THE RKI-PROTOCOLS - PART 9. Dr. Mike Yeadon: Now it's official. It was all a fraud. Suavek's 2 cents : Those responsible for the mass poisoning were criminal politicians and corrupt officials.
I wonder if there are any orders that a fool would refuse to follow, or will everything just be carried out without thinking ?
Dr. Mike Yeadon, November 10, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/2058
This presentation by Prof Dr Stefan Homburg is devastating.
You may recall his analysis of files deliberately released by Germany’s Robert Koch Institute in summer 2024? These were official & heavily redacted. Still, they revealed extensive political control of what the public (& the courts) were told were independent experts.
Now, there’s been a substantial leak from inside RKI of internal correspondence which tears apart any semblance of reality surrounding the pretend pandemic.
It’s official. There was no pandemic. No public health emergency. The hospitals were emptier than usual.
The entire scandalous episode, lasting years, was manufactured by named politicians.
If you still think there’s been a new, fast spreading disease which shut down the world and necessitated rushed (fake, dangerous) injections, I don’t know what to say to you.
Please - share this widely. Numerous politicians in the German government are named as bad actors in this RKI-Leak and this extended to NATO members.
Our sole defence against tyranny is to shine the disinfectant of sunlight upon it.
Best wishes
Mike
Linked :
Whistleblow Uncovers Covid Scam
Video : https://youtu.be/-j7qjedth3A
Recorded 2 November 2024 in Berlin, English subtitles provided by the speaker.
In case the film is deleted from the Internet, I have saved it :
Video on YouTube with links to download the 2000+ pages of the unredacted files from RKI ( Robert Koch Institute in Germany ).
Published : November 5, 2024 BERLIN
A whistleblower obtained 10GB from Robert-Koch-Institute, the German CDC. This so-called RKI-Leak reveals that Covid was a scam from start to finish. The presentation took place in the second largest room of the German Bundestag, which is actually intended for committees of inquiry. Recorded 2 November 2024 in Berlin, English subtitles provided by the speaker.
Internet sources: The RKI-Leak The Federal Ministry of Health has confirmed the authenticity of the leak. You can download the entire material anonoymously and free of charge from
https://rki-transparenzbericht.de/
Here is a convenient search tool:
Lauterbach‘s Post on X: https://x.com/Karl_Lauterbach/status/... Lauterbach and political independence https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/rk... Spahn: Test, test, test https://www.aerztezeitung.de/Politik/... CNN reporting emergency authorization https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/11/he... RKI-Grapah Influenca like illnesses (ILI) https://influenza.rki.de/Wochenberich... WDR-Graph vaccine development https://www.quarks.de/gesundheit/medi... Lauterbach on the unvaccinated https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschla... Citation Dr. Brigitte Keller-Stanislawki https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/gesun... Steinmeier, Merkel, Scholz, Lauterbach, Spahn were allegedly vaccinated https://www.bundespraesident.de/Share... https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichte... https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutsc... Lauterbach on child vaccination https://x.com/Karl_Lauterbach/status/... RKI risk levels (deleted, only available from the internet archive) Go to
and type: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Risikobewertung.html
Intensive care unit occupation :
https://infektionsradar.gesund.bund.de/de/gesamt/intensivstationen
p. 188 of the pdf, from November 2, 2020 :
…………………………
Here is the transcript :
Thank you very much for the invitation. This is my second lecture in this circle, and compared to last year we are significantly progressed it must be said. Because we in Germany were lucky that there is a whistleblower who has provided us with data that the whole world envies us for.
This is the RKI-Leak. Please do not mix it up with RKI-files which referes to redacted protocols. The RKI-Leak encompasses much more. Almost ten gigabytes. Namely, ALL protocols. Not just some of them. All are completely unredacted, and we obtained a lot of additional material such as letters. For example a letter from President Macron to Germany, suggesting that both countries should conduct lock-downs in a similar fashion.
We also got Excell-sheets, E-mails, PowerPoin presentations and so on. The significance if the RKI leak is not so much that it reveals something new that has not been said by critics. Rather, these documents are probative. Hence, at first they have been admitted as evidence in a court that has based its decision on the RKI-Leak.
Clearly, if anyone writes on Facebook that something is not right, then this basically has little effect. Even scientific articles are often dismissed and refuted by opposing articles. However, if RKI internally affirms certain facts, then these facts can be used as evidence before the courts.
As lockdowns and the enire Corona policies were internationally coordinated, what we found here in Germany is important for all countries and not just Germany. The most important question posed in the preceding years was: Has RKI, who’s statements were authoritative and used by the courts, has it worked independently, or was it politically influenced?
In March, our Federal Minister of Health made a crystal clear statement, and I quote: “Media speculates that RKI has received political instructions rather than worked scientifically and independently. This is wrong. The redacted parts are mainly employees’ names, to protect them from hate.» This is a typical victim/offender reversal. When making his allegation, Lauterbach had published only a few protocols, and not a single one from his own term in office, and that is still true today, and the protocols were redacted maximally as you can see here.
The documents were not telephone books, but simply protocols with only a few names. No one believes that only names were redacted. However, Minister Lauterbach got away with his allegation for months. As usual, newspapers simply repeated his lies in articles and editorials.
This continued until 23 July of 2024 when the following happened: At 4 AM about 10 Gigabytes of information were unlocked on the internet. At 6 AM a press conference in Berlin was announced, which was attended by about 30 journalists. It started at 10 AM, and the journalists learned what we found after thousands of people had already downloaded the RKI-Leak.
We arranged matters so as to avoid arrests or home searches by police. Of course the leak was certainly important for authorities, but police did not react since they knew it was pointless. Shortly after the unredacted protocols were discussed in public, our Federal Minister of health changed his opinion. I quote: ”Lauterbach admits that corona experts were politically influenced.”
So he kept up his allegation for five months, and then he said exactly the opposite of what he had said originally but, as always, his lie had no consequences.
In which respect has RKI been influenced politically? I will now show you som examples. The following slides are designed so that on the left you find the RKI protocols, and on the right what was happening in the real world at the same time.
Let’s start with examples of political influence. On 5 May, 2020 RKI writes, and I quote: “If RKI does not meet policy makers’ demands, there is a risk that policy makers themselves develop indicators and/or that RKI will no longer be integrated.” You see a typo here since these are all literal quotes including typos and comma mistakes.
We learn that the institute thinks that either we do what we are told to do, or policy makers will put us on the sidelines. Two days later we read: “Testing, testing, testing is basically an implicit strategy that was dictated by politics. Overall tricky, because politics has set guidlines.”
In May 2020 it was obvious that there were no medical risks, and only rising PCR numbers were employed to prolong the notion of a pandemic. The directive from then Minister Spahn was key here. He ordered testing of not only sick people, but also the healthy, which had never been done before. And a media journal added that people with health insurance have to bear the financial burden.
My second example of political influence is from 5 March, 2020: “It would be good to get the oral orders from the Federal Ministry of Health in written form.” This is what the wise official demands when he receives illegal instructions and fears disciplinary action or criminal prosecution. If the “public servant” has written instructions from the ministry, then he is largely off the hook. (1.)
Conversely we see from the material that the ministry hesitated in issuing written instructions. Next quote from 26 May, 2020: “How should RKI deal with political orders from, for example Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Labor, etc.?” Here we learn that there were not only orders from the Federal Ministry of Health, but from other ministries that interfered with the work of RKI.
….., and now I present the most disturbing quote from the entire RKI-Leak, 28 September, 2020: “An approval of the mRNA vaccine by the FDA before US elections is not desirable. The same holds true for European authorities.” This quote reveals it was all about politics rather than health. They told the public that they wanted to save as many lives as possible via vaccination, but it was even more important for them that Biden would win the US presidential election.
Recall that Trump sponsored Project Warp Speed and tied his fate to an early mRNA admission, desirably before the US election. He wanted an admission on 1 November, 2020, but the political forces behind the Corona scam wanted Biden. We then read on CNN, after the votes were counted and original ambiguities in vote counting were resolved that the FDA granted EUA for Phizer-BioNTech in December.
A second important point relates to the possibility of a medical emergency. We find already in March of 2020 some remarkable quotations. The first relates to findings of AGI, a working group within RKI that monitors infectious diseases and has statistics over years and decades, unlike these new PCR statistics, and I quote: “AGI results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 does not circulate widely.” This report is from the second day of the first lockdown. One day later they write: «The trends are best not formulated (or communicated) because otherwise it would become dificult to justify further measures.»
This demonstrates how RKI thought. A way that is visible in all protocols. They subordinated themselves to politics, and tried to promote measures. The measures were the true objective, and they knitted together justifications to legitimize them. (2)
Next quote: “The number of free and occupied beds are almost equal.”, meaning 50% vacancy in our hospitals, and RKI adds that usual vacancy is less than 10%. …., and now comes a red sentence that was removed from the official protocols. We found it as a residual, i.e. as the original version of the protocol, which was forgotten. This protocol from 25 March, 2020 was finally redacted in 2023, notably by an employee of the legal department, which herself had not taken part in the meeting, and was responsible for rejecting requests under the Freedom Of Information Act.
The employee says she did not change the file, but stored it only by accident. As RKI does not have a registration system complying with legal requirements, this can neither be proven nor disproven. I quote: “It’s daring to say that causality exist (between measures and the decline of the wave). After all, we are at the end of the flue season.”
In addition, ladies and gentlemen, the RKI saw the following graph, the most important graph of the entire Corona crisis, in my view. However, it is somewhat complex. Therefor I explain in detail and emphasize that the graph was not made afterwards. So, this is not a matter of hindsight bias. They had the graph at their disposal at the beginning of the first lockdown, and they saw the folloing:
On the abscissa are the calendar weeks, from mid-year to mid-year, and on the ordinate are the influenza like illnesses. These are colds with fever, so somewhat stronger colds. Every single curve represents a specific year, and you recognize the same pattern every year: At first the number of colds is low, i.e. mid-summer. This number then grows until winter, and in the months of January and February these colds explode, and then return to the original value. That is why people speak of cold or flue waves.
What is interesting now is the black curve which represents the year 2020. First you see that the number of feverish colds, including SARS-CoV-2, i.e. independent of the specific virus that causes the colds was abnormally low in 2020, for that time of year. More importantly, it started declining in February where you recognize the peak of the black curve.In February, however, politicans told us that Corona was harmless, or a conspiracy (my edit: theory) of the right-wingers. They also told us that we should celebrate Carnival. Three assertions were made until the end of February. (3)
It was only in the first week of March that the political mood changed for unknown reasons. When the mood changed, the number of common colds was already in free fall. That also means that excuses such as, “Yes, of course, colds already receded before the lockdown, but only because school closures worked, or prohibitions of large gatherings worked.” All these excuses are inconsistent with the data, as all these measures started from the 10th week onwards. …., but colds receded, as you see in the graph, already in the 6th calendar week.
The next topic concerns vaccination. I have several slides here because these protocols were particularly heavily redacted. We first read on 15 April, 2020, when we learned from newspapers that no vaccines are available at all, and that there will be none for a long time (4), since development takes ten years, and if vaccination becomes possible, it will be voluntary.
We read the following in April of 2020: “There is currently no experience with RNA and DNA vaccines, EMA and Phizer are considering whether to skip phase 3 trials.”
Two weeks later: “A number of vaccines will become available that have been tested in quick succession. Relevant data will be collected post-marketing.” Put differently: Let’s first vaccinate the entire population, and then afterwards let’s learn whether the stuff helps or harms. That was the plan, and that’s how it was implemented.
On 27 December, 2020 vaccination started in Germany. On 8 January, 2021, in the very early phase we read: “Vaccine effectivness is not yet known. The duration of protection is also unknown.” That just repeats what we could read in the EMA approval, namely, that only protection from a positive PCR test was really confirmed. (5) Everything else like protection from severe illnesses, death and the like was not confirmed in the admission process.
In March (2021) we find the first signs of scepticism: “It is not yet clear that after vaccination, fewer old people are dying. Do vaccinated people die?” On the right side you see material from state TV, demonstrating how vaccine development works normally: R&D takes upto 17 years. This time it was conducted in just a few months. The result, as we know now, was devastating.
What about protection against transmission? This question is extremely important because vaccination mandates were base don the claim that vaccinated persons also protect others. If it was just about self protection, then legal obligation had been out of the question. (emphasis mine)
What did RKI think about protection of others? Very early, in February 2021 we read: “It is to be expected, (but not certain, because it has never been shown) that vaccines protect from severe illness, but they cannot stop local proliferation of viruses”.
In August we read: “The benefit of 2G (a scheme excluding unvaccinated people from social life) is not greater protection of others, but greater self-protection.”, and in 2022 we read: “There is no indication that vaccination has an effect on excretion, no change in evidence.” In sum there existed a crystal clear and consistent position, in accordance with the literature, and especially with Phizer’s approval study that made no respective claim: “There exists no protection of others.”
What did that mean for communication? Public communication had it that “The whole country is held hostage by these people, that is, the unvaccinated”. Karl Lauterbach threw this at the other members of the Bundestag in a debate about comprehensive vaccination mandates. His proposal, as we now know, failed narrowly, and if we are honest, it failed only since government and CDU/CSU had different ideas of how to implement comprehensive vaccination mandates and blocked each other in their respective suggestions. It was a very narrow decision. Overall this slide proves that what was communicated to the outside world totally contradicted what was known internally.
The next slide concerns vaccine safety. Now things are getting serious, and if you have weak nerves, just og outside for a moment. I start with 29 March, 2021, at which time vaccination had been going on for almost three months: “Astra Zeneca, a lot of hype in general. Now twelve cases of sinus vein thrombosis. Paul Erlich Institute, pharmacovigilance offices can’t keep up well. Sinus thrombosis, also in men have a 20 fold higher incidence.” This means that if you have been vaccinated with Astra Zeneca, you had a 20 fold higher risk than an unvaccinated person of developing sinus vein thrombosis, a really severe and life threatening illness.
17 May: “Side effect reports, Paul Erlich Institute had 45.000 in the last weeks, myocarditis in young men, sinus vein thrombosis, and so on.”
In the only hearing that has taken place so far, by the Brandenburg’s investigative committee, the security department head of Paul Erlich Institute, Dr. Keller Stanislawski testified: “There were people who only cared for the deceased, and also people who only took care of myocarditis cases. We had much more work than ever before, only through this vaccine.”
Now, before looking at the most shocking slide, please recall the dates: In March, April and May of 2021, the devastating effects of the Astra Zeneca vaccine became clear. Even ordinary citizens who had no access to the scientific literature became suspicious. They had unreliable but convincing information from what they saw in their neighborhood. (6)
How did Germany’s leading politicians respond to these unmistakable warnings? They produced the following headlines: “Federal President Steinmeier vaccinated with Astra Zeneca”, “Chancelor Merkel and Vice Chancelor Scholtz vaccinated with Astra Zeneca”, “Karl Lauterbach vaccinated with Astra Zeneca”, and finally in May: “Health Minister Joseph Spahn gets vaccinated with Astra Zeneca”. Never before have I heard of politicians announcing what modical treatment they receive. With Mrs. Merkel, that is the highlight, even showing her vaccine certificate. My interpretation of that is that they wanted to avoid Astra Zeneca being left in storage and then become accused of wasting taxpayers’ money. (7)
People were still afraid of that back then. Meanwhile it has become common that billions are spent every year on vaccine doses that are thrown away later, but back then politicians were still afraid. Whether they really got vaccinated, everyone can decide for themselves. If you have an IQ above 90 you can only come to one conclusion.
Now to the topic of children.
On 11 March, 2020 we read: “School closures in areas that are not particularly affected are not recommended”. Five days later politicians shut down all schools, daycare centers, and kindergartens. Also on 11 March, 2020 another crisis team had already made a decision. Hence on 16 March all schools etc. closed against RKI’s advice.
21 March, 2021: “Pediatrics proffessional associations are reluctant to vaccinate children. Politicians are prepairing vaccination campaigns.” A little later, almost pleadingly: “Children, when compared with other respiratory diseases, have a lower risk of severe disease progression”. We recognise an internal resistance that, however, was never communicated to the outside world.
At the end of 2021, we read: “The Health Ministry plans a booster scheme for children although there is no recommendation, and partly no approval. The Health Minister posted the following: “In children 12 to 15, BioNTech was 100% effective against Covid without side effects. (So again, allegedly free of side effects!) Everything speaks in favor of vaccinating children”. If you are not blocked, like me, you can open Lauterbach’s post and click on his source. You will find a blog sharing a press release from Phizer and BioNTech. So, the minister is acting as an advertising agency of the pharmaceutical industry. No scientific article is behind his post.
Let me conclude. This last slide, the most complex, is divided into three parts, and it is also the most important one. It first shows the so-called RKI risk level, on which our lives depended for three years. Green bars indicate that we were allowed to live like people have done the last hundreds of thousands of years with viruses. Yellow and especially red bars indicate lockdowns, school and kindergarten closures, curfews, 15 kilometers restrictions, mask requirements and direct and indirect forms of compulsory vaccination. (8)
In March of 2020 RKI sudenly increased the risk level. The bars changed from green to yellow. This remained so until the beginning of 2023, when the bars returned to green.
Now let’s take a look at statistics from RKI and the Federal Ministry of Health, showing ICU bed occupancy in Germany. The green line below is the recommended occupation of intensive care units. You can see the following: In 2020 we had a significant under utilization. Totally abnormal. (9) This is what RKI stated in its protocol for total clinical occupation. At the time billions of dollars had to be earmarked to avoid hospital bankruptcies. This was also the time when dances were performed by hospital staff, which circulate everywhere on the internet.
Then you see that in 2021, 2022 and 2023 the total ICU bed occupation hardly fluctuates anymore, and that has now no longer to do with any special actions. The most interesting thing in this graph is the dotted line at the bottom. These are the PCR cases. They include people who have contracted Covid, as well as people who, for example, have arrived after a traffic accident and were required to take a PCR test at admission. (Edit: I would call these fluctuations varying numbers of false positives, but I’m not a doctor. I don’t even play one on TV.)
Obviously the PCR curve fluctuates enormously, but without any impact on the total ICU occcupation. The crux of the matter is that the media only showed PCR curves for three years with an alleged exponential growth, and whatever they called it. If you now compare the two, it is completely incomprehensible why RKI indicates high risk whereas the lower graph indicates complete normality. Clearly one cannot understand that, but you will soon understand it using the RKI-Leak.
Here on the left we have the explanation. I quote from 16 March, 2020: “During the weekend a new risk assessment was prepaired”. Before a court RKI stated the assessment was prepared outside, so it was not based on a scientific evaluation. Further quote: “Risk is scheduled to be scaled up this week.” One day later the RKI report stated that there was a high risk, and we went into lockdown.
In June of 2020, not only were the number of colds low, as is typical for the season, but even the PCR numbers approached the zero line. …., and in the prelude to the protocol shown here, RKI members thought that now the official risk level could be reduced again, but then we read about NATO General Holtherm, who was top boss of the RKI (10), two hierarchy levels above Mr. Wieler, the figure head or mouth piece. Holtherm decided on Tuesday that the risk assesssment in the next week must not be changed. Next week sounds harmless, but as you see on the top right it lasted three years.
Then on 25 February, 2022, the Federal Ministry of health prohibited reducing the risk level from very high to high. That was shortly before parliament’s vote on comprehensive vaccine mandates. The only really funny part that I found in the RKI leak is this one from 26 April, 2023. At the start of April the minister had declared that the pandemic was over, as RKI learned from the newspapers, and I quote: “It could be considered to set the risk assessment to low.” That is what they had forgotten to do, and it proves the whole thing was about politics, and not medicine. From start to finish.
The following conclusions emerge:
The RKI case reveals a fundamental problem of the rule of law: According to Montesquieu, courts shall control the executive, but courts mainly dealt with authorities, or believed mainly or only authorities, in almost all trials regarding vaccination mandates, lockdowns, or school closures. RKI and PEI acted as witnesses, and the courts found all restrictions ok. Because all authorities are bound by instructions, the government is its own witness, which is contradictory to the separation of powers.
You have to be lucky and have a good willed whistle blower to achieve better results. So, I will now quote a sentence from a recent court ruling. “This recommendation pro vaccination mandates, based on assessments of the Robert Koch Institute, is now refuted by the published internal protocols of the institute.” This means that the Administrative Courts of Osnabrück, in a trial concerning the vaccination mandate of a nursing employee, has actually refuted the mandate and has submitted the whole case to the Federal Constitutional Court. (Emphasis mine)
In my opinion we have the same problem with other authorities such as the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and the Federal Environment Agency. They have a say in trials notwithstanding that they subordinate.
Thank you very much for your attention.
1. We all know by now that the Nürnberg defense (I was just following orders.) is null and void.
2. I have said time and time again that they needed the pandemic in order to roll out the vaxxine.
3. A perfect way to poison large crouds so they could transfect on a massive scale.
4. In my post «This is not you will see that production of vaxxines was well underway at Moderna in 2018.
5. By now my readers also know that the inventor of the PCR test has explicitly stated that it is NOT for diagnostic purposes. Besides, all other nerds like me who actually read the PCR instructions from top to bottom didn’t have to wait for someone on Substack to tell them this.
6. Earlier this year my wife and I had a dinner guest who out of the blue just blurted out: «You know, nine of my childhood friends are now dead. Five of them even were in the same class in grade school.» He is seventy years old.
7. I call it doubbling down.
8. You may recall the «traffic lights» related to terror threats a decade or more ago.
9. I believe this is because people were being cautious and carefull due to all things Covid.
10. Why on earth does Germany have military people at the top of an organization within health care?
Source : https://greaterisrahell.substack.com/p/transcription-of-pro-dr-stefan-homurg
( Editor´s note : Unfortunately, it is still unclear to me how the explanatory 10 points at the end of the transcript came about. I will have to clarify this. For now, I assume that the author of the transcript could have written these explanations himself.)
……………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, November 13, 2024 ( A comment on the above transcript ) :
https://greaterisrahell.substack.com/p/transcription-of-pro-dr-stefan-homurg/comment/77010359
( … ) Thank you for leaning into this. It ought to be impossible for anyone becoming aware of this to continue to believe there’s been some natural phenomenon (indeed, any phenomenon other than fraud) since 2020.
Now make the leap to the reason why the gene based injections were designed as they were & compare this with my four year long statement that “these were designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors”.
Best wishes
Mike
……………………………………………………………….
Corona: Five Official Facts
Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg
Source : https://www.stefan-homburg.de/images/Corona%20Facts.pdf
Revised May, 2024. The first version contained short links, but these have expired. This fact sheet provides the original official internet links.
1. All-time low clinic occupancy in 2020
In 2020, clinic occupancy fell to an all-time low, in some cases 30% below the previous year's figure. Link Bundesgesundheitsministerium (p. 4):
https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/3_Downloads/C/Coronavirus/Analyse_Leistungen_Ausgleichszahlungen_2020_Corona-Krise.pdf
2. Few severe respiratory diseases
Respiratory diseases (SARI) were inconspicuous in 2020 and 2021. Peaks occurred in 2018 and at the end of 2022. Link Robert Koch-Institut (p.
6): https://influenza.rki.de/Wochenberichte/2022_2023/2023-30.pdf
3. Deaths increased noticeably in 2021 not 2020
In 2020, the age-adjusted mortality rate was between the values of 2018 and 2019. It only increased noticeably with the start of vaccination in
2021. Link Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes:
4. Corona deaths were older than other deaths
The median age of PCR fatalities was 83 years, Link Robert Koch-Institut (p. 20):
The median age of total fatalities was 82 year. Link und Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung:
https://www.bib.bund.de/DE/Fakten/Fakt/S30-Medianalter-Gestorbene-ab-1952.html
5. Sweden performed better than Germany
The overall mortality rate per capita was lower in lockdown- and mask-free Sweden than in Germany. Link: World Health Organization:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05522-2
…………………………………………………………….
Sasha Latypova also reports on this :
………………………………………………………………………………….
2000+ pages leaked form German CDC, Robert Koch Institute containing meeting minutes on covid from 2020-2023
An offer to crowdsource articles from my readers.
Nov 09, 2024
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/2000-pages-leaked-form-german-cdc
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Prof. Denis Rancourt highlighted one of the important deceptions of the non-existent "Covid" diseases here :
………………………………………….
Prof. Denis Rancourt, February 10, 2024 :
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/thoughts-on-stuff-1
Medical myth: happy hypoxia and “covid”
Silent hypoxia (low blood oxygen in the absence of breathing distress) is a generic condition that routinely occurs with lung infections, depending of the pathophysiological circumstances
So-called happy hypoxia is not specific to so-called COVID-19 postulated to be caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2
Conclusion: Clinicians and influencers can come to idiotic conclusions during periods of pandemic propaganda.
References:
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397783/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558242/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512283/
Full article :
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/thoughts-on-stuff-1
……………………………………………..
Editor´s note :
The following study is hidden behind one of the links above. Please note that such studies, despite the evidence of medical fraud they publish, very often use the "Covid narrative" so that the text can be published at all.
………………………………………………
Happy or Silent Hypoxia in COVID-19–A Misnomer Born in the Pandemic Era
Published online 2021 Oct 18. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.745634
Source : https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558242/
Early in the pandemic era of COVID-19 the term “happy or silent hypoxia” was introduced to describe patients with COVID-19 who presented with severe hypoxemia and absence of dyspnea (Couzin-Frankel, 2020; Guan et al., 2020). The absence of dyspnea despite severe hypoxemia was considered to be a “paradox” and unique to COVID-19 (Archer et al., 2020; Ferenchick and Ferenchick, 2020). As such the term “happy or silent hypoxia” has been received wide attention by the press and social media and even described as a silent killer in COVID-19 (Levitan, 2020). Although scientific evidence is lacking, central nervous system viral invasion has been put forward to explain this “paradox” (Nouri-Vaskeh et al., 2020; Gopal et al., 2021; Tavčar et al., 2021). Nevertheless, basic principles of respiratory system physiology dictate that the absence of dyspnea despite severe hypoxemia is not specifically linked to COVID-19 but to other lung diseases as well (Tobin et al., 2020). The aim of our article is to present information about the responses to both acute and sustained hypoxia and provide an analysis of control of breathing physiology that could explain the absence of dyspnea despite severe hypoxemia. Specifically, we apply in hypoxemic patients with COVID-19 our currently published analysis (Vaporidi et al., 2020) that relates arterial carbon dioxide levels with respiratory centers response to this stimulus, contrasting the brain's responses to the patient's ability to generate effective alveolar ventilation. This analysis may facilitate comprehension of the pathophysiology of dyspnea in hypoxemic patients with COVID-19.
(…)
In conclusion, patients with COVID-19 pneumonia may present without dyspnea, despite severe hypoxemia. The absence of dyspnea is not specifically related to COVID-19 but may occur in any patient with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure exhibiting normal respiratory muscle function and relatively normal respiratory system mechanics.
( … )
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
A conversation about fake "Covid" deaths :
( Editor's note : The number of fake Covid deaths is actually no less than 100%, because "Covid" never existed ).
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
On X ( formerly Twitter ) this picture was captioned with the following comment :
“Wait… How come the Fake News Mainstream Globalist Media don’t report this ?”
Source : https://x.com/rustyrockets/status/1855373382356754667
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Editor´s note :
We can remember how early on Dr Yeadon, together with Dr Wodarg, protested against the "pseudo-vaccinations". Since then, he has not remained idle, continued researching, and has since revised some of his views at the time. Nevertheless, it is worth remembering that he foresaw some of the health damage that would be caused. The deliberate mass poisonings began in late December 2020. The document was sent to the EMA on 1 December, before the introduction of the bioweapon. The Internet press reports :
………………………
Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition
December 1, 2020
On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).
Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.
On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.
Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:
The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.
CALL FOR HELP: Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA.
Nachtrag: Wegen teilweiser Überlastung der Server hier der Inhalt der E-Mail und die Kontaktadressen zum späteren Selbst-Versenden:
An: press@ema.europa.eu; petitionEMA@corona-ausschuss.com
Betreff: Co-signing the petition of Dr. Wodarg, Germany, and Dr. Yeadon, UK (submitted on 1-Dec-2020)
Dear Sir or Madam, I am hereby co-signing the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon to support their urgent request to stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b (EudraCT Number 2020-002641-42) and other clinical trials. The full text of the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon can be found here: https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf I hereby respectfully request that EMA act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon immediately. Regards
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Many people have known for a long time that they have been deceived and poisoned. They are angry. Here are older recordings (probably from the beginning of 2024?) from the then Italian Minister of Health. Unfortunately, I have to spend a while looking for the exact date of the film on my computer. Or can a clever reader help me? I'm more careful about saving now, but this data is a bit old. It dates back to when I was still an inexperienced "Substack journalist."
PS. The same applies to the video about the fake "Covid" deaths published above. Among the thousands of files I have stored on my PC, it is not always easy to find descriptions of the videos. I apologize for this gap !
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Related articles :
……………………………………
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/there-was-no-pandemic-the-ultimate
……………………………………
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/not-even-a-small-ghost
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
For the most reliable information about the "Covid" scam and deceptions of the system, read Dr. Mike Yeadon's daily statements :
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr. Yeadon's videos only two browsers are recommended :
Yandex :
and Mojeek :
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
Many statements and videos from Dr. Mike Yeadon can also be found on Suavek's Substack, which is recommended by Dr. Yeadon on the main page of his Substack.
Both links lead to Suavek`s Substack :
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Indeed, i often cite the fact that those who conspired to “lock us down” (such a US prison service expression) disregarded their own orders.
Instead, in U.K. for example, senior members of the Conservative government & civil servants held a party in No. 10 Downing Street.
THEY WERE NOT SCARED AT ALL.
If they’d been scared, they’d have politely declined the invitation.
Did they attend because they were people of courage?
They’re not famous for putting themselves at risk to benefit others.
I conclude they weren’t scared, because they knew perfectly well that there was nothing to be scared of.
It was always a scam.
Now, about those rushed “vaccines”. What were they really for??
Men of lesser intelligence will follow any authority blindly since authority to such men is what they are told it is. Independent thinking always loses out where intelligence is not. Morals and intelligence are close relatives.