My "Suavek's 2 cents" are also included: We are dealing with the worst class struggle in the history of the earth. To cover this up, the left was simply replaced by the right and vice versa.
I wish I deserved this praise! In fact it is copied from the NZ doctors webpage, scroll a bit down the link.
Ralph Baric is mentioned as one of the authors of a paper discussing the generation of abnormal clots by these artificial lipids (written long PRIOR to the "pandemic")
So harms wer5e clearly known. It is worth listening to the whole presentation - or getting a technically qualified person to do it for you. There is a lot of info hidden in the talk - but a strong NZ accent is a bit of a problem.
This presentation deserves to be known widely. Good luck!
The clots do not come from the spike protein but from the synthetic lipids in the LNP capsule. When they get inside the cell and open up, they expose their phosphorous molecules which combine with elements in blood chemistry to form abnormal protein strands together with a blood protein called fibrinogen. This process is self perpetuating. The spike protein damages the lining of the blood vessels and causes inflammation - natural clotting processes begin- the spike helps the fibrinogen tangles to intertwine - so you get massive long clots.
This is my understanding anyway, I am not an expert. I think all the information anyone would need is in this website talk. Mike Yeadon already knows about this I think - Sasha Latypova has briefly mentioned it - If you can ask Mike I am sure he can explain.
Here I list my concerns regarding the alleged NLP study results.
I think it is appropriate to explain what I think about this NLP work.
Nobody can rule out that unknown damage mechanisms may come to light. However, I find the claim that these are the only damage mechanisms to be both questionable and most likely fraudulent. But that is exactly what this work seems to point to, or at least it goes in that direction.
The successfully completed peer review process has long been used to make medical fraud appear scientifically credible. In the case of the work with NLPs described, I suspect fraud that comes directly from the US Department of Defense, and that is why I will no longer seriously deal with it. It seems obvious to me that the perpetrators are now trying to attribute ALL of the damaging mechanisms of mRNA technology solely to NLPs, so that they can later claim the following, for example:
"Well, we have now replaced the harmful NLPs of the time with others (or changed them), so that mRNA technology is now safe and effective."
In addition, many honest scientists and their work results can be defamed in this way, such as the work results of Prof. Arne Burkhardt. It does not matter where the proteins that he found in the deceased and called "spike proteins" came from.
The attempts to attribute all damage mechanisms solely to NLPs also serve the purpose of portraying the deliberate toxicity of the alleged "vaccines" as an "isolated error" in order to escape responsibility for the deliberate mass murder.
In this Substack, I do not offer a platform for the work of CIA agents such as Ralph Barick, who have long since lost their credibility. The censored scientists are the only ones I trust. They recognized several damage mechanisms as early as 2020, which later actually led to the damage they previously suspected. And what did Ralph Barick do at that time? What does he have to show? Those who supported the lie of "safe and effective" at the time, or who remained silent about it, do not get a platform in this Substack. The work of such paid lackeys of the perpetrators is not worth "closer examination".
I consider such alleged "research results" of the CIA to be meaningless, and, moreover, their possible purposes are now, in the year 2024, easy to predict even by laypeople. I have listed these easily identifiable purposes above.
PS.
The fact that NLPs have a damaging mechanism was in fact well documented and widely known even before the introduction of mRNA technology. Of course, there is always something genuine in such work. A grain of truth helps the perpetrators' propaganda to appear credible.
I am afraid I don't know whether the Campbell is the same man.
These NZ doctors have not heard of Latypova and Watt's legal research and sadly they believe this to be just regulatory failure. They do not understand the planned nature of this psyop.
Thank you for this perspective about the clots. This is a very good article from nzdos. I note the observation that it is most likely the (charged) LNPs which are the triggering factor for the clots. Others working in this field, including the late Prof. A Burkhardt from Germany, whose work I translated into English with a colleague, always attributed the causative agent to be the ‘spike protein’. However, I see little solid evidence for the production of spike protein and prefer to think of the transfection story as a piece of science fiction created for marketing purposes by a desperate and degenerate industry which has lost its connection with real science and medical ethics and is producing only toxic junk. Having had a career in product development for a multinational producer and marketer of FMCG I can see how corporate financial interests can subvert ethical considerations and lead to unsafe products entering the market.
Suavek, I have no objection to your choice to delete earlier comment. Thank you for your explanation. However, please draw Mike Yeadon's attention to the deleted discussion if you are in contact with him, and please get his opinion.
Howard -My earlier comments have been deleted, but they tended to agree with you,. Having listened to the (long) interview, the biochemist who spoke gave as his opinion that the fibrinogen strands were triggered to form by the charged exposed ends of the LNPs. The spike was just an additional factor. In this regard, what do you make of the antibody findings of spike protein in cells histology? Do you think it is just a cross reaction to similar proteins?
I will refrain from making medical statements because it is easy to damage the enlightenment work in this substack. I would of course like to avoid this. My aim is to spread Dr Yeadon's findings and not my opinion. The medical field in this substack belongs only to him. I hope that you will forgive my reticence and understand that I do not want to be led astray one day and thereby damage Dr Yeadon and my own work in this substack. In German, one sometimes says, "to lead someone on slippery ice". I want to avoid that.
A bit funnier sounds this German saying: "The cow has already left the ice". That means that it is safe now. I don't like walking on thin ice. The medical field can be compared to such thin, or slippery ice.
What is of note is that Suavek analyses the conflict as a class struggle, whereas most commentators, including Yeadon, see it in terms of Good and Evil. Without wishing to place a capital letter on “evil,” it strikes me that this better fits the breadth of the ills being imposed upon us. My own position tends towards an analysis in terms of the disregard for moral fundamentals, such as allegiance to the truth, or at least the robust rejection of falsehoods and absurdities.
Only some of those against us would seem to be motivated by greed or even the addiction to power. I do not see a unitary front, but a loose coalition of scheming forces whose conspiracies do not add up.
For example, if you want to grab the resources of Ukraine, as a first step to grabbing those of Russia, you do not disable your armed forces and air pilots by making them take a dangerous vaccine against a non-existent disease. Other contradictions abound.
It looks rather as if many of those lined up against us actually believe some of the absurdities being broadcast. This does not mean that they all believe the same absurdities, belief being measured by how they act rather than what they say.
“Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold.” The positions held by our enemies are not only superficial, but incoherent. (Superficial because there is more to life than everlasting enjoyment.)
This makes their position evil, because evil seeks only destruction. In this case, some of the perils they have visited upon our world are such that all life may be threatened, i.e. not only the lives of us "useless eaters", but that of the animal and plant world, and of course themselves. They are suicidal, the danger being that, tho certainly they will perish, we stand to perish first.
Hence I cannot see these developments in terms of a class struggle, which would have to understood in terms only of the subjugation of a majority.
I can agree with you that it is about more than a typical class struggle that we know from history, although the school systems try to skilfully avoid this topic. However, I think that the decades of preparation for the Great Reset and the effective work of the propaganda machine indicate a fairly precise planning. That is why I tend to see the contradictions as part of the PsyOp, in which I do not expect any major coincidences. Anything that "does not fit the picture" can serve to deliberately confuse people so that they cannot see through the plan. The poisoning of the military can theoretically be explained by the fact that future wars will be decided by robots, and that the military can pose the greatest threat to the perpetrators' plans. The military can thwart the perpetrators' plans. The soldiers whose intelligence has been reduced by the micro-thrombosis in the brain have been largely rendered harmless and are incapable of attempting an uprising. Unfortunately, I see this problem with many "vaccinated" people. The intelligence left over is definitely enough to shoot, but not to recognize the injustice suffered. These people will think until they die that "mistakes were made". Or worse, some will thank the "vaccine" for saving their lives and will not bother to look at the evidence to the contrary.
If the meaning of the political-economic upheaval and medical fraud is not recognized, and if the contradictions not are seen as expedient, then I can understand that the interests behind it remain partially unrecognized. When Dr Yeadon uses the term "evil", it does not mean that he sees anything as "accidental evil". On the contrary, he is painfully aware of the hidden meaning of what is happening. I cannot speak for him, but this is clear from his countless statements, which I have collected in this Substack and sorted by topic. But this is where the problem lies. The contradictions, which I believe were deliberately designed in advance to confuse, weaken the credibility of anyone who tells the truth. That is exactly what the perpetrators were after and, as I see it, this trap worked well. If I cannot explain all the hundred contradictions to people immediately and briefly, then my credibility will be diminished, and I will not be able to appear as convincing as I would like. I interpret this as the meaning of the contradictions constructed specifically for this purpose.
Everything is being done exactly according to plan. The UN has long been preparing what it calls "flying auxiliary police brigades" in case (as in Canada) the national police (or military) are not ready to act. Of course, this is all evil (or evil), but it all seems to me to be driven by interests. I don't think that anything in world politics can be dismissed as coincidence.
Of course I allow the idea that you are more right than I am.
However, as long as I see a plausible explanation for the contradictions, I tend to believe that the upheavals are driven by interests.
Our own National Police and military are likely to act on the side of the people once they realise what is happening, that is why they must be put out of the way. The fascists in the US government have a long history of using paramilitary death squads in countries they take over.
This is all exceedingly intricate. The idea that our adversaries were fearful of the military mounting a counter-coup is interesting, and in 2020 I was furious that they had failed to do so, i.e. even before the vaccine mandates. The top military, with its support for mindless escalation against Russia and generally, obviously having never countenanced any such coup, is very much part of the cabal. Lower-ranking officers and soldiers are another matter.
We are not going to unravel this with certainty in our time-frame, and therefore we need an ongoing debate, some of which will have to be discreet.
One of my questions is who our greater enemies are. Are they the puppet-masters themselves, or not rather those in our midst who complied and the others who provide protection?
One line of reflection I have been pursuing in my writing since early this century is the need to revitalise and complete our checks & balances. Both the deep Christian state, now in its dying throes, and the Enlightenment traditions suffered from severe defects which made them vulnerable to the long march of the puppeteers. The checks & balances of the Glorious and the American Revolutions needed additions and further refinement as history unfolded with the emergence of new practical possibilities and perils. One of the tasks I have set myself is to set out such additions. Yet my flagship concept of “fuzzy democracy” has met with indifference even among alternative gatekeepers. In my eyes, “Electoral democracy” in a Republic must be understood as one of those checks & balances, with other forces determining the unfolding of policy.
Gradually, the puppeteers infiltrated every institution, having placed in the upper echelons men of weak character, judgement and education, so that now even the mass media and courts have been captured. The younger generation, i.e. at or recently in school, has been brainwashed with absurdities such as the need to fight climate change (as if we could even if we wanted to). Zero knowledge of photosynthesis.
Members of my tiny network hope that the children who were masked will, on assuming power, take revenge. We ourselves, retired, are too old, unequipped and marginal to resort to violence. Some of us abroad had hoped that the US Second Amendment would come to the rescue of the First, especially as the USA must have many veterans who are reasonably fit. But organisation is nigh impossible.
My approach, which, granted, may prove a lost cause, is to elevate good character above compliance with rules & regulations, via procedures in the professions to weed out poor characters long before they can do anything criminal. I developed this theme in a book I published in German in 2015. Reflection on the notion of character itself has been neglected, and I am seeking to rectify this. Suffice it here to say that there is no such thing as a man for all seasons.
My attention is also turning to denial in the alternative scene, that is, the refusal to debate certain topics fairly & squarely. Most in that scene fight from a Christian corner with calls for a return to the traditional values which have proven wanting. Those values contained contradictions and inadequacies which were bound eventually to lead to their demise even without the machinations of the puppeteers.
But the fog of war, not least the fog of moral war, makes everything, as said, exceedingly intricate.
This has been long, and barely touched the surface. I do of course have websites which spell out these matters in detail, but I do not think it appropriate to list them on this forum. Anyone who wants to know can email me.
Suavek, the divergent analyses we remain with will both be needed as events unfold; they may complement each other until some future distant time that one or the other is refuted.
If we really want to change anything for the better, we need to begin with childhood adversity in all its forms, some more subtle and insidious than others.... IMO...
Literally EVERYTHING that humans think, believe and DO happens DOWNSTREAM from the way we perceive and treat children during their FORMATIVE years and we must remember that the human brain is not fully developped until the early 20's.
NOTHING will change fundamentally, until we address this fundamental issue.
***
"What kind of a society is it, that does NOT place the Children's Fire at the very centre of its institutions of power?
It's an INSANE society!"
~ Tim "Mac" Macartney
#TheChildrensFire
Please Watch this Video presentation to the very end...
“The total neglect or trivialization of the childhood factor operative in the context of violence and the way it evolves in early infancy sometimes leads to explanations that are not only unconvincing and abortive but actively deflect attention away from the genuine roots of violence. The abstract term “anti–Semitism” contains an infinite number of meanings and frequently only serves to blur the complicated psychological processes involved, processes that need to be identified and called by name. Only in this way can we hope to change anything.”
One place to start would be to STOP TORTURING [male] BABIES... and children in general...
Have you ever watched a routine American genital mutilation of a newborn baby boy? It's all right there! If we just stopped torturing children, we'd live in a completely different world within 1 or 2 generations!!
These are very good resolutions for the new year 2025. We can only hope that they will not be forgotten as quickly as the New Year's resolution to quit smoking.
I deleted my comment that was previously here because after a short thought I came to a different conclusion. You can read it here :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/allens-arguments-part-2-anyone-who/comment/71671700
Dear currer,
I have deleted your comment along with my comment. I ask for your understanding. You can read the important reasons for this at the link above.
Best wishes,
Suavek
I wish I deserved this praise! In fact it is copied from the NZ doctors webpage, scroll a bit down the link.
Ralph Baric is mentioned as one of the authors of a paper discussing the generation of abnormal clots by these artificial lipids (written long PRIOR to the "pandemic")
So harms wer5e clearly known. It is worth listening to the whole presentation - or getting a technically qualified person to do it for you. There is a lot of info hidden in the talk - but a strong NZ accent is a bit of a problem.
This presentation deserves to be known widely. Good luck!
The clots do not come from the spike protein but from the synthetic lipids in the LNP capsule. When they get inside the cell and open up, they expose their phosphorous molecules which combine with elements in blood chemistry to form abnormal protein strands together with a blood protein called fibrinogen. This process is self perpetuating. The spike protein damages the lining of the blood vessels and causes inflammation - natural clotting processes begin- the spike helps the fibrinogen tangles to intertwine - so you get massive long clots.
This is my understanding anyway, I am not an expert. I think all the information anyone would need is in this website talk. Mike Yeadon already knows about this I think - Sasha Latypova has briefly mentioned it - If you can ask Mike I am sure he can explain.
XXXX
Here I list my concerns regarding the alleged NLP study results.
I think it is appropriate to explain what I think about this NLP work.
Nobody can rule out that unknown damage mechanisms may come to light. However, I find the claim that these are the only damage mechanisms to be both questionable and most likely fraudulent. But that is exactly what this work seems to point to, or at least it goes in that direction.
The successfully completed peer review process has long been used to make medical fraud appear scientifically credible. In the case of the work with NLPs described, I suspect fraud that comes directly from the US Department of Defense, and that is why I will no longer seriously deal with it. It seems obvious to me that the perpetrators are now trying to attribute ALL of the damaging mechanisms of mRNA technology solely to NLPs, so that they can later claim the following, for example:
"Well, we have now replaced the harmful NLPs of the time with others (or changed them), so that mRNA technology is now safe and effective."
In addition, many honest scientists and their work results can be defamed in this way, such as the work results of Prof. Arne Burkhardt. It does not matter where the proteins that he found in the deceased and called "spike proteins" came from.
The attempts to attribute all damage mechanisms solely to NLPs also serve the purpose of portraying the deliberate toxicity of the alleged "vaccines" as an "isolated error" in order to escape responsibility for the deliberate mass murder.
In this Substack, I do not offer a platform for the work of CIA agents such as Ralph Barick, who have long since lost their credibility. The censored scientists are the only ones I trust. They recognized several damage mechanisms as early as 2020, which later actually led to the damage they previously suspected. And what did Ralph Barick do at that time? What does he have to show? Those who supported the lie of "safe and effective" at the time, or who remained silent about it, do not get a platform in this Substack. The work of such paid lackeys of the perpetrators is not worth "closer examination".
I consider such alleged "research results" of the CIA to be meaningless, and, moreover, their possible purposes are now, in the year 2024, easy to predict even by laypeople. I have listed these easily identifiable purposes above.
PS.
The fact that NLPs have a damaging mechanism was in fact well documented and widely known even before the introduction of mRNA technology. Of course, there is always something genuine in such work. A grain of truth helps the perpetrators' propaganda to appear credible.
I am afraid I don't know whether the Campbell is the same man.
These NZ doctors have not heard of Latypova and Watt's legal research and sadly they believe this to be just regulatory failure. They do not understand the planned nature of this psyop.
Thank you for this perspective about the clots. This is a very good article from nzdos. I note the observation that it is most likely the (charged) LNPs which are the triggering factor for the clots. Others working in this field, including the late Prof. A Burkhardt from Germany, whose work I translated into English with a colleague, always attributed the causative agent to be the ‘spike protein’. However, I see little solid evidence for the production of spike protein and prefer to think of the transfection story as a piece of science fiction created for marketing purposes by a desperate and degenerate industry which has lost its connection with real science and medical ethics and is producing only toxic junk. Having had a career in product development for a multinational producer and marketer of FMCG I can see how corporate financial interests can subvert ethical considerations and lead to unsafe products entering the market.
In case of interest in Burkhardt’s work here is a link to our summary of his research. https://x.com/howardsteen4/status/1665317277976109062
Here I list my concerns regarding the alleged NLP study results :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/allens-arguments-part-2-anyone-who/comment/71671700
I think your enthusiasm for the NLP study is premature. You can read the reasons for my attitude in this regard in the link above.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Suavek, I have no objection to your choice to delete earlier comment. Thank you for your explanation. However, please draw Mike Yeadon's attention to the deleted discussion if you are in contact with him, and please get his opinion.
Howard -My earlier comments have been deleted, but they tended to agree with you,. Having listened to the (long) interview, the biochemist who spoke gave as his opinion that the fibrinogen strands were triggered to form by the charged exposed ends of the LNPs. The spike was just an additional factor. In this regard, what do you make of the antibody findings of spike protein in cells histology? Do you think it is just a cross reaction to similar proteins?
Dear Currer,
I will refrain from making medical statements because it is easy to damage the enlightenment work in this substack. I would of course like to avoid this. My aim is to spread Dr Yeadon's findings and not my opinion. The medical field in this substack belongs only to him. I hope that you will forgive my reticence and understand that I do not want to be led astray one day and thereby damage Dr Yeadon and my own work in this substack. In German, one sometimes says, "to lead someone on slippery ice". I want to avoid that.
A bit funnier sounds this German saying: "The cow has already left the ice". That means that it is safe now. I don't like walking on thin ice. The medical field can be compared to such thin, or slippery ice.
Best wishes,
Suavek
What is of note is that Suavek analyses the conflict as a class struggle, whereas most commentators, including Yeadon, see it in terms of Good and Evil. Without wishing to place a capital letter on “evil,” it strikes me that this better fits the breadth of the ills being imposed upon us. My own position tends towards an analysis in terms of the disregard for moral fundamentals, such as allegiance to the truth, or at least the robust rejection of falsehoods and absurdities.
Only some of those against us would seem to be motivated by greed or even the addiction to power. I do not see a unitary front, but a loose coalition of scheming forces whose conspiracies do not add up.
For example, if you want to grab the resources of Ukraine, as a first step to grabbing those of Russia, you do not disable your armed forces and air pilots by making them take a dangerous vaccine against a non-existent disease. Other contradictions abound.
It looks rather as if many of those lined up against us actually believe some of the absurdities being broadcast. This does not mean that they all believe the same absurdities, belief being measured by how they act rather than what they say.
“Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold.” The positions held by our enemies are not only superficial, but incoherent. (Superficial because there is more to life than everlasting enjoyment.)
This makes their position evil, because evil seeks only destruction. In this case, some of the perils they have visited upon our world are such that all life may be threatened, i.e. not only the lives of us "useless eaters", but that of the animal and plant world, and of course themselves. They are suicidal, the danger being that, tho certainly they will perish, we stand to perish first.
Hence I cannot see these developments in terms of a class struggle, which would have to understood in terms only of the subjugation of a majority.
Dear Paul,
I can agree with you that it is about more than a typical class struggle that we know from history, although the school systems try to skilfully avoid this topic. However, I think that the decades of preparation for the Great Reset and the effective work of the propaganda machine indicate a fairly precise planning. That is why I tend to see the contradictions as part of the PsyOp, in which I do not expect any major coincidences. Anything that "does not fit the picture" can serve to deliberately confuse people so that they cannot see through the plan. The poisoning of the military can theoretically be explained by the fact that future wars will be decided by robots, and that the military can pose the greatest threat to the perpetrators' plans. The military can thwart the perpetrators' plans. The soldiers whose intelligence has been reduced by the micro-thrombosis in the brain have been largely rendered harmless and are incapable of attempting an uprising. Unfortunately, I see this problem with many "vaccinated" people. The intelligence left over is definitely enough to shoot, but not to recognize the injustice suffered. These people will think until they die that "mistakes were made". Or worse, some will thank the "vaccine" for saving their lives and will not bother to look at the evidence to the contrary.
If the meaning of the political-economic upheaval and medical fraud is not recognized, and if the contradictions not are seen as expedient, then I can understand that the interests behind it remain partially unrecognized. When Dr Yeadon uses the term "evil", it does not mean that he sees anything as "accidental evil". On the contrary, he is painfully aware of the hidden meaning of what is happening. I cannot speak for him, but this is clear from his countless statements, which I have collected in this Substack and sorted by topic. But this is where the problem lies. The contradictions, which I believe were deliberately designed in advance to confuse, weaken the credibility of anyone who tells the truth. That is exactly what the perpetrators were after and, as I see it, this trap worked well. If I cannot explain all the hundred contradictions to people immediately and briefly, then my credibility will be diminished, and I will not be able to appear as convincing as I would like. I interpret this as the meaning of the contradictions constructed specifically for this purpose.
Everything is being done exactly according to plan. The UN has long been preparing what it calls "flying auxiliary police brigades" in case (as in Canada) the national police (or military) are not ready to act. Of course, this is all evil (or evil), but it all seems to me to be driven by interests. I don't think that anything in world politics can be dismissed as coincidence.
Of course I allow the idea that you are more right than I am.
However, as long as I see a plausible explanation for the contradictions, I tend to believe that the upheavals are driven by interests.
Thank you for your valuable food for thought !
Best wishes,
Suavek
Our own National Police and military are likely to act on the side of the people once they realise what is happening, that is why they must be put out of the way. The fascists in the US government have a long history of using paramilitary death squads in countries they take over.
Dear Suavek,
This is all exceedingly intricate. The idea that our adversaries were fearful of the military mounting a counter-coup is interesting, and in 2020 I was furious that they had failed to do so, i.e. even before the vaccine mandates. The top military, with its support for mindless escalation against Russia and generally, obviously having never countenanced any such coup, is very much part of the cabal. Lower-ranking officers and soldiers are another matter.
We are not going to unravel this with certainty in our time-frame, and therefore we need an ongoing debate, some of which will have to be discreet.
One of my questions is who our greater enemies are. Are they the puppet-masters themselves, or not rather those in our midst who complied and the others who provide protection?
One line of reflection I have been pursuing in my writing since early this century is the need to revitalise and complete our checks & balances. Both the deep Christian state, now in its dying throes, and the Enlightenment traditions suffered from severe defects which made them vulnerable to the long march of the puppeteers. The checks & balances of the Glorious and the American Revolutions needed additions and further refinement as history unfolded with the emergence of new practical possibilities and perils. One of the tasks I have set myself is to set out such additions. Yet my flagship concept of “fuzzy democracy” has met with indifference even among alternative gatekeepers. In my eyes, “Electoral democracy” in a Republic must be understood as one of those checks & balances, with other forces determining the unfolding of policy.
Gradually, the puppeteers infiltrated every institution, having placed in the upper echelons men of weak character, judgement and education, so that now even the mass media and courts have been captured. The younger generation, i.e. at or recently in school, has been brainwashed with absurdities such as the need to fight climate change (as if we could even if we wanted to). Zero knowledge of photosynthesis.
Members of my tiny network hope that the children who were masked will, on assuming power, take revenge. We ourselves, retired, are too old, unequipped and marginal to resort to violence. Some of us abroad had hoped that the US Second Amendment would come to the rescue of the First, especially as the USA must have many veterans who are reasonably fit. But organisation is nigh impossible.
My approach, which, granted, may prove a lost cause, is to elevate good character above compliance with rules & regulations, via procedures in the professions to weed out poor characters long before they can do anything criminal. I developed this theme in a book I published in German in 2015. Reflection on the notion of character itself has been neglected, and I am seeking to rectify this. Suffice it here to say that there is no such thing as a man for all seasons.
My attention is also turning to denial in the alternative scene, that is, the refusal to debate certain topics fairly & squarely. Most in that scene fight from a Christian corner with calls for a return to the traditional values which have proven wanting. Those values contained contradictions and inadequacies which were bound eventually to lead to their demise even without the machinations of the puppeteers.
But the fog of war, not least the fog of moral war, makes everything, as said, exceedingly intricate.
This has been long, and barely touched the surface. I do of course have websites which spell out these matters in detail, but I do not think it appropriate to list them on this forum. Anyone who wants to know can email me.
Suavek, the divergent analyses we remain with will both be needed as events unfold; they may complement each other until some future distant time that one or the other is refuted.
regards, Paul
Dear Paul,
I can't add anything because you've already said everything that's important and I agree with you. I found your German book here :
https://www.ebay.de/itm/134802883638
I've just read your statement about media fees. Of course, I assume that you are also an author of this book: :
Ethical misapprehensions
Paul Gregory
https://www.academia.edu/9099053/Ethical_misapprehensions
I just read a fragment of it.
Best wishes,
Suavek
If we really want to change anything for the better, we need to begin with childhood adversity in all its forms, some more subtle and insidious than others.... IMO...
Literally EVERYTHING that humans think, believe and DO happens DOWNSTREAM from the way we perceive and treat children during their FORMATIVE years and we must remember that the human brain is not fully developped until the early 20's.
NOTHING will change fundamentally, until we address this fundamental issue.
***
"What kind of a society is it, that does NOT place the Children's Fire at the very centre of its institutions of power?
It's an INSANE society!"
~ Tim "Mac" Macartney
#TheChildrensFire
Please Watch this Video presentation to the very end...
https://youtu.be/1JchSac-VP0
***
A piece of gruesome, little known, historical context...
The Childhood Origins of World War II and the Holocaust:
https://psychohistory.com/books/the-origins-of-war-in-child-abuse/chapter-6-the-childhood-origins-of-world-war-ii-and-the-holocaust/
***
“The total neglect or trivialization of the childhood factor operative in the context of violence and the way it evolves in early infancy sometimes leads to explanations that are not only unconvincing and abortive but actively deflect attention away from the genuine roots of violence. The abstract term “anti–Semitism” contains an infinite number of meanings and frequently only serves to blur the complicated psychological processes involved, processes that need to be identified and called by name. Only in this way can we hope to change anything.”
~ Alice Miller
Full article 👇🏼
http://psychohistory.com/articles/the-political-consequences-of-child-abuse/
~*~
One place to start would be to STOP TORTURING [male] BABIES... and children in general...
Have you ever watched a routine American genital mutilation of a newborn baby boy? It's all right there! If we just stopped torturing children, we'd live in a completely different world within 1 or 2 generations!!
Don't believe me?
Watch this from beginning to end:
https://youtu.be/5MLtxCwdMv0
Dear Nicoletta,
These are very good resolutions for the new year 2025. We can only hope that they will not be forgotten as quickly as the New Year's resolution to quit smoking.
https://dhughes.substack.com/
This substack good on class struggle.