In addition, it might be worth considering the extent to which the mass murder and injuries caused by the bioweapon disguised as a "vaccine" were intended as a distraction from the robbery. This fits with Dr. Yeadon's expert statement "TOXIC BY DESIGN." Although there is no evidence for the diversion hypothesis, I would not be surprised if it were one of several possible motives, and could thus represent one of several pieces of the puzzle in answering the question of the motives behind toxicity by design. The perpetrators know that the more evil their motives are, the less credible they would appear to ordinary citizens.
I mentioned the hypothetical second piece of the puzzle in another article: toxicity can be used to blackmail those responsible later on, to force them to commit further crimes ( protection from public anger and impunity in exchange for absolute obedience ).
Not to mention that the US, probably with help, destroyed the Nordstream pipeline (which Biden said they would not tolerate, even before Russia 'invaded' Ukraine), in order to deprive Germany, in particular, of cheap Russian energy. This was a terrorist attack on a friendly nation, since half of the pipeline belonged to Germany (demolition of the other half constituted an act of undeclared war). And there's no way Germany's leaders don't know who did it.
The Great Reset goes much deeper than just theft. It is the fourth industrial revolution, and "resetting" the economy, society etc. The oligarchy have toyed with democracy and decided they prefer feudalism and fascism.
My article does not contradict your view. However, I think that the Great Reset is a fraud primarily because it conceals the theft. The fourth industrial revolution that you mentioned play a much smaller role in my opinion and have been deliberately inflated by propaganda. Of course, the other aspects you mentioned are there. Please note that the US is not deindustrializing. However, you are right that I should have expanded on your points in the article. I apologize for exaggerating the simplification for the sake of clarity.
Klaus Schwab, alleged founder of the World Economic Forum, and chairperson for over 50 years, was the father of public-private partnerships. The Great Reset is his dream.
The WEF’s members include; royalty, politicians, corporations, media outlets, ngos, etc. They are in the perfect position to manufacture whatever crisis they require to fulfil their agenda of greed and enslavement. Of course, that’s not what the PR team say.
Below is a PR view of the Great Reset (see what you think).
WEF is an arm of the CIA and Klaus Schwab is carrying out a clear mission. I am convinced that he is carrying out someone else's mission and not his own wishes. His immediate boss was the recently deceased Henry Kissinger, who worked on behalf of David Rockefeller. The approximately 1,000 international corporations that work with WEF and destroy the democratic remnants ensure the CIA's influence outside the Western Hemisphere, among other things, and influence governments worldwide, including through their lobbying. I don't know if all of this is in your article?
The other aspects are of course taking place. But the USA is currently building up its industry, which is being dismantled in other countries. German companies are already largely over there. The green agenda, which is destroying industries worldwide, will soon be toned down by Donald Trump in the USA. By the time the USA has destroyed the world economy, they will be the export champions. This lying train is heading there right now. The direction is recognizable. In this sense, the Great Reset turns out to be a lie. You can also call it an exaggeration of some aspects and a distraction from the global robbery.
No production facility will be irreparably destroyed. At this point, a new one is created somewhere else, but under the control of someone else. However, the location is not the most important thing, but rather the person who controls the new production (regardless of where it will be created). If a WEF member controls the new production, then the new location does not necessarily have to be the USA. Sometimes the long transport route may have to be excluded. The ownership structure will remain difficult for us, ordinary citizens, to understand. I think the dependence of such robbers on the US financial elite is crucial. The destruction of the economy is really just a hostile takeover. If the robbers hypothetically already had all the production, distribution, transport, sales, and leasing in their hands, in addition to the finances, then the so-called reset (a misleading term) would have long since become a thing of the past.
I see the destruction of the economy as the final push ... the means to financially debilitate people through unemployment and stolen retirement funds so they have no choice but to accept universal basic income, digital ID, 15 minute cities etc and therefore have to give up all control of their decision making to TPTB.
The food production and distribution system is being similarly destroyed for the same reason.
I don't think location matters either. Consolidation does though.
They describe the goals of the perpetrators, which I have not mentioned here because I have only focused on one topic: covering up the theft by using the term "reset". So thank you for your very necessary addition. As for pension funds, I have been asking myself this question for a long time: any government can reprint money (in the case of the USA, it would not be the government, but the Fed). The stolen pension funds can be compensated for by simply reprinting them. Even if this would increase inflation, this does not seem impossible. So why is this problem generally presented as if it were insoluble? Unfortunately, I could not find the answer to this question in Catherine Austin Fitts's statements, so I stopped looking for it. However, I would really like to find the answer because the stolen funds are mentioned by several people in connection with the mass murder ("TOXIC BY DESIGN").
Printing money only works for state pensions such as old age pension.
The issue is insoluble if the financial system is allowed to crash, rather than continuing to be propped up. Then the stocks and bonds that pension funds are typically invested in will be wiped out and governments and corporations will be unable to meet pension rolls. If the end goal is for TPTB to control all the resources, including us, many speculate that a financial crash will be allowed to happen. Some say it is inevitable anyway. And I can't see any other way that a total reset could be accomplished from an "own nothing and be happy" perspective. This would also wipe out privately invested retirement funds such as RRSPs.
The Canadian government is in the process of "borrowing" $9 billion from the federal employees' pension fund (which is different from the pension fund all working Canadians pay into). It might be a good time to take early retirement and invest those funds in something else.
I speculate that The Great Taking as described by David Rogers Webb could be (& possibly has to be) accompanied by the very destruction of all sovereign currencies? If no one will accept US dollars in exchange for goods and services from overseas exporters, doesn’t the dollar “fail”? Need to be replaced with CBDC?
I don’t have the deeper appreciation that those immersed in financial matters may have.
I do recommend precious metals because I don’t know in what else one can invest if, like we non elites are, tiny specs of capital and not juggernauts.
Yep. Theft,robbery.
And murder….
In addition, it might be worth considering the extent to which the mass murder and injuries caused by the bioweapon disguised as a "vaccine" were intended as a distraction from the robbery. This fits with Dr. Yeadon's expert statement "TOXIC BY DESIGN." Although there is no evidence for the diversion hypothesis, I would not be surprised if it were one of several possible motives, and could thus represent one of several pieces of the puzzle in answering the question of the motives behind toxicity by design. The perpetrators know that the more evil their motives are, the less credible they would appear to ordinary citizens.
I mentioned the hypothetical second piece of the puzzle in another article: toxicity can be used to blackmail those responsible later on, to force them to commit further crimes ( protection from public anger and impunity in exchange for absolute obedience ).
Absolute obedience…the absolute opposite of free will. God will never take back this gift.
🙏🙏🙏
Not to mention that the US, probably with help, destroyed the Nordstream pipeline (which Biden said they would not tolerate, even before Russia 'invaded' Ukraine), in order to deprive Germany, in particular, of cheap Russian energy. This was a terrorist attack on a friendly nation, since half of the pipeline belonged to Germany (demolition of the other half constituted an act of undeclared war). And there's no way Germany's leaders don't know who did it.
Appreciation and blessings from Sydney Australia.
🙏🙏🙏
The Great Reset goes much deeper than just theft. It is the fourth industrial revolution, and "resetting" the economy, society etc. The oligarchy have toyed with democracy and decided they prefer feudalism and fascism.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-152468006?source=queue
Dear Janey,
My article does not contradict your view. However, I think that the Great Reset is a fraud primarily because it conceals the theft. The fourth industrial revolution that you mentioned play a much smaller role in my opinion and have been deliberately inflated by propaganda. Of course, the other aspects you mentioned are there. Please note that the US is not deindustrializing. However, you are right that I should have expanded on your points in the article. I apologize for exaggerating the simplification for the sake of clarity.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Dear Suavek,
The Great Reset is everything.
Klaus Schwab, alleged founder of the World Economic Forum, and chairperson for over 50 years, was the father of public-private partnerships. The Great Reset is his dream.
The WEF’s members include; royalty, politicians, corporations, media outlets, ngos, etc. They are in the perfect position to manufacture whatever crisis they require to fulfil their agenda of greed and enslavement. Of course, that’s not what the PR team say.
Below is a PR view of the Great Reset (see what you think).
Blessings.
I had problems earlier, so restacked.
Dear Janey,
WEF is an arm of the CIA and Klaus Schwab is carrying out a clear mission. I am convinced that he is carrying out someone else's mission and not his own wishes. His immediate boss was the recently deceased Henry Kissinger, who worked on behalf of David Rockefeller. The approximately 1,000 international corporations that work with WEF and destroy the democratic remnants ensure the CIA's influence outside the Western Hemisphere, among other things, and influence governments worldwide, including through their lobbying. I don't know if all of this is in your article?
Are you saying that the other aspects of the Great reset, other than deindustrialization, are not occurring in the US? Or will not?
It seems to me that deindustrialization has already occurred over the past many decades in many sectors. Are you saying TPTB are now reversing this?
The other aspects are of course taking place. But the USA is currently building up its industry, which is being dismantled in other countries. German companies are already largely over there. The green agenda, which is destroying industries worldwide, will soon be toned down by Donald Trump in the USA. By the time the USA has destroyed the world economy, they will be the export champions. This lying train is heading there right now. The direction is recognizable. In this sense, the Great Reset turns out to be a lie. You can also call it an exaggeration of some aspects and a distraction from the global robbery.
It'll be interesting to see what Trump does.
I'm also curious about which other countries are losing industries to the US.
No production facility will be irreparably destroyed. At this point, a new one is created somewhere else, but under the control of someone else. However, the location is not the most important thing, but rather the person who controls the new production (regardless of where it will be created). If a WEF member controls the new production, then the new location does not necessarily have to be the USA. Sometimes the long transport route may have to be excluded. The ownership structure will remain difficult for us, ordinary citizens, to understand. I think the dependence of such robbers on the US financial elite is crucial. The destruction of the economy is really just a hostile takeover. If the robbers hypothetically already had all the production, distribution, transport, sales, and leasing in their hands, in addition to the finances, then the so-called reset (a misleading term) would have long since become a thing of the past.
Best wishes,
Suavek
I see the destruction of the economy as the final push ... the means to financially debilitate people through unemployment and stolen retirement funds so they have no choice but to accept universal basic income, digital ID, 15 minute cities etc and therefore have to give up all control of their decision making to TPTB.
The food production and distribution system is being similarly destroyed for the same reason.
I don't think location matters either. Consolidation does though.
Have a good evening!
They describe the goals of the perpetrators, which I have not mentioned here because I have only focused on one topic: covering up the theft by using the term "reset". So thank you for your very necessary addition. As for pension funds, I have been asking myself this question for a long time: any government can reprint money (in the case of the USA, it would not be the government, but the Fed). The stolen pension funds can be compensated for by simply reprinting them. Even if this would increase inflation, this does not seem impossible. So why is this problem generally presented as if it were insoluble? Unfortunately, I could not find the answer to this question in Catherine Austin Fitts's statements, so I stopped looking for it. However, I would really like to find the answer because the stolen funds are mentioned by several people in connection with the mass murder ("TOXIC BY DESIGN").
Kind regards,
Suavek
Printing money only works for state pensions such as old age pension.
The issue is insoluble if the financial system is allowed to crash, rather than continuing to be propped up. Then the stocks and bonds that pension funds are typically invested in will be wiped out and governments and corporations will be unable to meet pension rolls. If the end goal is for TPTB to control all the resources, including us, many speculate that a financial crash will be allowed to happen. Some say it is inevitable anyway. And I can't see any other way that a total reset could be accomplished from an "own nothing and be happy" perspective. This would also wipe out privately invested retirement funds such as RRSPs.
The Canadian government is in the process of "borrowing" $9 billion from the federal employees' pension fund (which is different from the pension fund all working Canadians pay into). It might be a good time to take early retirement and invest those funds in something else.
I speculate that The Great Taking as described by David Rogers Webb could be (& possibly has to be) accompanied by the very destruction of all sovereign currencies? If no one will accept US dollars in exchange for goods and services from overseas exporters, doesn’t the dollar “fail”? Need to be replaced with CBDC?
I don’t have the deeper appreciation that those immersed in financial matters may have.
I do recommend precious metals because I don’t know in what else one can invest if, like we non elites are, tiny specs of capital and not juggernauts.