Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Suavek's avatar

Because the symptoms after the injection were predictable, this means that the substances and "mechanisms of action" stated by the manufacturers are at least partially correct. Whether all the manufacturer’s information was true is another question. However, the information already available is sufficient to confirm the intent to cause harm. A poison that was previously known remains a poison that was deliberately inflicted. There is no changing this simple conclusion. The additional hypotheses or theories about the additional intentions of the perpetrators cannot change anything, either. But we would like reality to be less disturbing, don't we? So we invent all sorts of "other explanations" that make us a little less afraid. This is the so-called “art of not learning” that prevents us from truthfully informing other people.

However, in a simple, logical way, you can see that Dr. Yeadon's statement "Toxic by design" cannot be replaced or relativized by any other option. Whether it's your best ideas, alternative explanations, hypotheses seeking excuses, or hopeful relativizations of global cruelty and know-it-all attitudes, none of it will protect you and your children.

In my opinion, recognizing the truth alone is not a sufficient means to achieve the desired goals. Only when you share this truthful information with others do we all have a chance of success. Given the increasing brutality ( and censorship ) of this criminal gang, we do not have much time left to understand the depth of the problem and communicate that knowledge to others.

Expand full comment
gettingreadyfor25's avatar

"If harms were not intentional, they would have used saline or something else that’s harmless. Safe mRNA vaccines are an immunological impossibility."

Not necessarily. It is possible they were wanting to experiment with various dosages of various ingredients for multiple mass medical studies of undisclosed purpose. Any harms may not be explictly intentional, but might simply be lucky side effects.

One of my hypotheses: Consider that most (all?) of the meglomaniac globalists and Black Nobility are aging. Consider that they also have a desire to live forever (see their funding for longevity science). Assuming they believe they can cure their aging bodies (repair heart damage, liver damage, eliminate cancers, etc) they may want to rapidly identify which genes are responsible for those disease states (or which are responsible for preventing those states of disease). Enter mRNA. In their minds they just need to test several thousand genes and combinations of genes being turned on and off in various combinations. They would need to test each one a few thousand subjects (about the size of a batch of covid jabs). They would need to collect data for their studies of course, hence vax passes and national vax databases, and how convenient there is OneHealth globally, My Health Record in Aus, MyHealthEData in the USA (thanks Trump!), and most hospitals and medical facilities will be using "the cloud" (almost certainly Microsoft or Amazon, which just so happen to be majority owned by two prominent aging meglomaniac globalists). Oh no! This combination of genes being turned off or on induces turbo cancer in the brain. Oh no! This combination induces turbo cancer of the prostate! Oh no.... you get the picture. Now in their minds they might be thinking that the inverse combination of genese off and on could prevent those cancers. Of course they have most likley designed these experiments a bit better than my layperson's brain can come up with. Australia's health minister in 2021 Greg Hunt (formerly a WEF strategist) even referred to the global roll out of the covid jabs as the biggest medical experiment in human history.

To circle back to the "lucky side effects" comment earlier, the mass disease, disability and death helps contributes to their other meglomaniac goal to retire a huge portion of their herds of human resources.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts