With your comment you have pretty much summed up everything. Thank you very much for that! I will put your comment in the article straight away. I always find the idea of getting to the point quickly very useful. This way I can also learn something useful from the readers, which makes me very happy.
Thanks, as ever, to Suavek and Mike (I hope you don't mind all these strangers calling you by your first name - it's out of long-range affection!).
I was on Mark Crispin Miller's Substack today and responded to a comment from an ivermectin user by mentioning Mike's concerns. This was met with 'Yeadon realizes he was wrong about Ivermectin, this has been debated and its over.'
Where to start ... Anyway, I put the person right and haven't had any comeback.
I would really appreciate it if you could send the link to this article to the weird person who claims the discussion is over. I tried to do that. Unfortunately, the comments there are only available to paying subscribers.
Somehow I can't figure out what the polite form (like in German: "SIE") looks like in English and how it "should" be used. Apparently this is a trade secret of the automatic translation services. Obviously there is some difference, but I haven't been able to figure it out yet. I'm always happy when people address me informally in German, because for decades I've considered polite forms to be artificial walls between people. Even when I use this strange polite form, I always think "du/you" and I respect both adults and children equally. I can't show any more respect to either group than to the other, because I find the hierarchical structure of our culture harmful. I even consider this to be a kind of indoctrination that we should let go of as quickly as possible.
PS.
When I write "Dr. Mike Yeadon" every time, it is because I use his title so that his statements are viewed as expert statements. This therefore has a communications strategy background. However, he signs his statements as "Mike" so that it is clear that his point of view is not diametrically different from mine.
Technically 'Sie' in German equates to 'you' in English. 'Du' equates to the old-fashioned 'thou' that is no longer used in English, apart from in e.g. the King James Bible, which was obviously written at a time when you/thou were both in use. So it's not the formal version that's missing in English, it's the intimate one (or disrespectful one, depending on context!) that has died out.
Dear Sheila, unfortunately this additional information causes a kind of cacophony for me. That's more or less how it looks in my head now. In the German-speaking world, this matter is clear. There is "Sie" ( can the word be translated? This does not mean the same as "you") , and "du"( you). The automatic translation services supposedly offer two different types of translation, one in the polite form and the other in the "du" ( you) form. Unfortunately, I didn't notice any differences in the variously translated texts. That's where I am at right now. Unfortunately, I still have to write so many articles in English that I don't have time to learn English. That probably sounds pretty crazy.
'Sie' also means 'they', of course, which complicates matters!). Anyway, you only need to use 'you' in all contexts when addressing people directly in English, whether singular or plural. I think your English is really excellent.
Automatic translation services can be problematic (that's a bit of English understatement!). If your English wasn't already good, you wouldn't be able to rely on them, as the end result always needs tidying up, in my experience (which is more in French than in German). b/w Sheila
Dear Shane, congratulations! You have just become a writer because you wrote a great afterword to an important article about Ivermectin. Thank you for that!
Welcome to the club! I hope that the article clearly shows that Dr. Yeadon spends a lot of time combing through various study results before he says anything. That takes time, and that is where his credibility lies.
Isn't ivermectin a worming treatment? More poisoning to cure. Yeah right. But Dr Yeadon should expect it; he is making a REAL difference. Would love to see him do an interview with the Drs. Bailey...
Mike was the first (and most) expert person questioning covid I found (around Nov 2020?). He has been instrumental in destroying the narrative, but some only want it destroyed to a point, it seems.
"He has been instrumental in destroying the narrative, but some only want it destroyed to a point, it seems."
These people are only admitting what everyone already knows. They don't want to destroy the "Covid" lie because they are making money from this lie. They are doctors, so they can appear more credible than a layman. This makes them doubly guilty. It is a disgusting abuse of their own status. So many people trusted them, and everyone was lied to. Sometimes I think that these people have never experienced what happiness is. Maybe that's why they think you can achieve your own happiness through fraud. What a mistake that produces exactly the opposite of what you intended !
I think they're trying to achieve happiness through status. Go against the grain, lose you job. Lose your job, lose your status. Then you get treated like everyone else, after years of being treated as if you're smart and special.
The desire for status fuels much of what ails our society.
PLEASE remember 2 important caveats. 1). People over 55 have NO CONCERNS over limited fertility and GREAT concerns over being targeted with mRNA therapies. 2). The Horse has very sensitive drug responses and meds take this into account. Ivermectin Paste was used by MANY elderly, including me, with zero ill effects. Ivermectin Paste was literally a lifesaver for many folks over 55.
Also, it would be incumbent on you to post WHICH meds and substances combine to make Ivermectin more potent…when making enhancement part of your argument against usage.
WE know a real vaccine works as in Rabies = its the other ones to come that J.D. Rockefeller's Allopathic crews would utilize:
it all started with the original so called "Spanish Flu" started by vax's on a U.S. Military Base in 1918 and went with our troops worldwide-> had ZERO to do with Spain is when the Global cabal knew they had the final blow to mankind once EVERYONE was led to trust implicitly for the day they would pull the lever on humanity 100yrs later...!
Rabies "vaccination" also seems to be an ancient but profitable scam. When many doctors started researching other medical scams in 2020, there were many voices saying that only 4-5 different vaccines can be useful. In 2022, I have only heard such claims of usefulness about the vaccination against tuberculosis. Today, in 2024, all these people seem to have done their homework. Digging through the study results must have been very time-consuming. In my experience, those doctors who have spent a lot of time researching are now talking quite openly about the fact that the vaccination system cannot work either theoretically or practically, and that all vaccines are harmful AND not useful. I don't mean that they do more harm than good, but that they are not useful at all and can only cause harm. This is a different kind of fraud than is often assumed. In most cases, the study results are biased, the control studies either do not exist, are carried out incorrectly, or are fraudulent, and the study results that do not suit the pharmaceutical industry are hidden in a drawer and never published. And each individual "vaccination" is a science in itself, the verification of which takes a lot of time. Because there was great interest in the flu "vaccine," this topic was probably examined best. I have no doubt that this "vaccination" only causes harm. The pharmaceutical industry will never want to finance or publish studies that harm their profits. Therefore, all we can find are the inconsistencies and omissions in the studies that praise the "vaccines." When reading such studies, laypeople will in most cases think that there is nothing wrong with the "vaccine" and that the benefits outweigh the risks.
As for the flu vaccine, I also spent a lot of time getting a clear picture. The tricks used in the studies on this were the best eye-opener I could imagine. These and other tricks were best described on Prof. Norman Fenton's website. I have read several articles on the subject of rabies "vaccination" that have contained scathing assessments of its effectiveness and the classification of the disease itself. I admit, however, that I did not bother to read any studies on this. After reading Prof. Fenton's website, I lost faith in the sincerity of any study results.
Dr. Yeadon is very diligent in researching such studies and knows all the tricks of the industry. To date, he has not been able to find a "vaccine" whose positive effects have been clearly proven. The areas that could indicate that a drug is harmful are often left untested in the studies. Such omissions turn an entire study into a meaningless collection of data.
15). They will try to scare you into believing that the vaccine is necessary or you will face certain death. This is untrue as the majority of bites by "rabid" animals resulted in no deaths without treatment. Find out more about the rabies fraud here:
With your comment you have pretty much summed up everything. Thank you very much for that! I will put your comment in the article straight away. I always find the idea of getting to the point quickly very useful. This way I can also learn something useful from the readers, which makes me very happy.
Thank you again and best wishes!
Suavek
Thanks, as ever, to Suavek and Mike (I hope you don't mind all these strangers calling you by your first name - it's out of long-range affection!).
I was on Mark Crispin Miller's Substack today and responded to a comment from an ivermectin user by mentioning Mike's concerns. This was met with 'Yeadon realizes he was wrong about Ivermectin, this has been debated and its over.'
Where to start ... Anyway, I put the person right and haven't had any comeback.
Conversation thread here:
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/four-years-after-vaccination-started-experts-still-baffled/comment/79772908
Also pointed out that 'this has been debated and its (sic) over' is up there with 'the science is settled'.
Dear Sheila,
I would really appreciate it if you could send the link to this article to the weird person who claims the discussion is over. I tried to do that. Unfortunately, the comments there are only available to paying subscribers.
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-against-the-covid-1a3
No problem - I've posted the link.
Dear Sheila,
Somehow I can't figure out what the polite form (like in German: "SIE") looks like in English and how it "should" be used. Apparently this is a trade secret of the automatic translation services. Obviously there is some difference, but I haven't been able to figure it out yet. I'm always happy when people address me informally in German, because for decades I've considered polite forms to be artificial walls between people. Even when I use this strange polite form, I always think "du/you" and I respect both adults and children equally. I can't show any more respect to either group than to the other, because I find the hierarchical structure of our culture harmful. I even consider this to be a kind of indoctrination that we should let go of as quickly as possible.
PS.
When I write "Dr. Mike Yeadon" every time, it is because I use his title so that his statements are viewed as expert statements. This therefore has a communications strategy background. However, he signs his statements as "Mike" so that it is clear that his point of view is not diametrically different from mine.
Hello Suavek
Technically 'Sie' in German equates to 'you' in English. 'Du' equates to the old-fashioned 'thou' that is no longer used in English, apart from in e.g. the King James Bible, which was obviously written at a time when you/thou were both in use. So it's not the formal version that's missing in English, it's the intimate one (or disrespectful one, depending on context!) that has died out.
Dear Sheila, unfortunately this additional information causes a kind of cacophony for me. That's more or less how it looks in my head now. In the German-speaking world, this matter is clear. There is "Sie" ( can the word be translated? This does not mean the same as "you") , and "du"( you). The automatic translation services supposedly offer two different types of translation, one in the polite form and the other in the "du" ( you) form. Unfortunately, I didn't notice any differences in the variously translated texts. That's where I am at right now. Unfortunately, I still have to write so many articles in English that I don't have time to learn English. That probably sounds pretty crazy.
Best wishes,
Suavek
'Sie' also means 'they', of course, which complicates matters!). Anyway, you only need to use 'you' in all contexts when addressing people directly in English, whether singular or plural. I think your English is really excellent.
Automatic translation services can be problematic (that's a bit of English understatement!). If your English wasn't already good, you wouldn't be able to rely on them, as the end result always needs tidying up, in my experience (which is more in French than in German). b/w Sheila
Wow, that was an eye opener for ivermectin and I am not surprised. Over 4 billion doses and I bet majority are to African countries.
The shadows behind the curtains are so devious it would be incomprehensible as to what else has been done.
A little snippet here, a whisper there, next thing you know plant the seed, watch it unfold and let the fools ( populace )destroy themselves.
Quite clever little psychopaths aren’t they?
Dear Shane, congratulations! You have just become a writer because you wrote a great afterword to an important article about Ivermectin. Thank you for that!
Best wishes,
Suavek
Dr. Yeadon is one of the few people I trust. If he makes a claim or states his opinion, I am going to sit up and take notice.
Welcome to the club! I hope that the article clearly shows that Dr. Yeadon spends a lot of time combing through various study results before he says anything. That takes time, and that is where his credibility lies.
It does, very much so. Thank you!
Isn't ivermectin a worming treatment? More poisoning to cure. Yeah right. But Dr Yeadon should expect it; he is making a REAL difference. Would love to see him do an interview with the Drs. Bailey...
Mike was the first (and most) expert person questioning covid I found (around Nov 2020?). He has been instrumental in destroying the narrative, but some only want it destroyed to a point, it seems.
Keep fighting, we WILL overcome.
Blessings.
Your text :
"He has been instrumental in destroying the narrative, but some only want it destroyed to a point, it seems."
These people are only admitting what everyone already knows. They don't want to destroy the "Covid" lie because they are making money from this lie. They are doctors, so they can appear more credible than a layman. This makes them doubly guilty. It is a disgusting abuse of their own status. So many people trusted them, and everyone was lied to. Sometimes I think that these people have never experienced what happiness is. Maybe that's why they think you can achieve your own happiness through fraud. What a mistake that produces exactly the opposite of what you intended !
All the best,
Suavek
Not only doctors. Covid has been a nice cash cow for MANY, it seems. “By their fruits you shall know them”.
Blessings
I think they're trying to achieve happiness through status. Go against the grain, lose you job. Lose your job, lose your status. Then you get treated like everyone else, after years of being treated as if you're smart and special.
The desire for status fuels much of what ails our society.
Wonderful clarification Mike …blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.
Yes yes and yes !
And Beware the Noahide Laws
!
Excellent article!
PLEASE remember 2 important caveats. 1). People over 55 have NO CONCERNS over limited fertility and GREAT concerns over being targeted with mRNA therapies. 2). The Horse has very sensitive drug responses and meds take this into account. Ivermectin Paste was used by MANY elderly, including me, with zero ill effects. Ivermectin Paste was literally a lifesaver for many folks over 55.
Also, it would be incumbent on you to post WHICH meds and substances combine to make Ivermectin more potent…when making enhancement part of your argument against usage.
WE know a real vaccine works as in Rabies = its the other ones to come that J.D. Rockefeller's Allopathic crews would utilize:
it all started with the original so called "Spanish Flu" started by vax's on a U.S. Military Base in 1918 and went with our troops worldwide-> had ZERO to do with Spain is when the Global cabal knew they had the final blow to mankind once EVERYONE was led to trust implicitly for the day they would pull the lever on humanity 100yrs later...!
Hi mtman2,
Rabies "vaccination" also seems to be an ancient but profitable scam. When many doctors started researching other medical scams in 2020, there were many voices saying that only 4-5 different vaccines can be useful. In 2022, I have only heard such claims of usefulness about the vaccination against tuberculosis. Today, in 2024, all these people seem to have done their homework. Digging through the study results must have been very time-consuming. In my experience, those doctors who have spent a lot of time researching are now talking quite openly about the fact that the vaccination system cannot work either theoretically or practically, and that all vaccines are harmful AND not useful. I don't mean that they do more harm than good, but that they are not useful at all and can only cause harm. This is a different kind of fraud than is often assumed. In most cases, the study results are biased, the control studies either do not exist, are carried out incorrectly, or are fraudulent, and the study results that do not suit the pharmaceutical industry are hidden in a drawer and never published. And each individual "vaccination" is a science in itself, the verification of which takes a lot of time. Because there was great interest in the flu "vaccine," this topic was probably examined best. I have no doubt that this "vaccination" only causes harm. The pharmaceutical industry will never want to finance or publish studies that harm their profits. Therefore, all we can find are the inconsistencies and omissions in the studies that praise the "vaccines." When reading such studies, laypeople will in most cases think that there is nothing wrong with the "vaccine" and that the benefits outweigh the risks.
As for the flu vaccine, I also spent a lot of time getting a clear picture. The tricks used in the studies on this were the best eye-opener I could imagine. These and other tricks were best described on Prof. Norman Fenton's website. I have read several articles on the subject of rabies "vaccination" that have contained scathing assessments of its effectiveness and the classification of the disease itself. I admit, however, that I did not bother to read any studies on this. After reading Prof. Fenton's website, I lost faith in the sincerity of any study results.
Dr. Yeadon is very diligent in researching such studies and knows all the tricks of the industry. To date, he has not been able to find a "vaccine" whose positive effects have been clearly proven. The areas that could indicate that a drug is harmful are often left untested in the studies. Such omissions turn an entire study into a meaningless collection of data.
Regards,
Suavek
Hello mtman2.
Here is some information about rabies and rabies vaccination for you. I have not been able to verify all the information contained here :
1). Some pet owners are advocating against rabies vaccines. Here's why rabies is dangerous.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/pet-owners-advocating-against-rabies-090334742.html
2). For examples of the dangers of rabies vaccines to both animals and humans, please see these relevant articles.
3). 65 ways rabies vaccination can harm dogs
https://www.dogsnaturallymagazine.com/65-ways-rabies-vaccination-can-harm-your-dog/
4). 2. Article on the harm of rabies vaccine
https://www.whole-dog-journal.com/blog/rabies-shots-for-senior-dogs-why-i-fear-and-loathe-them/
5). Senior dog death due to vax
https://www.kxan.com/news/pet-owner-spreading-vaccination-awareness-after-senior-pets-death/
6). Dog death immediately after vax
https://www.12news.com/article/news/local/valley/autopsy-confirms-valley-familys-suspicions-that-vaccine-caused-dogs-death/75-449179031
7). Study sought to understand deaths after rabies vax
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/study-sought-into-rabies-deaths-after-vaccination/article36928978.ece
8). 33 year old male death
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/50/1/77/312471?login=false
9). 3 deaths reported here
https://english.mathrubhumi.com/news/kerala/rabies-related-deaths-in-kerala-efficacy-storage-and-administration-of-vaccine-under-scanner-1.7813529
10). 12 year old girl death
https://www.onmanorama.com/news/kerala/2022/09/05/rabies-kottayam-medical-college-vaccine.amp.html
11). 19 year old girl and 2 others died
https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2022/Jul/02/deaths-post-jabs-put-rabies-vaccine-under-cloud-2471952.html
12). 67 year old woman death
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4502497/
13). 3 deaths reported here
https://english.mathrubhumi.com/news/kerala/rabies-related-deaths-in-kerala-efficacy-storage-and-administration-of-vaccine-under-scanner-1.7813529
14). 3 year old girl death
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3010154/girls-death-after-rabies-shot-hits-raw-nerve-china-after-vaccine
15). They will try to scare you into believing that the vaccine is necessary or you will face certain death. This is untrue as the majority of bites by "rabid" animals resulted in no deaths without treatment. Find out more about the rabies fraud here:
https://viroliegy.com/category/rabies/
16). What about rabies?
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/what-about-rabies/
17). The Rabies Delusion Revealed
Rabies Facts and Fictions
Brendan D. Murphy Official
May 02, 2023
https://substack.com/home/post/p-118143648
Best wishes,
Suavek
great info Mike 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻