Dr. Mike Yeadon : Additional statements on the topic of ivermectin and alleged contagion.
The beginning of the end of the alleged “early Covid treatment” by the enterprising “healers”.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Editor`s Note : Below you can see 3 parts of a single post by Dr. Mike Yeadon .
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, August 19, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1743
This is an interesting piece from Dr Tess Lawrie.
I don’t disagree with quite a bit of what she said.
But we’ve exchanged messages on some areas where I am unable to get a response, which isn’t opinion but evidence based & which matter fundamentally.
1. There’s been no pandemic.
Nor is “covid19” a new & defined illness.
WHO are not fortune tellers. There must have been increases in all causes mortality especially in the frail elderly PRIOR to WHO calling a pandemic. That did not happen, anywhere. Professor Denis Rancourt (a qualified epidemiologist among other things) & team have published many reports showing the absence of evidence of a pandemic.
I agree that early treatment for all illnesses should be considered. I’m absolutely not against this principle. The objection I have is to the specific phrase “early treatment for covid19”, because the evidence is that it’s a deliberate misattribution to a non existent, claimed-to-be viral illnesses that existed before 2020 (See note at end about viruses).
2. Ivermectin may well have uses as Tess outlines in parasitic infestations. It’s derived from a natural product that’s extremely toxic to insects. It appears not acutely toxic to humans. We’re not seeing this part differently. However, there’s an extensive body of evidence in multiple species (mice, rats and rabbits at least) all showing adverse effects in reproduction. It’s not a case of “insufficient evidence to condemn it”. I am in the camp that I need to be sure I’m not harming people. We lack definitive evidence of safety in this regard and there’s much troubling information.
The rule of thumb (which is underscored by conserved biological mechanisms at play) is that a drug that shows similar toxicity in two or more species is considered likely to do the same in humans. I assure you, that’s the basic assumption that all regulators would have, if they hadn’t gone rogue in recent years.
The point about dose levels. Almost all toxicity testing is done at multiples of the anticipated human blood levels. If a drug isn’t safe at 10x or 30x human levels, you are unlikely to get a pass from regulators. Why? Because some people will achieve higher blood levels than the average. And some of those will be more sensitive to potential adverse effects.
This isn’t hard. There’s clearly a risk. Why take that risk?
Western populations aren’t suffering parasitic infestations. You’re left with a claim for benefit in a disease that doesn’t exist. If it exists, it failed to raise all cause mortality despite allegedly spreading through a population replete with frail, elderly people.
It cannot be ignored that there is another potential cause for harms to fertility. Like many drugs, ivermectin is cleared (removed / eliminated / excreted / detoxified) from the body by various biochemical processes. One is called “pgp”. It turns out that several highly promoted supplements interact with pgp in such a way as to block the ability of your body to clear ivermectin. It would not be surprising if some people taking ivermectin were also taking some of these supplements (which are also unnecessary).
Readers may judge if a public debate it needed. Obviously I don’t think it is. I’ve laid out the basis upon which I advise people not to use ivermectin for alleged covid19 especially if you’re also taking supplements.
We are at war. Tess and I agree that globalist “elites” are encroaching on our freedoms with a view to digital, totalitarian control and both of us believe there’s already sufficient evidence that an objective from this is their intention to murder a large proportion of us.
I have famously analysed the claimed composition of the not-vaccines, which are gene-based injections. Specifically, I’ve shown that there are multiple, independent, unnecessary and (to me) obvious mechanisms of harm in humans. They’re designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors. I wasn’t wrong about this (how I wish fervently that I was).
Linked in the post above :
Is ivermectin really a genocidal tool of the globalists?
Aug 19, 2024
https://open.substack.com/pub/drtesslawrie/p/is-ivermectin-really-a-genocidal-f19
Editor`s Note : Tess Lawrie ist the founder of the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development International initiative and a steering group member of the World Council for Health. Source : https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/about .
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, August 19, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1744
Given the total war unleashed upon us, I would say ANY new treatment suddenly proposed for our mass consumption should be regarded with suspicion. I say as much now about the non existent “monkey pox”. It’s the same scam which will inevitably culminate in vaccine passports, tyrannical digital ID, movement restrictions and coerced mass injections with intentionally harmful substances masquerading as “vaccines”.
I will bet fake PCR based diagnostics feature strongly, as well.
Sadly, I do think ivermectin and it’s drug/drug interacting supplements partners have been foisted upon humanity as one of the myriad “nudges” leading to our demise, if we allow it. Don’t take any surprising new treatments for monkey pox, either.
No debate is needed. You’ve enough information to decide for yourself. I don’t plan to put any more effort into this. Tess has dozens of literature references from a substantial Substack article, which I’ll add here momentarily.
I don’t mind what she decides to do. It’s not about Tess Lawrie (or indeed Mike Yeadon). It’s about YOU. Please use discernment and be prepared to deny your cooperation to dreadful, evil people operating at levels way above me and everyone else. The executive jet crowd do not give a damn about any of us. No one is coming to save us. But you can save yourself. There is not going to be a rerun. If you rely upon others “exposing the crimes of the evil elites”, you free life will be over. You must yourself take action, to save yourself. If billions of us do this, their evil plan will fail.
Best wishes
Mike
Linked in the post above :
Ultimate Guide To Anti-Fertility Ivermectin Genocide: 14 Studies Showing It Wrecks Fertility
Now All The Psy-Ops Make Total Sense - And Many Prominent Anti-Vaxxers Are Guilty In Helping Perpetrate Genocide
May 01, 2024
https://open.substack.com/pub/timtruth/p/ultimate-guide-to-anti-fertility
………………………………………………………………………..
Editor`s note :
Although the post below differs thematically from the previous one, it still represents their continuation. This is evident from the system setting, so that with this post Mike Yeadon is responding to his own, previous post. In this way he ensures that the connection between the two texts is visible.
It can be said that the symptoms of "Covid" are not transmittable in a double sense, because there is no such thing as "Covid". This makes the claim that "early treatment" of "Covid" with Ivermectin is necessary all the more absurd. Dr. Yeadon has often stressed that he does not criticize the treatment of existing diseases if they are correctly named. However, stirring up unnecessary fears about "Covid" is counterproductive.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, August 19, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1745
It’s not incidental & probably unhelpful here, but I have to say it anyway. There is a great mass of evidence showing that transmission (“contagion”) of acute respiratory illnesses DOES NOT HAPPEN. It’s the unbelievable truth. I don’t mind if you disagree, but it tells me you have not reviewed that evidence. If you had, like me you’d no longer be able to maintain the fiction that these acute respiratory illnesses, colds and flu, are infectious in nature or contagious. Respiratory viruses are a fiction.
Unfortunately this fiction extends to every other “viral illness” that I’ve run to ground.
I’m not particularly clever & the sole contribution that I can claim in all this is to have risked my immaterial reputation by speaking out early and firmly. An interaction initiated by Dr Wolfgang Wodarg led me first to condemn rushed “vaccines” and shortly thereafter to have forensically dissected the multiple bases of harm anticipated from exposure to them. The rest is simply weighing the evidence from many others, looking for consistency of behaviour and scientific analysis of the fundamentals. It’s been obvious to me from first lockdown that we were under supranational direction, a coup d’etat if you will. No such action appeared in any country’s emergency preparedness plan and there was never any evidence it could help, even if there’d been a pandemic (which there wasn’t, because they’re immunologically impossible).
From that moment I knew we faced the most powerful foe humans have ever encountered outside of Eden. The evidence for his has mounted up continuously ever since.
This is not a rehearsal.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
UPDATE :
………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, September 6, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1823
You must do your own research and also be sensitive to your instincts about people, whenever they are telling you things they want you to believe.
I share this piece in order to highlight one version of the history of how ivermectin came to prominence.
If you find it remarkable, please don’t ignore the fact that preparations for the divoc-91 related tyranny took place over many decades.
In light of that, the remarkable origins story became highly suspicious, to my mind, anyway.
Given all that, what’s it really doing here?
Best wishes
Mike
Linked in the post above :
Ivermectin & Population Control Poison: a Deep Dive into a Nobel Prize Winning Medicine
May 12, 2024
https://open.substack.com/pub/chemtrails/p/ivermectin-and-population-control
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Afterword
Dr. Mike Yeadon, August 20, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1749
Suavek deserves a lot of subscribers, not least because he groups themes together better than I do myself.
This is a useful & portable tool in order to have the basics of the ivermectin controversy in one place.
Best wishes
Mike
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
For the most reliable information about the "Covid" scam and deceptions of the system, read Dr. Mike Yeadon's daily statements :
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr. Yeadon's videos only two browsers are recommended:
Yandex :
and Mojeek :
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
Many statements and videos from Dr. Mike Yeadon can also be found on Suavek's Substack, which is recommended by Dr. Yeadon on the main page of his Substack.
Both links lead to Suavek`s Substack :
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
An example of the medical "science" of the terrorist organization WHO :
“keep it up - the picture`s coming in”
I posted this at Celia Farber's Substack. and re-posted at the Substack of Dr Mike Yeadon and Tim West.
Jeffrey Strahl
Lockdown Times
16 mins ago
Liked by Tim West
Dr Mike Yeadon, i'm with Planet Waves, am a colleague of our mutual friend Eric Francis Coppolino. I posted this comment at the Substack of Celia Farber, who has launched an attack on the video you did which mentions Ivermectin.
https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/best-most-contextualized-article/comment/66547313
Jeffrey Strahl
Lockdown Times
8 hrs ago
·edited 8 hrs ago
Tess Lawrie is totally invested in the "pandemic" narrative. See this,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_2sBImR9-A
Opportunity Youth - An In-Depth Follow-up to Questioning "The Greater Reset III”
Here is a link to the slides [180 of them!] for this presentation: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1v8n_VJ0fk4TVxi9txMgEAZrfGhW_EBRuMobvskr2FWw/edit?usp=sharing I refer to some of them, by number.
Another speaker at TGR was Tess Lawrie, a promoter of Ivermectin. She runs the Evidence-Based Medical Consultancy, worked with the WHO re data collection on a study of prenatal health care behavior. This is directly connected to development impact bonds, a form of social impact investing, which monitors behavior and rewards investors for observable changes in behavior of subjects. All of this is connected to data analytics, ongoing bio-surveillance, pre-emptive strikes against “disease,” pay for success impact investing, with success defined as the avoidance or the lessening of disease impacts. [See slides 38,39]
The big issue here, the “acid test,” is rule by electron-microscope, seeing what’s happening via the lens of germ theory, making it out to be a medical bio-sciences problem, including the notion of “bio-weapon.” Cost savings (in terms of public “health”) and impact investing oriented to seeing such offsets as a “success” to be rewarded. Dr Pierre Kory is quoted in RFK Jr’s book as to how the use of early treatment could have cut down hospitalizations by 90%, deaths by 75%, saving hundreds of billions of dollars, ending the “pandemic” by May 2020. Joe Rogan has likewise promoted repurposed drugs, turning the situation into an impact investment space. This is a perfect example of rule by electron-microscope, with the early treatment protocol being a blockchain chain. If you accept rule by electron-microscope, you will be spending the rest of your life under it. 85-90% of the stuff currently being spun by the “resistance” involves precisely such an acceptance. Tess Lowry also pushes “early treatment,” which is a weaponized narrative, enhancing fear.[Slides 51-3]
The entire narrative of “mismanaged pandemic” (the title of RFK Jr’s book’s first chapter) is based upon rule by electron-microscope and the promotion of testing with early treatment (a week after someone tests “positive”) using repurposed drugs such as HCQ and Ivermectin. But the virus has never been physically isolated, it has only been identified “in silico” (on a computer), whip what are we supposed to be “treating”? [Indeed, what are we supposedly detecting with the “early testing”?] Are we now gonna treat people who are asymptomatic on the basis of tests which are not calibrated using an actual virus? How much room does this open for mistreatment, at the very least? This is a perfect setup for a pay-for-success investment model. Testing and treating people who are asymptomatic assumes they are infectious. This is exactly what James Bullard, CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis suggested in April 2020, universal testing. Such a massive use of testing and early treatment requires data analytics of massive amounts of biometric data, a perfect setup for social impact investing. [See slides 51-4, 58)
Someone whose work should be discussed regarding this topic is Steve Kirsch, a very wealthy friend of RFK Jr, with connections to MIT and the “alternative” professionals pushing testing and early treatment. See slide 61. He has his own enterprise, CETF, Covid Early Treatment Fund, slide 59. CETF has a direct connection to the Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisers, slide 60. There is a big problem in the “resistance” with celebrity culture, which allows people to look right past such connections and not say a word. [in part a sign of how deep fear has permeated so many people that they would rather overlook stuff like this as mere “blemishes” and “imperfections.” ] Thus, Dr Malone can tell Joe Rogan that a CIA friend told him 1/4/20 that “we got a problem with the virus,” and no questions are raised re the “virus” or the source of the information. Kirsch is involved with the One ID system and token financing (usage of tokens in finance). Kirsch has been prominent in challenging people who raise the perspective that no virus has been isolated, no surprise given that the entire pay-for-success early testing/early “treatment” program requires a virus in order to be viable. 85-90% of the resistance, per Alison, have leaned into the rule by electron-microscope model. So many of them are opposed to allopathic medicine, yet have no problems with a program which is based on pharmaceutical drugs.
Covid-19, the operation, was never an epidemiological event, it is a geopolitical event and a business model designed to increase the portfolios of the super-wealthy. There is no such thing as “Covid 19” except as a criminal conspiracy.
Anyone who thinks "Covid" is a distinct illness hasn't done their homework. The "accepted" medical science of "early treatments" for a non-existent disease rests on the same foundation as the invention of this non-existent disease. Therefore it too is invalid.
The authors of the "official" government narrative- thesis #1- and those of the "official" "health freedom" leaders- thesis #2- are, in the end, likely to become "strange bedfellows" and not real adversaries under these conditions, as both validate the imaginary disease by different means. Thus it is hard to imagine that we arrive at a place much different, if these are to be the "accepted" and "hotly contested" narratives, regardless of which of the 2 theses "wins the day."
The scale of the operation was massive, the scale of the deception was massive. The "hero" doctors offering "alt-treatments", the "renegade media up-to-a point-truth-teller" is not who you think they are. Many of the people thought to be and portrayed as being on the "right side" were and are playing a role.