The arguments for “NO VIRUS” -- PART 4 - Dr. Mike Yeadon : The fundamental weaknesses of the virus hypothesis should not be ignored.
The list of links to Dr. Tom Cowan’s statements is also included here.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, June 20, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1498
I find this article a little bewildering.
There are certainly straw man arguments in it, for example, the demand made by some people not to use cell cultures in virology.
I haven’t personally encountered this argument. What I have understood recently is crystal clear, that cell cultures used in claimed virus isolation experiments always lack “uninfected controls”.
Michael’s rebuttal to a very large body of such work, lacking controls, is simply that he’s never seen a cell culture experiment which lacked appropriate controls. I must say, I haven’t either. But then I’ve not worked in a virology lab.
Does Michael not know that it’s not a minor technicality, this lack of uninfected controls in alleged virus isolation experiments?
And that it has been shown independently by more than one lab, that uninfected control cultures can result in exactly the same outcomes as are seen in the alleged infected cells, with the same extent of cytopathic effect, the effect which is claimed is due to the presence of the alleged virus?
Is he further not aware that, in a hundred years of clinical attempts to demonstrate symptomatic transmission of acute respiratory Illnesses, there are only failures so to demonstrate?
I’d be happy to focus discussion initially to just these two points.
Best wishes
Mike
The post above is linked to an article that was linked in the next Telegram post ( https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1499 ) :
The fallacies of the “no virus” doctrine
https://doctors4covidethics.org/the-fallacies-of-the-no-virus-doctrine/
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
kordelas
https://conspiracysarah.substack.com/p/perhaps-the-most-important-work-of/comment/59260443
( … ) Mike, you should communicate more with people like me, Jordan Grant, Mike Stone and others because you can learn a lot from us. ( … ).
……………………..
Dr. Mike Yeadon replies, June 17, 2024
https://conspiracysarah.substack.com/p/perhaps-the-most-important-work-of/comment/59273372
You’re right. I won’t pretend I’m that interested though.
Please, just do what each is best doing.
I’m irked that others appear to believe “If only person X will correctly describe Y”, something important will happen.
I’m best qualified to comment on areas I’ve spent my professional life in.
Plenty of others are just brilliant in their fields of expertise.
I earnestly ask us to do what we’re best at, because we’re most compelling as witnesses.
I’m massively over the goal line. The whole field is fraud.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Anen Allidnab, June 16, 2024 :
https://conspiracysarah.substack.com/p/perhaps-the-most-important-work-of/comment/59189007
But why people get the same sickness when being exposed to someone for example who had the flu symptoms? My son when he started to go to day care at 6 months always get sick with flu symptoms almost every week. Literally, it was an ending cycle. When he was 3 yrs old I completely took him out of day care and look after him at home. Since then, he never had any single sniffle or even a mild flu symptoms as in never! So that was interesting!. When my son came with flu symptoms from day care we also as a family catch it? Where is the sickness coming from? Is it not a virus??
I’m confused! And I’m sure so many other people.
…………………………..
Dr. Mike Yeadon replies, June 16, 2024 :
https://conspiracysarah.substack.com/p/perhaps-the-most-important-work-of/comment/59193767
1. They often don’t. But nobody keeps notes of the number of times they’re “exposed” to someone with a “viral illness”, yet don’t go on to become sick.
2. Apparent contagion is explained by (a) coincidence. We develop acute respiratory illnesses like colds quite often. When you do, most people think back to the last person they came across who looked sick and decide they “caught it” from them. Did you know that when clinical investigators have sought to demonstrate that transmission of symptoms every, they never can? Not in 100+ years of trying. Also (b) when people genuinely do become ill close in time to someone they’re close to, it’s shared environmental factors that caused then both to become unwell.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, June 16, 2024 :
https://conspiracysarah.substack.com/p/perhaps-the-most-important-work-of/comment/59194468
Liked by Conspiracy Sarah
This basic experiment, transmission of symptoms, or contagion, has been tried dozens of times over a CENTURY.
They all failed to show transmission of symptoms.
Please find an exception.
For me, it was coming across this trove of empirical evidence that pushed me to the conclusion that acute respiratory illnesses are non-infectious in nature and also not contagious.
Why hasn’t this evidence ever featured in a mainstream media report?
I think the answer is obvious. It destroys the basis of fear-control.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, April 25, 2024 / A two-part post :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1138 :
A reply to a question in our channel that became so long that I thought it work placing here where it’s more likely to be read.
***********************
I’m formally confident that acute respiratory illnesses that we call colds and flu (“influenza like illnesses) are not caused by submicroscopic infectious particles called viruses & are not contagious.
For a number of other diseases which are attributed to viruses, such as “HIV/AIDS” & “Polio”, I’ve followed the trail of evidence far enough to also state that there is no evidence that they’re caused by such viruses. On the contrary, and like “Covid-19”, they are more correctly termed syndromes (since the claimed symptoms vary to an extraordinary extent) and are misattributions of a collection of other illnesses. In each case, people really are ill. It’s just that the diagnosis is wrong and not viral, either.
I’ve read of the failures ever to meet reasonable isolation expectations for any virus.
Speaking as a man on the Clapham omnibus, I have learned enough to say I think viroLIEgy is wholly fraudulent.
Speaking as Dr Mike Yeadon, PhD, I haven’t done enough personal, detailed research to be sure that viruses don’t exist, though I suspect that it’s true.
I make the distinction because I think people have a right to know whether I’m speaking as an experienced scientist or as a thoughtful but inexpert person. If I make a claim without qualification, it would be reasonable for a 3rd party to expect me to be able to produce chapter & verse on numerous important claims about allegedly viral illnesses and, in many cases, I couldn’t do that. I’d be relying on others testimony.
I do have the evidence & have read primary literature on respiratory illnesses and selected others. That’s why I’m sure about them.
I’m also securely of the opinion that global pandemics of severe illnesses are impossible.
There haven’t been any pandemics. The most famous example, Spanish Flu Pandemic, is a mixture of exaggeration and probable, deliberate poisoning. In recent years, they’re “PCR false positive pseudo epidemics”, a well-established, real thing, in which 100% of the claimed positive test results are false. There have been famous examples where this is entirely accidental, such as the whooping cough pseudo epidemic.
That we’re at risk at any moment of emergence of a pandemic or severe, highly infectious disease is a central lie which I now regard as an obvious untruth.
It’s been a strange and bumpy journey. The strangest thing is showing clever people the evidence underwriting my current position on acute respiratory illnesses & finding them unmoved by it.
There have been some who’ve travelled along similar roads to the same conclusions. I believe Dr Jonathan Engler is one. There are numerous other people who I believe are sincere, so I’m not going tomorrow pick on them, yet still speak as if the propaganda of a lifetime remains intact. It’s maddening & I am unable to account for that.
Interestingly, one person, years ago, confessed to me that they didn’t want to believe what I was telling them, because it was simply too frightening. It’s possible that psychological protection mechanisms prevents some of us from accepting new information. I think we are much more subconsciously active beings than we realise. We then rationalise consciously those things our subconscious has processed (or not).
This may be why many of us have found it impossible to persuade others, even those we love & have known for many years, that we’re being lied to & are under extraordinary attack. I’m not a psychologist either, so I’m unsure what’s really going on when I failed to convince my older sister, who has a PhD in a biological field, that the pandemic is a long planned fraud.
There are some people who act as if they believe that all we need to do is assert that viruses don’t exist and the scales will fall from humanity’s eyes and the battle will be over. My own empirical evidence is that this is among the least successful ways of approaching the undoubtedly thick layers of infectious diseases.
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1139 :
Holding this opinion prompts some of them to claim I’m working for the perpetrators. I cannot help that.
I think this is pretty much where my thinking is at present.
For avoidance of doubt, both PCR based diagnostics, and tests for what are claimed to be antibodies to certain infectious disease causing agents, and vaccines (without reservation) are all fraudulent.
The underlying illnesses are real, which is why the lies are so effective.
Best wishes
Mike
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Eleftherios Gkioulekas
https://palexander.substack.com/p/there-was-no-pandemic-no-covid-pandemic/comment/55647990
Discover with Dr. Eleftherios G…
My spidey sense is that the no-virus narrative is a "honeypot" to suck in some indepedent thinkers to discredit them. It kind of emerged with the post pandemic attack on our doctors, so timing clicks...
…………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon replies, May 6, 2024 :
https://palexander.substack.com/p/there-was-no-pandemic-no-covid-pandemic/comment/55653767
https://palexander.substack.com/p/there-was-no-pandemic-no-covid-pandemic/comments
I suggest that debating whether or not viruses exist is probably the least effective way to change hearts and minds. For many, it’s too great a leap and too intangible. Personally, I’m satisfied by the extensive body of clinical research evidence that acute respiratory illnesses are not contagious. Therefore it is irrelevant what causes them, from a “public health” perspective.
What’s really important about “covid19” is that opinion isn’t necessary to evaluate the “public health” threat. This is because the epidemiological evidence tells us, unequivocally, that there was no pandemic, not even a public health emergency of any kind, BEFORE the WHO fraudulently declared a pandemic. They’re not fortune tellers. They don’t have the power to predict the future. There needs FIRST to be some event or series of events that are later assembled to make a statement about it. But nothing happened. Just lies and a fake pandemic declaration. It was only after that announcement that, as if by prior arrangement, most countries in the world applied lockdowns to varying stringencies, something we’ve never done before & for which they was nor is now any medical rationale. You don’t quarantine healthy people.
Changes were made extensively in The West at least in medical protocols in hospitals, care homes and the community. In any prior year, if you reviewed those changes, you’d expect to cause a huge increase in avoidable deaths. This is exactly what happened. The random deployment of known to be meaningless “PCR tests” was used to claim there were lots of “cases” and “covid deaths”, which wasn’t true. The deaths were iatrogenic. Killed by their doctors actions or inactions.
In addition to smashing up the economy and civil society, the next stage was massed, intentional poisoning with new technology gene-based preparations they fraudulently called “vaccines”. The perpetrators were initially not sure about the injury & death rates that they’d accomplish with these jabs, hence enormous variation in toxicity from batch to batch. Early on, I interpreted this as a consequence of rushed manufacture. I now believe the variation was deliberate and the VAERS results were used to “calibrate” these weapons. They’ll do it again, if we let them.
Having a summary of what they did last time ought to prepare every one to be alert for repeat offenders, like “Sir” Jeremy Farrar.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Tom Cowan: Recapping the Virus/ No Virus Debate- June 19th, 2024 :
In this webinar, Tom recaps the virus/no virus debate and discusses the issues.
VIDEO :
https://www.youtube.com/live/YyjA4HPPoFs?si=Ytzr2AJct8VBn5u3
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zeQ7Pef75KkF/
Websites :
https://www.drcowansgarden.com/
https://newbiologycurriculum.com/
Video Platforms :
/ @talkinturkeywithtom Backup YouTube Channel
/ @conversationswithdr.cowana5439 Bitchute
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/CivT... Odysee
https://odysee.com/@Dr.TomCowan:8 Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/DrTomCowan Twitch
/ drtomcowan Social Media Facebook
/ drtomcowan Facebook
/ drcowansgarden Facebook
/ newbiologyclinic Facebook
/ drtomcowan Instagram
/ talkinturkeywithtom Instagram
/ drcowanspowders Instagram
/ newbiologyclinic Instagram
/ newbiologycurriculum Pinterest
/ drcowansgarden Telegram https://t.me/DrTomCowanChannel Telegram https://t.me/DrTomCowan LinkedIn
/ drtomcowan LinkedIn
/ dr-cowan-s-garden LinkedIn
/ new-biology-clinic LinkedIn
/ new-biology-curriculum SubscribeStar Community https://www.subscribestar.com/dr-tom-... Podcast https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... Become an Affiliate
https://affiliates.drtomcowan.com/
https://drcowansgarden.goaffpro.com/
……………….
Slightly different links were mentioned under another video. They also seem to work :
YouTube :
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzxdc2o0Q_XZIPwo07XCrNg
Backup YouTube Channel :
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh4jE8jPfd9H02FCAtR0muw
Bitchute :
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/CivTSuEjw6Qp/
Odysee :
https://odysee.com/@Dr.TomCowan:8
Rumble :
https://rumble.com/c/DrTomCowan
Twitch :
https://www.twitch.tv/drtomcowan
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr.Yeadon's videos only two browsers are recommended :
Yandex :
and Mojeek :
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
 | A guest post by
|
If someone gets "flu symptoms" nearly every week after attending the same place with the same group of people, it obviously cannot be possible that this is caused by contagion. Why?
(Let's pretend we believe in the conventional model for a minute.)
Encountering the "flu virus" initially would set up immunity in the body. This would fade, but not that quickly. And the "virus" would not mutate so quickly that the immunity would lose its protection. Again, even if you believe in the conventional explanation, it's impossible that contagion repeated that frequently could be an explanation.
Therefore, it must be that the symptoms - the same each time - were triggered by the same thing: allergens in the room or on other attendees, poisonous substances ingested from food and drinks offered from the same kitchen, emitted by items in the room (off-gassing) such as fire retardants or fake scents which could be breathed in or in contact with skin or eyes, or these days shedding by other attendees of harmful substances their bodies have been instructed to produce (I was recently sick for a long time as a result of only a few hours in these conditions).
I notice that this stopped happening when the sufferer was no longer exposed to the risky conditions.
Just wondering. Where do the electron microscope pictures come from?