The biggest danger to reality is the compliance of the Sheeple. There is no 'science' to quackcine-ology It is marketing and propaganda. Rona was a plandemic to keep Tonald Drumpf out of the White House and run the pilot project across the G20 that Mr. Yeadon discusses. The stolen 2020 US election and Rona was a CIA-DoD-NATO project. One of their proxies is the WHO, run by Kill Gates. They openly tell us their plans, as given in the post:
"In a document published in the October Bulletin of the World Health Organization, funded by the Gates Foundation, the WHO is proposing a globally interoperable digital identity infrastructure that permanently tracks every individual’s vaccination status from birth.
The proposed system will track things like socioeconomic data such as household income, ethnicity, and religion. It deploys artificial intelligence for identifying and targeting the unreached and combating misinformation, and enables governments to use vaccination records as prerequisites for education, travel, and other services."
AI control, mandatory stabs, and Transhumanism on the menu. Welcome to the 'thriving democracy' and 'values' we hear so much about.
Trump... Trump...? Oh, you mean the man who, on behalf of the Useless Eliters, organized Operation Warp Speed to "save" innocent people using "safe and effective" chemicals? I think I remember that guy ( lol ). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Warp_Speed
True, I read in RFK Jr's book on Fauci that Pfizer gave the Drumpald U$2 mn in Jan 2017. He has started to talk down the stabbinations and their efficacy. With RFK Jr there seems to be some changes (Rona, Hep B etc).
In general the US, UK, G20 gov'ts are owned by pharma, the military and NASA. 90% bought includng the regulators such as the CDC who make royalties and profits from the stabs and the idiots like Offit, Hotez the midget, Plotkin, etc make many millions from the same and from pharma directly. Massive corruption aka 'the science'.
Sadly, RFK Jr’s book is a deception from end to end. I didn’t know then, but there not only was no virus but there are no viruses at all. You certainly couldn’t draw that conclusion from his book.
It’s severely criminal because the central PsyOp that is going to be used again & again to murder very large numbers of people is the core “Virus Lie + Contagion Lie = Vaccine Lie”, per my short Substack article of a similar name.
RFK Jr has gone out of his way to preserve the core of the crime, while revealing much else.
Thanks for the insight Dr Yeadon. Completely agree re the myth of dead RNA posing as a 'virus'. I know of many people who shun the quackcines but accept the virus myth. Very hard to get them to comprehend the difference between bacteria which does exist and 'germs' which do not. They cannot make the most critical and logical conclusion.
Clicling the dropbox links in the pdf to the respective videos opens them eith the video and a transcript option. Sash'a's is complete - but all other transcripts are foreshortened- are not complete.
Thank you, Binra, for the tip. Have you checked if the videos in source 2 (on the article below) are longer? If so, please let me know. Thanks in advance,
I wasn't referring to the videos - but to the transcripts.
I rechecked via links in the article. (Though are they not the same as in the pdf?)
Two of these transcripts are foreshortened:
(CAF and Joe)
I and others don't have time for video-feed-so transcripts are valuable and searchable. Is mass migration to 'video' part of infantalising a push based 'feed me' mind-habit? (Not demonising it - but look at the loss of function to tech-fed externalisation of knowledge).
Binra, I'm afraid I'm not familiar with these kinds of cases at all, and I don't know how I could improve things. In other words, I probably know much less than you do. Furthermore, I'm not a native English speaker, and therefore I cannot expand or correct the transcripts.
Suavek, I am not addressing it your you or your skillset - but to pass the message on to whoever set up the web page. Why not nip it in the bud - instead of providing incomplete transcripts in perpetuity?
Suavek, I don't know how to fix any of this. But I too noticed that in Dr Yeadon's transcript the omission of most of his resume concerning his important responsibilities at Pfizer. So it does mention he started a biotech and a few other details but the transcript omits mention of most of his Pfizer responsibilities. This may be an intentional hack. So you know. Thanks for your great work.
Someone who speaks English can create a transcript from the video. I can't. But I've done it several times with the German videos. It takes forever because I constantly have to pause and rewind, but there's no other way to capture the most important information. Translation programs fail miserably with videos.
Re: A New Blood-borne Systemic Amyloidosis – with prion-like characteristics subsequent to mRNA vaccination.
Thank you for your letter of 4th September 2025 stating that you believe mRNA coronavirus vaccines to be safe and effective, and providing references to government research and assurances dating from 2021 and 2022.
I am sending you details of an ongoing court case in the Netherlands for tort which were initially brought before the Leeuwarden District Court (reference C/17/190788 and roll number 23/172,
Seventeen defendants, including the State of the Netherlands, Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, (Pfizer) and Mark Rutte, are involved in legal proceedings in connection with this tort.
According to Dutch independent news outlet Zebra Inspiratie, the plaintiffs allege that Gates, through his representatives, deliberately misled them about the safety of the COVID-19 shots, despite knowing “that these injections were not safe and effective.”
Mr. Stassen is also submitting four expert statements in both proceedings that provide convincing evidence that Covid-19 is not a disease but a project, and that the Covid-19 injections are not a safe and effective vaccine but a pathogenic and deadly bioweapon used by governments and those in power to commit democide against their own populations.
The Recht Oprecht Foundation (Stichting Recht Oprecht) will hold a press conference on Monday, December 15, 2025 which is intended to give the press an opportunity to ask Mr. Stassen questions about the content and significance of this evidence, and about the proceedings pending before the District Court of Leeuwarden and the Court of Appeal of Amsterdam.
The expert reports and videos will be posted on the website of the Stichting Recht Oprecht (Recht Oprecht Foundation). http://www.rechtoprecht.online/
I trust you will find this information of interest.
Yours sincerely,
Please write similarly to your own political representatives.
Substack is a ghetto - writing here does little. Secrecy is essential for the "Reset" to work, only publicity can shine enough truth to counteract these plans.
Dr. Yeadon leaves the management of his Telegram and Substacks to his assistant. In such cases, he always asks that people contact him directly. I can forward your message to Tim West, but anything else would be pointless.
Hi Tim, I know how hard you work every day. If you had more time to read, I would have given you several well-deserved compliments. But maybe this will do? :
This is an email from a valued subscriber at FRAUD PREVENTION HOTLINE :
PS Suavek, can you ask Mike to take the block off my posts as I cannot see his posts on substack. I do not know why he blocked me.
Suavek answers :
....................................
Hi Currer,
Dr. Yeadon leaves the management of his Telegram and Substacks to his assistant. In such cases, he always asks that people contact him directly. I can forward your message to Tim West, but anything else would be pointless.
He was only banned from commenting. He should have had no problem subscribing and seeing stuff. Anyway it was over a year ago so I removed the comment ban too.
Just came across this in my documents. It is Mike Yeadon's very first public statement. (probably from September 2020) I am putting it here for historical reference. I put up the second statement - which was dated - a few days ago here.
"I have never done anything like this in my life. I’ve played no role in politics beyond voting.
I didn’t pick this fight.
Merely the uncovering in recent days of the extent of false positives in community testing of the mostly-well means those centrally involved in this can no longer be trusted to provide accurate, reliable information. This isn’t an accident. It’s testing for beginners that “when prevalence is lower than the false positive rate, the test loses all useful positive predictive value”. I was taught this in O level statistics in the 1970s.
Those involved have no defence at all. So today I am calling the following to resign their roles or immediately to recuse themselves from any role whatsoever in management of this pandemic: Mr Hancock, Health Sec; Sir Patrick Vallance, Chief Scientific Advisor; rof Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer; Prof Neil Ferguson, Imperial College (in all capacities including modelling of pandemics & vaccine requirements).
I make no allegations but I believe public confidence in the results of testing, the implications of the results & actions for public health as well as the disposition of National Health Service facilities (which remain sub par, in large measure due to preparation for a modelled “2nd wave”, for which underlying assumptions & evidence base has STILL not been shared)
I take full responsibility for the contents & potential effects of this message & stand ready to be questioned by officials or anyone who needs to know why I’ve taken this action, after much thought & not a little trepidation.
There will never be any direct action taken against BigPharma.
They own the governments.
The only course of action is full spectrum communication that 9/11 was a DEW attack.
Every government on the planet knows this reality and has a responsibility to publicly state so.
The entire global network of governments must be exposed for collaborating to cover up 9/11.
Dr Judy Wood did the indissoluble work of freezing Where Did The Towers Go truth.
It is inarguable. It can and has been blocked from recognition.
Wake TF up!
What is hell does CAFATTZZ have to do with CV19?! She is a fiat money finance alleged guru. She is a fully self discredited concerning break through energy.
Catherine Austin Fitts & Breakthrough Energy
Weaponized Breakthrough Energy has been deployed, but no one wants to talk about it
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Dr David A. Hughes interview with 9/11 Revisionist
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
I agree with you, by the way. Communication is already all but impossible & communication to MANY is definitely beyond me. I doubt I’ve reached a significant number of new people in many years and I know of no way around that.
The obvious way is that a significant number of those I did reach picked up my messages and independently ran with it. Sadly, I don’t think that happened with more than a tiny number of people.
THanks to each of you good people for your work, diligent truth telling and brave effort in putting this together for people to learn. What is being done and planned for us is depraved. Thanks to those who presented testimony and to Suavek for putting this together. I'd never know otherwise.
Your Honor, my name is Alexander Latypova. I'm an expert witness addressing the court adjudicating C -17 -190788 and Procedure 23/172.
In these cases, the defendants named include Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, the Dutch state, Mark Rutte, and others. This video accompanies my written testimony, and this is a concise roadmap to help you assessing my affidavit.
In my expert opinion, the COVID -19 injections as deployed are indistinguishable from weapons.
They are deployed under international legal frameworks for military medical countermeasures, all of which bypass normal regulatory norms, practices, and laws, and remove all manufacturers' liability.
The mechanisms of harm were fully foreseeable and documented in numerous regulatory guidances all over the world. The mechanisms include synthetic RNA and DNA, mediated cellular dysregulation, inflammatory immune effects, and distributed injury to all organs.
The mass deployment of known harmful countermeasures using deceptive advertisement as pharmaceutical vaccines and drugs meets elements of democide, depraved indifference, and criminal negligence leading to mass deaths and injury.
Whether it meets the definition of genocide is legal determination for the court.
Dual use mechanisms make weaponisation of these injections possible. Dual use means that they can be used both for military and civilian purposes.
Synthetic RNA can cause major damage without necessarily coding for any specific proteins.
Vaccine platforms also recognized in biodefense literature as a mechanism to deliver this deleterious cargo into human body. And as previously mentioned, absence of meaningful, enforceable pharmaceutical regulations or manufacturer liability makes this platform completely open for weaponization and adulteration by design.
These countermeasures were sold in a bait -and -switch scheme to the public as medicine. In the U.S., emergency use authorization and PREP Act and equivalent laws in the European Union, including emergency provisions for countermeasures, waived enforcement of pharmaceutical law and created liability shields to manufacturers and administrators of these shots.
Mutual recognition agreements allowed European regulators to accept U.S. regulators' decisions bypassing any independent testing.
The conditional marketing approval authorization pathway provided veneer of regulation, while, as previously mentioned, no pharmaceutical laws are meaningfully enforced for countermeasures. And this crucial fact was and remains hidden from the public.
Military governance and contracting were used to develop, procure, deliver and distribute these shots all over the world. In the US National Security Council, Department of Defense, and Barda oversaw the development, manufacturing and distribution of Operation Warp Speed designed products.
Department of Defense funded all contracts for vaccines, whether for American distribution or European distribution, ordering them as prototypes and large -scale manufacturing demonstrations under Defense Production Act.
The Department of Defense placed their own staff in all vaccine manufacturing facilities.
And global distribution was coordinated through NATO and joint Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear and Military frameworks.
Contracts for these countermeasures reference civil and military application which are all hallmarks of defence production.
There is substantial evidence of non-compliance with good manufacturing practices which is the law that governs pharmaceutical purity and honesty in labelling all over the world.
For example, in late November 2020, the European Medicines Agency was hacked and data was leaked from it, including emails and Pfizer manufacturing documentation existing at the time just two weeks before global launch of these products.
The regulators were clearly bringing up objections to the technical implementation, to the purity of the product. There were substantial problems with manufacture.
The integrity of RNA was non -conforming with previous standards. So instead of fixing those problems, the standards were changed.
Instead of over 70%, for example, pure RNA to the spec, the regulators allowed the product to contain just over 50 % of the RNA to the spec.
The Pfizer and other manufacturers used proprietary, unvalidated analytics. Regulators were objecting to it. There were validation methods missing, and the regulators again were objecting to it.
Later on, in 2022, FDA, when they resumed inspections internationally issued Form 483 to Ranchler, which is a supplier to Pfizer, documenting severe CGMP violations.
And overall, no regulatory actions were taken. The products were never stopped and public was never informed about these severe violations to the quality of the products.
Even prior to 2020, in 2019, the FDA changed administrative rule allowing to arbitrarily waive inspections for biological facilities.
And during 2020, claiming COVID lockdowns and restrictions, they did not inspect any manufacturing facilities prior to launch of these products, which is one of the major requirements for pharmaceutical product to be inspected prior to launch.
In conclusion, the legal frameworks designed for chemical, biological, radiological nuclear attacks and military deployment renders these injections functionally indistinguishable from biochemical weapons.
In addition to that, media lies, propaganda, censorship constitute an accompanying psychological weaponry deployed via NATO psychological operations forces.
I urge the court to please open the record to full adversarial testing and call opposing experts to testify. I offer to testify under oath and work the courts through all the evidence.
My name is Dr Mike Yeadon. I have spent my entire professional life in research and early development of new medicines for respiratory and skin diseases. I have spent over 30 years in both big pharma and in biotech. I have a training in biochemistry and toxicology, and a PhD in respiratory pharmacology.
In big pharma I was once the most senior person in Pfizer’s Respiratory Discovery group. I was responsible for everything to do with drugs in research and early development. After that I founded my own biotechnology company which I led as CEO and was ultimately able to sell that to Novartis, a big drug company.
Around that time, I also was highly sought after as a consultant to other biotech companies and I consulted to them, and advised about 30 companies over a nine -year period.
So those are my credentials. I would say the professional opinion that I provide to you is that of someone who's deeply experienced in the scientific procedures and practices of creation and testing of molecules, in particular for their safety, their lack of toxicity.
So, my underlying training in toxicology, mechanistic toxicology, allowed me many times to detect and steer away from structural features or contents of potential medicines that could cause harm, based on my wide knowledge of those things that sadly have harmed humans and animals in the past.
And so, it doesn't really matter if an individual like me worked in vaccines or heart disease or respiratory because the principle, the core of my testimony, is about the safety and toxicity risks of any new medicine, and it's about that that I am particularly concerned, and I have been since the middle of 2020.
So, I'm just going to outline maybe half a dozen points that I want you to take on board. I could give you many more, but just for brevity. And others of my expert colleagues, I think will expand these points.
The first one to know, which is shocking if you don't know this, is there was no pandemic. There was no new illness called COVID -19. What there was, was all of the normal human illnesses that people get.
Acute respiratory illnesses like influenza are real, but we had that misattributed through incorrect diagnostic tests and told you had COVID and it was spreading. This was not true.
There was a long-planned deception and it used well-known human weaknesses, our susceptibility to fear, our credibility when authority figures tell us things. And that was misused. So, no pandemic, no new illness.
And because I worked that out, and I'm totally sure about this. I know that the people behind the so -called vaccines also knew this. Senior people, my peers, in the pharmaceutical industry, my peers in the pharmaceutical industry also knew this.
So did the regulatory agencies like FDA. So did senior figures who guide administrations in governments and any supranational organization, like the WHO, I’m afraid, also knew this.
There are two major things I want to talk about.
One was, the treatment of people who had this purported new illness – what they had was the normal range of illnesses that people have always suffered from – amplified by fear.
And what happened was that medical treatments in care homes, of seniors in assisted living facilities, were changed radically in 2020. And I knew this especially because of my underlying training especially in respiratory medicine, I knew that treating people with opiates like morphine and sedatives like midazolam was the wrong thing to do.
If you treat elderly people on their own with midazolam and morphine (which was the standard treatment for covid) what it does is - as they are respiratory depressants, they slow the rate and depth of your breathing and eventually if you're left alone with these treatments at night these people literally faded away and died while asleep
They were killed by their treatments. They never needed them. They were known to be inappropriate and contraindicated. If they're used together the person has to be under active medical monitoring. That did not happen.
I don't think the doctors who gave them these drugs early on knew that would be the consequence, but later on, I'm afraid they did, and they are culpable.
In hospitals, large numbers of people were put on mechanical ventilators. You know the kind of breathing equipment you see in the movies. I can tell you this much. I'm not a medical doctor, but I've been around pulmonologists and respiratory specialists for 40 years.
You do not take a person who is walking into the hospital, able to breathe, unassisted, even if distressed, who did not have a blocked airway, or gunshot, knife wound or crush injury to the chest, you do not sedate, intubate and ventilate these people.
Why? Because God and nature left you a perfectly adequate apparatus to breathe in and breathe out. If you needed extra oxygen, it would be easy to provide it with a mask or nasal cannula. In fact, that is the normal non-invasive treatment for people in respiratory distress who have unobstructed airways and no injury to the chest.
You do not Sedate-Intubate-Ventilate. If you do, this is an aggressive procedure.
Life-saving under certain circumstances like drug overdose or elective surgery, but under other circumstances what happens if you do that is it gradually produces lung injury and the person fades away and you have to increase the pressure day after day in the pump until they die of what's called adult respiratory distress syndrome.
So that's the second way in which people were wrongly treated because top down medical protocols for covid 19 (which did not exist) were known by people like me to be harmful and ultimately lethal.
And finally in hospitals people were given ineffective drugs, that were known to be dangerous, and the classic one is remdesivir,
Nurses on clinic started to call this drug run deaths as near after a while, and that's because remdesivir, if given persistently kills people.
So I hope I've outlined to you there was no acute public health crisis and the treatments given to people with these alleged illnesses, (which were other illnesses) were wrong. They were bad treatments
The really important thing I need to tell you about which comes from the core of my training and then decades of application of looking for potential toxic vulnerabilities in a medicine.
It was in the core of my training to look out for molecules and components that were picked up for good reasons to accomplish some medicinal aim but might have toxic liabilities.
I will describe to you three things about these so-called vaccines, that I know as a professional from this industry that gave birth to them, must axiomatically cause injury, (I could pick others but there are three). I know these to be true from the heart of my training.
The first one is, we were told that these molecules were gene sequences that encoded something called spike protein. The spike protein we were told was on the outside of this virus.
Now, I don't agree with that, but This is what we were told, a cartoon like a sphere with spikes coming out of it. We were told these vaccines encoded the protein, the spike protein that sat on the outside of these viruses. And this would train your immune system to fight it off.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is a really important concept in immunology. It's taught to every person who has a training in immunology, as I did,
In the first lesson, - What allows your body to treat itself kindly but to go to war if something unto war is discovered in your body?
And the concept is this, self, non -self or foreign.
My body is healthy right now. My immune system that is surveilling all parts of my body is at peace with itself because everything it encounters is known to it to belong to Mike Yeadon himself.
If you inject me with a gene sequence that will make my body manufacture a foreign protein that isn't me that is a viral protein, my body, every cell in my body that follows that instruction will signal to my immune system that I have been attacked, and my immune system goes to war.
And attacks and kills every cell that complied with that instruction. And that is what has happened ladies and gentlemen to every cell in every tissue in every person who received that injection.
The toxicity that you would experience varies tremendously, because some people would take it up efficiently, copy it efficiently, make the protein for a long time, and I'm afraid those people are mostly dead.
Other people took it up poorly, transcribed it poorly, and only briefly, and those people are alive.
And then there's every continuity in between. But that point that if you inject an instruction that makes your body make a foreign protein that is not self, your body will attack it.
This is the basis behind organ rejection. This, ladies and gentlemen, is the basis behind autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis and many others, and neurological diseases where your body destroys itself.
That is the first principle that was designed into every company's molecule, Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca. So, I knew by the middle of 2020, it was designed to cause injury. How much, I did not know, I still don’t completely know, but this expert is telling you, they were designed to cause injury.
The second really important point to tell you about is what was encoded in these gene based alleged vaccines was spike protein.
I didn't know what spike protein was. It was new to me, but it's the spikes on the outside of this alleged virus (that I don't think is real) I could find proteins like it, and I found all of them were known to be toxins like neurotoxins, cardio toxins, and things that would prompt blood coagulation.
So again, the question, why would you encode in your helpful medicinal product, something that when expressed in your body would harm you. That's the second thing.
There is a third one, which is when I discovered it, late in 2020 or early 2021, I have to say I cried.
Two of the products made by Pfizer and Moderna were formulated. Every medicine is formulated. You'll be familiar with a tablet. It might be film coated or dry. It might be a capsule of various sizes. It could be a liquid for injection and inhaler. All of these, you have the active principle, but it's surrounded and protected with something that helps it do its work, hopefully beneficial work.
Two of these products were wrapped in something called lipid nanoparticles or LNPs. Lipid is fat. Nano means tiny particle means little blobs. So, they were wrapped in nanoparticles.
I looked them up, they had been used before in certain oncology drugs, but here is the thing, as a toxicologist when I started researching, I found these things are known to be toxic and the further I explored, here is the shocking thing.
Lipid nanoparticles, every one of them tested, is known to promote the uptake of their payload, whatever they were protecting, into the organs inside your abdomen and what's called the visceral organs, and most prominently liver and your ovaries.
So, ladies and gentlemen, the person who picks lipid nanoparticles to formulate these materials knew, professionally, that when it was injected into women and girls, this material would travel around their body and concentrate in their reproductive organs. And then it would do those two things I just describe. It would be expressed and your body would recognise it as foreign and kill those cells. It would, when expressed, cause toxicity directly to those (reproductive) cells.
And I ask you, ladies and gentlemen, what possible motivation could you have for doing that when you could have picked half a dozen other means of protecting the drug?
And I have to say at that point, I knew deeply in my heart, that the first two observations I made weren't just like mistakes or things they would ride the risks of.
These three things together told me, someone got in a room, someone like me, and said, Dr Yeadon design injections that will injure, kill and reduce fertility in the people you give it to, and design it so that it won’t kill everybody, it wont injure everybody, but that if you give it over time it will lower fertility and their health, and reduce population.
And this is what I have watched happen all around me for five years since that moment. I've been speaking out and warning of this for five years. What I've just told you I did not make up after the fact.
I have worked for newspapers as a reporter and for attorneys as a paralegal, and I have written and published independent investigative reporting at my own websites on the subjects of local government and corporate corruption on prosecutorial and judicial misconduct, and on homesteading and local food and water security.
Since 2021, I have published my work on the history of communicable disease control law and biological product law at Bailiwick News on Substack.
I have prepared this video presentation for the judges in the multi -member chamber of the district court of Northern Netherlands in Leeuwarden. Case reference C -1719088, case number 23 -172 against the Dutch state, Mark Ruta, Bill Gates, Albert Borla, and others.
This video presentation is in support of my written statement to be submitted in these proceedings by attorney Peter Stosson on behalf of his clients with COVID -19 injection damage at the court in Leeuwarden.
It is my informed opinion that communicable disease and pandemic threats are political fabrications based on widespread use of intentionally deceptive diagnostic testing devices for the purposes of instilling public fear and justifying vaccination and biodefense programs.
It is my informed opinion that all vaccines, including but not limited to the injections labelled as COVID -19 MRNA vaccines are unstable, heterogeneous mixtures of biological matter, including bacteria, plant, animal, and human cells and tissues, along with chemical toxins, heavy metals, preservatives, solvents, and nutrient solutions.
It is my informed opinion that those who develop, produce, recommend, approve, authorize, procure, stockpile, distribute, and use vaccines for alleged disease control and pandemic response purposes, including but not limited to COVID -19 MRNA vaccines, know or should have known that injection of unstable mixtures of biological agents and chemical toxins causes biological malfunction and organ damage in living human and animal recipients.
This is due to living animal organisms’ individual capacities to distinguish between self and non -self biological material and to attempt to isolate, reject, or expel harmful foreign or non -self matter that has breached natural protective barriers presented by skin, digestive tract, and respiratory and lung surfaces.
These rejection reactions can and do take the form of autoimmune conditions such as asthma and allergies, neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis and autism, cancers, metabolic digestive and gastrointestinal disorders such as obesity and diabetes, infertility, and many other chronic conditions whose incidence in heavily vaccinated populations has increased since the middle of the 20th century when mass vaccination campaigns targeting infants, children, and expectant mothers began.
It is my informed opinion that those who develop, produce, recommend, approve, authorize, procure, stockpile, distribute, and use vaccines, including, but not limited to the COVID -19 vaccines, have committed war crimes under the Geneva Conventions and U.S. implementing law, specifically torture, performing biological experiments, mutilation, and murder.
Their acts have no legitimate medical or protective purpose, but have been presented deceitfully as having legitimate medical and protective purposes to cloak their intentional harmfulness from public view, public comprehension, and public obstruction.
It is my informed opinion that the war crime acts of vaccine -mediated torture, mutilation, and murder committed by the defendants in this case have been legalized under international legal instruments and U.S. federal law governing biological product regulation,
communicable disease control, and pandemic preparedness and response, as enacted by the U.S. Congress and U.S. presidents, and as executed by federal, state, and local health, military, and homeland security officials.
In my opinion, this precludes criminal prosecution of the defendants until such time as treaties have been amended to eliminate exemptions for acts allegedly committed for legitimate medical purposes, and until such time as enabling U.S. federal laws have been repealed by the U.S. Congress or nullified by U.S. federal courts.
It is my informed opinion that there can be no civil liability for or civil litigation to allege and prove design defects because there are no design standards for vaccines.
There can also be no civil liability for or civil litigation to allege and prove manufacturing defects because there are no manufacturing standards for vaccines.
In other words, criminal prosecutions of war crimes and civil litigation against developers and manufacturers of vaccines have both been rendered impossible by law to enable the past, present, and continued future deployment of intentionally harmful products to intentionally harm recipients.
Cases such as the present case brought by plaintiffs can help to publicly expose the long -known and intentional harmfulness of vaccine products and vaccination acts, and to bring about the end of all vaccine manufacturing and all vaccination programs.
The attached report includes two main sections, providing chronologically organized collections of summaries of relevant U.S. federal law and international law.
An appendix section contains lists of supporting evidence in the form of U.S. federal regulations, international mutual recognition agreements, which are trade agreements, academic and government publications, court decisions, and many other records.
My core findings are twofold.
One, for more than 120 years, persons working within the U.S. government's executive, legislative, civil administrative, and judicial branches have coordinated their lawmaking and law execution efforts with persons working within supranational organizations such as the UN World Health Organization and persons working within pharmaceutical corporations such as Pfizer and Merck to disguise the malevolent development, non-regulation, production, procurement, stockpiling, and use of intentionally harmful biological agents and toxins as regulated components of benevolent, routine public health and communicable disease control programs.
For more than 100 years, they targeted primarily infants, children, and expectant mothers while operating vaccination programs at the local, state, national, and international level.
Two, for approximately 25 years, Deceptive acts are capable of inducing rapid, widespread, all ages, schedule-driven submission to vaccination acts by disguising their malevolent, non -regulated acts as regulated components of emergency biodefense and pandemic preparedness and response
This court has an opportunity to further expose the original and long -running malevolence of vaccination programs to wider public understanding, and I urge you to take it up.
Please read the written report, titled the St. Benedict memo. There are several people working to understand and explain many of the aspects of the ongoing legalized war crimes program, including the other witnesses prepared to testify in this case, Sasha Latipova, Mike Eden, Catherine Austin Fitts.
I would like to thank the District Court of Northern Netherlands for the opportunity to address you. My name is Catherine Austin Fitz, and I am the publisher of the Solari Report, and I am the former partner and member of the Board of Dillon Reed, an investment bank on Wall Street, and the former Assistant Secretary of Housing in the First Bush administration.
I wish to give this statement because I believe that the pandemic represented an egregious misuse of health care policies to implement economic and political agendas. And I would like to explain the history and background as to why I am convinced that that is so.
I'm an expert on the United States federal credit and the federal budget and financial mechanisms. I have a great deal of information about that at my website, including on $21 trillion that's gone missing from the federal government.
Starting in 1998, I became very concerned that a change in policy had changed in the federal government, whereby billions and then trillions of dollars was going missing from federal accounts.
It started in October 1st, 1997, which is the beginning of federal fiscal 1998. Between that time and the 9 -11, there was approximately $4 trillion missing from the federal government.
In fact, the day before 9 -11, the Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld gave a press conference and said the U.S. Department of Defence was missing $2 .3 trillion, and this was a terrible problem
Money continued to go missing from then on, and as of fiscal 2015, there was $21 trillion missing.
I had been tracking the missing money between fiscal 1998 and 2015 and then started speaking about it publicly. A professor from Michigan State University, Dr Mark Skidmore, heard me, contacted me, thought it was unbelievable, checked out the federal financial statements, (all these numbers are from official documents) and proceeded with his students to do a survey.
That survey brought tremendous pressure on the government to obey the financial management laws, particularly the laws requiring audited financial statements.
Between fiscal 1998 and 2015, the federal government had refused to obey the laws related to or requiring audited financial statements.
As that pressure put more pressure under the federal government to obey, what happened was a policy was adopted in 2018 called Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Statement 56, which essentially was an administrative policy that took a position that they could authorize secret books by the federal government.
And we've had essentially no meaningful financial disclosure, in my opinion since, once FASB 56 went into place.
It was at that point that I realized, (as I had realized all the way along, one of the reasons that I continue to try and publicize and tell people about the missing money and encourage reforms around the missing money) If we don't balance the budget by providing financial resources for the retirement systems, both at the federal and state level, and continue to have this money disappear from the federal government,- I called it a financial coup -the only way they can balance the books is by lowering life expectancy.
And in fact, that had started to happen. In the spring of 1997, I was meeting with a leadership of some of the top pension funds who were on one of my advisory boards at my company in Washington called Hamilton Securities Group. I made a presentation to them about how we could re-engineer federal finances in a way that would bring tremendous new wealth to the country and make it possible for the pensions to afford the retirement's promise to the boomer generation.
Essentially, the boomer generation was a financial pig going through the snake, and the question was, how would we generate enough returns on the pension funds to make it?
And a leader when I presented my plans on how we could re-engineer federal spending so that we stopped running huge deficits, the head of the largest pension fund in the country, CalPERS, said to me, “You don't understand it's too late. They've given up on the country. They are moving all the money out starting in the fall.”
And I thought he meant - we're reallocating the investments in the pension funds to emerging markets because the growth rate is bigger.
That's not what he meant. He meant, no, we're going to start moving huge amounts out of the back door of the federal government with the $21 trillion that went missing by 2015.
And in fact, if you look at the budget deal where I believe that decision was made in 1995 when he said - they have given up on the country- there was a huge effort by the leadership of the financial system to get the budget on a balanced budget
When they failed, literally the next month, a series of policies were put in place that started to lower life expectancy in the lower income groups. And that continued.
If you look at any chart of life expectancy in the United States versus the other industrialized nations, the top 19 industrial nations other than the U.S. are steadily rising in terms of life expectancy. And starting at that point in 1997, you start to see the United States drop and start to diverge from the other countries.
And then when the pandemic hits, it falls off the chart.
I remember sitting in my car,… and talking to Dr. Skidmore, after our efforts to get real reforms done.
Dr. Skidmore said, why don't you just give up? Why do you keep bringing this up? And I said, Mark, don't you understand if we don't do something here, they're going to have to lower life expectancy, much more than they're doing now. They're going to have to lower life expectancy in the middle class. So when the pandemic happened, I was not surprised.
In the summer of 2019 every year the central bankers meet in Jackson Hole and the G7 central bankers have various policy discussions. In 2019 (the year after FASB statement 56 was adopted) the central bankers met in Jackson Hole, and they reviewed a plan by the Blackrock Investment institute prepared by a group of retired central bankers, called the Going Direct reset.
Now we know that the central banking system every eighty or a hundred and twenty years does a reset and often that reset is when you evolve the currency or you move the currency to a different currency.
So, we know this happens every, you know, at some point you flush the system. And so, I assume when that happened that we were going into a new reset.
The Going Direct reset, going direct refers to a radical change in policy. Traditionally, when a central bank like the Federal Reserve added money to the system, it would add it by investing in or putting money into the reserve track, and then the banks would use that reserve track to then put money in the system.
Going Direct was the Fed essentially injecting enormous amounts of money directly without going through reserve track, but buying, among other things, securities from the non -depository institutions.
And what happened, (starting that September after the Going Direct meeting) was the Federal reserve, with interventions in the market in September but then with the announcement of the pandemic injected extraordinary amounts of money into the system.
Different estimates are that it was five or six trillion dollars invested or injected directly.
Normally, any injection like that would have extraordinary inflationary impact. And in fact, there was one former Undersecretary of the Treasury who, speaking with Swiss investors said, you know, enormous inflation is baked into the cake. We just won't feel it right away.
And The reason we won't feel it right away, as it turns out, was the pandemic, many of the pandemic actions of locking people down, or calling certain businesses not essential, and leaving other businesses open, l created an enormous inflationary offset.
If you look at what happened in the United States, we basically shut down Main Street, lots of small businesses, left the publicly traded companies open, and shifted enormous market shares out of the small businesses into the big businesses thus radically consolidating enormous amounts of economic activity.
So, you inject $5 trillion, essentially grossly oversimplified into Wall Street, and you shut down Main Street, and then Wall Street has money to go shopping, and Main Street isn't an economic squeeze.
The last estimates I saw estimated that 35 % of the small businesses in America were shut down, and in some places, I think San Francisco, it was as much as 49%.
So, it was very, very successful at consolidating economic activity into the big players.
One estimate was in the United States, or maybe it's worldwide, we created 500 new billionaires. So, as I said, looking at this from the viewpoint of what was happening financially around the world, it was pretty clear to me that much of the pandemic was essentially designed to implement the Reset and using health policy as an excuse.
I had been an investment advisor for 10 years, and because of that, had dealt with many clients who'd experienced vaccine injury or neurological damage from vaccines, but also various pharmaceuticals.
And so, I was very concerned about whether or not the vaccine was safe and effective. We now have many studies proving that it wasn't.That doesn't surprise me.
What we certainly have in looking at what's going on in the United States is we have enormous increases in excess death and a continued drop in lowering life expectancy, including in the middle class. So, it certainly fits with what I expected.
What I would say is that when a society allows public policy and healthcare policy to be created based on other economic and political goals, and does so with terrible lies, and propaganda, and misinformation, that's not a society that can endure.
And so, if we are going to have a civilisation based on the rule of law these kinds of egregious lies that are being used, essentially by oligarchs and billionaires, to engineer central control using these techniques, including things which are very, very harmful to people's health, can absolutely not be tolerated.
So, I would just ask the courts to look at this case and look at the misuse of both, basically misinformation and disinformation to make cases for what was appropriate from a medical or scientific standpoint, (that clearly wasn't) in a way that did terrible, terrible harm to people throughout Europe and the United States.
And I would encourage you to take a very serious look at this because if you look at what was happening economically and politically, it is clear to me that what we're looking at is a re-engineering of how our governments work and how our societies work, in a way that is not in any of our interests.
Certainly, what we want and what we need is the rule of law and we depend on the courts to give that to us.
So, I would ask that you give this case very serious consideration and I thank you for the opportunity to address you today and I thank you for your willingness to look at this case.
Those videos were great. Thank you for posting this incredibly important information. Though I'm sure it won't happen, there's not much that would give me more hope than seeing "doktor" Bill Gates in shackles being marched to his Supermaxx prison cell.
Pursuant to 28 U .S .C. 1746, I. Joseph Sansone declare under penalty of perjury that the following statement is true to the best of my knowledge.
I'm a psychotherapist with a bachelor's degree in psychology, a master's degree in clinical mental health counselling, and a PhD in psychology.
I've been litigating here in Florida for over a year and a half to get the MRNA nanoparticle injections off the market because they're biological and technological weapons of mass destruction in violation of Florida Statute 790 .166, 18 USC 175 Chapter 10 Biological Weapons, as well as the Biological Weapons Convention.
I filed an affidavit in my case from Dr. Francis Boyle, the law professor that wrote the Biological Weapons and Anti -Terrorism Act of 1989.
Dr. Francis Boyle was arguably the world’s leading legal authority on biological weapons
Dr Boyle clearly states in his affidavit that covid injections and the mRNA nanoparticle injections are in violation of Florida statute 790,166 Weapons of Mass Destruction, as well as 18 USC 175 chapter 10, Biological Weapons.
Keep in mind, that the Biological Weapons and Anti-Terrorism Act 1989 was US domestic implementation of the Biological Weapons Convention.
I certify the authenticity of Dr Boyle’s affidavit as well as his intention to testify in this case that the covid injections and the mRNA injections are biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction, clearly in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention and relevant Dutch laws.
I've also been initiating legislation to prohibit the mRNA nanoparticle injections because they are already illegal in violation of existing biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction laws.
I've also been initiating legislation to prohibit the mRNA nanoparticle injections because they are already illegal in violation of existing biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction laws.
I believe that the COVID-19 injections and the mRNA nanoparticle injections are biological and technological weapons of mass destruction in violation of the biological weapons conventions and relevant Dutch laws.
There can be no lawful purpose to distribute biological and technological weapons of mass destruction targeting civilian populations.
There can be no lawful purpose to inject civilians with these weapons of mass destruction.
There can be no law that sanctions murder and genocide. Such a law would be invalid on its face.
In short, the mRNA nanoparticle injections have a negative effectiveness.
mRNA nanoparticle injections cause harm, including death.
mRNA nanoparticle injections injure and kill directly through injection and indirectly through transmission or shedding of the material in the injections.
Governments, the pharmaceutical industry, as well as government and corporate-controlled media, deliberately concealed the negative harms from these injections.
The mRNA nanoparticle injections have no prophylactic effect. They cause a myriad of diseases and disorders.
Governments, healthcare facilities, and the media, deliberately concealed this information from the public showing clear criminal intent.
The Florida Department of Health in official bulletins has stated that the mRNA injections are not safe for humans and a potential threat to the human genome.
The United States Department of Health and Human Services has admitted that the mRNA injections provide no protection for flu or COVID, meaning there's no prophylactic effect, and the risks outweigh the benefits.
Once again, by keeping these injections on the market, that shows clear criminal intent.
According to the Kansas v. Pfizer case, this information was available to health authorities as early as December of 2020.
The mRNA nanoparticle injections were a DARPA project.
Furthermore, what is called “COVID-19” is an offensive weapon of biowarfare. The fact that the quote, unquote “virus” was also in the quote, unquote “vaccines” also means that the vaccine was in fact a bioweapon.
This shows premeditation and foreknowledge for those that perpetrated this crime.
A recent peer reviewed journal article, by Dr Andrew Zywiec et al. published in the American Journal of Physicians and Surgeons, clearly states that both the quote unquote “virus” and the quote unquote “vaccines” violated the Biological Weapons Convention.
More recently, the Alliance of Indigenous Nations International Tribunal issued an order declaring mRNA nanoparticle injections and COVID injections to be biological and technological weapons of mass destruction, becoming the world's first governing body and judicial authority to make such a declaration.
Recent research out of Japan showed that among 21 million people there was an excess 610,000 deaths attributed to the COVID injections.
When adjusted for population, that would mean that the VAERS system in the United States has an underreporting factor of 41. Therefore, 1 million 558,000 people died shortly after getting these injections.
Keep in mind, these are people that died shortly after these injections. These are not people that are getting cancer, heart diseases, autoimmune problems, and so on, currently.
There are some estimates that show as many as there are 5,000 excess deaths a week or 250,000 excess deaths a year currently in the United States.
Recent research also showed that as many as seventy-five percent of those that got these injections, even if they are asymptomatic, have auto-immune problems. Sometimes this is called vaccine acquired immune deficiency syndrome or VAIDS.
The COVID-19 nanoparticle injections are associated with neurological disorders and diseases, autoimmune diseases, heart problems, cancers, inflammatory disorders, and so on.
The COVID -19 nanoparticle injections are associated with a 1236 % increase in cardiac arrest death, a 112,000 percent increase in brain strokes when compared to the traditional flu shot.
They're associated with increased infant mortality, reduced birth rates, and reduced lifespans by as much as 37%. Extrapolated over a lifetime, this could be as much as a 29-year reduction in life.
This would mean that a child getting an injection today would be lucky to live into their fifties.
The Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED). Information was released from this database during Senator Ron Johnson’s hearings in February of 2022. This database showed among United States military personnel, a dramatic increase in auto-immune disorders, neurological disorders and diseases, heart problems, cancers, heart attack and strokes and so on.
The mRNA nanoparticle injections show uncontrolled biodistribution of spike proteins and other materials throughout the body, also leading to shedding of this technology to unvaccinated individuals.
Darkfield microscopy reveals that hydrogels and nanotechnologies or nanoparticles are present not only in the blood of the vaccinated, but also in the blood of the unvaccinated through shedding or transmission.
U.S. patents show that the nanoparticle technology is a dual-use technology and can be used to target cells and maliciously used to target and infiltrate cells genetically.
In conclusion, mRNA nanoparticle injections cause harm, injure and kill directly, injure and kill indirectly through shedding. They have a negative effectiveness, no prophylactic effect whatsoever. They contain dual-use nanotechnology. They have uncontrolled spike protein distribution.
And there appears a clear, concerted effort between governments, the healthcare industry, the pharmaceutical industry, and the media to conceal the negative and harmful consequences of these deadly weapons of mass destruction.
The sad reality is that most people will have a shortened lifespan because of the complications of these mRNA nanoparticle injections.
Reduced lifespans, increased infant mortality, reduced birth rates, show a clear agenda for depopulation. The altering of the genetic code is an existential threat to the future existence of our species.
This court has an opportunity to redress these crimes.
I pray that this court will hear the evidence and do everything possible to protect the public from these weapons of mass destruction in an effort to protect and save our species.
Rest, breathe and get back on your horse . You are needed .
And pray .
Blessings to you from Aus.
The biggest danger to reality is the compliance of the Sheeple. There is no 'science' to quackcine-ology It is marketing and propaganda. Rona was a plandemic to keep Tonald Drumpf out of the White House and run the pilot project across the G20 that Mr. Yeadon discusses. The stolen 2020 US election and Rona was a CIA-DoD-NATO project. One of their proxies is the WHO, run by Kill Gates. They openly tell us their plans, as given in the post:
"In a document published in the October Bulletin of the World Health Organization, funded by the Gates Foundation, the WHO is proposing a globally interoperable digital identity infrastructure that permanently tracks every individual’s vaccination status from birth.
The proposed system will track things like socioeconomic data such as household income, ethnicity, and religion. It deploys artificial intelligence for identifying and targeting the unreached and combating misinformation, and enables governments to use vaccination records as prerequisites for education, travel, and other services."
AI control, mandatory stabs, and Transhumanism on the menu. Welcome to the 'thriving democracy' and 'values' we hear so much about.
Trump... Trump...? Oh, you mean the man who, on behalf of the Useless Eliters, organized Operation Warp Speed to "save" innocent people using "safe and effective" chemicals? I think I remember that guy ( lol ). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Warp_Speed
He said “ you knew I was a snake when you let me in “. All I had to do was look at him to know that he is indeed a reptile.
True, I read in RFK Jr's book on Fauci that Pfizer gave the Drumpald U$2 mn in Jan 2017. He has started to talk down the stabbinations and their efficacy. With RFK Jr there seems to be some changes (Rona, Hep B etc).
In general the US, UK, G20 gov'ts are owned by pharma, the military and NASA. 90% bought includng the regulators such as the CDC who make royalties and profits from the stabs and the idiots like Offit, Hotez the midget, Plotkin, etc make many millions from the same and from pharma directly. Massive corruption aka 'the science'.
Sadly, RFK Jr’s book is a deception from end to end. I didn’t know then, but there not only was no virus but there are no viruses at all. You certainly couldn’t draw that conclusion from his book.
It’s severely criminal because the central PsyOp that is going to be used again & again to murder very large numbers of people is the core “Virus Lie + Contagion Lie = Vaccine Lie”, per my short Substack article of a similar name.
RFK Jr has gone out of his way to preserve the core of the crime, while revealing much else.
Thanks for the insight Dr Yeadon. Completely agree re the myth of dead RNA posing as a 'virus'. I know of many people who shun the quackcines but accept the virus myth. Very hard to get them to comprehend the difference between bacteria which does exist and 'germs' which do not. They cannot make the most critical and logical conclusion.
Chilling and concise raw Truth is speaking. As I watch Mike and Katherine present , I breathe and pray.
Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.
Consent in this is never ever , not ever , informed. But it still counts so be very careful my fellow travellers.
Tech feedback.
Clicling the dropbox links in the pdf to the respective videos opens them eith the video and a transcript option. Sash'a's is complete - but all other transcripts are foreshortened- are not complete.
Thank you, Binra, for the tip. Have you checked if the videos in source 2 (on the article below) are longer? If so, please let me know. Thanks in advance,
Suavek
I wasn't referring to the videos - but to the transcripts.
I rechecked via links in the article. (Though are they not the same as in the pdf?)
Two of these transcripts are foreshortened:
(CAF and Joe)
I and others don't have time for video-feed-so transcripts are valuable and searchable. Is mass migration to 'video' part of infantalising a push based 'feed me' mind-habit? (Not demonising it - but look at the loss of function to tech-fed externalisation of knowledge).
Binra, I'm afraid I'm not familiar with these kinds of cases at all, and I don't know how I could improve things. In other words, I probably know much less than you do. Furthermore, I'm not a native English speaker, and therefore I cannot expand or correct the transcripts.
Suavek, I am not addressing it your you or your skillset - but to pass the message on to whoever set up the web page. Why not nip it in the bud - instead of providing incomplete transcripts in perpetuity?
Suavek, I don't know how to fix any of this. But I too noticed that in Dr Yeadon's transcript the omission of most of his resume concerning his important responsibilities at Pfizer. So it does mention he started a biotech and a few other details but the transcript omits mention of most of his Pfizer responsibilities. This may be an intentional hack. So you know. Thanks for your great work.
Someone who speaks English can create a transcript from the video. I can't. But I've done it several times with the German videos. It takes forever because I constantly have to pause and rewind, but there's no other way to capture the most important information. Translation programs fail miserably with videos.
I will do it above.
I sent this today to my MP in the UK re Sasha's recent post.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/announcement-press-conference-on
Re: A New Blood-borne Systemic Amyloidosis – with prion-like characteristics subsequent to mRNA vaccination.
Thank you for your letter of 4th September 2025 stating that you believe mRNA coronavirus vaccines to be safe and effective, and providing references to government research and assurances dating from 2021 and 2022.
I am sending you details of an ongoing court case in the Netherlands for tort which were initially brought before the Leeuwarden District Court (reference C/17/190788 and roll number 23/172,
Seventeen defendants, including the State of the Netherlands, Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, (Pfizer) and Mark Rutte, are involved in legal proceedings in connection with this tort.
According to Dutch independent news outlet Zebra Inspiratie, the plaintiffs allege that Gates, through his representatives, deliberately misled them about the safety of the COVID-19 shots, despite knowing “that these injections were not safe and effective.”
Mr. Stassen is also submitting four expert statements in both proceedings that provide convincing evidence that Covid-19 is not a disease but a project, and that the Covid-19 injections are not a safe and effective vaccine but a pathogenic and deadly bioweapon used by governments and those in power to commit democide against their own populations.
The Recht Oprecht Foundation (Stichting Recht Oprecht) will hold a press conference on Monday, December 15, 2025 which is intended to give the press an opportunity to ask Mr. Stassen questions about the content and significance of this evidence, and about the proceedings pending before the District Court of Leeuwarden and the Court of Appeal of Amsterdam.
The expert reports and videos will be posted on the website of the Stichting Recht Oprecht (Recht Oprecht Foundation). http://www.rechtoprecht.online/
I trust you will find this information of interest.
Yours sincerely,
Please write similarly to your own political representatives.
Substack is a ghetto - writing here does little. Secrecy is essential for the "Reset" to work, only publicity can shine enough truth to counteract these plans.
PS Suavek, can you ask Mike to take the block off my posts as I cannot see his posts on substack. I do not know why he blocked me.
Hi Currer,
Dr. Yeadon leaves the management of his Telegram and Substacks to his assistant. In such cases, he always asks that people contact him directly. I can forward your message to Tim West, but anything else would be pointless.
Please ask Tim West to unblock me. Thanks.
I already did that (Source: https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/227439) :
..............................................................................................
Hi Tim, I know how hard you work every day. If you had more time to read, I would have given you several well-deserved compliments. But maybe this will do? :
This is an email from a valued subscriber at FRAUD PREVENTION HOTLINE :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/video-messages-from-5-experts-on/comment/188011918
currer :
PS Suavek, can you ask Mike to take the block off my posts as I cannot see his posts on substack. I do not know why he blocked me.
Suavek answers :
....................................
Hi Currer,
Dr. Yeadon leaves the management of his Telegram and Substacks to his assistant. In such cases, he always asks that people contact him directly. I can forward your message to Tim West, but anything else would be pointless.
...................................................................................
Best wishes,
Suavek
Thanks 👍
A response from Tim West:
Tim West in Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel Chat
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/227529
He was only banned from commenting. He should have had no problem subscribing and seeing stuff. Anyway it was over a year ago so I removed the comment ban too.
Hi Suavek,
Just came across this in my documents. It is Mike Yeadon's very first public statement. (probably from September 2020) I am putting it here for historical reference. I put up the second statement - which was dated - a few days ago here.
"I have never done anything like this in my life. I’ve played no role in politics beyond voting.
I didn’t pick this fight.
Merely the uncovering in recent days of the extent of false positives in community testing of the mostly-well means those centrally involved in this can no longer be trusted to provide accurate, reliable information. This isn’t an accident. It’s testing for beginners that “when prevalence is lower than the false positive rate, the test loses all useful positive predictive value”. I was taught this in O level statistics in the 1970s.
Those involved have no defence at all. So today I am calling the following to resign their roles or immediately to recuse themselves from any role whatsoever in management of this pandemic: Mr Hancock, Health Sec; Sir Patrick Vallance, Chief Scientific Advisor; rof Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer; Prof Neil Ferguson, Imperial College (in all capacities including modelling of pandemics & vaccine requirements).
I make no allegations but I believe public confidence in the results of testing, the implications of the results & actions for public health as well as the disposition of National Health Service facilities (which remain sub par, in large measure due to preparation for a modelled “2nd wave”, for which underlying assumptions & evidence base has STILL not been shared)
I take full responsibility for the contents & potential effects of this message & stand ready to be questioned by officials or anyone who needs to know why I’ve taken this action, after much thought & not a little trepidation.
Sincerely, Dr Michael Yeadon."
If possible, could you please send me a link (to the source of this statement, including the date)? Thank you in advance.
A lot of armed policemen around now in Leeuwarden..!!
https://hartuk.substack.com/p/covid-19-the-pandemic-revealed-the/comments
I live in Aus. It would not matter what I send to any politician ( that I know of ) because ….they know .
But it’s a great letter.
Better to post your letter where people can see it .
The politicians are corrupt
There will never be any direct action taken against BigPharma.
They own the governments.
The only course of action is full spectrum communication that 9/11 was a DEW attack.
Every government on the planet knows this reality and has a responsibility to publicly state so.
The entire global network of governments must be exposed for collaborating to cover up 9/11.
Dr Judy Wood did the indissoluble work of freezing Where Did The Towers Go truth.
It is inarguable. It can and has been blocked from recognition.
Wake TF up!
What is hell does CAFATTZZ have to do with CV19?! She is a fiat money finance alleged guru. She is a fully self discredited concerning break through energy.
Catherine Austin Fitts & Breakthrough Energy
Weaponized Breakthrough Energy has been deployed, but no one wants to talk about it
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/catherine-austin-fitts-and-breakthrough
Dr Mike Yeadon and Dr Judy Wood talk 9/11
COVID, 9/11 and Other Issues!
Full discussion: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-and-dr-judy-wood-talk
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Dr David A. Hughes interview with 9/11 Revisionist
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-hughes-on-the-importance-of
I agree with you, by the way. Communication is already all but impossible & communication to MANY is definitely beyond me. I doubt I’ve reached a significant number of new people in many years and I know of no way around that.
The obvious way is that a significant number of those I did reach picked up my messages and independently ran with it. Sadly, I don’t think that happened with more than a tiny number of people.
Dr Yeadon, here is just one X profile with 360k followers sharing clips about you, so your reach is far wider than you realize...
Link: https://x.com/HealthRanger/status/2000632404726419526
Then I remind them with a comment like this: https://x.com/911Revisionist/status/2000905068372009117
It's time to expose the tech in play on 9/11 and you can play a pivotal role in cutting Mr Global down just below the knees...
THanks to each of you good people for your work, diligent truth telling and brave effort in putting this together for people to learn. What is being done and planned for us is depraved. Thanks to those who presented testimony and to Suavek for putting this together. I'd never know otherwise.
Agreed .
It’s the format which made so much sense of the massive amount of information flooding my brain.
So I’ve returned to burn this into my brain and infuse it into my heart .
For the times ahead.
Suavek how you do thus and hold employment as well is staggering.
If I had computer skills I would give them to you . Same with $’s.
Is there some way you can locate an assist?
Kaylene, please don't worry. I'm working on a more detailed answer for you, but it's not finished yet. See you later,
Suavek
Sasha Latypova Statement 1.
Your Honor, my name is Alexander Latypova. I'm an expert witness addressing the court adjudicating C -17 -190788 and Procedure 23/172.
In these cases, the defendants named include Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, the Dutch state, Mark Rutte, and others. This video accompanies my written testimony, and this is a concise roadmap to help you assessing my affidavit.
In my expert opinion, the COVID -19 injections as deployed are indistinguishable from weapons.
They are deployed under international legal frameworks for military medical countermeasures, all of which bypass normal regulatory norms, practices, and laws, and remove all manufacturers' liability.
The mechanisms of harm were fully foreseeable and documented in numerous regulatory guidances all over the world. The mechanisms include synthetic RNA and DNA, mediated cellular dysregulation, inflammatory immune effects, and distributed injury to all organs.
The mass deployment of known harmful countermeasures using deceptive advertisement as pharmaceutical vaccines and drugs meets elements of democide, depraved indifference, and criminal negligence leading to mass deaths and injury.
Whether it meets the definition of genocide is legal determination for the court.
Dual use mechanisms make weaponisation of these injections possible. Dual use means that they can be used both for military and civilian purposes.
Sasha Latypova statement 2.
Synthetic RNA can cause major damage without necessarily coding for any specific proteins.
Vaccine platforms also recognized in biodefense literature as a mechanism to deliver this deleterious cargo into human body. And as previously mentioned, absence of meaningful, enforceable pharmaceutical regulations or manufacturer liability makes this platform completely open for weaponization and adulteration by design.
These countermeasures were sold in a bait -and -switch scheme to the public as medicine. In the U.S., emergency use authorization and PREP Act and equivalent laws in the European Union, including emergency provisions for countermeasures, waived enforcement of pharmaceutical law and created liability shields to manufacturers and administrators of these shots.
Mutual recognition agreements allowed European regulators to accept U.S. regulators' decisions bypassing any independent testing.
The conditional marketing approval authorization pathway provided veneer of regulation, while, as previously mentioned, no pharmaceutical laws are meaningfully enforced for countermeasures. And this crucial fact was and remains hidden from the public.
Military governance and contracting were used to develop, procure, deliver and distribute these shots all over the world. In the US National Security Council, Department of Defense, and Barda oversaw the development, manufacturing and distribution of Operation Warp Speed designed products.
Department of Defense funded all contracts for vaccines, whether for American distribution or European distribution, ordering them as prototypes and large -scale manufacturing demonstrations under Defense Production Act.
The Department of Defense placed their own staff in all vaccine manufacturing facilities.
And global distribution was coordinated through NATO and joint Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear and Military frameworks.
Latypova statement 3.
Contracts for these countermeasures reference civil and military application which are all hallmarks of defence production.
There is substantial evidence of non-compliance with good manufacturing practices which is the law that governs pharmaceutical purity and honesty in labelling all over the world.
For example, in late November 2020, the European Medicines Agency was hacked and data was leaked from it, including emails and Pfizer manufacturing documentation existing at the time just two weeks before global launch of these products.
The regulators were clearly bringing up objections to the technical implementation, to the purity of the product. There were substantial problems with manufacture.
The integrity of RNA was non -conforming with previous standards. So instead of fixing those problems, the standards were changed.
Instead of over 70%, for example, pure RNA to the spec, the regulators allowed the product to contain just over 50 % of the RNA to the spec.
The Pfizer and other manufacturers used proprietary, unvalidated analytics. Regulators were objecting to it. There were validation methods missing, and the regulators again were objecting to it.
Later on, in 2022, FDA, when they resumed inspections internationally issued Form 483 to Ranchler, which is a supplier to Pfizer, documenting severe CGMP violations.
And overall, no regulatory actions were taken. The products were never stopped and public was never informed about these severe violations to the quality of the products.
Even prior to 2020, in 2019, the FDA changed administrative rule allowing to arbitrarily waive inspections for biological facilities.
And during 2020, claiming COVID lockdowns and restrictions, they did not inspect any manufacturing facilities prior to launch of these products, which is one of the major requirements for pharmaceutical product to be inspected prior to launch.
In conclusion, the legal frameworks designed for chemical, biological, radiological nuclear attacks and military deployment renders these injections functionally indistinguishable from biochemical weapons.
In addition to that, media lies, propaganda, censorship constitute an accompanying psychological weaponry deployed via NATO psychological operations forces.
I urge the court to please open the record to full adversarial testing and call opposing experts to testify. I offer to testify under oath and work the courts through all the evidence.
Thank you.
Mike Yeadon statement. 1.
My name is Dr Mike Yeadon. I have spent my entire professional life in research and early development of new medicines for respiratory and skin diseases. I have spent over 30 years in both big pharma and in biotech. I have a training in biochemistry and toxicology, and a PhD in respiratory pharmacology.
In big pharma I was once the most senior person in Pfizer’s Respiratory Discovery group. I was responsible for everything to do with drugs in research and early development. After that I founded my own biotechnology company which I led as CEO and was ultimately able to sell that to Novartis, a big drug company.
Around that time, I also was highly sought after as a consultant to other biotech companies and I consulted to them, and advised about 30 companies over a nine -year period.
So those are my credentials. I would say the professional opinion that I provide to you is that of someone who's deeply experienced in the scientific procedures and practices of creation and testing of molecules, in particular for their safety, their lack of toxicity.
So, my underlying training in toxicology, mechanistic toxicology, allowed me many times to detect and steer away from structural features or contents of potential medicines that could cause harm, based on my wide knowledge of those things that sadly have harmed humans and animals in the past.
And so, it doesn't really matter if an individual like me worked in vaccines or heart disease or respiratory because the principle, the core of my testimony, is about the safety and toxicity risks of any new medicine, and it's about that that I am particularly concerned, and I have been since the middle of 2020.
So, I'm just going to outline maybe half a dozen points that I want you to take on board. I could give you many more, but just for brevity. And others of my expert colleagues, I think will expand these points.
Mike Yeadon statement 2.
The first one to know, which is shocking if you don't know this, is there was no pandemic. There was no new illness called COVID -19. What there was, was all of the normal human illnesses that people get.
Acute respiratory illnesses like influenza are real, but we had that misattributed through incorrect diagnostic tests and told you had COVID and it was spreading. This was not true.
There was a long-planned deception and it used well-known human weaknesses, our susceptibility to fear, our credibility when authority figures tell us things. And that was misused. So, no pandemic, no new illness.
And because I worked that out, and I'm totally sure about this. I know that the people behind the so -called vaccines also knew this. Senior people, my peers, in the pharmaceutical industry, my peers in the pharmaceutical industry also knew this.
So did the regulatory agencies like FDA. So did senior figures who guide administrations in governments and any supranational organization, like the WHO, I’m afraid, also knew this.
There are two major things I want to talk about.
One was, the treatment of people who had this purported new illness – what they had was the normal range of illnesses that people have always suffered from – amplified by fear.
And what happened was that medical treatments in care homes, of seniors in assisted living facilities, were changed radically in 2020. And I knew this especially because of my underlying training especially in respiratory medicine, I knew that treating people with opiates like morphine and sedatives like midazolam was the wrong thing to do.
If you treat elderly people on their own with midazolam and morphine (which was the standard treatment for covid) what it does is - as they are respiratory depressants, they slow the rate and depth of your breathing and eventually if you're left alone with these treatments at night these people literally faded away and died while asleep
They were killed by their treatments. They never needed them. They were known to be inappropriate and contraindicated. If they're used together the person has to be under active medical monitoring. That did not happen.
I'm afraid my conclusion is they were murdered.
Mike Yeadon statement 3.
I don't think the doctors who gave them these drugs early on knew that would be the consequence, but later on, I'm afraid they did, and they are culpable.
In hospitals, large numbers of people were put on mechanical ventilators. You know the kind of breathing equipment you see in the movies. I can tell you this much. I'm not a medical doctor, but I've been around pulmonologists and respiratory specialists for 40 years.
You do not take a person who is walking into the hospital, able to breathe, unassisted, even if distressed, who did not have a blocked airway, or gunshot, knife wound or crush injury to the chest, you do not sedate, intubate and ventilate these people.
Why? Because God and nature left you a perfectly adequate apparatus to breathe in and breathe out. If you needed extra oxygen, it would be easy to provide it with a mask or nasal cannula. In fact, that is the normal non-invasive treatment for people in respiratory distress who have unobstructed airways and no injury to the chest.
You do not Sedate-Intubate-Ventilate. If you do, this is an aggressive procedure.
Life-saving under certain circumstances like drug overdose or elective surgery, but under other circumstances what happens if you do that is it gradually produces lung injury and the person fades away and you have to increase the pressure day after day in the pump until they die of what's called adult respiratory distress syndrome.
So that's the second way in which people were wrongly treated because top down medical protocols for covid 19 (which did not exist) were known by people like me to be harmful and ultimately lethal.
And finally in hospitals people were given ineffective drugs, that were known to be dangerous, and the classic one is remdesivir,
Nurses on clinic started to call this drug run deaths as near after a while, and that's because remdesivir, if given persistently kills people.
So I hope I've outlined to you there was no acute public health crisis and the treatments given to people with these alleged illnesses, (which were other illnesses) were wrong. They were bad treatments
Mike Yeadon statement 4.
The really important thing I need to tell you about which comes from the core of my training and then decades of application of looking for potential toxic vulnerabilities in a medicine.
It was in the core of my training to look out for molecules and components that were picked up for good reasons to accomplish some medicinal aim but might have toxic liabilities.
I will describe to you three things about these so-called vaccines, that I know as a professional from this industry that gave birth to them, must axiomatically cause injury, (I could pick others but there are three). I know these to be true from the heart of my training.
The first one is, we were told that these molecules were gene sequences that encoded something called spike protein. The spike protein we were told was on the outside of this virus.
Now, I don't agree with that, but This is what we were told, a cartoon like a sphere with spikes coming out of it. We were told these vaccines encoded the protein, the spike protein that sat on the outside of these viruses. And this would train your immune system to fight it off.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is a really important concept in immunology. It's taught to every person who has a training in immunology, as I did,
In the first lesson, - What allows your body to treat itself kindly but to go to war if something unto war is discovered in your body?
And the concept is this, self, non -self or foreign.
My body is healthy right now. My immune system that is surveilling all parts of my body is at peace with itself because everything it encounters is known to it to belong to Mike Yeadon himself.
If you inject me with a gene sequence that will make my body manufacture a foreign protein that isn't me that is a viral protein, my body, every cell in my body that follows that instruction will signal to my immune system that I have been attacked, and my immune system goes to war.
Mike Yeadon statement 5.
And attacks and kills every cell that complied with that instruction. And that is what has happened ladies and gentlemen to every cell in every tissue in every person who received that injection.
The toxicity that you would experience varies tremendously, because some people would take it up efficiently, copy it efficiently, make the protein for a long time, and I'm afraid those people are mostly dead.
Other people took it up poorly, transcribed it poorly, and only briefly, and those people are alive.
And then there's every continuity in between. But that point that if you inject an instruction that makes your body make a foreign protein that is not self, your body will attack it.
This is the basis behind organ rejection. This, ladies and gentlemen, is the basis behind autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis and many others, and neurological diseases where your body destroys itself.
That is the first principle that was designed into every company's molecule, Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca. So, I knew by the middle of 2020, it was designed to cause injury. How much, I did not know, I still don’t completely know, but this expert is telling you, they were designed to cause injury.
The second really important point to tell you about is what was encoded in these gene based alleged vaccines was spike protein.
Mike Yeadon statement 6.
I didn't know what spike protein was. It was new to me, but it's the spikes on the outside of this alleged virus (that I don't think is real) I could find proteins like it, and I found all of them were known to be toxins like neurotoxins, cardio toxins, and things that would prompt blood coagulation.
So again, the question, why would you encode in your helpful medicinal product, something that when expressed in your body would harm you. That's the second thing.
There is a third one, which is when I discovered it, late in 2020 or early 2021, I have to say I cried.
Two of the products made by Pfizer and Moderna were formulated. Every medicine is formulated. You'll be familiar with a tablet. It might be film coated or dry. It might be a capsule of various sizes. It could be a liquid for injection and inhaler. All of these, you have the active principle, but it's surrounded and protected with something that helps it do its work, hopefully beneficial work.
Two of these products were wrapped in something called lipid nanoparticles or LNPs. Lipid is fat. Nano means tiny particle means little blobs. So, they were wrapped in nanoparticles.
I looked them up, they had been used before in certain oncology drugs, but here is the thing, as a toxicologist when I started researching, I found these things are known to be toxic and the further I explored, here is the shocking thing.
Lipid nanoparticles, every one of them tested, is known to promote the uptake of their payload, whatever they were protecting, into the organs inside your abdomen and what's called the visceral organs, and most prominently liver and your ovaries.
Mike Yeadon statement 7.
So, ladies and gentlemen, the person who picks lipid nanoparticles to formulate these materials knew, professionally, that when it was injected into women and girls, this material would travel around their body and concentrate in their reproductive organs. And then it would do those two things I just describe. It would be expressed and your body would recognise it as foreign and kill those cells. It would, when expressed, cause toxicity directly to those (reproductive) cells.
And I ask you, ladies and gentlemen, what possible motivation could you have for doing that when you could have picked half a dozen other means of protecting the drug?
And I have to say at that point, I knew deeply in my heart, that the first two observations I made weren't just like mistakes or things they would ride the risks of.
These three things together told me, someone got in a room, someone like me, and said, Dr Yeadon design injections that will injure, kill and reduce fertility in the people you give it to, and design it so that it won’t kill everybody, it wont injure everybody, but that if you give it over time it will lower fertility and their health, and reduce population.
And this is what I have watched happen all around me for five years since that moment. I've been speaking out and warning of this for five years. What I've just told you I did not make up after the fact.
Katherine Watt Statement. 1.
I have worked for newspapers as a reporter and for attorneys as a paralegal, and I have written and published independent investigative reporting at my own websites on the subjects of local government and corporate corruption on prosecutorial and judicial misconduct, and on homesteading and local food and water security.
Since 2021, I have published my work on the history of communicable disease control law and biological product law at Bailiwick News on Substack.
I have prepared this video presentation for the judges in the multi -member chamber of the district court of Northern Netherlands in Leeuwarden. Case reference C -1719088, case number 23 -172 against the Dutch state, Mark Ruta, Bill Gates, Albert Borla, and others.
This video presentation is in support of my written statement to be submitted in these proceedings by attorney Peter Stosson on behalf of his clients with COVID -19 injection damage at the court in Leeuwarden.
It is my informed opinion that communicable disease and pandemic threats are political fabrications based on widespread use of intentionally deceptive diagnostic testing devices for the purposes of instilling public fear and justifying vaccination and biodefense programs.
It is my informed opinion that all vaccines, including but not limited to the injections labelled as COVID -19 MRNA vaccines are unstable, heterogeneous mixtures of biological matter, including bacteria, plant, animal, and human cells and tissues, along with chemical toxins, heavy metals, preservatives, solvents, and nutrient solutions.
Watt 2.
It is my informed opinion that those who develop, produce, recommend, approve, authorize, procure, stockpile, distribute, and use vaccines for alleged disease control and pandemic response purposes, including but not limited to COVID -19 MRNA vaccines, know or should have known that injection of unstable mixtures of biological agents and chemical toxins causes biological malfunction and organ damage in living human and animal recipients.
This is due to living animal organisms’ individual capacities to distinguish between self and non -self biological material and to attempt to isolate, reject, or expel harmful foreign or non -self matter that has breached natural protective barriers presented by skin, digestive tract, and respiratory and lung surfaces.
These rejection reactions can and do take the form of autoimmune conditions such as asthma and allergies, neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis and autism, cancers, metabolic digestive and gastrointestinal disorders such as obesity and diabetes, infertility, and many other chronic conditions whose incidence in heavily vaccinated populations has increased since the middle of the 20th century when mass vaccination campaigns targeting infants, children, and expectant mothers began.
It is my informed opinion that those who develop, produce, recommend, approve, authorize, procure, stockpile, distribute, and use vaccines, including, but not limited to the COVID -19 vaccines, have committed war crimes under the Geneva Conventions and U.S. implementing law, specifically torture, performing biological experiments, mutilation, and murder.
Their acts have no legitimate medical or protective purpose, but have been presented deceitfully as having legitimate medical and protective purposes to cloak their intentional harmfulness from public view, public comprehension, and public obstruction.
Watt statement 3.
It is my informed opinion that the war crime acts of vaccine -mediated torture, mutilation, and murder committed by the defendants in this case have been legalized under international legal instruments and U.S. federal law governing biological product regulation,
communicable disease control, and pandemic preparedness and response, as enacted by the U.S. Congress and U.S. presidents, and as executed by federal, state, and local health, military, and homeland security officials.
In my opinion, this precludes criminal prosecution of the defendants until such time as treaties have been amended to eliminate exemptions for acts allegedly committed for legitimate medical purposes, and until such time as enabling U.S. federal laws have been repealed by the U.S. Congress or nullified by U.S. federal courts.
It is my informed opinion that there can be no civil liability for or civil litigation to allege and prove design defects because there are no design standards for vaccines.
There can also be no civil liability for or civil litigation to allege and prove manufacturing defects because there are no manufacturing standards for vaccines.
In other words, criminal prosecutions of war crimes and civil litigation against developers and manufacturers of vaccines have both been rendered impossible by law to enable the past, present, and continued future deployment of intentionally harmful products to intentionally harm recipients.
Cases such as the present case brought by plaintiffs can help to publicly expose the long -known and intentional harmfulness of vaccine products and vaccination acts, and to bring about the end of all vaccine manufacturing and all vaccination programs.
Watt statement 4.
The attached report includes two main sections, providing chronologically organized collections of summaries of relevant U.S. federal law and international law.
An appendix section contains lists of supporting evidence in the form of U.S. federal regulations, international mutual recognition agreements, which are trade agreements, academic and government publications, court decisions, and many other records.
My core findings are twofold.
One, for more than 120 years, persons working within the U.S. government's executive, legislative, civil administrative, and judicial branches have coordinated their lawmaking and law execution efforts with persons working within supranational organizations such as the UN World Health Organization and persons working within pharmaceutical corporations such as Pfizer and Merck to disguise the malevolent development, non-regulation, production, procurement, stockpiling, and use of intentionally harmful biological agents and toxins as regulated components of benevolent, routine public health and communicable disease control programs.
For more than 100 years, they targeted primarily infants, children, and expectant mothers while operating vaccination programs at the local, state, national, and international level.
Two, for approximately 25 years, Deceptive acts are capable of inducing rapid, widespread, all ages, schedule-driven submission to vaccination acts by disguising their malevolent, non -regulated acts as regulated components of emergency biodefense and pandemic preparedness and response
This court has an opportunity to further expose the original and long -running malevolence of vaccination programs to wider public understanding, and I urge you to take it up.
Please read the written report, titled the St. Benedict memo. There are several people working to understand and explain many of the aspects of the ongoing legalized war crimes program, including the other witnesses prepared to testify in this case, Sasha Latipova, Mike Eden, Catherine Austin Fitts.
Katherine Austin Fitts. Statement 1.
I would like to thank the District Court of Northern Netherlands for the opportunity to address you. My name is Catherine Austin Fitz, and I am the publisher of the Solari Report, and I am the former partner and member of the Board of Dillon Reed, an investment bank on Wall Street, and the former Assistant Secretary of Housing in the First Bush administration.
I wish to give this statement because I believe that the pandemic represented an egregious misuse of health care policies to implement economic and political agendas. And I would like to explain the history and background as to why I am convinced that that is so.
I'm an expert on the United States federal credit and the federal budget and financial mechanisms. I have a great deal of information about that at my website, including on $21 trillion that's gone missing from the federal government.
You can find that at missingmoney.solari.com
Starting in 1998, I became very concerned that a change in policy had changed in the federal government, whereby billions and then trillions of dollars was going missing from federal accounts.
It started in October 1st, 1997, which is the beginning of federal fiscal 1998. Between that time and the 9 -11, there was approximately $4 trillion missing from the federal government.
In fact, the day before 9 -11, the Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld gave a press conference and said the U.S. Department of Defence was missing $2 .3 trillion, and this was a terrible problem
2.
Money continued to go missing from then on, and as of fiscal 2015, there was $21 trillion missing.
I had been tracking the missing money between fiscal 1998 and 2015 and then started speaking about it publicly. A professor from Michigan State University, Dr Mark Skidmore, heard me, contacted me, thought it was unbelievable, checked out the federal financial statements, (all these numbers are from official documents) and proceeded with his students to do a survey.
That survey brought tremendous pressure on the government to obey the financial management laws, particularly the laws requiring audited financial statements.
Between fiscal 1998 and 2015, the federal government had refused to obey the laws related to or requiring audited financial statements.
As that pressure put more pressure under the federal government to obey, what happened was a policy was adopted in 2018 called Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Statement 56, which essentially was an administrative policy that took a position that they could authorize secret books by the federal government.
And we've had essentially no meaningful financial disclosure, in my opinion since, once FASB 56 went into place.
Again, tremendous documentation available at missingmoney.solari.com
It was at that point that I realized, (as I had realized all the way along, one of the reasons that I continue to try and publicize and tell people about the missing money and encourage reforms around the missing money) If we don't balance the budget by providing financial resources for the retirement systems, both at the federal and state level, and continue to have this money disappear from the federal government,- I called it a financial coup -the only way they can balance the books is by lowering life expectancy.
3.
And in fact, that had started to happen. In the spring of 1997, I was meeting with a leadership of some of the top pension funds who were on one of my advisory boards at my company in Washington called Hamilton Securities Group. I made a presentation to them about how we could re-engineer federal finances in a way that would bring tremendous new wealth to the country and make it possible for the pensions to afford the retirement's promise to the boomer generation.
Essentially, the boomer generation was a financial pig going through the snake, and the question was, how would we generate enough returns on the pension funds to make it?
And a leader when I presented my plans on how we could re-engineer federal spending so that we stopped running huge deficits, the head of the largest pension fund in the country, CalPERS, said to me, “You don't understand it's too late. They've given up on the country. They are moving all the money out starting in the fall.”
And I thought he meant - we're reallocating the investments in the pension funds to emerging markets because the growth rate is bigger.
That's not what he meant. He meant, no, we're going to start moving huge amounts out of the back door of the federal government with the $21 trillion that went missing by 2015.
And in fact, if you look at the budget deal where I believe that decision was made in 1995 when he said - they have given up on the country- there was a huge effort by the leadership of the financial system to get the budget on a balanced budget
4.
When they failed, literally the next month, a series of policies were put in place that started to lower life expectancy in the lower income groups. And that continued.
If you look at any chart of life expectancy in the United States versus the other industrialized nations, the top 19 industrial nations other than the U.S. are steadily rising in terms of life expectancy. And starting at that point in 1997, you start to see the United States drop and start to diverge from the other countries.
And then when the pandemic hits, it falls off the chart.
I remember sitting in my car,… and talking to Dr. Skidmore, after our efforts to get real reforms done.
Dr. Skidmore said, why don't you just give up? Why do you keep bringing this up? And I said, Mark, don't you understand if we don't do something here, they're going to have to lower life expectancy, much more than they're doing now. They're going to have to lower life expectancy in the middle class. So when the pandemic happened, I was not surprised.
In the summer of 2019 every year the central bankers meet in Jackson Hole and the G7 central bankers have various policy discussions. In 2019 (the year after FASB statement 56 was adopted) the central bankers met in Jackson Hole, and they reviewed a plan by the Blackrock Investment institute prepared by a group of retired central bankers, called the Going Direct reset.
Now we know that the central banking system every eighty or a hundred and twenty years does a reset and often that reset is when you evolve the currency or you move the currency to a different currency.
So, we know this happens every, you know, at some point you flush the system. And so, I assume when that happened that we were going into a new reset.
The Going Direct reset, going direct refers to a radical change in policy. Traditionally, when a central bank like the Federal Reserve added money to the system, it would add it by investing in or putting money into the reserve track, and then the banks would use that reserve track to then put money in the system.
5.
Going Direct was the Fed essentially injecting enormous amounts of money directly without going through reserve track, but buying, among other things, securities from the non -depository institutions.
And what happened, (starting that September after the Going Direct meeting) was the Federal reserve, with interventions in the market in September but then with the announcement of the pandemic injected extraordinary amounts of money into the system.
Different estimates are that it was five or six trillion dollars invested or injected directly.
Normally, any injection like that would have extraordinary inflationary impact. And in fact, there was one former Undersecretary of the Treasury who, speaking with Swiss investors said, you know, enormous inflation is baked into the cake. We just won't feel it right away.
And The reason we won't feel it right away, as it turns out, was the pandemic, many of the pandemic actions of locking people down, or calling certain businesses not essential, and leaving other businesses open, l created an enormous inflationary offset.
If you look at what happened in the United States, we basically shut down Main Street, lots of small businesses, left the publicly traded companies open, and shifted enormous market shares out of the small businesses into the big businesses thus radically consolidating enormous amounts of economic activity.
So, you inject $5 trillion, essentially grossly oversimplified into Wall Street, and you shut down Main Street, and then Wall Street has money to go shopping, and Main Street isn't an economic squeeze.
6.
The last estimates I saw estimated that 35 % of the small businesses in America were shut down, and in some places, I think San Francisco, it was as much as 49%.
So, it was very, very successful at consolidating economic activity into the big players.
One estimate was in the United States, or maybe it's worldwide, we created 500 new billionaires. So, as I said, looking at this from the viewpoint of what was happening financially around the world, it was pretty clear to me that much of the pandemic was essentially designed to implement the Reset and using health policy as an excuse.
I had been an investment advisor for 10 years, and because of that, had dealt with many clients who'd experienced vaccine injury or neurological damage from vaccines, but also various pharmaceuticals.
And so, I was very concerned about whether or not the vaccine was safe and effective. We now have many studies proving that it wasn't.That doesn't surprise me.
What we certainly have in looking at what's going on in the United States is we have enormous increases in excess death and a continued drop in lowering life expectancy, including in the middle class. So, it certainly fits with what I expected.
What I would say is that when a society allows public policy and healthcare policy to be created based on other economic and political goals, and does so with terrible lies, and propaganda, and misinformation, that's not a society that can endure.
And so, if we are going to have a civilisation based on the rule of law these kinds of egregious lies that are being used, essentially by oligarchs and billionaires, to engineer central control using these techniques, including things which are very, very harmful to people's health, can absolutely not be tolerated.
So, I would just ask the courts to look at this case and look at the misuse of both, basically misinformation and disinformation to make cases for what was appropriate from a medical or scientific standpoint, (that clearly wasn't) in a way that did terrible, terrible harm to people throughout Europe and the United States.
And I would encourage you to take a very serious look at this because if you look at what was happening economically and politically, it is clear to me that what we're looking at is a re-engineering of how our governments work and how our societies work, in a way that is not in any of our interests.
Certainly, what we want and what we need is the rule of law and we depend on the courts to give that to us.
So, I would ask that you give this case very serious consideration and I thank you for the opportunity to address you today and I thank you for your willingness to look at this case.
Those videos were great. Thank you for posting this incredibly important information. Though I'm sure it won't happen, there's not much that would give me more hope than seeing "doktor" Bill Gates in shackles being marched to his Supermaxx prison cell.
Joseph Sansone Statement. 1.
Pursuant to 28 U .S .C. 1746, I. Joseph Sansone declare under penalty of perjury that the following statement is true to the best of my knowledge.
I'm a psychotherapist with a bachelor's degree in psychology, a master's degree in clinical mental health counselling, and a PhD in psychology.
I've been litigating here in Florida for over a year and a half to get the MRNA nanoparticle injections off the market because they're biological and technological weapons of mass destruction in violation of Florida Statute 790 .166, 18 USC 175 Chapter 10 Biological Weapons, as well as the Biological Weapons Convention.
I filed an affidavit in my case from Dr. Francis Boyle, the law professor that wrote the Biological Weapons and Anti -Terrorism Act of 1989.
Dr. Francis Boyle was arguably the world’s leading legal authority on biological weapons
Dr Boyle clearly states in his affidavit that covid injections and the mRNA nanoparticle injections are in violation of Florida statute 790,166 Weapons of Mass Destruction, as well as 18 USC 175 chapter 10, Biological Weapons.
Keep in mind, that the Biological Weapons and Anti-Terrorism Act 1989 was US domestic implementation of the Biological Weapons Convention.
I certify the authenticity of Dr Boyle’s affidavit as well as his intention to testify in this case that the covid injections and the mRNA injections are biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction, clearly in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention and relevant Dutch laws.
I've also been initiating legislation to prohibit the mRNA nanoparticle injections because they are already illegal in violation of existing biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction laws.
2.
I've also been initiating legislation to prohibit the mRNA nanoparticle injections because they are already illegal in violation of existing biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction laws.
I believe that the COVID-19 injections and the mRNA nanoparticle injections are biological and technological weapons of mass destruction in violation of the biological weapons conventions and relevant Dutch laws.
There can be no lawful purpose to distribute biological and technological weapons of mass destruction targeting civilian populations.
There can be no lawful purpose to inject civilians with these weapons of mass destruction.
There can be no law that sanctions murder and genocide. Such a law would be invalid on its face.
In short, the mRNA nanoparticle injections have a negative effectiveness.
mRNA nanoparticle injections cause harm, including death.
mRNA nanoparticle injections injure and kill directly through injection and indirectly through transmission or shedding of the material in the injections.
mRNA nanoparticle injections contain dual-use technology.
Governments, the pharmaceutical industry, as well as government and corporate-controlled media, deliberately concealed the negative harms from these injections.
The mRNA nanoparticle injections have no prophylactic effect. They cause a myriad of diseases and disorders.
Governments, healthcare facilities, and the media, deliberately concealed this information from the public showing clear criminal intent.
3.
The Florida Department of Health in official bulletins has stated that the mRNA injections are not safe for humans and a potential threat to the human genome.
The United States Department of Health and Human Services has admitted that the mRNA injections provide no protection for flu or COVID, meaning there's no prophylactic effect, and the risks outweigh the benefits.
Once again, by keeping these injections on the market, that shows clear criminal intent.
According to the Kansas v. Pfizer case, this information was available to health authorities as early as December of 2020.
The mRNA nanoparticle injections were a DARPA project.
Furthermore, what is called “COVID-19” is an offensive weapon of biowarfare. The fact that the quote, unquote “virus” was also in the quote, unquote “vaccines” also means that the vaccine was in fact a bioweapon.
This shows premeditation and foreknowledge for those that perpetrated this crime.
A recent peer reviewed journal article, by Dr Andrew Zywiec et al. published in the American Journal of Physicians and Surgeons, clearly states that both the quote unquote “virus” and the quote unquote “vaccines” violated the Biological Weapons Convention.
More recently, the Alliance of Indigenous Nations International Tribunal issued an order declaring mRNA nanoparticle injections and COVID injections to be biological and technological weapons of mass destruction, becoming the world's first governing body and judicial authority to make such a declaration.
4.
Recent research out of Japan showed that among 21 million people there was an excess 610,000 deaths attributed to the COVID injections.
When adjusted for population, that would mean that the VAERS system in the United States has an underreporting factor of 41. Therefore, 1 million 558,000 people died shortly after getting these injections.
Keep in mind, these are people that died shortly after these injections. These are not people that are getting cancer, heart diseases, autoimmune problems, and so on, currently.
There are some estimates that show as many as there are 5,000 excess deaths a week or 250,000 excess deaths a year currently in the United States.
Recent research also showed that as many as seventy-five percent of those that got these injections, even if they are asymptomatic, have auto-immune problems. Sometimes this is called vaccine acquired immune deficiency syndrome or VAIDS.
The COVID-19 nanoparticle injections are associated with neurological disorders and diseases, autoimmune diseases, heart problems, cancers, inflammatory disorders, and so on.
The COVID -19 nanoparticle injections are associated with a 1236 % increase in cardiac arrest death, a 112,000 percent increase in brain strokes when compared to the traditional flu shot.
They're associated with increased infant mortality, reduced birth rates, and reduced lifespans by as much as 37%. Extrapolated over a lifetime, this could be as much as a 29-year reduction in life.
This would mean that a child getting an injection today would be lucky to live into their fifties.
5.
The Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED). Information was released from this database during Senator Ron Johnson’s hearings in February of 2022. This database showed among United States military personnel, a dramatic increase in auto-immune disorders, neurological disorders and diseases, heart problems, cancers, heart attack and strokes and so on.
The mRNA nanoparticle injections show uncontrolled biodistribution of spike proteins and other materials throughout the body, also leading to shedding of this technology to unvaccinated individuals.
Darkfield microscopy reveals that hydrogels and nanotechnologies or nanoparticles are present not only in the blood of the vaccinated, but also in the blood of the unvaccinated through shedding or transmission.
U.S. patents show that the nanoparticle technology is a dual-use technology and can be used to target cells and maliciously used to target and infiltrate cells genetically.
In conclusion, mRNA nanoparticle injections cause harm, injure and kill directly, injure and kill indirectly through shedding. They have a negative effectiveness, no prophylactic effect whatsoever. They contain dual-use nanotechnology. They have uncontrolled spike protein distribution.
And there appears a clear, concerted effort between governments, the healthcare industry, the pharmaceutical industry, and the media to conceal the negative and harmful consequences of these deadly weapons of mass destruction.
The sad reality is that most people will have a shortened lifespan because of the complications of these mRNA nanoparticle injections.
Reduced lifespans, increased infant mortality, reduced birth rates, show a clear agenda for depopulation. The altering of the genetic code is an existential threat to the future existence of our species.
This court has an opportunity to redress these crimes.
I pray that this court will hear the evidence and do everything possible to protect the public from these weapons of mass destruction in an effort to protect and save our species.