“A virus, we are now told, is a tiny, infectious pathogen containing RNA or DNA, with a protein or lipid coating.”
The above statement I cut and pasted from the original article.
This is where we, as the dominant human species, have outlived any and all, naturally occurring, maligned compromising germs. Our natural immune system decides, which germ is good and which germ is bad, with the proper immune system response, nearly perfect every time.
Unfortunately we’re living in a world of fear induced, manmade chaos, threatening our very existence. Manmade “germ-warfare” is
as real and deadly, as threatening as it gets sort of like the tip of a spear, plunged into a beating heart!
Nevertheless we’re finding ourselves in a world-war of “haves and have nots” and the “haves” have been seeking ways to destroy the “have-nots” for decades. Today with specific DNA capabilities, who’s to say who’s next?
Which is as real as it gets. This is exactly why, GOF enthusiasts have more than a “leg-up” on honest, good and decent human beings inspired to better the world not destroy it.
“Where there’s a
will, there’s a way.” This is the scenario which leaves us wondering who’s next! Certainly not unrealistic for anyone who thinks for him or herself to ponder.
This kind of scenario should concern everyone and anyone who has ever asked a question about anything, ever. Essentially everyone should be asking themselves similar questions so as not to get caught off guard when something happens.
“Expect the unexpected.”
My concern is, how can anyone prevent another “covid-mind-virus” from happening? We can’t but we can be conscious about the potentiality and likelihood, it will happen again!
Unless there’s a complete ban on all GOF developments, (which still wouldn’t stop those who want to harm / scare / control others) simply by limiting those who seek to harm others, I don’t believe can be stopped.
Others will use whatever means to screw with, other peoples existence / other people’s fears and uncertainties, etc. solely for monetary gains. Still others will do the same, for both monetary gains and for the “fun” of it.
In such demented minds, we can’t ever stop nor let our guard down. My question is, how can anyone know if some sort of germ, created in a lab, will cause half the world’s demise? How?
It seems unlikely. Humanity must deal with this problem directly. If there’s any chance of evading, some deadly creation, someone created in a lab, with all the necessary coding’s elements / trimmings, etc. with a specific
targeted audience in mind, how can this be avoided? I don’t know if it can or can’t be avoided. If a certain specificities of subset life forms have been identified for extermination, I believe this can be achieved fairly easily today.
I thought about this many times over when lockdowns
were forced upon us.
What if?
Gun haters can take away every gun on planet earth yet someone will use something else to achieve their desired outcome. This is the same issue we’re facing now. Banning GOF simply means they’ll find another way and will use whatever means to achieve their desired outcome. Those who seek to harm others, have many tools at their disposal. The “covid-fraud” harmed millions in many different ways. This is the “unknown” what if scenario’s we’re all faced with today.
A guessing game of “should I or shouldn’t I” or “Did they or didn’t they.” Maybe covid was a benefit in some distorted sense. The “covid-fraud” has illuminated this reality for all to see. A reality of coordinated messaging, proved, has shown us, how easy it was for
“Evilness” to attack, without ever firing a single shot, so to speak, against all of mankind, worldwide! Who would have thought this would ever happen?
A guessing game of chance or a pull of the trigger as in “Russian Roulette.” This clicking of the mindsets of all of those who’ve already feared the unknown, were rapidly lining-up turning out en masse!There will be another round of events coming to a theater near us all, sooner rather than later. Maybe we shouldn’t forget so quickly?
It's clear to me that "COVID" propaganda has succeeded in instilling false fears in you. If you were to read older articles on this Substack, you wouldn't completely eliminate your fears, but you would refocus them on real dangers. The narrative of banning GoF stems from the perpetrators' propaganda and is intended to reinforce the existence of "COVID." If many people believe it, the perpetrators will have an easy time with the next plandemic and the next forced "vaccinations". The fears are justified, but they should focus on the real dangers, not on the false imagery and propaganda.
No "COVID," no "virus," and therefore no "viruses" can escape from a laboratory. Even according to conventional medicine, the alleged "viruses" could pose no danger, because according to official science, any "virus" would quickly lose its toxicity. Or: a "virus" whose genes are based on RNA cannot reproduce indefinitely. So you can believe what you want, but please don't stir up unjustified panic. Please read the other articles. Thank you in advance.
I was one of the first who knew we were being lied too! The point of my post was to make those aware, who still line up for their covid Bioweapon inject, to wake up!
My reply wasn’t in any way to express my “FEARS” rather those who still wear a masks, who still scream at people! Covid was “ Psychological Warfare-operation” Executed with military precision, in fact our own “DoD-OWS” which Trump authorized during his first term has now completely “Pigeonholed” this entire “Weapons of Mass Destruction” attack by means of an mRNA-Bioweapon!
This attack against humanity hadn’t absolutely nothing to do with Healthcare or the well-being of humanity.
If you go back and read the thousands of articles I’ve written, you’ll understand why I wrote this today!
My thoughts today was how it inform others what “NOT” to do! It has nothing to do about me being afraid or fearful. I was trying to get others to understand and not to allow another of this same “Psychological mind virus” divide each other! We lose every time when we are “separated!”
My apologies if you misinterpreted or I misspoke on miss wrote which implied any of the sort which you replied with.
Thank you Suavek. It’s quite sad these monstrous-murders, so deliberately knew what they were doing and so many people died / were killed / murdered needlessly.
I lost 4 clients and 3 friends, all injected with the mRNA and all were healthy people prior. I’m literally-livid, what these maniacally-deranged psychopaths, have done to us!
Infuriatingly-diabolical, the “Covid-Fraud” one could equate this to a cowardly, deceitful act, premeditated-excessive murder, deliberately by design! They knew what they were doing and why they were doing this, period!
Thanks again Suavek, I appreciate your insight. AJR
Almost forgot to mention. I have also called out our beloved President numerous times! At this juncture he is complicit in the deaths of “millions of innocent people!” Simply because he has remained “SILENT!” A full Class-I Recall of all mRNA product should have already happened! Instead our president doubled-down by allowing Larry Ellison to speak about developing a cancer treatment in 48 hours using AI & mRNA! AYKM? Additionally, the more dangerous and potentially as deadly saRNA was given the fast-track green light! Again, AYKM? Our president has failed miserably in protecting the American people from these known “Bioweapons!” Miserably may be an understatement IMO! Nevertheless he has failed! I have multiple clients still injecting people because 1. There’s money to be made and 2. People haven’t any clue what they are doing! Our president could end this maddening madness simply by addressing the nation during prime time! Lastly, this “Covid-Fraud” was the greatest “Weapons of Mass Destruction Attack” ever committed against humanity during peacetime! More than 31 million people have been murdered worldwide! Million more permanently disabled and still millions more may or may not wake up for work or school tomorrow! Fear? Not a Chance! Angry? You bet your life! Anger is an understatement! I cannot describe my true feelings about what has been “DONE TO US, NOT FOR US!”
I am just an ordinary bod with no scientific or medical credentials, some others of dubious value, but no PHD in anything, so I can readily be discounted as a "non-expert".
Wandering around as I tend to do, I have noticed that the official literature of the DoD & CO, about GOF research and related subjects, appears to be fully accepting of the existence of viruses and their dangerous potential as contagious lethal pathogens.
However, there is significant evidence of repeated covert experiments, without the knowledge or consent of the people involved, attempting to determine: if there is contagion; or if not, how pathogens can be effectively spread to appear to be contagious.
Based upon the research of Katherine Watt and my own, I am convinced that there is no effective definition of "a virus" in US law.
Strange ... so much about viruses and vaccination but no exact legal definition.
This obviously raises red flags and critical questions.
In these circumstances, I must question if the medical/scientific players on the virus chessboard, are all ignorant of the real facts or knowingly promoting lies.
The latter is quite possible, but the extent of the coverup seems to indicate the former to me.
Could most military/scientific/medical "professionals", be absolutely convinced that viruses do exist; have been proven to exist by credible scientific isolation; are actually dangerous, contagious, potentially lethal pathogens with pandemic potential?
Impossible for most medical/scientific professionals to be so ignorant of the true facts?
I think not.
So many "experts" believe the climate change mythology!
Therefore, most experts believing the virus mythology is quite possible!
Kinda dints faith in the competence and integrity of the medical/scientific community.
But that faith may have been in a false religion anyhow.
I completely agree with you. The power of indoctrination is so strong that even experts think they don't need to verify anything. That will change soon, because the issue is getting louder and louder. Until now, if an expert, a doctor, or a government official discovers that there is indeed no evidence for the existence of "viruses," they will, in the vast majority of cases, say nothing about it to the public. And if they do, it will only be after they retire. Money, not truth, or God, is worshipped. For this reason, it's difficult to estimate how many people know about it. The narrow-mindedness I observe, based largely on indoctrination but also on a lack of imagination, also makes me think that most people in high positions don't know anything about it and probably don't want to know anything about it.
From this perspective, you know more than most experts in the country in which you live. And if you need further information, you have the appropriate sources at your fingertips. As far as I know, "expert" is not a legally protected term.
Thanks for putting this together Suavek - I'm new to your substack, and at first I found the articles difficult to follow, but now I'm getting the hang of it.
It's great that you re-print excerpts of all the articles - I don't have the time to read it all, but the way you break it down allows me to get the Big Picture.
I am mostly struck by the whole lie of the Contagion Boogey Man. It's amazing that we've all been frightened of this Figment of the Evil One's Imagination forever.
I used to think I had such an amazing immune system because I never got sick when I spent time around people who had supposedly contagious diseases.
Now I know that, while my God-given immune system is amazing, mine is no more amazing than anyone else's. That humbling thought is somehow incredibly comforting.
Dear Ana, it would be especially important to read Colpo's article to the end. Unfortunately, I can only post a fragment of it here. You'd be glad to have read the whole article. I promise!
Yeah, if you can't perceive the simple excess mortality data, the declining birth rate, the increase in the number of disabled people requiring care, and don't know of any studies that have proven the ingredients and mechanisms of action of the "COVID" "vaccine" to be highly toxic even before its market launch, then how can I help you? Your self-protection mechanisms against stress are obviously wonderful, and your self-belief is quite admirable. They are psychological defence mechanisms, so no Substack writer can help you, no matter how much evidence of intent someone presents. Many people don't even believe that the Pfizer soup can be harmful. They believe in random physical weaknesses of the suddenly deceased and in the immunological peculiarities of the 31 million corpses so far. You have no right to call us all idiots so you can continue to dismiss the stress that you feel very subconsciously. Of course, what is going on here is completely schizophrenic, but what can Mike Yeadon do about it? Be grateful that someone is even warning you, which costs time and a lot of effort. How do you know what goes on in the sick mind of a psychopathic perpetrator? Maybe someone wants to pay back their trillions of dollars in debt to Chinese oligarchs and give them a few depopulated states in return? That sounds sick, like everything else.
But anything is possible. Very few people are capable of such crimes, and I estimate that there are no more than two perpetrators who planned and orchestrated this. How do I know? Because this kind of psychopathy is extremely rare, so it would be impossible for 10 such psychopaths to meet together. There are too many harmful mechanisms in the genetic injections for you to continue dreaming of chance, to continue feeling carefree and stress-free. If you can't deal with problems like this, then please take up gardening, but don't ruin the time-consuming enlightenment work of others.
Not to mention Suavek, that many of the monsters behind all of this have *publicly* stated there are too many people on the planet. They don't care if they kill us all. We've heard estimates of 500,000,000 to 1 Billion people max is what these dystopian dreamers are aiming for. Obviously, Jo either hasn't listened to or read any of the speeches or books from those behind this whole charade. Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates just to name two.
Finally! I'm so pleased to see that these two incredible gentlemen have joined forces to expose this evil agenda. May I please strongly recommend you both go take a read of 'A Farewell to Virology' by Dr. Mark Bailey in Mew Zealand, if you haven't already. I think you'll find it may be exactly what you're looking for. Keep up the fantastic work, love reading all of both of your articles and thank you so much for the work you do. It's so valuable and important. Best wishes from New Zealand.
Wow. Excellent. We are learning that these greedy control freaks have been in "problem, reaction, 'solution'" mode for decades and decades. Disgusting.
Thank you for going to the trouble of organizing and re-posting your Telegram stuff here, neatly packaged-up. Not only does it make it more convenient for slow-to-change luddites like me to get, but as you have probably already strategized, the replication makes the message harder to cancel.
Re. "Why on earth would they lie?" Exactly.
On earth, a.k.a., in this fallen world, beholden (i.e., unable not) to sin, enslaved to the pragmatic expedient I'll-do-whatever-they-ask fear of death, under the thumb of the created on-a-leash pit-bull (a.k.a., Satan) who "was a liar and a murderer from the beginning" (John 8:44)... the wonder is not that people lie, but that one man, the singular God-man, Christ Jesus, NEVER lied. He is The Truth (John 14:6). He spoke and speaks only Truth. They killed him for it. He overruled them.
The means to terrorise the mind via a proxy threat, establishes a cover story for persistence of the split mind of 'control-rules and filters' set over and apart from life - the Living.
The split-mind is not particular to the circular reasoning of pathological 'cell-hacking' virus 'non-living or alien entities asserted and believed to be "OUT THERE AND COMING TO GET YOU!"
It is a corollary to masking shock or fear of attack/conflict and guilting the mask, to then mask the guilt in lies passing off as true - or 'given a blind eye'.
A conflicted system, social group or self WILL seek and find scapegoats to protect the split against exposure to feared truth.
I speak to underlying beliefs that may never have been formulated in thought, but as assumed reality, frame our thoughts, perceptions and responses.
Uncovering this level of the psyche carries a temptation to hack the mind of others ie; to leverage outcomes for personal gain - perhaps in the fantasy of cosplaying of a purveyor of truth revealing. Not because we are inherently evil, but because the mind of a 'self-protective' recoil from love and life is a much deeper or deeply protected habit than any intellectual insight can break. Ie: an addict can have an extraordinary insight into the nature of their affliction without in any way releasing the identity investment of addictive behaviours.
For my part I was already aware of much of the spurious nature of a pharmaceutically and pathologically framed biotech model of 'body systems' as the purview of trained silos of specialised compartmentalisation. But the USE of the 'medical industrial complex' as a tightening choke hold over a financially dependent corporate 'mindshare' (society) revealed the extent of a managed warren of lies framed as protections, services and solutions - in which we are all in various ways 'invested stakeholders'.
Hedging and protecting or pre-emptively fighting against feared pain of loss seems altogether natural - but the mind framing of associative definitions and masking 'solutions' interjects a masking defence over a split mind.
Thank you for your second comment on this Substack. I've never been able to read so much information in a single sentence. Each sentence you write feels like a separate book. You live in South America, don't you? Your previous comment made me realize I was reading something I would soon be thinking about for years. Now you've sent me the next, years-long homework assignment. Many thanks again and greetings from your study country, Germany,
I appreciate joining in a sense of shared worth and to my heart and mind, relevance to a shift of perspective that cannot be forced but only allowed or given welcome.
If you share resonance with the underlying' terrain' (of which I seek to share in some sketch of articulation), then you are 'opening the book' of your own rising awareness. The mind can run a head in its own thinking, neglecting living context of real relationship for the spin of its own justifictions suffered as real.
I have set no task for you - but shared from 'where I live' in terms of contributing to the undoing of active ignorances.
England? Then my research obviously yielded the wrong result, although the biophysics wasn't entirely wrong. After your first comment, I started crafting an article from your Substack notes, because it's very rare for someone to understand everything that's happening and delve so deeply into the problem. If you'll allow me, I'll publish your notes on my Substack, with references, of course. I call "homework" the texts that can't be read quickly because you have to pause for reflection. This isn't due to incomprehensibility, but simply to the sheer amount of information within a single sentence, and also to the fact that you bring together many disciplines and actually create something new out of them. I find that unique. Who else besides you can create such good, indirect psychological personality profiles of perpetrators, their accomplices, and the victims? I was very pleased to have read almost all of your notes on Substack. Topics like projections and rationalizations/self-justification, in my opinion, truly represent homework for reflection. I'm continually amazed at how some people so conveniently cobble together their entire worldview, and their self-image. Perhaps, by reflecting on this, I'll find something that could help my persuasion? Of course, I'm looking for ideas on how to quickly encourage people to do deeper research so that they acknowledge the uncomfortable facts instead of rejecting them.
I wrote a raft of responses to this and then shelved them
You are welcome to extend my posts with credits - or integrate the essence by giving your own witness in your own way.
We are all unique in various ways. My life has brought me to write in this way - rather than from a presumption of lack, conflict or separateness (but aware of our experience of such).
Yes - evading or masking over fear or self-conflict generates defences against the call to heal or correct them. The 'best defence' being pre-emptive attack or denial.
At some point the demands of the masking ego-defence become more fearful than the fears it is made to hide. The 'mask' breaks down to a willingness to question, but fear can still frame, distort and limit acceptance until there is a deeper trust of self and life in truth. We cant force trust - its a relationship. Not a contract.
In this Substack, I simply wanted to use arguments to somewhat accelerate the understanding of the truth, as time is of the essence. I can only hope this is possible, because what else are arguments for, and what are they used for?
I previously stated that I would like to cite you and your Substack notes as the source in the publication, but not add any other sources or texts. With the psychological aspect, you significantly add perspective on the events of this time. For me, this addition is very significant. I can't add anything "unique" to your valuable thoughts, and although I've read a lot, I haven't been able to disagree with any of them so far. That's why I was so astonished when I read your notes. I had to laugh a little when I wrote the following sentence: My "uniqueness" could only have detracted from your well-thought-out text. Of course, I am VERY grateful for everything you've written so far.
Let's say for now that I know I am not special - and yet I also see that very few give witness as an integrative acceptance and appreciation for being. I do see a movement towards (recognising and accepting the need for) healing - where it is needed - that is - at a depth and intimacy of being that we are largely and unwittingly masked against.
I am not interested in arguing anything, but I am open to exploring differences within a willingness or relational communication. Insofar as people come to question or re-evaluate social or cultural assumptions - such as bio-chemical models underlying our pharma-funded and framed 'medicine' - it is helpful to find witnesses supporting a more conscious focus and decision - even if leaving the seemingly known self/world for an 'uncomfortable or unsettling' sense of life. However this is the context for decision in place of passive default.
The term 'psychological' implicitly distances our psychic or felt existence as a judged specimen as does co-fusing biology with life. A more direct expression of heart and mind as integrally one, is filtered out bu linguistic conventions or accepted currencies of thought. 'Moral' as integral is very different from 'moral' as judgement set over the unworthy or blameworthy.
The latter uses projection as a 'scaping device for 'sins+consequences' by placing or attributing CAUSE to a cast-out 'mind or creative/causative agency (in others and world) - to mitigate pain of guilt. Hence to WANT to 'see' evils in others and world - as a contagion to be stamped out, checked or made manageable. Thus to WANT to protect invested identity in magical (false) masking solutions that are be-lived, suffered and died in, as real.
What we project (give) sets the true measure of our receipt, but I might THINK to have dumped my self-hate onto another who may buy into guilted fear or gaslighting and thus support my (and their) delusions. Having recognised this futility, I would rather be healed of a masking or manipulative hate, by joining with the 'dreamer' but not supporting the evil 'dream'.
To attack the 'persona' will shift focus to 'externalised' personality or identity conflict. Its tricky to try and articulate this. But more are perhaps recognising that true freedom is responsibility for thought - from which actions (expressing or suppressed) follow automatically. Healing and renewing our mind-errors - in place - that is in the moment at hand, is within life - not set over and apart from life judged unworthy or hateful. Yet we are 'trained' to the latter - are we not?
I understood your last text as a suggestion for solving the problem, based on two ideas: "Human, know thyself" and "Know life." I just didn't understand whether you meant that anger/hate should also be integrated into the self, or whether such emotions become meaningless and lose their power during the "integration work" anyway?
Do you make a distinction between blind and useful anger, or do you think that all anger inevitably leads to unhealthy projections? Do you think that a person who views their anger as constructive energy has been trained for anger and is therefore dependent on projections instead of insight?
Please forgive me for these many questions, I have already largely abbreviated the text...
The energy of anger can 'sweep out our own Temple' - but my understanding of this is the clearing out of what has no true belonging.
The Temple represents our devotions.
Forceful communication aligning and embodying integrity can look and feel angry - but the core communication is NO to a disintegrity. And the form of the no can be an outward expression or act as it can an abiding in silence rather than engaging in lies (intended or defended).
The key context for me is whether I 'give vengeance to the Lord' - so to speak or claim it as my personal right to power and self validation.
We have to live with our self and no matter who or what we are angry at - who is the one that carries it?
If I come to recognise that I hurt myself I lose interest in 'getting angry' and become curious as to what triggers me and how. But it isn't for me to say how anyone else should or shouldnt think or act - but I may be able to offer reflections to the choices being made so as to enable better outcomes. Triggered reactions don't seem to allow or embody choice - apart from whether to attack now or mask over to 'fight another day'.
How much of our focus is a form of replaying our past in attempt to fix it? More than we might think.
I'm wary of setting rules for situations that have specific contexts and are not the same. Hence my primary invitation is to open and grow in discernment (aka Holy Spirit) - this is where we are moved from a different purpose than self-imaged status and survival strategy.
So in practical terms, the Spirit meets us where we Are - not where we 'should be' - and as we allow, will transform or heal our perceptions.
Where once I would see attack, I may now recognise a 'call for help' - albeit entirely unconscious. Because I no longer project a past grievance onto the situation as the only way to 'see'. Ego will always seek to usurp Spirit - ie - seek to fix others 'seen' as in need of (our) correction. This doesn't heal, no matter how 'spiritual' the presentation. It is MY call for help that another carries - but that goes deeper than I would attempt to write of here. The practical experience is of release and recognition in place of an 'ancient hatred'.
Generally I write to invite the willingness and curiosity - not to 'sell' the fruits of what is in truth an intimate or direct relational honesty (not mine to sell!)
Blind anger - recognised as such, is no longer wholly blind. Shall we learn from mistakes or heap on blame? Hate and guilt are part of each other.
Guilt make a 'self' that then extends to others. As does love. But only one can truly know and share - the other cannot afford honesty or trust and so MUST hate - and seek others to join in hate - so as to 'scape it...
I am very grateful for your words, which allow me and the other readers to share your thoughts. With the arrival of spring, I hope that everything will become easier again. If I then act according to the natural spring hormones and can enjoy this season a little, then I can hopefully regain clarity about how to communicate effectively. I am simply offering suggestions for distinguishing between political-medical fraud and simple reality, which is largely possible thanks to the expert testimony of Dr. Mike Yeadon. You can write about the truly unspeakable and offer a way to broaden horizons. That can actually be very useful. I can't do that.
As for sweeping away the entire temple, perhaps it (or at least our idea of it) was built on sandy ground, and if so, perhaps it should be swept away entirely? I, as a human ape who has not yet reached the end of his evolutionary development, can no more imagine the actual temple than a turkey can imagine advanced mathematics. I only know that any notion of it is indoctrinated, so I might not be entirely wrong in my ignorance. I've probably already completely swept this temple away from within me to make room for something new. I even managed this without using anger. Freedom from some notions allows me to act somewhat more freely. I consider the fear of immoral behaviour in the absence of a temple to be unfounded because we carry morality within us, and access to one's true, inner self seems to be the best "moral guardian." I enjoy living without the intellectual superstructure and carrying as few conceptual constructs as possible. Likewise, I recognize reality exclusively by seeing what works and what doesn't, that is, through my own experience. I consider an overdose—no matter what, even of many "firm principles"—to be toxic, but life seems too short to be able to determine the right dose in all areas of life. Not everything seems feasible for the human ape, and therefore I consider many problems unavoidable. That's precisely why I assume we'll never know most things in this lifetime. We only have a little time to try out a few things, and then it's over here.
I am more afraid of paying homage to false knowledge than of consciously living in relative ignorance. But there actually seems to be something that calms the fear of ignorance, and even makes us smile about it. Is this spring?
If you hold conflicting devotions - how shall your 'temple stand'.
And how shall you recognise your fulfilment?
I don't see a structure - but a consecrated relationship.
Indeed the way conflicts are masked behind apparently unifying assertive identities is set on 'shifting sands' rather than the uncarved block.
I am in no way calling your service into question. We can only give from what we have and grow thereby.
The principle of moderation, the middle way and by various names in other times does indeed serve life well.
In addition to "know thyself' Solon's gift of a temple, inscribed 'nothing too much'.
Self conflict can also arise from conflicted principles or a 'War of Principalities'.
There is an active ignorance called 'knowledge' that possesses the minds of all who think to possess and wield it.
There is a quality of 'knowing' that is being. This is also the wellspring or 'uncarved block' from which to extend true with-ness and worth-ship. Both religious and scientific 'explanations' of life (as a problem to be fixed) offer and operate an active ignorance - or chosen self-illusion.
Workability is a signature for reality. Whereas ideals can frame reality as a pale or unworthy copy. (scapegoat all that doesn't fit its ideal.
The transience of our human lifetime can serve a portal to the Timeless, while dreaming of permanence enables sleepwalking even while alive.
Springing forth: "Behold I make all things new!".
Babes come into our world and without a word say 'remember Home'. There's a light - an innocence - of being that the image and form cant really contain. Nor words define.
“A virus, we are now told, is a tiny, infectious pathogen containing RNA or DNA, with a protein or lipid coating.”
The above statement I cut and pasted from the original article.
This is where we, as the dominant human species, have outlived any and all, naturally occurring, maligned compromising germs. Our natural immune system decides, which germ is good and which germ is bad, with the proper immune system response, nearly perfect every time.
Unfortunately we’re living in a world of fear induced, manmade chaos, threatening our very existence. Manmade “germ-warfare” is
as real and deadly, as threatening as it gets sort of like the tip of a spear, plunged into a beating heart!
Nevertheless we’re finding ourselves in a world-war of “haves and have nots” and the “haves” have been seeking ways to destroy the “have-nots” for decades. Today with specific DNA capabilities, who’s to say who’s next?
Which is as real as it gets. This is exactly why, GOF enthusiasts have more than a “leg-up” on honest, good and decent human beings inspired to better the world not destroy it.
“Where there’s a
will, there’s a way.” This is the scenario which leaves us wondering who’s next! Certainly not unrealistic for anyone who thinks for him or herself to ponder.
This kind of scenario should concern everyone and anyone who has ever asked a question about anything, ever. Essentially everyone should be asking themselves similar questions so as not to get caught off guard when something happens.
“Expect the unexpected.”
My concern is, how can anyone prevent another “covid-mind-virus” from happening? We can’t but we can be conscious about the potentiality and likelihood, it will happen again!
Unless there’s a complete ban on all GOF developments, (which still wouldn’t stop those who want to harm / scare / control others) simply by limiting those who seek to harm others, I don’t believe can be stopped.
Others will use whatever means to screw with, other peoples existence / other people’s fears and uncertainties, etc. solely for monetary gains. Still others will do the same, for both monetary gains and for the “fun” of it.
In such demented minds, we can’t ever stop nor let our guard down. My question is, how can anyone know if some sort of germ, created in a lab, will cause half the world’s demise? How?
It seems unlikely. Humanity must deal with this problem directly. If there’s any chance of evading, some deadly creation, someone created in a lab, with all the necessary coding’s elements / trimmings, etc. with a specific
targeted audience in mind, how can this be avoided? I don’t know if it can or can’t be avoided. If a certain specificities of subset life forms have been identified for extermination, I believe this can be achieved fairly easily today.
I thought about this many times over when lockdowns
were forced upon us.
What if?
Gun haters can take away every gun on planet earth yet someone will use something else to achieve their desired outcome. This is the same issue we’re facing now. Banning GOF simply means they’ll find another way and will use whatever means to achieve their desired outcome. Those who seek to harm others, have many tools at their disposal. The “covid-fraud” harmed millions in many different ways. This is the “unknown” what if scenario’s we’re all faced with today.
A guessing game of “should I or shouldn’t I” or “Did they or didn’t they.” Maybe covid was a benefit in some distorted sense. The “covid-fraud” has illuminated this reality for all to see. A reality of coordinated messaging, proved, has shown us, how easy it was for
“Evilness” to attack, without ever firing a single shot, so to speak, against all of mankind, worldwide! Who would have thought this would ever happen?
A guessing game of chance or a pull of the trigger as in “Russian Roulette.” This clicking of the mindsets of all of those who’ve already feared the unknown, were rapidly lining-up turning out en masse!There will be another round of events coming to a theater near us all, sooner rather than later. Maybe we shouldn’t forget so quickly?
May God Bless America and The Entire World!
AJR
It's clear to me that "COVID" propaganda has succeeded in instilling false fears in you. If you were to read older articles on this Substack, you wouldn't completely eliminate your fears, but you would refocus them on real dangers. The narrative of banning GoF stems from the perpetrators' propaganda and is intended to reinforce the existence of "COVID." If many people believe it, the perpetrators will have an easy time with the next plandemic and the next forced "vaccinations". The fears are justified, but they should focus on the real dangers, not on the false imagery and propaganda.
No "COVID," no "virus," and therefore no "viruses" can escape from a laboratory. Even according to conventional medicine, the alleged "viruses" could pose no danger, because according to official science, any "virus" would quickly lose its toxicity. Or: a "virus" whose genes are based on RNA cannot reproduce indefinitely. So you can believe what you want, but please don't stir up unjustified panic. Please read the other articles. Thank you in advance.
Sincerely,
Suavek
Not at all.
Not in the least of ways Suavek.
I was one of the first who knew we were being lied too! The point of my post was to make those aware, who still line up for their covid Bioweapon inject, to wake up!
My reply wasn’t in any way to express my “FEARS” rather those who still wear a masks, who still scream at people! Covid was “ Psychological Warfare-operation” Executed with military precision, in fact our own “DoD-OWS” which Trump authorized during his first term has now completely “Pigeonholed” this entire “Weapons of Mass Destruction” attack by means of an mRNA-Bioweapon!
This attack against humanity hadn’t absolutely nothing to do with Healthcare or the well-being of humanity.
If you go back and read the thousands of articles I’ve written, you’ll understand why I wrote this today!
My thoughts today was how it inform others what “NOT” to do! It has nothing to do about me being afraid or fearful. I was trying to get others to understand and not to allow another of this same “Psychological mind virus” divide each other! We lose every time when we are “separated!”
My apologies if you misinterpreted or I misspoke on miss wrote which implied any of the sort which you replied with.
Thanks for your time.
If I misunderstood something, I apologize. I thought you were afraid of GoF and the possibility of "viruses" escaping from a lab.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Thank you Suavek. It’s quite sad these monstrous-murders, so deliberately knew what they were doing and so many people died / were killed / murdered needlessly.
I lost 4 clients and 3 friends, all injected with the mRNA and all were healthy people prior. I’m literally-livid, what these maniacally-deranged psychopaths, have done to us!
Infuriatingly-diabolical, the “Covid-Fraud” one could equate this to a cowardly, deceitful act, premeditated-excessive murder, deliberately by design! They knew what they were doing and why they were doing this, period!
Thanks again Suavek, I appreciate your insight. AJR
Almost forgot to mention. I have also called out our beloved President numerous times! At this juncture he is complicit in the deaths of “millions of innocent people!” Simply because he has remained “SILENT!” A full Class-I Recall of all mRNA product should have already happened! Instead our president doubled-down by allowing Larry Ellison to speak about developing a cancer treatment in 48 hours using AI & mRNA! AYKM? Additionally, the more dangerous and potentially as deadly saRNA was given the fast-track green light! Again, AYKM? Our president has failed miserably in protecting the American people from these known “Bioweapons!” Miserably may be an understatement IMO! Nevertheless he has failed! I have multiple clients still injecting people because 1. There’s money to be made and 2. People haven’t any clue what they are doing! Our president could end this maddening madness simply by addressing the nation during prime time! Lastly, this “Covid-Fraud” was the greatest “Weapons of Mass Destruction Attack” ever committed against humanity during peacetime! More than 31 million people have been murdered worldwide! Million more permanently disabled and still millions more may or may not wake up for work or school tomorrow! Fear? Not a Chance! Angry? You bet your life! Anger is an understatement! I cannot describe my true feelings about what has been “DONE TO US, NOT FOR US!”
I am just an ordinary bod with no scientific or medical credentials, some others of dubious value, but no PHD in anything, so I can readily be discounted as a "non-expert".
Wandering around as I tend to do, I have noticed that the official literature of the DoD & CO, about GOF research and related subjects, appears to be fully accepting of the existence of viruses and their dangerous potential as contagious lethal pathogens.
However, there is significant evidence of repeated covert experiments, without the knowledge or consent of the people involved, attempting to determine: if there is contagion; or if not, how pathogens can be effectively spread to appear to be contagious.
Based upon the research of Katherine Watt and my own, I am convinced that there is no effective definition of "a virus" in US law.
Strange ... so much about viruses and vaccination but no exact legal definition.
This obviously raises red flags and critical questions.
In these circumstances, I must question if the medical/scientific players on the virus chessboard, are all ignorant of the real facts or knowingly promoting lies.
The latter is quite possible, but the extent of the coverup seems to indicate the former to me.
Could most military/scientific/medical "professionals", be absolutely convinced that viruses do exist; have been proven to exist by credible scientific isolation; are actually dangerous, contagious, potentially lethal pathogens with pandemic potential?
Impossible for most medical/scientific professionals to be so ignorant of the true facts?
I think not.
So many "experts" believe the climate change mythology!
Therefore, most experts believing the virus mythology is quite possible!
Kinda dints faith in the competence and integrity of the medical/scientific community.
But that faith may have been in a false religion anyhow.
Hi Seeds,
I completely agree with you. The power of indoctrination is so strong that even experts think they don't need to verify anything. That will change soon, because the issue is getting louder and louder. Until now, if an expert, a doctor, or a government official discovers that there is indeed no evidence for the existence of "viruses," they will, in the vast majority of cases, say nothing about it to the public. And if they do, it will only be after they retire. Money, not truth, or God, is worshipped. For this reason, it's difficult to estimate how many people know about it. The narrow-mindedness I observe, based largely on indoctrination but also on a lack of imagination, also makes me think that most people in high positions don't know anything about it and probably don't want to know anything about it.
From this perspective, you know more than most experts in the country in which you live. And if you need further information, you have the appropriate sources at your fingertips. As far as I know, "expert" is not a legally protected term.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Thanks for putting this together Suavek - I'm new to your substack, and at first I found the articles difficult to follow, but now I'm getting the hang of it.
It's great that you re-print excerpts of all the articles - I don't have the time to read it all, but the way you break it down allows me to get the Big Picture.
I am mostly struck by the whole lie of the Contagion Boogey Man. It's amazing that we've all been frightened of this Figment of the Evil One's Imagination forever.
I used to think I had such an amazing immune system because I never got sick when I spent time around people who had supposedly contagious diseases.
Now I know that, while my God-given immune system is amazing, mine is no more amazing than anyone else's. That humbling thought is somehow incredibly comforting.
Dear Ana, it would be especially important to read Colpo's article to the end. Unfortunately, I can only post a fragment of it here. You'd be glad to have read the whole article. I promise!
Best regards,
Suavek
You were right! It was definitely worth reading all of Colpo's article. I've left a longer comment there.
Thank you for the guidance.
https://suavek1.substac921686921686k.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-5
921686
Yeah, if you can't perceive the simple excess mortality data, the declining birth rate, the increase in the number of disabled people requiring care, and don't know of any studies that have proven the ingredients and mechanisms of action of the "COVID" "vaccine" to be highly toxic even before its market launch, then how can I help you? Your self-protection mechanisms against stress are obviously wonderful, and your self-belief is quite admirable. They are psychological defence mechanisms, so no Substack writer can help you, no matter how much evidence of intent someone presents. Many people don't even believe that the Pfizer soup can be harmful. They believe in random physical weaknesses of the suddenly deceased and in the immunological peculiarities of the 31 million corpses so far. You have no right to call us all idiots so you can continue to dismiss the stress that you feel very subconsciously. Of course, what is going on here is completely schizophrenic, but what can Mike Yeadon do about it? Be grateful that someone is even warning you, which costs time and a lot of effort. How do you know what goes on in the sick mind of a psychopathic perpetrator? Maybe someone wants to pay back their trillions of dollars in debt to Chinese oligarchs and give them a few depopulated states in return? That sounds sick, like everything else.
But anything is possible. Very few people are capable of such crimes, and I estimate that there are no more than two perpetrators who planned and orchestrated this. How do I know? Because this kind of psychopathy is extremely rare, so it would be impossible for 10 such psychopaths to meet together. There are too many harmful mechanisms in the genetic injections for you to continue dreaming of chance, to continue feeling carefree and stress-free. If you can't deal with problems like this, then please take up gardening, but don't ruin the time-consuming enlightenment work of others.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Not to mention Suavek, that many of the monsters behind all of this have *publicly* stated there are too many people on the planet. They don't care if they kill us all. We've heard estimates of 500,000,000 to 1 Billion people max is what these dystopian dreamers are aiming for. Obviously, Jo either hasn't listened to or read any of the speeches or books from those behind this whole charade. Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates just to name two.
Finally! I'm so pleased to see that these two incredible gentlemen have joined forces to expose this evil agenda. May I please strongly recommend you both go take a read of 'A Farewell to Virology' by Dr. Mark Bailey in Mew Zealand, if you haven't already. I think you'll find it may be exactly what you're looking for. Keep up the fantastic work, love reading all of both of your articles and thank you so much for the work you do. It's so valuable and important. Best wishes from New Zealand.
Thank you Sarah for your kind comment and, as I just learned, also for your support. Best regards from Germany,
Suavek
Wow. Excellent. We are learning that these greedy control freaks have been in "problem, reaction, 'solution'" mode for decades and decades. Disgusting.
Thank you for going to the trouble of organizing and re-posting your Telegram stuff here, neatly packaged-up. Not only does it make it more convenient for slow-to-change luddites like me to get, but as you have probably already strategized, the replication makes the message harder to cancel.
Re. "Why on earth would they lie?" Exactly.
On earth, a.k.a., in this fallen world, beholden (i.e., unable not) to sin, enslaved to the pragmatic expedient I'll-do-whatever-they-ask fear of death, under the thumb of the created on-a-leash pit-bull (a.k.a., Satan) who "was a liar and a murderer from the beginning" (John 8:44)... the wonder is not that people lie, but that one man, the singular God-man, Christ Jesus, NEVER lied. He is The Truth (John 14:6). He spoke and speaks only Truth. They killed him for it. He overruled them.
The means to terrorise the mind via a proxy threat, establishes a cover story for persistence of the split mind of 'control-rules and filters' set over and apart from life - the Living.
The split-mind is not particular to the circular reasoning of pathological 'cell-hacking' virus 'non-living or alien entities asserted and believed to be "OUT THERE AND COMING TO GET YOU!"
It is a corollary to masking shock or fear of attack/conflict and guilting the mask, to then mask the guilt in lies passing off as true - or 'given a blind eye'.
A conflicted system, social group or self WILL seek and find scapegoats to protect the split against exposure to feared truth.
I speak to underlying beliefs that may never have been formulated in thought, but as assumed reality, frame our thoughts, perceptions and responses.
Uncovering this level of the psyche carries a temptation to hack the mind of others ie; to leverage outcomes for personal gain - perhaps in the fantasy of cosplaying of a purveyor of truth revealing. Not because we are inherently evil, but because the mind of a 'self-protective' recoil from love and life is a much deeper or deeply protected habit than any intellectual insight can break. Ie: an addict can have an extraordinary insight into the nature of their affliction without in any way releasing the identity investment of addictive behaviours.
For my part I was already aware of much of the spurious nature of a pharmaceutically and pathologically framed biotech model of 'body systems' as the purview of trained silos of specialised compartmentalisation. But the USE of the 'medical industrial complex' as a tightening choke hold over a financially dependent corporate 'mindshare' (society) revealed the extent of a managed warren of lies framed as protections, services and solutions - in which we are all in various ways 'invested stakeholders'.
Hedging and protecting or pre-emptively fighting against feared pain of loss seems altogether natural - but the mind framing of associative definitions and masking 'solutions' interjects a masking defence over a split mind.
Dear Binra,
Thank you for your second comment on this Substack. I've never been able to read so much information in a single sentence. Each sentence you write feels like a separate book. You live in South America, don't you? Your previous comment made me realize I was reading something I would soon be thinking about for years. Now you've sent me the next, years-long homework assignment. Many thanks again and greetings from your study country, Germany,
Suavek
Dear Suavek,
I appreciate joining in a sense of shared worth and to my heart and mind, relevance to a shift of perspective that cannot be forced but only allowed or given welcome.
If you share resonance with the underlying' terrain' (of which I seek to share in some sketch of articulation), then you are 'opening the book' of your own rising awareness. The mind can run a head in its own thinking, neglecting living context of real relationship for the spin of its own justifictions suffered as real.
I have set no task for you - but shared from 'where I live' in terms of contributing to the undoing of active ignorances.
But I reside in England.
Binra | Brian
Dear Binra,
England? Then my research obviously yielded the wrong result, although the biophysics wasn't entirely wrong. After your first comment, I started crafting an article from your Substack notes, because it's very rare for someone to understand everything that's happening and delve so deeply into the problem. If you'll allow me, I'll publish your notes on my Substack, with references, of course. I call "homework" the texts that can't be read quickly because you have to pause for reflection. This isn't due to incomprehensibility, but simply to the sheer amount of information within a single sentence, and also to the fact that you bring together many disciplines and actually create something new out of them. I find that unique. Who else besides you can create such good, indirect psychological personality profiles of perpetrators, their accomplices, and the victims? I was very pleased to have read almost all of your notes on Substack. Topics like projections and rationalizations/self-justification, in my opinion, truly represent homework for reflection. I'm continually amazed at how some people so conveniently cobble together their entire worldview, and their self-image. Perhaps, by reflecting on this, I'll find something that could help my persuasion? Of course, I'm looking for ideas on how to quickly encourage people to do deeper research so that they acknowledge the uncomfortable facts instead of rejecting them.
Best wishes,
Suavek
I wrote a raft of responses to this and then shelved them
You are welcome to extend my posts with credits - or integrate the essence by giving your own witness in your own way.
We are all unique in various ways. My life has brought me to write in this way - rather than from a presumption of lack, conflict or separateness (but aware of our experience of such).
Yes - evading or masking over fear or self-conflict generates defences against the call to heal or correct them. The 'best defence' being pre-emptive attack or denial.
At some point the demands of the masking ego-defence become more fearful than the fears it is made to hide. The 'mask' breaks down to a willingness to question, but fear can still frame, distort and limit acceptance until there is a deeper trust of self and life in truth. We cant force trust - its a relationship. Not a contract.
Dear Binra,
In this Substack, I simply wanted to use arguments to somewhat accelerate the understanding of the truth, as time is of the essence. I can only hope this is possible, because what else are arguments for, and what are they used for?
I previously stated that I would like to cite you and your Substack notes as the source in the publication, but not add any other sources or texts. With the psychological aspect, you significantly add perspective on the events of this time. For me, this addition is very significant. I can't add anything "unique" to your valuable thoughts, and although I've read a lot, I haven't been able to disagree with any of them so far. That's why I was so astonished when I read your notes. I had to laugh a little when I wrote the following sentence: My "uniqueness" could only have detracted from your well-thought-out text. Of course, I am VERY grateful for everything you've written so far.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Let's say for now that I know I am not special - and yet I also see that very few give witness as an integrative acceptance and appreciation for being. I do see a movement towards (recognising and accepting the need for) healing - where it is needed - that is - at a depth and intimacy of being that we are largely and unwittingly masked against.
I am not interested in arguing anything, but I am open to exploring differences within a willingness or relational communication. Insofar as people come to question or re-evaluate social or cultural assumptions - such as bio-chemical models underlying our pharma-funded and framed 'medicine' - it is helpful to find witnesses supporting a more conscious focus and decision - even if leaving the seemingly known self/world for an 'uncomfortable or unsettling' sense of life. However this is the context for decision in place of passive default.
The term 'psychological' implicitly distances our psychic or felt existence as a judged specimen as does co-fusing biology with life. A more direct expression of heart and mind as integrally one, is filtered out bu linguistic conventions or accepted currencies of thought. 'Moral' as integral is very different from 'moral' as judgement set over the unworthy or blameworthy.
The latter uses projection as a 'scaping device for 'sins+consequences' by placing or attributing CAUSE to a cast-out 'mind or creative/causative agency (in others and world) - to mitigate pain of guilt. Hence to WANT to 'see' evils in others and world - as a contagion to be stamped out, checked or made manageable. Thus to WANT to protect invested identity in magical (false) masking solutions that are be-lived, suffered and died in, as real.
What we project (give) sets the true measure of our receipt, but I might THINK to have dumped my self-hate onto another who may buy into guilted fear or gaslighting and thus support my (and their) delusions. Having recognised this futility, I would rather be healed of a masking or manipulative hate, by joining with the 'dreamer' but not supporting the evil 'dream'.
To attack the 'persona' will shift focus to 'externalised' personality or identity conflict. Its tricky to try and articulate this. But more are perhaps recognising that true freedom is responsibility for thought - from which actions (expressing or suppressed) follow automatically. Healing and renewing our mind-errors - in place - that is in the moment at hand, is within life - not set over and apart from life judged unworthy or hateful. Yet we are 'trained' to the latter - are we not?
I understood your last text as a suggestion for solving the problem, based on two ideas: "Human, know thyself" and "Know life." I just didn't understand whether you meant that anger/hate should also be integrated into the self, or whether such emotions become meaningless and lose their power during the "integration work" anyway?
Do you make a distinction between blind and useful anger, or do you think that all anger inevitably leads to unhealthy projections? Do you think that a person who views their anger as constructive energy has been trained for anger and is therefore dependent on projections instead of insight?
Please forgive me for these many questions, I have already largely abbreviated the text...
Honesty to feelings - ie allowing them into awareness - allows transformation or reintegration.
I've used this diagram a few times. It's worth pondering in my opinion.
https://x.com/onemindinmany/status/1849726223871611140
The energy of anger can 'sweep out our own Temple' - but my understanding of this is the clearing out of what has no true belonging.
The Temple represents our devotions.
Forceful communication aligning and embodying integrity can look and feel angry - but the core communication is NO to a disintegrity. And the form of the no can be an outward expression or act as it can an abiding in silence rather than engaging in lies (intended or defended).
The key context for me is whether I 'give vengeance to the Lord' - so to speak or claim it as my personal right to power and self validation.
We have to live with our self and no matter who or what we are angry at - who is the one that carries it?
If I come to recognise that I hurt myself I lose interest in 'getting angry' and become curious as to what triggers me and how. But it isn't for me to say how anyone else should or shouldnt think or act - but I may be able to offer reflections to the choices being made so as to enable better outcomes. Triggered reactions don't seem to allow or embody choice - apart from whether to attack now or mask over to 'fight another day'.
How much of our focus is a form of replaying our past in attempt to fix it? More than we might think.
I'm wary of setting rules for situations that have specific contexts and are not the same. Hence my primary invitation is to open and grow in discernment (aka Holy Spirit) - this is where we are moved from a different purpose than self-imaged status and survival strategy.
So in practical terms, the Spirit meets us where we Are - not where we 'should be' - and as we allow, will transform or heal our perceptions.
Where once I would see attack, I may now recognise a 'call for help' - albeit entirely unconscious. Because I no longer project a past grievance onto the situation as the only way to 'see'. Ego will always seek to usurp Spirit - ie - seek to fix others 'seen' as in need of (our) correction. This doesn't heal, no matter how 'spiritual' the presentation. It is MY call for help that another carries - but that goes deeper than I would attempt to write of here. The practical experience is of release and recognition in place of an 'ancient hatred'.
Generally I write to invite the willingness and curiosity - not to 'sell' the fruits of what is in truth an intimate or direct relational honesty (not mine to sell!)
Blind anger - recognised as such, is no longer wholly blind. Shall we learn from mistakes or heap on blame? Hate and guilt are part of each other.
Guilt make a 'self' that then extends to others. As does love. But only one can truly know and share - the other cannot afford honesty or trust and so MUST hate - and seek others to join in hate - so as to 'scape it...
I am very grateful for your words, which allow me and the other readers to share your thoughts. With the arrival of spring, I hope that everything will become easier again. If I then act according to the natural spring hormones and can enjoy this season a little, then I can hopefully regain clarity about how to communicate effectively. I am simply offering suggestions for distinguishing between political-medical fraud and simple reality, which is largely possible thanks to the expert testimony of Dr. Mike Yeadon. You can write about the truly unspeakable and offer a way to broaden horizons. That can actually be very useful. I can't do that.
As for sweeping away the entire temple, perhaps it (or at least our idea of it) was built on sandy ground, and if so, perhaps it should be swept away entirely? I, as a human ape who has not yet reached the end of his evolutionary development, can no more imagine the actual temple than a turkey can imagine advanced mathematics. I only know that any notion of it is indoctrinated, so I might not be entirely wrong in my ignorance. I've probably already completely swept this temple away from within me to make room for something new. I even managed this without using anger. Freedom from some notions allows me to act somewhat more freely. I consider the fear of immoral behaviour in the absence of a temple to be unfounded because we carry morality within us, and access to one's true, inner self seems to be the best "moral guardian." I enjoy living without the intellectual superstructure and carrying as few conceptual constructs as possible. Likewise, I recognize reality exclusively by seeing what works and what doesn't, that is, through my own experience. I consider an overdose—no matter what, even of many "firm principles"—to be toxic, but life seems too short to be able to determine the right dose in all areas of life. Not everything seems feasible for the human ape, and therefore I consider many problems unavoidable. That's precisely why I assume we'll never know most things in this lifetime. We only have a little time to try out a few things, and then it's over here.
I am more afraid of paying homage to false knowledge than of consciously living in relative ignorance. But there actually seems to be something that calms the fear of ignorance, and even makes us smile about it. Is this spring?
Best wishes,
Suavek
To what are you devoted?
If you hold conflicting devotions - how shall your 'temple stand'.
And how shall you recognise your fulfilment?
I don't see a structure - but a consecrated relationship.
Indeed the way conflicts are masked behind apparently unifying assertive identities is set on 'shifting sands' rather than the uncarved block.
I am in no way calling your service into question. We can only give from what we have and grow thereby.
The principle of moderation, the middle way and by various names in other times does indeed serve life well.
In addition to "know thyself' Solon's gift of a temple, inscribed 'nothing too much'.
Self conflict can also arise from conflicted principles or a 'War of Principalities'.
There is an active ignorance called 'knowledge' that possesses the minds of all who think to possess and wield it.
There is a quality of 'knowing' that is being. This is also the wellspring or 'uncarved block' from which to extend true with-ness and worth-ship. Both religious and scientific 'explanations' of life (as a problem to be fixed) offer and operate an active ignorance - or chosen self-illusion.
Workability is a signature for reality. Whereas ideals can frame reality as a pale or unworthy copy. (scapegoat all that doesn't fit its ideal.
The transience of our human lifetime can serve a portal to the Timeless, while dreaming of permanence enables sleepwalking even while alive.
Springing forth: "Behold I make all things new!".
Babes come into our world and without a word say 'remember Home'. There's a light - an innocence - of being that the image and form cant really contain. Nor words define.
Greetings from England!