The Roulette with Conventional "Vaccinations" - PART 12. Prof. Denis Rancourt : The longstanding industry of infant vaccination programmes is a baseless, fraudulent enterprise of exploitation.
"There’s never been an INERT-placebo-controlled study on childhood vaccines. Not one."
Foreword :
Dr. Mike Yeadon, January 30, 2025 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/2457
Major publication & claims about the entire childhood vaccination programme.
Professor Denis Rancourt’s most recent analyses lead him to conclude that mass roll outs of childhood vaccinations are NOT associated with reductions in mortality from the disease against which the vaccine is claimed to protect children.
Furthermore, mass vaccination programs in children are associated with increased mortality.
He estimates approximately 100 million deaths have been associated with these programs in the last fifty years.
PLEASE READ & if you see fit, share it widely.
For avoidance of doubt, I’ve long since strongly recommended AGAINST anyone being injected with anything categorised as a vaccine. The entire field is corrupt and is not to be given any credence, any longer. It’s an act of warfare against trusting populations and it’s long past time we withdrew any trust we may have had in the authorities.
Best wishes
Mike
Linked :
………………
Prof. Denis Rancourt, January 30, 2025 :
https://substack.com/@denisrancourt/note/c-89810487
Frank Bergman at x.com/Slay_News_ writes:
A new paper published this week found that claim from health “experts” about the safety and effectiveness of the injections was based on fake data.
The scientific report was authored by all-cause mortality expert Dr. Denis Rancourt, Ph.D. Rancourt revealed that claims by public health agencies and top medical journals that childhood vaccination prevents millions of deaths annually are based on “tentative and untethered models of epidemiological forecasting” that produce “unlikely results.”
The paper was published on Wednesday by Correlation, a Canadian nonprofit research organization.
According to Rancourt, the models depend entirely on invalid estimates of vaccine efficacy and disease prevalence and virulence, none of which are based on real-world data concerning actual deaths. They also fail to account for other complex factors contributing to child mortality — particularly in low-income countries, where most of these millions of infant lives are purportedly saved. These factors include nutritional deficiency, toxic exposures, and poverty.
Rancourt also found that, contrary to public health claims, there are no examples in all-cause mortality data of a drop in infant or child mortality temporally associated with the rollout of a childhood vaccination program.
On the contrary, he wrote, independent observational studies have tied vaccine rollouts to increased infant or child mortality and morbidity.
In the paper, Rancourt develops an alternative model using yearly all-cause infant mortality. Rancourt estimates that childhood vaccination campaigns since 1974 may have been associated with approximately 100 million vaccine-related deaths.
However, he emphasizes that any true estimate of mortality would also have to account for other factors. Such factors would include the shifting political and economic dynamics that drive poverty and its associated health problems.
In his paper, Rancourt writes:
“I express and support the opinion that all models that purport to calculate the mortality (infant mortality in particular) averted by vaccine programs are invalid because they are based on inputs of vaccine efficacy and pathogen prevalence and virulence that are themselves invalid.
“Even with ideal testing, the counterfactual number of deaths from a presumed pathogen, if the targeting vaccination program was not implemented, is impossible to calculate reliably because it is contrary to biological reality: the deaths of concern are always complex non-linear events that involve several interacting contributing factors that do not have additive effects.
“Furthermore, infant mortality factors other than vaccination are highly variable and overwhelmingly more important than any presumed vaccine benefit; predominantly, deleterious effects of nutritional deficiencies and of relentless exposures to challenges from toxic living environments.
“The underlying cause is so-called failed-state extreme poverty due to structural financial exploitation that is not being addressed.
“There is no known example of a drop in measured infant or child mortality temporally associated with the rollout of a childhood vaccination program.
“Independent studies suggest that, contrary to dogma, excess infant mortality (not averted infant mortality) is associated with vaccine program rollouts and maintenance.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Here is (finally) the important article by Prof. Rancourt, which was discussed in the above texts :
……………………………………………………………………………………….
Opinion: Invalidity of counterfactual models of mortality averted by childhood vaccination
The longstanding industry of infant vaccination programmes is a baseless fraudulent enterprise of exploitation
Jan 29, 2025
“( … )
Abstract
I express and support the opinion that all models that purport to calculate the mortality (infant mortality in particular) averted by vaccine programmes are invalid because they are based on inputs of vaccine efficacy and pathogen prevalence and virulence that are themselves invalid. Even with ideal testing, the counterfactual number of deaths from a presumed pathogen if the targeting vaccination programme was not implemented is impossible to calculate reliably because it is contrary to biological reality: the deaths of concern are always complex non-linear events that involve several interacting contributing factors that do not have additive effects. Furthermore, infant mortality factors other than vaccination are highly variable and overwhelmingly more important than any presumed vaccine benefit; predominantly, deleterious effects of nutritional deficiencies and of relentless exposures to challenges from toxic living environments. The underlying cause is so-called failed-state extreme poverty due to structural financial exploitation that is not being addressed. There is no known example of a drop in measured infant or child mortality temporally associated with the rollout of a childhood vaccination programme. Independent studies suggest that, contrary to dogma, excess infant mortality (not averted infant mortality) is associated with vaccine programme rollouts and maintenance. Using yearly infant all-cause mortality rate directly, I estimate approximately 100 million vaccine-rollout-associated infant deaths 1974-2024 worldwide, with the caveat of concomitant largescale economic transformations. I conclude, overall, that the longstanding industry of infant vaccination programmes is a baseless fraudulent enterprise of exploitation.
Researchers and I at CORRELATION and collaborators continue to be engaged in a broad research program of all-cause mortality and its associations with various factors: https://correlation-canada.org/research/
( … )
The opposite is true: Independent studies show vaccination-programme-associated excess infant mortality. 28
( … )
The published clinical trials of vaccine efficacy cannot be taken to be valid because the entire clinical trial and publication process is overwhelmingly controlled by an industry making large profits from the vaccines, and this industry has amply, historically, consistently and repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to act fraudulently at the expense of endangering the public (Gøtzsche, 2013). Gøtzsche (2013)’s landmark documented overview proves that the degree of deceit and corruption is astronomical and deeply entrenched. Reasonable researchers must conclude that clinical trial evaluations of vaccine efficacy are unusable.
( … )
Therefore, so-called randomized clinical trials of vaccines for infants provide no information about safety, and do not allow one to estimate impacts on infant mortality from vaccine adverse effects and toxicity, especially in low-income countries. Vaccine safety cannot be assumed in forecasting and counterfactual theoretical models of mortality. Published clinical trial results claiming vaccine efficacy (Section 4.1) do not demonstrate vaccine safety for real-world applications.
( … ).”
Full article :
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/opinion-invalidity-of-counterfactual
…………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, January 30, 2025 :
https://substack.com/@drmikeyeadon/note/c-89848111
Superb work, Denis, as always & I admire your calm and courageous attitude to uncovering this longstanding & terrible crime.
For it is my opinion that certain senior stakeholders have long (perhaps always) known of the real world outcomes of mass infant & child injection schedules.
The underlying mechanisms may be many fold but one that’s dawned on some of us only recently is the surreptitious and intentional inclusion in these injections of trace amounts of proteins or protein fragments that represent, in aggregate, all the main food groups (peanuts, milk, beef, eggs etc). Injections of this materials primes many victims to express allergic reactions to foods containing those immunogens.
These are classified as hypersensitivity reactions of which, when I last studied this phenomenon (without the current context of deliberate induction), comprised five distinct immunological phenomena, ranging from an acute response (Type I) that can be fatal through slow onset, persistent responses (Type IV), probably underlying some of the observed striking increases in prevalence of certain chronic illnesses in highly vaccinated populations.
Anyone interested in learning more about this mechanism of what can be fairly described as a multigenerational assault upon the youngest in our societies are recommended to read & listen to retired pharma contract research organization entrepreneur, Sasha Latypova’s recent articles on this topic and also legal scholar, Katherine Watt’s unearthing of corrupt non-regulation of these products as a class.
As with the “covid19” “vaccines”, it falls to me to state that my professional opinion is that, too, this is entirely intentional. It’s not just the most recent injections that have been designed to injure recipients. It’s always been this way.
I remember in 2020, when the first penny dropped for me that this (absurdly rushed injections, calling them vaccines) was a deliberate assault, I began using this piece of rhetoric:
“Why is it that, of all the products of the pharmaceutical industry, only vaccines may not be questioned, let alone criticised? No other category prompts such speedy and violent reactions against anyone even asking questions. Why is this?”
I thought then, as I do now, that the answer is that the authorities always intended to use injections, under the guise of “safe and effective vaccines” to assault the entire population.
Refs to be added here.
Linked :
You already know the video from my previous article :
The source of the above published video : https://x.com/RealDrJaneRuby/status/1876833307620409668
Further links :
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/orientation-for-new-readers
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/recording-from-the-iron-will-podcast
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/summary-of-everything-and-quick-links
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Prof. Denis Rancourt, January 19, 2025 :
https://substack.com/@denisrancourt/note/c-87105712?
It would also be correct to say:
"There’s never been an INERT-placebo-controlled study on childhood vaccines. Not one."
See : https://icandecide.org/vaccine-safety-debate/
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Prof. Denis Rancourt, January 19, 2025 :
https://substack.com/@denisrancourt/note/c-87098803
Excellent analysis of infant vaccine clinical trial sophistry.
Fact: There has never been a long-term placebo-controlled study on childhood vaccines.
Linked :
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/fact-checkers-exposed-the-truly-pathetic
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Prof. Denis Rancourt, January 23, 2025 :
https://substack.com/@denisrancourt/note/c-88092886
Lots to unpack in this high-density video pamphlet
My work is not described correctly, but hey... it's a fun and thought provoking blurb
Linked :
https://gregreese.substack.com/p/parasitic-science-and-the-unproven
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
This is what Prof. Denis Rancourt’s Substack currently looks like :
It's worth taking a look inside : https://denisrancourt.substack.com/
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
NO CHILDHOOD "VACCINE" HAS EVER BEEN TESTED FOR SAFETY OR EFFICACY, EVER.
https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/no-placebo-101823.pdf
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
The list of ingredients in the various “vaccines”. Anything that is unnatural and does not belong in your own body is poison.
Appendix B
Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary
Excipients Included in U.S. Vaccines, by Vaccine
https://learntherisk.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Vaccine_Ingredients_Excipient_Table.pdf
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dear Pregnant Mom who is Just Beginning to Question Vaccines
Jul 30, 2024
( … )
If you were born in the 1990s and if you were vaccinated, you were one of the children to receive the full brunt of Thimerosal in vaccines. Even though you may not have had significant (clinically recognized) reactions or lasting effects from the vaccines you received, your body was still injected with a lot of mercury, which is the second-most toxic substance on earth. Mercury is mutagenic. It alters DNA. Altered DNA is passed to subsequent generations. Even though the effects of vaccines you received as a child may not be noticeable in YOU, the effects of those vaccines can be expected to increase your children’s vulnerability to reactions. The impact of vaccines given to parents on their children can be illustrated by looking at the children of military personnel. In 2007, when the “official” autism rate was 1 in 150, it was 1 in 67 among children of military personnel – adults who receive the highest number of vaccines.
So… with all of the options out there, where should you start?
( … )
Full article :
https://marcellapiperterry.substack.com/p/dear-pregnant-mom-who-is-just-beginning
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
For the most reliable information about the "Covid" scam and deceptions of the system, read Dr. Mike Yeadon's daily statements :
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr. Yeadon's videos, only two browsers are recommended : Yandex and Mojeek. But you can also try other, smaller browsers, too.
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
Many statements and videos from Dr. Mike Yeadon can also be found on Suavek's Substack, which is recommended by Dr. Yeadon on the main page of his Substack.
Both links lead to Suavek`s Substack :
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
The children fight against the poisons of the Pharma :
