Re: “When writing the text, CJ Hopkins was not fully aware that Donald Trump is knowingly carrying out the exact instructions of the globalists.” Having read a number of CJ’s articles, I think there’s a good chance you may receive a little pushback from CJ regarding that line. It’s just my gut feeling. :)
Recently many substack writers are discussing "controlled opposition" and delving into who or what may be described as such and what reasons or rationale they may have for taking on such a role, whether consciously or otherwise; in my view I would consider a large majority of substack writers who demand paid subscriptions before being allowed to comment or participate in open discussion a large part of a form of controlled opposition; this very same group are often shills and sponsors for larger substack holders and most, if not all, are selling products and/or operating private companies; they, in effect, severely restrict many of us who simply cannot afford to pay for what should be freedom of speech in the first place; beyond personal and ideological agendas(openly declared or kept hidden) the only and ultimate test of who we are and what we believe must be the honest pursuit of knowledge and truth with evidence to support our positions; I trust you will agree that the real and original "controlled opposition" had its roots in our historical past whether in the widespread fraud perpetrated in the name of medical science or in any human endeavor that allowed power and control to usurp irrefutable truths; keep up the invaluable work you are passionate about...and a belated but VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR!
Unfortunately, I cannot write you a short answer because I cannot express what I think in a short text. Today, 2 related articles about "Covid" preachers are being published, which hopefully shed some light on the topic of "perpetrator narratives". And later, I will be happy to tell you what I think. In any case, I think that it depends on the individual's financial situation whether someone makes their articles available for free. There are people who have worked 16 hours a day for a couple of years for the cause of enlightenment, without any remuneration, and at some point cannot pay their bills. If such people continue to have little time for their own business and continue to work on Substack, then please forgive them if they hide their articles behind a paywall, for example, after 1 month of publication. By the way, I have already read your article on this topic. The other person's situation can be very different from our own. That is why I suggest leniency. I think that the paywall in Substack and the controlled opposition are two different things. I believe that the controlled opposition is in a much better financial position than the truth tellers.
I know there are some people who need to earn a living somehow, because they’ve lost their old ways to earn income.
But i have observed that almost everyone who places a paywall get only one thing, and that’s a tiny audience. What’s the point of the effort & perceived risks, only to make pin money?
If your goal is to reach as many people as possible, you definitely shouldn’t put a paywall in place. All that will do is reduce your audience by 90-99%. I don’t think that automatically makes them bad actors. Most people aren’t particularly good at business.
Some people have managed to combined audience maximisation and some level of income by being open to voluntary subscriptions and gifting. I recommend that.
Re: “When writing the text, CJ Hopkins was not fully aware that Donald Trump is knowingly carrying out the exact instructions of the globalists.” Having read a number of CJ’s articles, I think there’s a good chance you may receive a little pushback from CJ regarding that line. It’s just my gut feeling. :)
Thank you, I changed the text a bit.
Yep... I think that's much better. You can remove my comment if you like, Suavek.
Recently many substack writers are discussing "controlled opposition" and delving into who or what may be described as such and what reasons or rationale they may have for taking on such a role, whether consciously or otherwise; in my view I would consider a large majority of substack writers who demand paid subscriptions before being allowed to comment or participate in open discussion a large part of a form of controlled opposition; this very same group are often shills and sponsors for larger substack holders and most, if not all, are selling products and/or operating private companies; they, in effect, severely restrict many of us who simply cannot afford to pay for what should be freedom of speech in the first place; beyond personal and ideological agendas(openly declared or kept hidden) the only and ultimate test of who we are and what we believe must be the honest pursuit of knowledge and truth with evidence to support our positions; I trust you will agree that the real and original "controlled opposition" had its roots in our historical past whether in the widespread fraud perpetrated in the name of medical science or in any human endeavor that allowed power and control to usurp irrefutable truths; keep up the invaluable work you are passionate about...and a belated but VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR!
Dear Tony,
Thank you for EVERYTHING!
Unfortunately, I cannot write you a short answer because I cannot express what I think in a short text. Today, 2 related articles about "Covid" preachers are being published, which hopefully shed some light on the topic of "perpetrator narratives". And later, I will be happy to tell you what I think. In any case, I think that it depends on the individual's financial situation whether someone makes their articles available for free. There are people who have worked 16 hours a day for a couple of years for the cause of enlightenment, without any remuneration, and at some point cannot pay their bills. If such people continue to have little time for their own business and continue to work on Substack, then please forgive them if they hide their articles behind a paywall, for example, after 1 month of publication. By the way, I have already read your article on this topic. The other person's situation can be very different from our own. That is why I suggest leniency. I think that the paywall in Substack and the controlled opposition are two different things. I believe that the controlled opposition is in a much better financial position than the truth tellers.
I wish you and your family a Happy New Year 2025!
I know there are some people who need to earn a living somehow, because they’ve lost their old ways to earn income.
But i have observed that almost everyone who places a paywall get only one thing, and that’s a tiny audience. What’s the point of the effort & perceived risks, only to make pin money?
If your goal is to reach as many people as possible, you definitely shouldn’t put a paywall in place. All that will do is reduce your audience by 90-99%. I don’t think that automatically makes them bad actors. Most people aren’t particularly good at business.
Some people have managed to combined audience maximisation and some level of income by being open to voluntary subscriptions and gifting. I recommend that.
Sadly, we have only one CJ.