Dr. Mike Yeadon - The holy relics of the Pharma : antibodies, PCR tests and viruses - PART 1 : How can we teach this to Steve ?
Dr. Mike Yeadon comments on the conversation between Steve Kirsch and Dr. Andrew Kaufman.
Dr. Mike Yeadon provided science-based comments to the conversation.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, June 14, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1466
I didn’t get around to watching the debate, but I posted extensively below the Substack.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr. Mike Yeadon, June 16, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1470
There was recently what was tagged as a debate between Steve Kirsch and Andrew Kaufman about viruses.
While I didn’t watch the event, I commented yesterday on Steve’s brief Substack piece referring to it.
Steve demands people answer questions that he thinks are relevant, for example “how come millions of people have samples taken & all contained the same sequence, if there wasn’t a pandemic?”
This is called “leading the witness”.
The right place to start isn’t with sequencing, a process which nobody but the high priests of sequencing can even claim fully to understand. It’s certainly not a field Steve knows anything about.
Surely better places to start are by asking the question “Can you show me the evidence that there even was a pandemic?”
If there isn’t any, then questions relating to what was allegedly found using “sequencing” become totally irrelevant.
That data is the answer to a non question. A better question is “Why are wealthy people running a global sequencing operation, when there clearly wasn’t a pandemic?”
There’s only one answer, and Ockham has his Razor in his hand. To deceive the unwary with distracting information.
Best wishes
Mike
Linked in the above post :
https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/how-can-millions-of-people-all-exhibiting
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-the-holy-relics-of?triedRedirect=true
Article linked above / with a link to the video :
A debate about viruses : Virus believer Steve Kirsch debates with Dr. Andrew Kaufman M.D., who does not believe in the existence of viruses.
Title of article :
How can millions of people, all exhibiting signs of COVID have whole genome sequences that match the SARS-CoV-2 reference genome if viruses don't exist?
Do you know? They were sequenced from scratch. The machines computed the sequences solely based on the samples under test using random primers.
Steve Kirsch
June 14, 2024
Source : https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/how-can-millions-of-people-all-exhibiting
Original photo from the video
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
The comments under the article by Steve Kirsch :
Source :
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/how-can-millions-of-people-all-exhibiting/comments
NOTE :
The time stamp of the comments only reflects the time when they were saved and not the actual order.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon, June 14, 2024 :
Antibodies, I do know much more about. Let me briefly explain. How are “antibodies to SARS-CoV-2” detected in a biological sample? What do you mean, you don’t actually know? Then you cannot cite such results as “evidence of a pandemic”, can you?
The general method is to immobilise the thing you’re seeking to detect antibodies against. So if you’re interested in “anti-spike protein antibodies”, you’ll need a sample of authentic spike protein. Let me know where you got that from.
Let’s for the sake of a thought experiment allow spike protein to magically appear in your lab. You stick some of it to multi well plates, then gently wash the plates. Now apply some sample, like serum from a “suspected previous infection”. Circulating antibodies to spike will bind to your plate. Gently wash, then “develop” the plate using say donkey anti-human antibodies, to which a colour-generating system is permanently bound. Final gentle wash then develop the colour, which will indicate that there was, in your serum sample, binding capacity which also is bound by an antibody to human antibodies.
It’s elaborate and can be miniaturised & automated, by this principle, enzyme linked, immunosorbent assays, or ELISAs, have been stock techniques since I was in the lab 40 years ago.
Now, in order to make this foolproof, it’s first necessary to rule in & rule out all sorts of potential to be misled.
I’ve never seen THE originating “methods development paper” for this technique.
I would point out that this ought to be as much of core interest as the Corman-Drosten paper with the PCR test development got. But crickets here, as far as I know.
The more sophisticated fraud is that you don’t do any of this. You simply buy-in a test which CLAIMS to detect antibodies to parts of the alleged virus. But no detailed dismantling of the methods inherent to the trustworthiness of the commercial kits most people use these days.
I think this was one of the easier components to deceive us with. Most people don’t even know how they’re supposed to work. They’ll actually be detecting analytes other than what you’re told.
Remember, there’s absolutely no question that there’s been a global coup d’etat.
The start of the “pandemic” is demonstrably lies, per Rancourt et al.
The (or rather, an) endgame was to inject 6 billion people with materials, ostensibly “vaccines”. While I was never a vaccinologist, I spent over 30 years working in “structure based drug design”. All medical products are designed and carefully so, with the intention of improving people’s lives while minimising the risk of harms (side effects).
So I’m very familiar with examining structures with the question: “what was the designer seeking to do using this molecular design?”
I also am qualified in “Mechanistic Toxicology”, the detailed how a chemical can injure us, at the molecular level.
Combining these skills and knowledge of a veteran of multidisciplinary drug discovery, I am 100% certain that the jabs were designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors.
Armed with this data point, I put it to you that we need to lift up our eyes from sonething initiated over four years ago.
Also, these are not vaccines. They’re not even medical products. They’re subject to NO regulation whatsoever. Nothing about efficacy, safety or manufacturing quality entered into the legalities of how “emergency use authorization” was granted.
The fake pandemic.
The deliberate design-in of toxicity.
The sneaky altering of public health laws.
The even sneakier alteration of “regulations” so as to appear to be properly tested and manufactured materials.
We’ve not touched on why, but do note that the imposition, almost everywhere, in almost every country, almost simultaneously, of unprecedented & dangerous and ineffective “measures”, is absolute proof of SUPRANATIONAL power. Lockdown is absurd. Never in human history have we quarantined the healthy. If you’re sick you withdraw. If you’re sick enough, you don’t get to choose. Add “lockdown” and all you do is force healthy people to remain at home. Run the money printers and you’ve the seeds of ruinous debts which I believe will be used to end all sovereign currencies and usher in central bank digital currencies.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, June 14, 2024 :
Sequencing isn’t what it seems is my answer. Those posing the question know no better than I do. They pretend it’s something that it’s not.
Also, I’m not at all convinced that the sequencing was & is done by independent experts.
I’ve been told that a component of the multi step sequencing process involves reference to or even sending samples or data to a central database.
If there’s a single element of sequencing, the type that’s described, possibly improperly, as “full length”, that involves reference to a central database, that’s where the deception occurs.
For there is undoubtedly a grand deception.
There was no sign of a pandemic until WHO fraudulently declared one. If that fact alone didn’t set off alarm bells, why didn’t it? Why doesn’t it now?
Set aside claims of “covid19 cases” and “covid19 deaths”.
Honestly, that’s child’s play to fake. Take an sick person and apply a test designed to generate false positives in the absence of the thing that the test is nominally designed to detect. Voila! A “covid19 case”.
Note, you don’t even need to have any symptoms.
If such a person subsequently dies, no matter the actual cause, that’s a “covid19 death”.
We have NEVER previously determined cause of death this way. Never. It’s always a collection of facts. Not one test that’s notoriously unreliable. Doesn’t this change alone make you suspicious? Why not?
………………………………………………………
2 Replies, June 14, 2024 :
…………………….
Kordelas
The thing is that existence of nucleotides is not proven as well. No variable has been noticed in nature which could be verified if it has properties of alleged nucleotide. There is no direct real time observations of all vital occurring processes with such variables and no experimentation on them in a form of independent variables.
Thus there is no reference material to create sequencing methods.
……………………
Rob
Exactly. My answer to Steve’s question is that just because a test reveals a certain pattern doesn’t prove it’s an invisible invader that is too small to view by itself in an electron microscope. It simply proves that the PCR test looks the same in many people, including many who have no symptoms of said virus.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Alfred Nassim, June 14, 2024 :
𝘕𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘶𝘪𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘈𝘙𝘚-𝘊𝘰𝘝-𝟮 𝘴𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘵.
Easy. The president of Tanzania revealed that the WHO gave the following results.
"Goat, quail and papaya in Tanzania test positive for COVID-19, raising concerns about false positives"
https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-05-10-faulty-coronavirus-tests-in-tanzania-false-positives.html
Sadly, it seem that president John Magufuli was assassinated a little later. Funny how these accidents never happen to those who promote the agenda.
https://greatgameindia.com/tanzania-president-john-magufuli-assassinated/
………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon / Reply, June 14, 2024 : :
………………………………
He was a PhD chemist. Not the ignorant antivaxxer he was painted to be in death.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
A little conversation, June 14, 2024 :
………………………………………………..
la chevalerie vit
The article makes the point that the unnatural, man-made Furin cleavage site is in the sequuence from all around the world. It’s not clear in the explanation given in the comment how that arises from our body’s natural detox process.
…………………
kordelas
Furin cleavage site is not proven.
………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, June 14, 2024 :
………………………
But is it in the sequence?
Who ran the sequencing?
I no longer automatically believe things.
If there’s room for manipulation, there’ll have been manipulation.
Nothing is as it seems.
Not while the largest crime in history is ongoing.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Dr. Mike Yeadon, June 14, 2024 :
Nobody exhibited signs of covid19. It is a non existent disease.
There are no set of symptoms that distinguish “covid19” from myriad other acute respiratory illnesses.
While some say there are, and I believe they believe what they’re saying, sadly, they’re not the same set of symptoms given by other believers.
What rules out a net additive cause of illness and particularly death is the epidemiological evidence.
Nowhere was there an increase in all-causes mortality prior to WHO fraudulently calling a pandemic.
They’re not fortune tellers. They can respond only to the same evidence available to us. A pandemic must happen FIRST before you can join the dots and exclaim “Look, this spike in all causes mortality in several continuous states might be an infectious disease event!”
No such event occurred PRIOR to the fraudulent declaration.
It was only after that fraudulent declaration that deaths spiked. We do know how that happened. You know it, too, unless you’re ok with planned, centrally organized and heavily incentivized iatrogenicide.
No pandemic.
No public health emergency.
Faked pandemic.
Planned iatrogenicide.
Cope harder.
All the other evidence is additional fakery, designed to thwart the confused and uncertain. And to assist crooks who, despite the availability of copious evidence of fraud are, 4.5 years in, still working hard to bring down a dystopian digital hellscape from which they expect to benefit.
…………………..
Reply, June 14, 2024 :
…………………..
Orioda
So true. It seems to be the case that so egregious is the reality of forces ranged against humanity that the truth becomes simply too horrible for the average person to take onboard. But I go along with the evidence, and horrible as it is, we are surely in the midst of a planned depopulation programme. As more and more malfeasance is uncovered from governments, industry, academia, covered up by a compliant mainstream media, we can only hope a tipping point will arise where entire masses of ordinary people say 'Enough!'
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Keith Renecle, June 14, 2024 :
Steve, that kind of debate actually goes nowhere. The first question that everyone should be asking before debating viruses, lock downs, masks, vaccines etc. etc. is this "WAS THERE ACTUALLY A GLOBAL PANDEMIC CAUSED BY SOME KIND OF RESPIRATORY VIRUS"? Is this actually a dumb question or what? Without first having established that issue, then all of these other issues become irrelevant. How would we prove one way or the other whether this is true or false? It's actually dead easy (pun intended). Just check the global all cause mortality (ACM). If you do this you will see clearly that there is no real global excess mortality that can be correlated to any kind of respiratory virus.
I would sincerely suggest that you have a look at the website of Denis Rancourt who together with his team, have done a thorough analysis of this. You can also read his substack on this here:
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/there-was-no-pandemic
His video from the Canadian Citizens Inquiry is also worth watching here: https://denisrancourt.ca/videos.php?id=86&name=2023_05_17_national_citizens_inquiry_ottawa_day_1_nci
Even better, why don't you invite Denis to a video chat on your channel. That would be great!
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
MYERS, June 14, 2024 :
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/how-can-millions-of-people-all-exhibiting/comments
In other discussions, Steve often brings up the Bradford Hill criteria as a valid test for causation when he rightly indicates vaccines may have caused disease symptoms. But here Steve seems to reject appealing to the Bradford Hill criteria when attempting to show that a “virus” caused disease symptoms.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Steve Kirsch, June 14, 2024 :
Author
if they don't exist, then what is being sequenced and what is replicating the sequence?
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Dr. Mike Yeadon / Reply, June 14, 2024 :
………………………
Fraudulent and intentionally misleading information.
There’s a huge ongoing crime against humanity.
I know you know this.
Once you know this, the rest is mere modus operandi.
……………………
Tim West, June 14, 2024 :
Can you point to ANY time ANY ‘virus’ has ever been sequenced? From a physical example?
I can show you loads of stuff I’ve designed in my computer.
I’m talking about stripping amino acids one by one from a physical object.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
A short statement from Dr. Yeadon from another, older conversation :
Antibodies could never be the defenders of the body against respiratory pathogens (if they existed).
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr.Yeadon's videos only two browsers are recommended :
Yandex :
and Mojeek :
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Afterword :
by Suavek
Many of Steve Kirsch's questions have already been answered in detail by Dr. Andrew Kaufman and other commenters. Dr. Yeadon has also already made his comment regarding sequencing. Nevertheless, Steve asks about it again. However, some of these commentators said that Steve was unable to understand these explanations because he would have needed appropriate medical training to do so. I would not like to speculate on whether Dr. Yeadon detected a certain unwillingness to understand in Steve or not. In case of his subsequent statements on this topic, I will amend the article and add those statements here. You can expect part 2 of the article anyway.
Update :
Dr. Mike Yeadon subsequently commented on the video of Kirsch and Kaufman. I published this comment in part 2 of the article :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-the-holy-relics-of-f21
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
 | A guest post by
|