The Arguments for “NO VIRUS”- PART 46. What do the "viruses" have to do with Hitler's diaries? The AI ​​acknowledges the possibility of validation fraud in the PCR test.

A reply to Kaylene.

---

---

Kaylene Emery, February 7, 2026 :

https://substack.com/@kayleneemery/note/c-211050484

Kaylene Emery

What exactly is “ a computer generated virus “ ?

Serious question .

…………………………………………………………………………..

Suavek's answer, February 7, 2026 :

---

Dear Kaylene,

At the time, German scientists received only computer data about the alleged “virus” from China, but not the “virus” itself. The genetic code of a small fragment of DNA, or RNA, is represented by a computer program as a series of numbers. Nobody knows who created these programs, and the “virus” databases are not subject to any public oversight. Everything is shrouded in secrecy and can be manipulated at will. But the scientists are comparing their computer data with the data from the “virus” database.

This reminds me of the German forger Konrad Kujau (1938–2000), who forged Hitler’s diaries in the early 1980s. Since he also forged Hitler’s signatures, he donated some forged signatures to a museum. When the Hitler diaries were later examined, a comparison was made between Hitler’s signature in the diaries and the signature in the museum. Because a graphologist proved that the signatures matched, Hitler’s diaries were deemed authentic and published. The forgery was exposed just a few days after publication because the paper and ink used contained substances that did not exist at the time of the Second World War. From my perspective, the “evidence” for the “viruses” is similar: one fake is compared to another and therefore perceived as genuine. This means that the “virus” fraud, like the graphological test mentioned above, is based on a circular argument. The computer programs used to identify a “virus”, and the “virus databases,” are operated by the same fraudster mafia.

I’m sorry I can’t elaborate on this amusing topic here. I’m not exactly a gifted article writer, so I prefer to quote others who are excellent writers. Only in exceptional cases, when I see a gap in the evidence and/or argumentation, do I feel compelled to write about it. Incidentally, Dr. Mike Yeadon’s statements about the strange “virus” databases are already covered in the “NO VIRUS” article series on this substack.

Now we’re coming back to China. The Chinese took a tissue sample from a sick man and examined it. All his symptoms pointed to pneumonia. But the scientists claimed it was “Covid” because he had an “unusual cough” and analyzed the data of the alleged “virus” on the computer. They then sent this data to Germany via email, which formed the basis for the PCR test.

I am deliberately arguing in such a way that even the proponents of the virus theory understand the deception. However, the deception is actually much easier to understand if one takes seriously the studies that show there is no contagion. Without contagion, there can be no “viruses.” To avoid diluting the clarity of the conclusion, I deliberately do not discuss the fraud in the field of epigenetics in great detail. Generally speaking, some scientists claim that much in this field has been fabricated to somehow bolster the “virus” myth and to apply false “evidence.”

Here, too, we see the similarity to the authentication of Hitler’s alleged diaries. The pseudo-evidence for the “viruses” is “supported” by pseudo-evidence from the field of epigenetics. The same thing was done back then by the German graphologist who compared Hitler’s signatures. Ironically, however, they were all forged.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Adolph Hitler as a child complains to Santa Claus.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

The AI ​​acknowledges the possibility of validation fraud in the PCR test.

by Suavek

---

My question to AI :

---

Please provide me with the validation studies that claim that SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests do not react to genetic sequences other than "SARS-CoV-2", and please identify the potential weaknesses of these studies.

---

[ Editor's note: The application of AI can reveal the weaknesses of the validation studies regarding the PCR test. My request to the AI ​​resulted in a lot of lies being presented as supposed “evidence.” But that’s not all. In the first paragraph, the AI ​​admits that it’s possible the PCR test might not identify a virus, but instead a perfectly normal biological material, mistakenly identifying it as “the virus.” This information is quite useful, don’t you think? ]

AI replies :

( ... )

General Weaknesses of PCR Validation Studies:

Limited Sample Diversity: Most studies test specificity against a pre-selected list of “common” viruses. They rarely account for all possible microbial or host DNA/RNA sequences present in every unique human sample.

[ Editor’s note: The next paragraph seems moderately interesting to me, and the last paragraph is critical because the “viruses” are a complete fabrication. Oh, there were a lot of lies in this AI compilation that I’d rather not publish to save you time.]

AI replies :

Pre-analytical Errors: Factors like sample contamination, improper storage, or pipetting errors can cause false positives that are not related to the genetic sequence itself.

High Cycle Thresholds: Running PCR tests for too many cycles (e.g., >35-40) can amplify trace amounts of nucleic acids or artifacts, leading to results that are technically positive but clinically irrelevant.

( ... )

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Related article :

…………………………………..

https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/transmission-failure

---

Transmission failure

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

The most reliable information on the “Covid” hoax and the deceptions of the system can be found in the statements of Dr. Mike Yeadon, at the links below :

---

---

Dr. Mike Yeadon’s Substack #1 :

https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/

( Notes : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/notes )

The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :

https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel

A collaborative Substack by Dr. Yeadon and Suavek ( Dr. Mike Yeadon’s Substack #2 ) :

Fraud Prevention Hotline / suavek1.substack.com

…………………………………..

Dr. Mike Yeadon, December 21 ( update Dec. 23 ), 2025 :

Source : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/scorpions-in-the-dock

---

Consider subscribing to my friend Suavek s publication an essential move please. There you can find many posts from my Telegram channel collated with other material in a skilful way. Fraud Prevention Hotline

Best

Mike

……………………………………………………

DEAR FRIENDS,

The two Substacks, Dr. Yeadon’s and Suavek’s, have merged into a single, highly informative entity. The Fraud Prevention Hotline is now officially Dr. Yeadon’s Substack No. 2. You can find his statement on this at the following link : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/my-other-substack

---

…………………………….

We urge you, if possible, to add both Substacks to your recommended list in your Substack. Thank you very much in advance,

Mike & Suavek

………………………………

The possible support goes to Suavek. Any support is especially welcome at this time, and is VERY appreciated, but of course is not mandatory, as this Substack is free. I extend my sincere thanks to those who have supported me so far.

You can either do something against or for something :

---

---