The arguments for "NO VIRUS" - PART 9. Dr. Mike Yeadon : "They’ve omitted the step involving addition of material purporting to contain the “virus” in question & yet obtained identical results..."
The meaningful control experiment.
Several experts are working together to uncover the old lie.
The important statement by Dr Mike Yeadon, which I have made the main content of this article, came from the comment section under his own article on the "NO VIRUS" topic, which I consider to be the most important article on this topic in the entire Substack ( https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/fph-the-arguments-for-no-virus ). Although the article mentions the compilations in my "Fraud Prevention Hotline" Substack in the title, the main reason for the particularly high informative value of the article is not my work, but the statements of Dr. Mike Yeadon and also the scientifically sophisticated works of the other three experts mentioned and linked therein, with which my mainly desk work can in no way compete :
— Christine Massey :
https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/
— Jamie Andrews :
https://controlstudies.substack.com/
— https://aldhissla.substack.com/
A thematically related article : https://aldhissla.substack.com/p/cytopathic-effects-in-uninoculated
Of course, there are many other top experts worldwide working on the topic of "No Virus" who have been mentioned in previous parts of this substack, without any guarantee of completeness. However, this is only about the essential subtopic of the control experiments that were recently carried out.
Dr. Yeadon's Substack article, written in collaboration with Tim West ( and including my compilations of information ), gets to the heart of the issue thanks to the few experts mentioned above. For any reader who is seriously interested in this, it is a must-read and one you definitely don't want to miss. Most readers of my articles have certainly already read Dr Yeadon's article. To be on the safe side, here is a link :
FPH: The Arguments for No Virus
A series focussing on the excellent curating work of the Fraud Prevention Hotline publication
Aug 08, 2024
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/fph-the-arguments-for-no-virus
The results of the control experiment refute the claims of the medical giants and the terrorist organization WHO.
The main message of this article here, in the “Fraud Prevention Hotline” concerns the results of the control experiments. Dr. Mike Yeadon summed up the essence of his message as follows :
“They’ve omitted the step involving addition of material purporting to contain the “virus” in question & yet obtained identical results to those studies in which a “virus” was allegedly added. This destroys the method as suitable for identification of the pathogen by causing “cytopathic effects”, because these occur spontaneously anyway, under the conditions of study.”
This statement by Dr. Yeadon is (among other things) closely linked to the work of Jamie Andrews and his team :
“The cytopathic effect occurs exactly the same if no sample of a ‘virus containing sample’ is added to the stressed, starved, poisoned (usually monkey kidney cell) tissue culture.”
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
You can read Dr. Yeadon’s full statement here :
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon, August 10, 2024 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/fph-the-arguments-for-no-virus/comment/65006364
Author
Dear Tomas,
I rarely comment on long run exchanges.
I have reviewed several backs and forths.
I am unable to glean your intentions.
If on balance your view as above is sincerely held, it’s presumably because like the rest of us, you can find no good quality evidence of the existence of SARS-CoV-2 or indeed any other “virus”.
Christine Massey has made the largest number of FOI requests of various government agencies and other institutions around the world, asking if they have a sample of the virus (or question with the same intent) & all those who’ve responded have done so in the negative.
Jamie Andrews and colleagues have sought to replicate as exactly as possible the methods described in peer reviewed journal articles and in the supplier’s instructions that come with samples of cell lines how to treat them, when “isolating” a virus.
They’ve omitted the step involving addition of material purporting to contain the “virus” in question & yet obtained identical results to those studies in which a “virus” was allegedly added. This destroys the method as suitable for identification of the pathogen by causing “cytopathic effects”, because these occur spontaneously anyway, under the conditions of study.
Obviously when a person describes what they’ve done, you can follow some of it but in the end, neither you nor I was writing or receiving replies to FOI requests or actually culturing cells & evaluating them later.
At that point a person has little option but to decide that the methods & results are being honestly described, or to decide that the person isn’t trustworthy and you shouldn’t make anything of what’s claimed.
I don’t see the value in sitting somewhere by the two positions.
I’ve decided I do believe that both Christine and Jamie are straightforward people who have done reasonable things in an honest endeavour.
As a result, while I’m not gullible, I take at face value the outcomes they describe.
I don’t think they’ve any motive to be other than honest.
I’m the same. I care about doing my best to determine the truth of a situation. I’m neutral what the truth is. Though obviously I’ve long since decided what it all means.
Nevertheless, at any time, adequate contradictory evidence would prompt me to revisit my current understanding. That’s how I got here in the first place.
I hope this is of some interest & perhaps use to you, to hear my perspective. If not, no worries.
I rarely add much to comments because there are so many exchanges that I could use all my spare time doing so & I don’t think it would make the slightest difference at this juncture.
Best wishes
Mike
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon, September 23, 2024 :
https://substack.com/@drmikeyeadon/note/c-69965107
There is no covid. No SARS-CoV-2. No contagion. No pandemic. It’s all fakery, huge PsyOps, intentionally useless diagnostic tests, misattribution of existing illnesses and campaigns of iatrogenicide.
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/statement-by-mike-yeadon
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Some of the other "NO VIRUS" experts :
Among the currently vocal protagonists of the ‘no virus exists’ side of the debate is virologist Stefan Lanka PhD (Germany), four medically trained doctors, Dr Tom Cowan (USA), Dr Sam Bailey (NZ), her husband, Dr Mark Bailey (NZ), and Dr Andrew Kaufman (USA). Health and exercise scientist, Mike Stone (USA), has done a comprehensive job coalescing most of the key arguments into a single website, viroLIEgy.com.
These six are among the signatories, who include ex-Pfizer vice president Dr Mike Yeadon, formerly vice president & chief scientific officer of Allergy & Respiratory at Pfizer Global R&D, of the Settling the Virus Debate challenge put forward by Drs Cowan et al in July 2022.
Dr. Stefan Lanka ( translated ) :
( … )
The virologists don’t get this! By the most basic scientific standards, they should have at least conducted control tests to be sure that it was really ‘viruses’ that led to cell and tissue death. In order to effectively establish the alleged ‘multiplication’ of viruses in cells, they should have conducted additional tests in a control group administering sterile substances from core healthy people. This was to check that, of course, it was not the method itself that produced or falsified the results.
( … )
Full article :
https://greatreject.org/dr-stefan-lanka-claims-about-viruses-are-false/
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Afterword
by Suavek
The significance of the findings from such control experiments mentioned by Dr. Mike Yeadon cannot be overestimated. It follows that large branches of the medical industry with considerable annual turnover are based solely on fraud and can of course never be interested in conducting such control experiments honestly and communicating their results to the public. Dr. Yeadon stressed that the cytopathic effects render any test officially supposed to identify the "viruses" useless.
This fits very well with what the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, has confirmed several times about his own invention: The PCR test is not suitable for diagnostic purposes. This Nobel Prize winner, passionate surfer, opponent of Anthony Fauci and also critic of the AIDS fraud and the "ozone hole", was in 2019 presumably killed, shortly before the "Covid" & PCR "Corona" test fraud. Many do not believe that pneumonia was the alleged natural cause of his death. If Kary Mullis had been alive, it would certainly have become common knowledge in 2020 that the "Covid" PCR test can only create the false appearance of a "pandemic".
In the context of such control experiments mentioned by Dr Yeadon, it seems understandable why the perpetrators had to invent the lie of the "symptomless illness" in relation to "Covid" for the first time in the history of the earth, in 2020. In doing so, they wanted to lend credibility to the useless "Covid" test, but on the other hand, they revealed to many critically thinking doctors and scientists that the "pandemic" cannot have anything to do with real science. The so-called "Covid" cases were not cases of illness, but merely tested nonsense.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
For the most reliable information about the "Covid" scam and deceptions of the system, read Dr. Mike Yeadon's daily statements :
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr. Yeadon's videos only two browsers are recommended:
Yandex :
and Mojeek :
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
Many statements and videos from Dr. Mike Yeadon can also be found on Suavek's Substack, which is recommended by Dr. Yeadon on the main page of his Substack.
Both links lead to Suavek`s Substack :
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
The photo was published on September 16, 2024.
On the left : Tim West, Dr. Mike Yeadon's assistant, whose contribution to exposing medical fraud cannot be valued highly enough. On the right is Dr. Mike Yeadon :
Source : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1849
“ Of cource the procedure is necessary. My Porsche isn´t going to pay for itself. ”
the usual viroLIEgy omissions...🤦🏻♂️ great work as always. they should teach the scientific method early in "schools" but they don't want the younguns to think tho...🤦🏻♂️ I now call them 'indoctrination camps'