HOW DID THEY DO THAT ? -- The shortest explanation of the “Covid” deception

About the article by Dr. Jonathan Engler, a master of summarization.

Apr 09, 2024

A symbolic image

A foreword from Dr. Mike Yeadon, April 9, 2024 :

I’m pleased to see this position statement. As you know, I’m open minded to the possibility that something was done in certain point locations like NYC, Northern Italy, though if so, it wasn’t contagious or represented a net increase in lethality over whatever else was ordinarily present (because there’s no evidence in the all causes mortality data).

I’m not persuaded that there must have been such a release. Only that there might have been.

Deaths spiked in many locations only after WHO declared a fraudulent pandemic and those deaths were medical murder, if done knowingly and manslaughter, if foolish enough not to appreciate that avoidable deaths would be expected to follow imposition of such protocols.

There have been several “PCR false positive pseudo epidemics”, in which it was later determined at all the positive test results were false, in other words 100% false positives. That such events can happen when nobody is trying to deceive, imagine how easy it would be to create one, deliberately.

Best wishes

Mike

Source : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1047

Note :

The foreword by Dr. Yeadon only refers to the Panda article that he linked in his Telegram channel and not to the rest of the text of my Substack article.

Every single aspect of the “Covid” narrative is fake. There was no pandemic.

A summary of PANDA's position statement of 1 March 2024

Jonathan Engler

Apr 09, 2024

https://open.substack.com/pub/pandauncut/p/every-single-aspect-of-the-covid

PANDA Uncut

Every single aspect of the “Covid” narrative is fake. There was no pandemic.

A full version of our position statement can be read here. There was no pandemic by any reasonable definition – which must surely include that large numbers of previously healthy people in all age groups perished, whereas there was no discernible rise in global mortality in 2020…

7 months ago · 33 likes · 7 comments · Jonathan Engler

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Afterword :

I don't know the author of the article, Jonathan Engler, personally. However, there are good reasons why I was very enthusiastic about his article. Apparently it also impressed Mike Yeadon, so he linked the article in his Telegram channel. Then it only took minutes until I knew: This article deserves a special mention in my Substack. A short time later I also shared it so that it would never be lost or forgotten by me and my friends in the sea of endless information.

Jonathan Engler's article is like a very useful gem that you definitely want to share with your friends.

So far I have not been able to find a better summary of the "Corona" scam that explains the key points of the deception so well. It is a simple and understandable text that seems to have been perfectly considered in its construction. Putting complex events into simple words is not always as easy as we think. Later I will add just one more piece of information: the negative effect of fear on our immune system.

All points recorded in the article have been supported by evidence which has been omitted here for reasons of space and clarity. You can find all of this evidence in my other Substack articles, which I created specifically for this purpose.

My letter to a friend about Jonathan Engler's article

April 11, 2024.

Dear Helen, I would like to add something. Jonathan Engler's article is actually something special. All I wanted was to highlight the value of his article. The author wrote me an email, which I answered as follows :

" Jonathan, perhaps the need for brevity also helped why the article turned out so well? Many have tried to publish such a summary. But I think that so far only you have succeeded so well. Everything else was a bit “too fragmentary” and “scattered”. The ability to send your article to friends who have not yet done sufficient research represents a great utility value of the article. I congratulate you ! "

My entire Substack is dedicated solely to so that people don't have to search for arguments to convince their friends and family. That's why the value of my Substack lies not in what I write, but only in the links that I publish there and which lead to important works and studies by the most important scientists. Of course I dream of being able to write something by myself. I don't have enough time for that at the moment. So for now I'll just focus on accumulating information. I don't have any copyright, so everyone can use anything they want to inform others who don't have enough time to do their research. That is the sole purpose of my Substack. Conveniently, I can work with this: I can answer someone's question by simply linking to an already finished article.

And imagine, suddenly I see an article by Jonathan Engler that briefly lists everything that I had to write so many different articles for. To get to the point: My Substack is intended to so that people don't have to spend a lot of time searching for splintered, fragmentary information. So it should be a kind of compendium. I had to write maybe 50 (?) different articles and I still didn't cover all the most important topics. And there I see a single article by Jonathan, who briefly described everything at once and in simple, convincing words. Nothing is "fragmented", but rather he has summarized everything at once. I hope that everyone can see the high utility value of their item.

Jonathan Engler has achieved something that no one has done before. Behind the simplicity of his text lies a very well thought-out and perfectly designed concept that can quickly convince anyone who has had less time for research. What happened, suddenly seems very plausible and the portrayal of the last few years seems convincing. This can easily be overlooked. Maybe that's why the true value of his article can only be seen at the second or third glance. In my opinion, the matter is worth taking this look at the essentials a little further.

I don't think it's an exaggeration to say that someone who sends Jonathan Engler's articles to their friends can probably do more to enlightenment than if they had linked all of my articles together.

Source : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/53453

Policy Review: The nature of the events of the Covid era.

A detailed summary of PANDA's current understanding.

Mar 01, 2024

Source : https://pandauncut.substack.com/p/policy-review-the-nature-of-the-events

I also recommend another article on the same topic.

Here too, the informative value of the article seems to be excellent. My entire Substack is dedicated to the idea of allowing people who have already done enough research to send the most important information to their friends and family in a compact form. There are still many lovely people who have not been able to invest much time in their own research. That's why I think a sensible selection of information in as compact a form as possible is very useful. This article also serves this purpose very well. The information contained therein often relates to the general approach of the greedy healthcare system, which has clearly been exploiting our ignorance for a long time and has been plundering the economies of many countries for decades.

Here is a short fragment as a sample :

Dr Peter Marsh again:

“The fact is that 260 people have died. But for every Chinese person who has died, 10 million have not. In an ordinary rational world, that sounds like quite good odds, but not in this context. In this country, every year, 1,500 people are killed falling down the stairs. The implication would be that people should only be allowed to build bungalows.”

Any medical journalist worth his salt should know that omitting such statistics from any news report on a so-called ‘new disease’ is a complete, professional no-no. While these so-called SARS deaths will of course be upsetting for the families, it is a dismally unshocking scoop.

Yes, but SARS is different to flu, say the experts.

SARS is a new disease.

The virus proves it.

Hmmm.