Hopefully the guilt will cause consequences such as walking from this genocide and hopefully (again), they will seek redemption of some sort. No excuses! No blame!
“Probably the most important scientific development of the twentieth century is that economics replaced curiosity as the driving force behind research.”
“We accept the proclamations of scientists in their lab coats with the same faith once reserved for priests. We have asked them to commit the same atrocities as the priests did when they were in charge. We have turned them into something almost as bad as lawyers.”
Whenever I hear of a considered remark from Dr Kary Mullis, I feel a deep pang of sadness that our paths never crossed.
I suppose they did, except that he’d almost certainly have been bumped off by then.
He was such an unusual kind of person. Particularly inquisitive.
I recall him drafting a research grant for submission and the first line of the introduction was “HIV is the probable cause of AIDS”. He then informed us who don’t know the convention, that you follow the assertion with a (1)…. which is the paper, the source of the statement, so that anyone can “read themselves into” any field in question, providing it’s not so distant from your own foundational knowledge that you can’t understand even “The Abstract”, the brief summary that precedes even the introductory remarks that front any scientific paper.
He didn’t have a reference, a scientific paper, that he could use for (1) in the example above. Being a chemist, that’s no crime. But he knew he didn’t know, yet was obligated to cite something appropriate as source.
Over the next several months, he asked everyone who ought to know this foundational point. It finally dawned on him: “They didn’t have the paper. There was no proof on which to base the assumption”.
It turns out that the opening statement in the grant application is a lie. There is no virus that causes AIDS. AIDS isn’t a new, single, distinct syndrome which hadn’t been seen before. There are numerous illnesses that were already well described that are acquired immunodeficiency syndromes. But no new Illness or new “virus”. This is because they’d literally made it up.
AIDS & it’s earliest “antiviral”, AZT, a preexisting drug designed to interrupt the growth of tumours, was already in the lab books and patent portfolio of Burroughs Wellcome. Pressure was manufactured from lobby groups to force the then US Federal Government (the FDA) to agree emergency authorization of AZT for the treatment of AIDS, which then happened.
Fake diagnostic tests were created, using PCR, and large numbers of mostly young men were prescribed this originally anti cancer drug, AZT.
And that’s what killed lots of men diagnosed with “AIDS” as well as intravenous drug users and others.
A slow but intentional massacre began to spread out across the world.
I regard this as one of many dress rehearsal steps for “covid19”, an event for which there was also no virus, no new illness, but preexisting illnesses that looked similar, deliberately useless and misleading diagnostic tests based on PCR. And later, of course, deliberately poisonous fake vaccines.
Are you not suspicious of non standard drugs that hitherto were never prescribed for influenza-like illnesses?
How did they become so well known? If as many claim ivermectin was heavily censored, please explain to me how it was that there was an almost 9-fold increase in global consumption of ivermectin?
I assure you, even with the very large advertising budgets of big pharmaceutical companies, never in world history has ANY drug that was already patent expired experienced an increase in sales of almost 800% over the previous few years prior to 2020. Not. Even. Close.
I deduce, from this evidence alone, that major forces beneath the surface of what we were seeing were responsible for inserting the name of ivermectin into almost everyone on earth. This isn’t censorship. It’s THE most effective drug promotional campaign in history.
There was no pandenic.
No new illness.
No plausible argument for introducing new & unusual treatments for what were, routinely, variations of illnesses we’ve always experienced, namely “influenza like illnesses”.
Yet almost nine times as much of it was being consumed in the years 2020-onwards.
This is a deliberate, carefully planned act. Someone prompted the generics manufacturers to order in raw materials to undergo a completely unprecedented spike in manufacturing of a drug in steady, intermittent use for decades, mostly in the developing world.
My experience is that, if tomorrow, you decided you wanted nine times the normal global amounts of any drug in the pharmacopeia, the suppliers would tell you “Thid cannot be done without a substantial notice period. Not only will we need to evaluate a change in synthetic route as an alternative to merely scaling up everything in our current manufacturing chain, and this will require months of analytical validation to ensure we maintain complete control of consistency, but I doubt our suppliers even hold or could immediately deliver on orders for such very large increases. That’s because they’ll need to secure big increases in the raws they use to manufacture the intermediates we need in order to complete the synthesis”.
I’m even more suspicious of ivermectin than I was before re-reading this piece and the many comments.
In this Substack, hundreds of pieces of evidence have been compiled and published suggesting that all pseudo-"vaccines" against "Covid" are useless and toxic. "Covid" never existed. The detailed differences are, in my opinion, of little relevance and depend on the specific case.
Please believe in yourself and you will understand. It is enough if you understand 80-90% of an article, because a lot of the same information is published in different parts of the series of articles in different contexts. If you ignore the difficult parts and just keep reading (the whole series of articles), you will understand everything in the end. Please do not lose faith in yourself.
That is exactly what took place, iatrogenic murder and injected bio poisons with endless lying and gaslighting, still going
Hopefully the guilt will cause consequences such as walking from this genocide and hopefully (again), they will seek redemption of some sort. No excuses! No blame!
“Probably the most important scientific development of the twentieth century is that economics replaced curiosity as the driving force behind research.”
“We accept the proclamations of scientists in their lab coats with the same faith once reserved for priests. We have asked them to commit the same atrocities as the priests did when they were in charge. We have turned them into something almost as bad as lawyers.”
- - Kary Mullis
Whenever I hear of a considered remark from Dr Kary Mullis, I feel a deep pang of sadness that our paths never crossed.
I suppose they did, except that he’d almost certainly have been bumped off by then.
He was such an unusual kind of person. Particularly inquisitive.
I recall him drafting a research grant for submission and the first line of the introduction was “HIV is the probable cause of AIDS”. He then informed us who don’t know the convention, that you follow the assertion with a (1)…. which is the paper, the source of the statement, so that anyone can “read themselves into” any field in question, providing it’s not so distant from your own foundational knowledge that you can’t understand even “The Abstract”, the brief summary that precedes even the introductory remarks that front any scientific paper.
He didn’t have a reference, a scientific paper, that he could use for (1) in the example above. Being a chemist, that’s no crime. But he knew he didn’t know, yet was obligated to cite something appropriate as source.
Over the next several months, he asked everyone who ought to know this foundational point. It finally dawned on him: “They didn’t have the paper. There was no proof on which to base the assumption”.
It turns out that the opening statement in the grant application is a lie. There is no virus that causes AIDS. AIDS isn’t a new, single, distinct syndrome which hadn’t been seen before. There are numerous illnesses that were already well described that are acquired immunodeficiency syndromes. But no new Illness or new “virus”. This is because they’d literally made it up.
AIDS & it’s earliest “antiviral”, AZT, a preexisting drug designed to interrupt the growth of tumours, was already in the lab books and patent portfolio of Burroughs Wellcome. Pressure was manufactured from lobby groups to force the then US Federal Government (the FDA) to agree emergency authorization of AZT for the treatment of AIDS, which then happened.
Fake diagnostic tests were created, using PCR, and large numbers of mostly young men were prescribed this originally anti cancer drug, AZT.
And that’s what killed lots of men diagnosed with “AIDS” as well as intravenous drug users and others.
A slow but intentional massacre began to spread out across the world.
I regard this as one of many dress rehearsal steps for “covid19”, an event for which there was also no virus, no new illness, but preexisting illnesses that looked similar, deliberately useless and misleading diagnostic tests based on PCR. And later, of course, deliberately poisonous fake vaccines.
Are you not suspicious of non standard drugs that hitherto were never prescribed for influenza-like illnesses?
How did they become so well known? If as many claim ivermectin was heavily censored, please explain to me how it was that there was an almost 9-fold increase in global consumption of ivermectin?
I assure you, even with the very large advertising budgets of big pharmaceutical companies, never in world history has ANY drug that was already patent expired experienced an increase in sales of almost 800% over the previous few years prior to 2020. Not. Even. Close.
I deduce, from this evidence alone, that major forces beneath the surface of what we were seeing were responsible for inserting the name of ivermectin into almost everyone on earth. This isn’t censorship. It’s THE most effective drug promotional campaign in history.
There was no pandenic.
No new illness.
No plausible argument for introducing new & unusual treatments for what were, routinely, variations of illnesses we’ve always experienced, namely “influenza like illnesses”.
Yet almost nine times as much of it was being consumed in the years 2020-onwards.
This is a deliberate, carefully planned act. Someone prompted the generics manufacturers to order in raw materials to undergo a completely unprecedented spike in manufacturing of a drug in steady, intermittent use for decades, mostly in the developing world.
My experience is that, if tomorrow, you decided you wanted nine times the normal global amounts of any drug in the pharmacopeia, the suppliers would tell you “Thid cannot be done without a substantial notice period. Not only will we need to evaluate a change in synthetic route as an alternative to merely scaling up everything in our current manufacturing chain, and this will require months of analytical validation to ensure we maintain complete control of consistency, but I doubt our suppliers even hold or could immediately deliver on orders for such very large increases. That’s because they’ll need to secure big increases in the raws they use to manufacture the intermediates we need in order to complete the synthesis”.
I’m even more suspicious of ivermectin than I was before re-reading this piece and the many comments.
My sister just received the this years COVID-19 vaccination. How is this one different than the earlier ones?
In this Substack, hundreds of pieces of evidence have been compiled and published suggesting that all pseudo-"vaccines" against "Covid" are useless and toxic. "Covid" never existed. The detailed differences are, in my opinion, of little relevance and depend on the specific case.
Best wishes,
Suavek
I appreciate the extra time with your reply. Often the medical articles I need help comprehending.
Please believe in yourself and you will understand. It is enough if you understand 80-90% of an article, because a lot of the same information is published in different parts of the series of articles in different contexts. If you ignore the difficult parts and just keep reading (the whole series of articles), you will understand everything in the end. Please do not lose faith in yourself.
All the best,
Suavek