TOXIC BY DESIGN - PART 11 : The curious look. What's inside ? How harmful is the "vaccinated" meat ? Is there "shedding" ? ... - Dr. Mike Yeadon answers.
Is there evidence that the jabbed ‘make spike protein’? That there is really spike protein in the blood? Antigen tests won’t do.
The cover image, which I call “curious eye,” was borrowed from a much valued subscriber named Richard Leger.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Tim West, October 29, 2024 ( actually this was a reply to someone ) :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/one-of-substacks-best-information/comment/74552580
Is there evidence that the jabbed ‘make spike protein’? That there is really spike protein in the blood? Antigen tests won’t do.
……………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, October 29, 2024 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/one-of-substacks-best-information/comment/74555398
I’m sure they don’t make spike protein. I of course AssUMe’d they did, because we were informed that was what was encoded in the mRNA.
However, numerous analyses have confirmed we were lied to.
I’m not sure what’s in any injection but to the extent there is some mRNA & apparently lots of cDNA, the victims cells will attempt to make whatever is encoded, which presumably varies.
Even a short piece of polypeptide if foreign should get expressed on cell surfaces in conjunction with MHC class II & that may be enough to trigger cell attack.
It isn’t good, that’s for sure.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
( Another ) Mike, October 30, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/130548
Bearing in mind the constant reporting of mandatory "vaccines" of this type being/about to be used on all mammal, fish and fowl destined for our food chain, do you Mike have an opinion on the effects of cooking on the poisons (spike proteins, lipid nanoparticles etc) likely to be in these meats? . I have asked versions of this question twice before on this channel and remain stunned and disappointed by the total lack of reply, I'm sure, judging from the emoji response, that others would like an opinion too.
………………………………..
Dr. Mike Yeadon, October 30, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/130560
In general, you cannot absorb intact dietary proteins.
If you could, your insides would not remain the unique you for more than a few meals!
Our intestines break down proteins and absorb the safe constituents.
I don’t think spike protein as in a 1250-odd string of anion acids is formed in anyone. I used to think so because that’s what we were told the gene based jabs encode.
But it’s been shown that there is little to no full length mRNA present.
I don’t worry about the idea of contaminated meat.
The hypodermic needle bypassing all your defenses is the crucial frontier. As in have nothing to do with them!
………………………………..
( Another ) Mike, October 30, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/130567
Thank you, Mike, your answer is much appreciated. I feel that it is very important that people hear your view so, as to circumvent the psychosomatic aspect of the threat, the "fear creating the reactive illness".
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr Mike Yeadon, November 11, 2023
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/55
The reason it’s not for FDA & CDC to prove that they’re safe via VAERS is that these are NOT even classified as pharmaceuticals and FDA played no real role in evaluating them, beyond the theatre of pretence.
They’re classified as “countermeasures” and authorised for emergency use by the Health and Human Services secretary.
See Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova who each run Substack accounts.
It’s very important not to fall for the distraction that “FDA isn’t doing it’s job” & “these vaccines are contaminated”. Their toxicity is intrinsic to their very design and they are unsafe, indeed intentionally harmful, even if there was an acceptable level of DNA in them or none at all.
My anxiety about this line of argument is that one could imagine the media alighting on DNA “contamination” as the reason for their toxicity. While that certainly doesn’t make them less toxic, it’s incidental to the inherent toxicity of their very design.
I have absolutely no argument with Jess about this matter being exposed. We must however be careful to comment as I just have, when we talk the DNA. Please be very vigilant not to give the perpetrators an “out”, which I think is a real risk, the way this story is rolling out.
It’s not a crazy idea to envisage the toxicity all being blamed on “DNA contamination”, which is very easy to lay at the door of a subcontractor, saying, “In all the rush and confusion in our desire to get these products out, we accepted the assurances of the contractor that everything was within limits. We should not have trusted them. Legal action has commenced. Once new batches are definitely free of DNA, shipping of these lifesaving vaccines will recommence”.
In conclusion, state clearly that “Even in the absence of the excess DNA, these materials are harmful and the evidence is clear that this is by design, that is, it’s intentional”.
Best wishes, and thanks,
Mike
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
Dr. Mike Yeadon, May 6, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1219
Time is now very short for people to decide:
1. If you trust the WHO & the “public health” infrastructure in your country not to elaborately lie to you in order to frighten you?
2. Whether you believe that acute respiratory illnesses are contagious (I no longer do).
3. If you’re willing to let evil people again pretend that the cause of illness (if there’s even illness) can be diagnosed using PCR.
( Editor´s note : Please note an explanation from me under this post ).
4. If, even if there was to be an illness in chickens or cows, that the health threat such would represent warranted the smashing up of society all over again.
5. If the coincidence of repeated “pandemics”, a word hardly ever used if at all more than a couple of decades back, is even faintly plausible.
6. Whether you anticipated that the same bunch of crooks would attempt to destroy modern civilization again (& so are not going to be taken in by lies).
The entire event that looks to be being created by criminals is a false construction, like the last one.
Based on last time, I suggest that you talk to others and ask questions, perhaps like some of the points posed above. We know that once people are frightened, there’s absolutely nothing we mere amateurs can do to help extract people from stereotypical safety-seeking behaviour. They won’t be able to hear you. So if you hope for different responses this time, I’m asking you to take the responsibility for doing your level best to get them to be primed to think more critically next time. That’s much more likely to be effective, because they themselves are the ones processing the lies.
Best wishes and good luck to you,
Mike
Linked in the post above :
https://x.com/wallstreetsilv/status/1786506743138099349
……………………………………
Editor´s note :
This concerns point 3 of the above statement :
“3. If you’re willing to let evil people again pretend that the cause of illness (if there’s even illness) can be diagnosed using PCR.”
At this point, I would like to explain a fragment of the above statement as best I can. Since this is a very uncertain and little researched topic, I make no claim that I am writing about established knowledge. Dr Yeadon has not made any clear statement on this either. It is simply an attempt to prevent possible misunderstandings that could arise here.
Why does the officially established definition of illness not correspond to reality?
The pharmaceutical industry sees illness as the enemy of nature and not as something that can be part of it. It wants to fight all diseases, but the "cures" often cause more damage than the so-called illness itself, which often disappears on its own over time, even without the "assistance" of chemicals. The often toxic drugs are of course only about "our protection", say the pharma "experts". But there have long been voices pointing to the seasonality of certain respiratory diseases, for example, and claiming that these could be natural, regenerative processes in the body that can only become a threat to life when the immune system is no longer intact, for example when life is drawing to a close anyway. In other words, these could be seasonal detoxification attempts, or temporarily increased body cell renewal, the "symptoms" of which do not necessarily have to be suppressed with chemical poisons. There are many views on this, so I cannot mention them all here. Since these are mostly logical conclusions that have yet to be proven, Dr. Yeadon mentions this subject with great caution, without claiming it with certainty.
I would like to know whether (and if so, when) there is a tipping point at which such a detoxification can turn into a type of illness due to the occurrence of complications? And of course, I would also like to know how often such complications occur due to the "life-saving" medication? This area seems to have been insufficiently researched. A few insightful comments on this would be welcome. Is there perhaps a useful study on this? With a mischievous smile, I confess that answers like “I don’t know” very often give me the impression of reliability and seriousness. Knowing everything can be suspicious, right ?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
ABOUT SHEDDING
………………………………………………………………..
Dr. Mike Yeadon, January 3, 2023 :
https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/mistakes-were-not-made-an-anthem/comment/11582899
I agree with Margaret Anna. There are many unvaccinated women & it removes a gnawing worry.
Personally I’m not so concerned about “shedding”. Dose is always important in toxicity & the fraction of a dose that feasibly could be shed is tiny and the fraction of that which could be absorbed by a third party is a fraction of that.
There’s also a kind of hallmark that attaches to the never jabbed.
I always say todays a good day to resolve never to have another, but I rejoice the most upon learning that another human is unjabbed.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
ABOUT 5G :
……………………………..
Ned Boll, November 18, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/135922
Mike,Unless you`ve been kind enough to have done so already on your channel, could you give your opinion on whether or not there is anything to support allegations circulating on the `net that 5g towers, particularly those in urban centres,are for nefarious purposes ( " population control")? that vaccine illness could in fact be a distraction from seeing that 5g is the real cause?
………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, , November 18, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/135923
Unfortunately it’s a field I know precisely zero about.
All I “know” is what some other people have told me. I have long realised that’s not real knowledge.
Jab illnesses of certain kinds were predicted based on first principles. We missed many others. But those we were thinking of came about before either of us had heard much about 5G.
So it’s a peculiar coincidence ot it’s the jabs.
Now, additionally, could electromagnetic radiation make people ill? While I don’t know for sure, it is plausible, provided field strength is high enough.
Is it high enough? Literally wouldn’t know where to begin to answer that.
I must say, I’m not aware of very sick people in greater numbers around me who y not been injected. I myself am generally in good health (my isfoes long predate 2020).
Cheers!
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
For the most reliable information about the "Covid" scam and deceptions of the system, read Dr. Mike Yeadon's daily statements :
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr. Yeadon's videos, only two browsers are recommended:
Yandex :
and Mojeek :
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
Many statements and videos from Dr. Mike Yeadon can also be found on Suavek's Substack, which is recommended by Dr. Yeadon on the main page of his Substack.
Both links lead to Suavek`s Substack :
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………