direction when they are comfy enough and feel secure enough. His wife is Chinese. She could be a member of the CCP for all we know. We have no idea about his connections
It has always been about what BIS wants, BIS gets. Its the bankers banker, and the insurers insurance.
And now and in the foreseeable future, BIS wants human beings tokenised. Whether it is in paper, oil, bonds, crypto, CBDCs, or next iteration of nano-tokens (aka nanotechnology/biotech). Its all essentially about cataloguing and tokenising humanity for profit. Why? Because once removed from tangible currency, to non-tangible, it's able to be manipulated without transparency. Its an endless blank check with no visible ledger.😉🤦♀️ ultimately they will even tokenise the one true wealth that so far has remained relatively "unobtainable"- actual time. They have managed to get nature on the ledger, but not time yet...
Everything else, the Starlink grid, the weather manipulation, the 5th gen war games, the "nudge"programs, panoptican surveillance, toxic food,water,air supplies, eugenic programs, medical and media warefare, it's all for profit for various groups with various causes and reasoning, but ultimately it all ends up at BIS.😐🤨
#itsnotyou #itsthem
It will be very important (and already is) for people to keep in mind that they are not the ID that has been assigned to them, whether it's a driver's license, health card, or whatever. Nowadays, any time I communicate with "government" or a corporation such as a bank or insurance company that refers to an allcaps name, I sign as "Christine, agent (not surety or trustee) of" the name (i.e. CHRISTINE MASSEY). And we are not parties to any acts, code, statues, so we cannot violate them.
Dear Christine, thank you very much for this idea. You certainly know more about legal matters than most readers. Could you be so kind as to write a short explanation ("operating instructions") in a few sentences? Thanks again, and all the best,
Suavek
I’ve made a note to do this. One limitation is that increasingly, one’s interactions with government are solely electronic (or physical alternatives made so inconvenient that virtually nobody uses them).
The modus operandi of the BIS is a travesty of democracy. We've all seen the Fat Controller explaining quite overtly how CBDCs will give him and his minions complete control over and surveillance of all transactions. And yet he and said minions could be roasting babies on their premises and not a single legal official has the right to enter their hallowed portals to stop them. They are demonic, not democratic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpNnTuK5JJU
(in case anyone has missed him)
Priming the pump to lead the masses into the beast system.
This is not that system yet, but it is coming. Maybe sooner rather than later !!!
I'd like to make two small long winded points.
First, the observation about US and globalist policies being designed primarily to benefit billionaires is only partly true. There are some billionaires who oppose such tyranny and not only Elon Musk. The primary beneficiaries of various tyrannical plots, extortion schemes, indoctrination schemes, extermination schemes and wars are political players of various stripes and colors. They all enrich themselves by means of their various malevolent behaviors, which they rationalize with the "virtue" of sacrificing some particular others for the latest fashionable collectivist crusade. When some are forced to sacrifice values, some particular others collect those values for themselves.
Republicans with their stupid head bobbing thank military people, including "verterans" for "Your Service". (I always politely respond "I didn't volunteer, I was drafted, so don't thank me.") Democrats are always demanding that people sacrifice their independence for the latest "urgent" cause threatening to end all life on earth. (Except for the war with Russia, which defends "Democracy").
Look at the wealthy political players--more numerous than anyone could count. Nancy Pelosi, Dennis Hastert (who profited handsomely from land he bought in the pathway of a highway project he ushered into law), the Clintons, the Bushes (GHW Bush's Zapata Oil was funded by the CIA, and his father, Prescott Bush, US Senator and investment banker maintained long term lucrative government-banking connections), $2 billion recently handed to Stacey Abrams of Georgia, Dick Cheney and his CEO position with Haliberton awarded to him after he retired from the US House, having been selected to head this huge business due to his extensive experience in the oil business (meaning "oiling" political deals) and many others. Endlessly. This is why Washington DC is home to fabulous wealth and loot.
Second point, which won't win kudos but is true anyway. "Democracy" is a word that is a toxic package deal, almost never unbundled for examination. It has long meant, in code, "the imposition of leftist tyrannical policies, by whatever means necessary." (Rightwing tyranny, justified by tradition, nationalism, and tribal appeals, doesn't call for Democracy, but is toxic and dangerous too). Appeals to Democracy feature stolen elections (not just in the US, but in Europe and places like Brazil), locking up political rivals (France most recently), overturning elections (Romania most recently) and so forth.
Democracy is like any other code word expropirated by tyrants to herd and control gullible people. It reminds me of "viral asympotmatic infections". Consider the name-format favored by various communist dictatorships: The Democratic People's Republic of Korea, The Lao People's Democratic Republic, The People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, and the many "People's Republics" imposed throughout the bloody 20th century. "Democracy is all about the Will of The People" (as interpreted by the Deciders). End of speech.
Dear Rider,
Among the collection of terms hijacked and reversed by the globalists, I also include the term "The Left." There is no real leftist party that works for big business and dispossesses the working class. Many people fall for this false label because the mainstream media reports it this way. These media outlets have been the 5th column installed by the globalists long ago. Please don't believe the slogans repeated by the media. The real left cannot work against the real, "leftist ideals." The terms "old and new left" used by the real left are also false because they only cement the deception. The indoctrination in such semantic areas is so strong that I don't like to talk about it. US-Americans in particular can't understand it and always say, "But...". The party platforms in the USA were deliberately designed so that each of the two major parties incorporates elements of left-wing and right-wing ideology. This is how people are misled. Historically, the term "The Left" originated from the term "The Democrats." It was always big business that tried to convince people that democracy was wrong. And why? Because big business has always wanted to govern and control the people. We are now dealing with the culmination of this problem. Please look at who is behind today's tyranny—that is, who is paying these strange people, not what the press calls them.
People who talk about the flaws of democracy are never able to say which system would be better or propose something constructive, because they are only working (consciously or unconsciously) to wrest power from the people and place it in the hands of big business. Much blood has already been shed throughout history to prevent this from happening. Please don't fall for this "democracy is bad" trick.
The semantically unadulterated terms can be identified by the goals each group of people is striving for. The left works for the interests of the working class. The right works for the interests of capital. Both groups have their legitimate interests, which they want to defend. A democratically elected government has the task of finding a compromise between the two groups that both groups can live with. At least that’s what the theory sounds like.
We are currently learning who wants to abolish democracy, or government, as a meaningful institution. The WEF is one example. The globalists want to introduce stakeholder capitalism, which is nothing other than a fascist tyranny.
This spectacle is already underway in Europe: First, tyrannical puppets, falsely labelled "leftists," were installed in governments. These people are rightly accused of poisoning (and killing) their populations with pseudo-vaccines. Then, the governments are declared dysfunctional because they were actually harmful. The trick, however, is that the government itself, -I mean the INSTITUTION we call government,- as the highest authority of state is also declared useless. Finally, stakeholder capitalism is being hailed as a "necessary lifesaver" by people suffering from "vaccine"-induced micro-thrombosis in their brains. A bit of free CBDC "helicopter money" from globalists will make the idea of the new system palatable to some healthy people as well. All as planned.
A Google search immediately reveals the globalists' goal. It's probably a ludicrous AI response if you google the term "stakeholder capitalism":
"Stakeholder capitalism is proving to be a groundbreaking model for a sustainable economy, opening up new perspectives, especially for women. The empirical evidence of its positive effects is compelling and demonstrates that this approach is not only ethically imperative but also economically sound. November 7, 2024"
Tyrants are good at wrapping their lies up so they sound completely harmless, aren't they?
Best wishes,
Suavek
I can identify a political system that's benevolent and productive and which enables everyone to use their own intelligence and efforts to sustain and advance their lives. Individual freedom, including economic freedom, which require a limited nightwatchman government. There is no power in such a limited government for any big business or political player to capture. With no special privileges granted to any person or entity, people always retain their right to say, "No."
Such a political system not only defends the right of every individual to keep what they earn and own, but is the prerequisite to rationality--the individual pursuit of understanding, proof and therefore of truth. The quest for truth requires that thinkers enjoy the freedom to discriminate between good and bad reasoning Rationality protects individuals from the tyranny and insanity of Correct Doctine imposed by big government Brothers, Nannies and state-business alliances.
Unfortunately, I don't see much to agree with in your comment this time, Suavek, except "Best wishes". I concur! Thank you for showcasing Dr. Yeadon and others!
I simply forgot to write that I agree with you on everything else because I got stuck in a mental tunnel and only got stuck on one topic. I'm making up for it here, because I agree with you on everything else. I apologize for not writing it down right away.
Please forgive me, but there is one exception :
By the way, I consider the downsizing of a government, in most cases, to be an intermediate step toward its abolition. First, they show us how bad a government is, with the "bad" parts being controlled by the globalists, then they reduce everything, and finally, they abolish it altogether. With my limited perception, I also perceive the narrative of downsizing / reducing the size of the government as deliberate media propaganda. It has always been the case that both too much and too little are inherently bad.
I believe that the size of a government does not determine its power. Throughout history, there have often been individuals who wielded absolute power.
Incidentally, I am not aware of any reduction in the military-industrial complex in the United States (annual budget nearly a trillion dollars!). Therefore, reducing government seems to me to be propaganda window dressing.
You write that you prefer a government whose power is limited and controlled by the people (and not the other way around), and I, for one, thought that was wonderful.
One more funny thing to end with: Unfortunately, it's usually the case that you find more points in longer comments that you see differently than in shorter ones. But I didn't invent that. It was already like this before. It's 5.00 a.m. in Germany right now, and I've been working all night. If someone runs out of coffee in such a situation, they are happy to contradict.
Well, your point is true that the Trump efforts to reduce spending are surely not guaranteed to reduce much spending. Incidentally, Trump just bragged the other day about his one trillion dollar "defense" budget. ("Defense"--hijacked).
I want to see government coercion slashed and eliminated--not just the fat, but the lean. I won't see that happen in my lieftime.
What prompted me to revisit your site tonight was my realization that I should stop writing essays about my political-philosophical convictions and posting them to your substack. That's an abuse of my privilege to read and sometimes comment on your site's posted content. If I'm burning to write, I should get serious and publish on my own channel. So I am ending unsolicited essays.
Thanks Suavek for your publishing Mike Yeadon's excellent commentary and others. That is a great public service.
Rider, you haven't abused anything, and I'm genuinely happy to be talking to you. However, the topic of "The Left" is my weak point, because I've discussed it so many times without making any difference. We're being misled by the changing definitions. When it gets very late, and I see how almost everyone has fallen for the "evil left" narrative, I wake up and can't help but respond. We're in a class struggle, in which the (real) right (i.e., the capitalist class) is trampling on the interests of the working class (i.e., the interests of the real left). And that's why I couldn't concentrate on the points where I obviously agree with you. I apologize for that. Good night, Rider !
Thanks, we don't have to agree...
Thanks also for featuring Dr. Yeadon’s writings. I find them useful and inspiring.
I’m not sure I understand what you’re saying about the “true left”, except as a theoretical construct. In practice, for the last 100+ years, the left has been about taking and holding power, not advancing the interests of the average person. That was true of all the communists and as far as I know all the socialists. AOC was shown during the George Floyd riots with a diagram explaining that revolution needed a “triggering event” and that this was to serve that purpose.
Perhaps people like her have persuaded themselves that atrocities like the Green New Deal are sound policy but as you point out, they are in reality just shills for NWO tyranny.
I wouldn’t personally label advocating for rights of the common man as Right, or Left.