Unfortunately, this article could not be sent via email due to excessive data volume. However, it will soon be linked to in several other articles on this Substack.
If you ask me for my opinion, I'd be happy to answer your question, especially since I only mentioned the problem twice in the articles – far too few and far too briefly. According to my information, it was indeed the case that people who reported too many vaccine injuries to VAERS could get into trouble. This was certainly not the officially stated reason for this nurse's dismissal, because she hadn't done anything illegal. Other, pretextual, reasons were likely given for her dismissal.
The problem is that the support organizations that care for such dismissed medical professionals who have got into legal trouble require them to strictly adhere to the alleged "scientific findings" in their public statements and not to spread "conspiracy theories." In plain language, this means that no one who speaks the truth about the fact that "COVID" never existed will be helped. Key positions in such support organizations are held by people who propagate "COVID" and promote medications for this fictitious disease. It's obvious that these organizations were set up by the perpetrators to prevent the truth from coming to light. To be fair, I must add at this point that I haven't researched all such organizations. There may be exceptions ( ?).
The Substack website you linked to contain the following text:
"Doctors letting us know that they will treat patients with proven therapies such as Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamins C and D, Quercetin, and Zinc;" ( https://www.covidlawcast.com/p/covid-civic-antibodies ).
So the website claims to be working against fearmongering, while at the same time reinforcing the "COVID" myth. The article you linked to mention the aid organization called Freedom Counsel, in which the well-known "COVID" preacher Dr. Pierre Kory plays a key role. His photo is on this organization's website here: https://freedomcounsel.org/. Personally, it looks to me as if the entire Substack website, which links to this aid organization, is working for propaganda. This is my strong, but personal, suspicion, because I have no evidence for it, of course. The perpetrators who invented the pandemic thought very far ahead and took precautions to ensure the "COVID" myth could continue to thrive. I consider the article you linked to be a propaganda promotion for the aforementioned aid organization. It is one of the greatest failures of the resistance not to have founded such an aid organization themselves. At least, I am unaware of such an organization. Of course, the propaganda is very happy to exploit this loophole.
A false or 'serpentine' thinking runs a masking overlay of distortion, conflict, limitation and loss.
Such a 'world' is be-lived real and in a sense made real by reaction - that is - by the reality we give it, and thus suffer as if at the hand of another.
Ideals, models and theories are artefacts of human thinking - which itself is within the realm of communication and exchange - but can be blocked, distorted, and run dys-functional as a result of circular reasoning, defended as protected self-invested possession and control - set against fears 'made real in the mind' by reactive defence.
As if a 'choice of false or true' occurs within a spike of emotional conflict, such as to flip the mind to protect the false against the true, and then operate from a false inhertiance - overmasking true or integral inherence.
The term bio-field offers a quasi-physical basis for modelling life and existence in terms of communication and exchange - not of separate and conflictive agents or a 'War of Powers' but as an inherent rebalancing of order from and within an embracing Field of Potentials.
Linear cause and effect is always an arbitrary result of the framing of 'where to begin or what to include' - ie of time and place. By agreement to share a focus, we share in the experience that such a focus engenders - whether it be true or false as a basis for life, consciousness, and creation as the nature of a true Nature. But a false foundation cannot stand (but temporarily by willingness to protect it at cost of life - while it yet seems to represent life in the terms and conditions of our definement.
True Cause is in its Effect - this is not a time concept- nor specific to a place. But while we operate within the experience of the world, we recognise resonant coherence, sychconicity of alignment and functional wholeness of an embracing communication as felt life - by which thinking and perceiving are healed or released of distorting dissonances arising from conflicted premise and purpose and set by guilting judgements as basis for fear of our own true life!
What can an 'immune system' represent but an attempt to protect a body of locked-down thought from change? What else underlies the bio-tech control system but seeking immunity from lawful transparency to account?
Seeking to possess, predict or control the Eternal or Timeless within the armature of the body and world runs a mind of fear set on lack and loss for Getting a 'self' on its terms.
Contracted into terms and conditions set by unhealed and masking toxic debt-conflicts that compound to irreconcilable dysfunction.
The balancing of inner and outer conditions is the nature of life. But having trained a compartmentalised consciousness to normalise a split mind, we gave power to structures & systems of surrogate power, as if to overcome, eradicate, or manage the evils engendered by the imposition of -or sacrifice to - structures that no longer serve life and the living.
Healing the mind allows the restoring of the body-function in truth and life - as a medium for communication - instead of a masking distance over weaponised grievance.
Can thinking capture or trap the mind that thinks?
Is that not what self-image 'does' in our name?
Ideological capture is 'real' in a world that knows not what it does, from a masking over 'conflicted love' where a special love turns to treachery and betrayal, rejection and abandonment.
"Despite my urgent pleas to the many no-virus commenters on my substack posts (including Massey, Cowan, Yeadon, Latypova) to shed light on this ... none of them have ever responded."
All the questions about evidence for nonexistent entities do not come from the readers of Dr. Yeadon's first substack, nor from the readers of this joint substack. The problem has already been described in detail in both substacks. It is scientifically impossible to prove the nonexistence of something, only its existence. Accordingly, it is not possible to prove that unicorns do not exist. However, in the case of "viruses," it can be stated that evidence of their existence has not been found, and that their existence is merely based on assumptions. Observations of submicroscopic particles under the electron microscope do not reveal the actual functions of these particles in the body because the images are taken outside the living body, and for other reasons already described in both substacks. I find it very disappointing that, instead of reading the articles, you demand that the people who have already described everything answer each reader individually. The corresponding explanations cannot be given multiple times because they are too extensive. I'm sorry, but now it's your turn to make the effort to read.
Best wishes,
Suavek
P.S.
If there is no evidence that the observable particles are contagious and cause disease, then this means that the definition of "viruses" is based on assumptions. If the definition, i.e., the alleged function of "viruses," is not proven, then the burden of proof for the alleged existence of viruses lies with those who claim it. However, this proof has not yet been provided. If something does not correspond to the claimed definition, then it must be something other than what is claimed, for example, cell debris.
"I find it very disappointing that, instead of reading the articles, you demand that the people who have already described everything answer each reader individually."
I did read, and I'm not at all demanding, I naively thought you might want to respond. I didn't mean to impose on you, I just thought it interesting, and though I did read, I have a lot more to learn.
I admit that I couldn't or didn't want to explain everything from A to Z myself, as others have already summarized it better. I certainly couldn't have done it better myself. Therefore, I have included links to important statements made by other people in the articles. Clicking on and reading all these links can indeed make the topic seem a bit time-consuming. However, I assume that at least the broad outlines of everything have already been clarified. Feel free to mention any points that remain unclear to you. Perhaps I should write an article about it later to fill in these gaps.
With cross-generational indoctrination, the false knowledge can be deeply embedded in the brain, and the facts are of little use. Only after engaging with the topic for a longer period of time do we mentally open ourselves to new information. There's probably no cure for this. It's difficult to understand how such a vast deception is supported by so many virologists, but there are already good explanations for it that I can't describe briefly here. The strange "virus" databases, which are not subject to public oversight, play a certain role in this. The natural, evolutionary weaknesses of the human brain also play a role. With the "COVID" fraud, we all had to understand every aspect of the fraud so that the false image could finally be shattered. It's similar with "No virus," but a little harder to believe. After all, we grew up with the lie. But the "virus" fraud is no better organized than "COVID" and is also based primarily on the misclassification of diseases and their definitions, and, of course, on well-functioning propaganda. Those who read about it will find out the truth. The number of people who know is increasing, and they can see how the study results are being falsified. The distinction between evidence and an assumption made in good faith is also increasingly known to many people.
Wondering if this is real or another mirage in the desert:
"Deborah Conrad was a Physician Assistant for 21 years…until she was publicly walked out of and fired from Rochester Regional Health.
Why was she fired?
She reported adverse events from the COVID-19 shot to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System).
...
Although there hasn’t been a ruling yet, we are optimistic and expect a ruling in the next two weeks." (posted May 7, 2025)
COVID Accountability for Hospitals and other COVID “vaccine” providers
https://www.covidlawcast.com/p/covid-accountability-for-hospitals
If you ask me for my opinion, I'd be happy to answer your question, especially since I only mentioned the problem twice in the articles – far too few and far too briefly. According to my information, it was indeed the case that people who reported too many vaccine injuries to VAERS could get into trouble. This was certainly not the officially stated reason for this nurse's dismissal, because she hadn't done anything illegal. Other, pretextual, reasons were likely given for her dismissal.
The problem is that the support organizations that care for such dismissed medical professionals who have got into legal trouble require them to strictly adhere to the alleged "scientific findings" in their public statements and not to spread "conspiracy theories." In plain language, this means that no one who speaks the truth about the fact that "COVID" never existed will be helped. Key positions in such support organizations are held by people who propagate "COVID" and promote medications for this fictitious disease. It's obvious that these organizations were set up by the perpetrators to prevent the truth from coming to light. To be fair, I must add at this point that I haven't researched all such organizations. There may be exceptions ( ?).
The Substack website you linked to contain the following text:
"Doctors letting us know that they will treat patients with proven therapies such as Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamins C and D, Quercetin, and Zinc;" ( https://www.covidlawcast.com/p/covid-civic-antibodies ).
So the website claims to be working against fearmongering, while at the same time reinforcing the "COVID" myth. The article you linked to mention the aid organization called Freedom Counsel, in which the well-known "COVID" preacher Dr. Pierre Kory plays a key role. His photo is on this organization's website here: https://freedomcounsel.org/. Personally, it looks to me as if the entire Substack website, which links to this aid organization, is working for propaganda. This is my strong, but personal, suspicion, because I have no evidence for it, of course. The perpetrators who invented the pandemic thought very far ahead and took precautions to ensure the "COVID" myth could continue to thrive. I consider the article you linked to be a propaganda promotion for the aforementioned aid organization. It is one of the greatest failures of the resistance not to have founded such an aid organization themselves. At least, I am unaware of such an organization. Of course, the propaganda is very happy to exploit this loophole.
P.S.:
What I wanted to mention, but couldn't add more due to Substack's strange correction system, is:
Thank you, Tommy, for asking, because I've covered this important topic far too briefly so far.
All the best,
Suavek
A false or 'serpentine' thinking runs a masking overlay of distortion, conflict, limitation and loss.
Such a 'world' is be-lived real and in a sense made real by reaction - that is - by the reality we give it, and thus suffer as if at the hand of another.
Ideals, models and theories are artefacts of human thinking - which itself is within the realm of communication and exchange - but can be blocked, distorted, and run dys-functional as a result of circular reasoning, defended as protected self-invested possession and control - set against fears 'made real in the mind' by reactive defence.
As if a 'choice of false or true' occurs within a spike of emotional conflict, such as to flip the mind to protect the false against the true, and then operate from a false inhertiance - overmasking true or integral inherence.
The term bio-field offers a quasi-physical basis for modelling life and existence in terms of communication and exchange - not of separate and conflictive agents or a 'War of Powers' but as an inherent rebalancing of order from and within an embracing Field of Potentials.
Linear cause and effect is always an arbitrary result of the framing of 'where to begin or what to include' - ie of time and place. By agreement to share a focus, we share in the experience that such a focus engenders - whether it be true or false as a basis for life, consciousness, and creation as the nature of a true Nature. But a false foundation cannot stand (but temporarily by willingness to protect it at cost of life - while it yet seems to represent life in the terms and conditions of our definement.
True Cause is in its Effect - this is not a time concept- nor specific to a place. But while we operate within the experience of the world, we recognise resonant coherence, sychconicity of alignment and functional wholeness of an embracing communication as felt life - by which thinking and perceiving are healed or released of distorting dissonances arising from conflicted premise and purpose and set by guilting judgements as basis for fear of our own true life!
What can an 'immune system' represent but an attempt to protect a body of locked-down thought from change? What else underlies the bio-tech control system but seeking immunity from lawful transparency to account?
Seeking to possess, predict or control the Eternal or Timeless within the armature of the body and world runs a mind of fear set on lack and loss for Getting a 'self' on its terms.
Contracted into terms and conditions set by unhealed and masking toxic debt-conflicts that compound to irreconcilable dysfunction.
The balancing of inner and outer conditions is the nature of life. But having trained a compartmentalised consciousness to normalise a split mind, we gave power to structures & systems of surrogate power, as if to overcome, eradicate, or manage the evils engendered by the imposition of -or sacrifice to - structures that no longer serve life and the living.
Healing the mind allows the restoring of the body-function in truth and life - as a medium for communication - instead of a masking distance over weaponised grievance.
Can thinking capture or trap the mind that thinks?
Is that not what self-image 'does' in our name?
Ideological capture is 'real' in a world that knows not what it does, from a masking over 'conflicted love' where a special love turns to treachery and betrayal, rejection and abandonment.
"Despite my urgent pleas to the many no-virus commenters on my substack posts (including Massey, Cowan, Yeadon, Latypova) to shed light on this ... none of them have ever responded."
I would love to see the debate.
https://thepredatorsversusthepeople.substack.com/p/the-proof-for-no-no-virus/comment/118100785
The proof for NO No-Virus
How a controversial theory was debunked 128 years ago
https://thepredatorsversusthepeople.substack.com/p/the-proof-for-no-no-virus
Hi Tommy,
All the questions about evidence for nonexistent entities do not come from the readers of Dr. Yeadon's first substack, nor from the readers of this joint substack. The problem has already been described in detail in both substacks. It is scientifically impossible to prove the nonexistence of something, only its existence. Accordingly, it is not possible to prove that unicorns do not exist. However, in the case of "viruses," it can be stated that evidence of their existence has not been found, and that their existence is merely based on assumptions. Observations of submicroscopic particles under the electron microscope do not reveal the actual functions of these particles in the body because the images are taken outside the living body, and for other reasons already described in both substacks. I find it very disappointing that, instead of reading the articles, you demand that the people who have already described everything answer each reader individually. The corresponding explanations cannot be given multiple times because they are too extensive. I'm sorry, but now it's your turn to make the effort to read.
Best wishes,
Suavek
P.S.
If there is no evidence that the observable particles are contagious and cause disease, then this means that the definition of "viruses" is based on assumptions. If the definition, i.e., the alleged function of "viruses," is not proven, then the burden of proof for the alleged existence of viruses lies with those who claim it. However, this proof has not yet been provided. If something does not correspond to the claimed definition, then it must be something other than what is claimed, for example, cell debris.
"I find it very disappointing that, instead of reading the articles, you demand that the people who have already described everything answer each reader individually."
I did read, and I'm not at all demanding, I naively thought you might want to respond. I didn't mean to impose on you, I just thought it interesting, and though I did read, I have a lot more to learn.
I admit that I couldn't or didn't want to explain everything from A to Z myself, as others have already summarized it better. I certainly couldn't have done it better myself. Therefore, I have included links to important statements made by other people in the articles. Clicking on and reading all these links can indeed make the topic seem a bit time-consuming. However, I assume that at least the broad outlines of everything have already been clarified. Feel free to mention any points that remain unclear to you. Perhaps I should write an article about it later to fill in these gaps.
With cross-generational indoctrination, the false knowledge can be deeply embedded in the brain, and the facts are of little use. Only after engaging with the topic for a longer period of time do we mentally open ourselves to new information. There's probably no cure for this. It's difficult to understand how such a vast deception is supported by so many virologists, but there are already good explanations for it that I can't describe briefly here. The strange "virus" databases, which are not subject to public oversight, play a certain role in this. The natural, evolutionary weaknesses of the human brain also play a role. With the "COVID" fraud, we all had to understand every aspect of the fraud so that the false image could finally be shattered. It's similar with "No virus," but a little harder to believe. After all, we grew up with the lie. But the "virus" fraud is no better organized than "COVID" and is also based primarily on the misclassification of diseases and their definitions, and, of course, on well-functioning propaganda. Those who read about it will find out the truth. The number of people who know is increasing, and they can see how the study results are being falsified. The distinction between evidence and an assumption made in good faith is also increasingly known to many people.