3 Comments

brilliant

Expand full comment

Dear Suavek, again, thanks for insightful combination of different perspectives which look to be convergent. What Sasha Latypova and I believe Katherine Watt have uncovered does fit astonishingly tightly with my own deductions.

What’s interesting, as an “expert” in allergic diseases, is how easy I found it to articulate how & why the gene based “vaccines” were to be toxic by design, and how I also failed to join dots, all of which are nominally on my patch!

It very often turns out that highly creative people can see linkages in a field in which they’re not “expert” (ie often, taught propaganda). They don’t have to plough through a set of assumptions that block one’s ability to see new arrangements of the observations.

Does Sasha have every last detail perfect? Probably not. But has she made some powerful connections whicb mesh with lots of other insights? I think so.

Best wishes

Mike

Expand full comment

Dear Dr. Mike,

It is said that if the screw is loose, then the amplitude of movement of what is attached to it can be somewhat greater. Perhaps this saying fits the way a layman thinks ? ( smiley ).

All the best,

Suavek

PS.

If only I had known which lines in the article should be corrected, I would have liked to have been able to add at least some illuminating remark...

Expand full comment