The climate lie - PART 4 - The purpose : taking over smaller banks and introducing CBDC slavery. And: the temperature measurement scam. Foreword by Dr. Mike Yeadon.
Dr. Vernon Coleman : Net Zero will Destroy You, Your Family and Everything You Love.
Foreword :
Dr. Mike Yeadon, February 10, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/37178
I’m sharing so that you hear / see the words of ECB chair, Christine Lagarde and her deputy.
They must think we’re stupid to accept the end of cash on the grounds that paper contributes to climate change.
It’s as if the self appointed elites have withdrawn their business from communications specialists and given the mandate for public commentary to a class of nine year olds.
Actually, that’s way too mature a group.
Best wishes
Mike
Linked in the post above :
WARNING: 90% of Banks Are At Risk and Cashless Society Is Inevitable, Central Bank Says
One of the comments under the video :
I laughed at how ridiculous it was.
A truly unbelievably childish and despicable exercise of power.
I believe that the wildfires around the world in recent years are arson. They are willing to go to any length to achieve their goals.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, July 5, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1567
Letter of the Month - July 1999
If you weren’t already aware of the oil lies (there are at least two: origins and amount remaining) then you might recoil at this one.
It probably doesn’t matter much, now. Once you’ve realised that several absolutely fundamental things you’ve been taught or told all your life are lies, what’s a couple more?
I do recall posting about how remarkable it is that large amounts of methane (CH4) is present in earths outer crust and also in several planets in the solar system. And that petrol is mostly octane (C8H10) which could theoretically arise from linear polymerisation of shorter length alkanes.
This route of synthesis seems a great deal more likely than from formerly living matter.
Do remember that human induced climate change is definitely a lie.
Best wishes
Mike
Linked in the post above :
Letter of the Month - July 1999
The Origins of Oil and Petroleum
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996
From: "Daniel E. Reynolds"
Subject: Oil - A REWEWABLE and ABIOTIC FUEL?
On June 20th, 1996 Col. Prouty stated...
"Oil is often called a 'fossil' fuel; the idea being that it comes from formerly living organisms. This may have been plausible back when oil wells were drilled into the fossil layers of the earth's crust; but today, great quantities of oil are found in deeper wells that are found below the level of any fossils. How could then oil have come from fossils, or decomposed former living matter, if it exists in rock formations far below layers of fossils - the evidence of formerly living organisms? It must not come from living matter at all!"
Two days after I read his statement I encountered the following statement in a newspaper I deeply respect:
"Any geologist will tell you, well, most geologists will tell you that OIL IS CREATED BY THE MAGMA OF THE EARTH. The oil wells in Pennsylvania that were pumped out dry at the turn of the century and capped are now filled with oil again."
Say what?
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Net Zero will Destroy You, Your Family and Everything You Love
Dr. Vernon Coleman
The drive towards Net Zero is fuelled by the climate change myth and is based on a delicately balanced raft of pseudoscientific evidence and fake news material which are used by professional propagandists and skilled conspirators to sustain the notion that fossil fuels are threatening our world and our very existence.
The myth they have created has been propagated with absurd enthusiasm by small but vocal teams of compliant and easily led enthusiasts, most of whom almost certainly believe that the lies they have been told are the truth and that if we do not make substantive changes to our way of life then we have no future. They’ve been taught that the seas will boil and rise up to engulf the land, life as we have known it will become impossible and the human race will be doomed.
As a result of this nonsensical belief (which is no better established in science than the equally absurd but far less dangerous and damaging theories that the earth is flat, there are no germs and that gravity does not exist) governments around the world now argue that they have no choice but to take drastic action to save us from doom. Aided and abetted by gullible, easily led, virtue signalling leaders of charities, lobby groups, bankers and investment groups, action is, therefore, being taken to halt the use of all fossil fuels and to change every aspect of the way we live.
The Supreme Court in the UK has ruled that a local council should have considered the climate impact of burning oil before allowing new wells. This will put all future oil and gas projects in doubt both in the UK and in the EU. A Swiss woman won a victory at the European Court of Human Rights to force Switzerland to do more to deal with the myth of climate change. This is all insanity.
The best joke of the century so far is that China is selling solar panels and electric vehicles to the West and burning coal to create the electricity to make them.
And as we in the West are encouraged by the lunatics to condemn fossil fuels no one is allowed to mention that 84% of global energy comes from fossil fuels. (That is just 2% less than in 1973, by the way.) Without oil and gas we would have to survive on 16% of the energy we use now. Oh, and you can’t make fertiliser or fly planes with solar power or ugly, bird crunching windmills.
It is absurd that it should be suggested that we abandon fossil fuels. To do so would mean being prepared to alter every aspect of our lives. Without fossil fuels we will have very little food, no schools, no hospitals, very little transport (except what is provided by horses and bicycles), no computers, no television, no magazines or newspapers, no air conditioning, no mobile phones, little or no lighting, little or no heating and little or no cooking. Like it or not we will be dragged back (by 2030, if the fanatics have their way) to the 19th century. Solar panels and windmills will not stop this happening. I wonder how many of those who support the idea of Net Zero know what will happen.
Full article :
https://www.vernoncoleman.com/main.htm
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
The climate scaremongers: How the Met Office fiddles the temperature figures
July 5, 2024
( … )
We know, of course, that many weather stations which were on the outskirts of cities years ago have since been swallowed up by urbanisation. City centre sites have been increasingly affected by the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect over the years, thanks to more transport, roads, homes and infrastructure. UHI artificially raises temperatures, something the Met Office does not take into account when they make their ‘hottest on record’ claims.
Another factor to consider is that till around the 1970s most homes had coal fires. Industry and power stations also used plenty of coal. As a result our towns and cities lived under a veil of smoke which had the effect of depressing temperatures. A Met Office study in 2006 actually stated that most of the warming since the 1970s was probably due to cleaner air. (This study has since been removed from their website – a copy can still be found here).
And as we already know, much of the Met Office’s weather station network is so poorly sited that temperatures can be inflated by as much as five degrees C. Poor siting can involve being too close to artificial heat sources such as buildings and roads, or hedges and walls which create suntraps.
All told, nearly eight out of ten stations are so poorly sited that they could be overstating underlying temperatures by at least 2C, and as much as 5C. Only stations classed as 1 and 2 on a five-point scale should be used for climatological purposes, but the data from these is being swamped by the junk sites which comprise the vast majority.
Is this just an academic problem, one which does not actually have any real significance in practice?
No.
( … )
Full article :
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Climate "Science" | Dr. Richard Lindzen | EP 320
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LVSrTZDopM
January 5, 2023
The Dr. Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
Ep. 320 Dr Jordan B Peterson and Dr. Richard Lindzen dive into the facts of climate change, the models used to predict it, the dismal state of academia, and the politicized world of “professional” science. Richard Lindzen is a dynamical meteorologist. He has contributed to the development of theories for the Hadley Circulation, hydrodynamic instability theory, internal gravity waves, atmospheric tides, and the quasi-biennial oscillation of the stratosphere. His current research is focused on climate sensitivity, the role of cirrus clouds in climate, and the determination of the tropics-to-pole temperature difference. He has attained multiple degrees from Harvard University, and won multiple awards in his field of study such as the Jule Charney award for “highly significant research in the atmospheric sciences”. Between 1983 and 2013, he was the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT where he earned emeritus status in July of 2013. Dr Peterson's extensive catalog is available now on DailyWire+: https://utm.io/ueSXh
Staged climate change: re-feudalization of society through the impoverishment of the productively employed
Posted on January 8, 2023 by Michael Klein
The climate change hoax and the COVID-19 measures, the fight against racism and the LGBTIQ+ mania, they are all used to create social hierarchy, to place those who operate under such rubrum above others To deny people access to resources that one grants oneself in order to ultimately destroy the prosperity of a certain class of people, of productive people, and in this way to restore an “old” social, a feudal hierarchy, which is based on the motto “ Build Back Better” and the catchphrase “Great Reset” are openly striving for a hierarchy in which what is now possible for many is possible for a few, in which a few live well and contentedly while many are busy making ends meet .
( … )
Full article ( in German ) :
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
UPDATE :
Editors note :
A friendly expert from London is exercising his English sense of humor by writing a witty review of my article. Should I now go on a hunger strike in protest or only publish the expert opinions in my articles? ( smiley ). This would be the first lay strike in medical history. You, the reader, decide.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, July 11, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1594
This is a pretty good collection of comments and articles on the absurdity of a human made climate crisis. Thanks as ever to Suavek.
Don’t worry, there is at least one, genuine expert quoted within!
Not that you need to be an expert to know this is all BS.
Best wishes
Mike
( Editor`s note : Dr. Yeadon did not forget to link to my article in his Telegram post. If you don't believe it, you can check it out here, in his Telegram channel : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1594 ).
"Would you like one of our experts to come and tell you what you think of it?"
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr.Yeadon's videos only two browsers are recommended :
Yandex :
and Mojeek :
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
"And this is our new expert on the impact of global warming."
She looks glowing like she gets what she really wants, for a hagfish like, if a hagfish was getting all it's needs met, blood curdling