Dr. Mike Yeadon : Examples of the life-threatening healthcare system. Screening, blood pressure lowering, anticholesterol, antidepressant drugs, and the fear.
The pollutant fear that poisons you.
A guest post by
Lifer in pharmaceutical R&D in big pharma as well as biotech. A biology PhD. I’ve been speaking out pro bono since spring 2020.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon, May 24, 2024 :
Source : https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/was-covid-testing-of-healthy-people
We probably all have stories of how our GP sought to get us onto one or other (or several) of the now almost traditional “medicines for life” (blood pressure lowering, anticholesterol, antidepressant drugs).
None of these have good datasets demonstrating that long term use is a net benefit to the person taking them.
I hadn’t realised how young they start trawling for victims. Our local pharmacist’s waiting area features adverts like “Over 40 & not on a blood pressure lowering medication? See your doctor now”.
My wife’s GP used to push these drug classes at her at every encounter.
It’s unsurprising to find that GP still lining up people of all ages for the mRNA injections, despite warnings from me, initially verbally and later in writing, why she should not do so.
Not only is she harming people who trust her, but she’s helping to install a dystopian hell on earth in which she too will be trapped.
Her new German SUV isn’t going to do her any good then.
In addition to stupidity, greed and possibly evil (my own hunch is that the first two characteristics were sufficient) she’s unable to think about the future implications of what she’s mired in.
Same with trolls and assorted fools online, still maintaining whatever they were trained to say online years ago, for money.
Our current rule of thumb is to keep the hell away from all parts of the “healthcare system”.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon, May 25, 2024 :
Source : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1345
“Screening for early detection and treatment” just doesn’t work.
You’d think surely they have factored in harms to those with false positive screening test results.
But no, they haven’t.
Screening for prostate cancer has similar numbers. For each man “saved”, dozens end up with unnecessary treatment, including surgery, from which permanent, life changing adverse effects are by no means rare.
Your welfare isn’t important in the algorithms.
I decline all forms of screening.
Best wishes,
Mike
( Linked in the post above ) :
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/was-covid-testing-of-healthy-people/comment/57087629
A comment from ExcessDeathsAU, May 23, 2024 :
Source : https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/was-covid-testing-of-healthy-people/comment/57087629
( Note from the author : It's really worth opening the links below. This is information that you don't often see in medical journals ).
Yes, please see disturbing Cochrane Review about screening for breast cancer : https://www.cochrane.org/CD001877/BREASTCA_screening-for-breast-cancer-with-mammography
"for every 2000 women invited for screening throughout 10 years, one will avoid dying of breast cancer and 10 healthy women, who would not have been diagnosed if there had not been screening, will be treated unnecessarily. Furthermore, more than 200 women will experience important psychological distress including anxiety and uncertainty for years because of false positive findings."
Author's recommendation : further links :
https://www.cochrane.org/search/site?f%5B0%5D=field_terms_cochrane_library%253Aparents_all%3A49385
https://www.cochrane.org/search/site?f%5B0%5D=field_terms_cochrane_library%253Aparents_all%3A49385
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Dr. Mike Yeadon, May 26, 2024 :
Source : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/66325
I read that all of us males, if we live long enough, go to our graves “with prostate cancer”.
Dying of it does happen, but early screening is definitely fake.
It generates work for proctologists and urologists, plus labs, scanners etc.
PSA in blood is no more reliable than PCR. It’s not prostate-specific and is elevated if you’ve exercised vigorously the day before.
After a “raised PSA”, you’ve got a permanently worried man, who’ll attend regular clinics.
There’s nothing between that and proctology but biopsy.
A very painful procedure underwent by a friend, against my advice.
They found some “marginally transformed cells”.
Now what?
He was left with chronic prostatic pain.
One option was TURPS (don’t even go there).
I showed him the flow chart evidence.
For every man who’s prostate cancer is “found early”, dozens have unnecessary, invasive procedures and many end up with unremitting pain (which is the location of mine, though from a different medical pathway). Those who have surgery, most won’t have been necessary and a large percentage of those men will never be properly well ever again.
God & nature had a great sense of humour in building us this way.
I am not condemning all early screening. I am pointing out that your welfare hardly features in the algorithm, so do your own research.
My wife had instinctively rejected all the usual screens her whole life. Good for her. She was always well ahead of me.
PSA Testing, Prostate Cancer, Dr. Pam Popper video, Biopsy Risk, etc. :
An abbreviated transcript :
"(... ) Research shows that almost all men develop prostate cancer as they age, and almost all of them die with their prostate cancer, not from it. Prostate cancer is often underdiagnosed. It's worth noting that Dr. John McDougall, a prolific author and one of the doctors involved in the documentary Foods Over (...?), found many years ago that 98% of men by age 80 have some form of prostate cancer. That was part of my decision to switch to a 100% plant-based eating plan nearly 12 years ago. It's worth noting that the use of PSA testing has cost the U.S. health care system billions of dollars. (... ) believes the risk of harm outweighs the benefit, but doesn't want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but it's a good idea to follow the money. ( …) that there was a 1 in 50 chance of being saved in 10 years. ( … ) 3% risk of dying from prostate. ( … ) It is more likely that 97% of patients will be harmed by the treatment. ( ... ) Prostate biopsy is risky, probably riskier than we think, and it can spread cancer. In addition to this basic risk of infection, a biopsy could kill a man who does not even have prostate cancer. ( ... ) “
Source : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cKwem9vdvM
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
NOTE :
I have tried to place Dr Mike Yeadon's name first under the article title and my, Suavek, as the second co-author. This would be helpful and good for a number of reasons. Unfortunately the system doesn't seem to allow such a change, probably because this is my Substack. Dr. Yeadon's word, however, was and remains of course the most important thing here.
The subsequent expansion of the article came from Suavek. You may also find mine ( Suavek's ) remarks at the top of the article. They simply contribute to a better understanding of the published text. Please remember that all errors in the article are Suavek's responsibility and can only be corrected after publication. Any comments on errors and suggestions for improvement are welcome, for which I would like to thank you in advance.
— Suavek.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
A comment from Beanz-meanz Heinz, May 26, 2024 :
Source : https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/was-covid-testing-of-healthy-people/comments
If your "healthcare system" consistently results in debilitating outcomes then it's more of a health sabotage system. Concealment of this murderous deception is the only time 'care' genuinely comes into it.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
A comment from skipper, May 23, 2024 :
Source : https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/was-covid-testing-of-healthy-people/comments
Breast cancer screening once imaging became better identifies nodules which are NOT cancer 98 out of 100 times. Rather than a cheap six month follow up to identify change (like used to be the case) malpractice lawers (and the AMA) have forced biopsies and possible-pre-cancer pathology readings (again to cya). The whole process is 98 times as expensive as it used to be without any better results. Wonder why health insurance costs so much. People do not realize that they are being harvested silently and, after their wealth is all extracted, they will be disposed of. We are close to that. I was part of this development.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
A comment from DemocracyManifest, May 23, 2024 :
Source : https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/was-covid-testing-of-healthy-people/comments
The screening scam, yes - but also a more sinister side in terms of high-level data collection.
Goal: mass DNA sampling plus mass on-boarding to digital ID, in addition to mass medical experiment with genetic 'vaccines'.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
A comment from Rjj, May 23, 2024 :
Source : https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/was-covid-testing-of-healthy-people/comments
If Thomas Szasz wrote about 'the medicalisation of everyday life'
This could be 'the data monetisation of duped everyday people'
Not so pithy.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
The hospital protocols at the time, called “death protocols,” show the height of the madness of the inventors of the “Covid” disease. I would like to thank Heinz for a very informative comment.
A comment from Beanz-meanz Heinz, April 20, 2024 :
Source : https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-perpetrators-last-line-of-defense
The most egregious hospital mistreatment came from administering high flow supplementary oxygen at 100% purity. People would unnecessarily show up at emergency rooms because their cheap chinese made pulse oximeter gave a bogus reading of less than 95% saturation.
Hospital staff then gave them the supplemental oxygen at crazy rates of 60 to 100 litres per minute. At 100% purity it would destroy the lining of the lungs. After wrecking the lungs they would then intubate them.
This lady's otherwise healthy husband succumbed to such mistreatment. It's mind-blowing to listen to what these lunatics did.
VIDEO : https://www.bitchute.com/video/Qoc1PuZMAgg1/
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
A comment from Tonya, May 21, 2024 :
Source : https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/we-mustnt-forget-the-stupidity-of/comments
Something to Think About
One type of testing of asymptomatic people has been going on for a long time and increasing more and more: screening for all kinds of health "conditions" so they can "catch them early" and "save lives." This video is talking about cancer specifically, but the idea applies to screening for heart conditions and more, even "mental health" screenings, all designed to pump everyone full of drugs that they are expected to take for the rest of their lives.
The Epidemic of Fake Disease
Source : https://youtu.be/yNzQ_sLGIuA?si=Kldba5g40hRhuHLr
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Afterword
by Suavek
It would be interesting to include the psychological level in the personal decision if worrying about one's own health causes enormous stress. What about people who take uncalculated risks just to be able to sleep more peacefully? I can imagine that some psychologists could recommend a comprehensive preventive examination to a patient with anxiety disorder. For him, reducing stress can mean a higher quality of life. I, on the other hand, can point to those people who seemed intoxicated by their happiness after their longed-for mRNA injection against the non-existent “Covid”. While I was talking to an older lady about the dangers of mRNA, she started dancing a little to show me how happy she was. That day she “finally” received her longed-for, first “Covid” injection. Of course, I personally give the Cochrane Institute's figures top priority and therefore also Dr. Yeadon's statements. Can there even be real reasons to suggest that someone should take uncalculated risks?
I can only hope that you have opened the Cochrane Institute links posted above. The information contained therein shows that reality can sometimes only be seen after a second or third look.
Fear seems to be a kind of pollutant. On the one hand, Pharma make profits and can rob entire economies and on the other hand, the unsuspecting people dance with happiness when they can feel free from fear. However, you can only be happy about it for so long before you are politely informed about the next danger, because your doctor's next invitation for a preventive examination or "vaccination" will soon land in your mailbox. There they learn that there are other, perhaps even worse, dangers lurking from nature that want to kill them. The fight against evil nature should never end. They tell you that you can only survive when you are engaged in constant battle. Always be ready for disease X and never relax. Such fearmongering propaganda can drive a sensitive mind crazy, but who cares? Is your government doing something about this sickening ploy ?
Thank you for reading. Please share the article. I wish you a lot of calm in your decisions and joy in acquiring new information.
— Suavek
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
When fear works...
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr.Yeadon's videos only two browsers are recommended :
Yandex
and Mojeek
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
"We found traces of conscience, fortunately we caught it early."
"Unfortunately these tests show that the test you've just had has caused cancer."
“There is an experimental treatment using mice that looks very promising. Unfortunately, you`re a hamster.”
It says that reading about cancer can give you CANCER !
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
 | A guest post by
|
The only good news from all this is to shake off the thought that without constant medical attention, you'll fall ill and die.
We can awake to the glory of having a lot to do with our own health. You know what to do.
If not already, today is a great day to leave the medical system behind.
Eat better. Lose weight. Improve basic fitness; absolutely anything is far better than nothing. Can you stand up from a chair and sit down again 20 times without using your hands?
Drink in moderation if at all.
Stop smoking, even if you need the crutch of NRT (as I do).
Go to bed earlier.
Be kind to those around you and especially to yourself.
Put down yoiur mobile devices much more often and go outside.
The world remains a wonderful place and almost everyone isn't try to kill you.
Pray and give thanks, if that floast your boat.
No regular prescription medicines (I'm a hypocrite because I take a strong pain reliever)
I remember my father, an old doctor, insulting the publishing houses which were publishing "medical encyclopedias" in the 60s.
He said that they were creating a population of hypocondriads. And then the television came with the "medicine programs".
And then the screenings for cancer, blood check every now and then. And so on.
When he retired he used to say that medicine was dead because it had become a business to make people sick.
But if you follow the increasing pressure of all that "information", it is so clear that they were preparing the people to get willingly injected with poisons.
And medicine is gone to hell