The arguments for “NO VIRUS” - PART 14. Dr Mike Yeadon & Dr Jamie Andrews : The PCR tests as the linchpin of allopathic medical fraud.
And: The website "Bird's Eye View" collects evidence of medical fraud.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, August 19, 2024 :
https://www.arkmedic.info/p/actuaries-inc/comment/65969621
That’s how the deceit was done, agreed.
Fake tests give fake positives.
You may continue to believe in respiratory viruses but all it shows is that you’ve not read into experimental transmission experiments. They’re many of them and they’re all failures.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, January 26, 2025 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/2443
I realised Theranos’ blood testing technology claims were implausible as soon as I heard it pitched.
I didn’t have any idea of why it’s board was loaded with the characters it had. In fact, I don’t recall ever knowing about the board’s composition. But back in the early 20-teens, I had no idea that the world didn’t operate like I imagined.
It’s well worth following the entire thread, but the payoff is probably as Gates summarized. A diagnostics mega platform, enabling testing 20% of the world’s population every week.
Notice that his global pandemic “firemen” & their equipment look very military.
Obviously we now know that pandemics have never happened because they cannot happen. No need to mass test any population let alone all of it. More plausible is that most people will believe that mass testing is valid & informative. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if regular testing for something using a technology as described by Gates will, at some point, become embedded in the control matrix.
Best wishes
Mike
Linked :
https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1883262345247658221
Complete thread:
https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1883258938097090612
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon, April 25, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1138
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1139
I’m formally confident that acute respiratory illnesses that we call colds and flu (“influenza like illnesses) are not caused by submicroscopic infectious particles called viruses & are not contagious.
For a number of other diseases which are attributed to viruses, such as “HIV/AIDS” & “Polio”, I’ve followed the trail of evidence far enough to also state that there is no evidence that they’re caused by such viruses.
On the contrary, and like “Covid-19”, they are more correctly termed syndromes (since the claimed symptoms vary to an extraordinary extent) and are misattributions of a collection of other illnesses. In each case, people really are ill. It’s just that the diagnosis is wrong and not viral, either.
I’ve read of the failures ever to meet reasonable isolation expectations for any virus.
Speaking as a man on the Clapham omnibus, I have learned enough to say I think viroLIEgy is wholly fraudulent.
Speaking as Dr Mike Yeadon, PhD, I haven’t done enough personal, detailed research to be sure that viruses don’t exist, though I suspect that it’s true.
I make the distinction because I think people have a right to know whether I’m speaking as an experienced scientist or as a thoughtful but inexpert person. If I make a claim without qualification, it would be reasonable for a 3rd party to expect me to be able to produce chapter & verse on numerous important claims about allegedly viral illnesses and, in many cases, I couldn’t do that. I’d be relying on others testimony.
I do have the evidence & have read primary literature on respiratory illnesses and selected others.
I’m also securely of the opinion that global pandemics of severe illnesses are impossible. That’s a central lie which I now regard as an obvious untruth.
It’s been a strange and bumpy journey. The strangest thing is showing clever people the evidence underwriting my current position on acute respiratory illnesses & finding them unmoved by it.
There have been some who’ve travelled along similar roads to the same conclusions. I believe Dr Jonathan Engler is one. There are numerous other people who I believe are sincere, so I’m not going tomorrow pick on them, yet still speak as if the propaganda of a lifetime remains intact. It’s maddening & I am unable to account for that.
Interestingly, one person years ago confessed to me that they didn’t want to believe what I was telling them, because it was simply too frightening. It’s possible that psychological protection mechanisms prevents some of us from accepting new information. I think we are much more subconsciously active beings than we realise. We then rationalise consciously those things our subconscious has processed (or not).
This may be why many of us have found it impossible to persuade others, even those we love & have known for many years, that we’re being lied to & are under extraordinary attack. I’m not a psychologist either, so I’m unsure what’s really going on when I failed to convince my older sister, who has a PhD in a biological field, that the pandemic is a long planned fraud.
There are some people who act as if they believe that all we need to do is assert that viruses don’t exist and the scales will fall from humanity’s eyes and the battle will be over. My own empirical evidence is that this is among the least successful ways of approaching the undoubtedly thick layers of infectious diseases. Holding this opinion prompts some of them to claim I’m working for the perpetrators. I cannot help that.
I think this is pretty much where my thinking is at present.
For avoidance of doubt, neither PCR based diagnostics, tests for what are claimed to be antibodies to certain infections disease causing agents, and vaccines (without reservation) are all fraudulent.
The underlying illnesses are real, which is why the lies are so effective.
Best wishes
Mike
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
The Magic of Enzymes
PCR Reagents Breakdown Part 1
Feb 08, 2025
“ ( … )
Conclusion
In the first instance when specifically talking about PCR, which is why we are here, I have to make this point if it hadn’t occurred already; They are putting French Pressed Bacteria in ALL PCR assays. This is occurring in any iteration of making Tac Polymerase which is either directly squished out of Thermus Aquaticus or its juices are squirted on E-coli and then squished out, so contain the juices of a couple of Bacteria.
This poses quite a problem when they use PCR for detecting Bacteria, which they are more and more frequently doing as discussed in my previous article here. They claim it is “purified” removing the “DNA” but when they verify this using EXACTLY the same methods of Gel Electrophoresis and the only difference is where a dyed band appears on a block of jelly you start to see the wholesale quackery of even the first letter of the Acronym, PCR.
They make HUGELY specific claims about how these magical Enzymes work, from denaturing proteins using a never ending supply of energy to being able to READ a sequence of nucleotides and find the correct nucleotide to join in a sequence. Despite this, you can just replace these enzymes with things you can find in your kitchen cupboard, like lemon juice and it works just the same. So they quite clearly are A. Not Specific and B. Just a condition or environmental buffer agent like pH, Temperature or pressure or electro-chemical gradients (Mg2+…) etc.
The rate of reaction is really the selling point behind what these magical juices can do, but school level science is all you need to know that rate is affected by all of these environmental conditions and substrate concentrations anyway.
In my opinion these aren’t wondrous free energy everlasting catalysts, this is juice being squeezed out of hot pond scum that is used in a cheap magic trick to add another layer of deceit and unnecessary bafflement to basic chemical reactions.
( … ).”
Full article :
https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/the-magic-of-enzymes
…………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Conversations under the article linked above :
……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
David S, February 9, 2025 :
https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/the-magic-of-enzymes/comment/92293452
Let me see if I understand what you are saying. They are using components of bacteria to test to see if bacteria is present. But they are introducing components of bacteria so even if bacteria wasn’t present, they have introduced it as part of the test so the test always comes up positive? That might sound stupid. I hope I’m not way off but I’m just trying to boil this down to something I can understand and share. I got the part about how they identify things (enzymes for example) as being present by introducing other things that produce the same effect as the thing they are looking for would produce. Then claiming that the predictably similar result is proof that the thing they were looking for is present. Sounds more like gaslighting than science. Do I have any of this right?
……………………………….
Jamie Andrews, February 9, 2025 :
https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/the-magic-of-enzymes/comment/92301326
Yes that's it... gaslighting instead of science
…………………………………
Question Everything! , February 9, 2025 :
https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/the-magic-of-enzymes/comment/92123980
It would be interesting to see a PhD try to respond to your points, one by one. Have you attempted to engage with any of the defenders of this supposed dogma?
………………………………..
Jamie Andrews, February 9, 2025 :
https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/the-magic-of-enzymes/comment/92166219
I leave this information open for any criticism.. 1000s of "phd's" have had superficial criticisms but none have ever provided a full scientific rebuttal.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Older conversations with Jamie Andrews :
…………………………………………………………………………………………….
Jamie Andrews, January 12, 2025 :
https://substack.com/@controlstudies/note/c-85743750
The Virology Controls Studies Project
The Answer to the poll put out: “Do you think the results of the PCR test are RANDOM?”
A: No, if it were correlating with NOTHING in the sample then the Negative Control of Water with the reagents would also register positive.
VIDEO : https://substack.com/@controlstudies/note/c-85743750
……………………………
Research Integrity, January 12, 2025 :
https://substack.com/@researchintegrity/note/c-85746292
You can get something from water only sometimes. After a certain procedure with 40+ cycles. According to the explanation of Dr. Jerneja Tomšič.
……………………………
Jamie Andrews, January 12, 2025 :
https://substack.com/@controlstudies/note/c-85746518
The Virology Controls Studies Project
yes as explained in some cases the reagents design are so bad that they produce invalid results…
This is talking holistically is it possible to produce “Non Random” results
………………………
Cynthia Bowers, January 13, 2025 :
https://substack.com/@cyndeejoan/note/c-85985719
Jamie I see that cancer biopsies are done using PCR tests now. As someone who has a beloved family member diagnosed with a non melanoma skin cancer I am horrified. He may be undergoing unnecessary radiation treatment after docs scared him to death.
Makes me wonder how many of these turbo cancers aren’t cancers but PCR positives and it’s the treatment that kills.
………………………..
Jamie Andrews, January 13, 2025 :
https://substack.com/@controlstudies/note/c-85987463
The Virology Controls Studies Project
Hi Cynthia
Sorry to hear about your family member.
Yes you touch upon a very good point. The PCR is NOT JUST for viruses... It IS the linchpin of the allopathic medicine fraud for diagnosing LOTS of "diseases" for the sole purpose of administering dangerous chemicals and drugs.
They have started to do it with Bacteria too... even though it is possible to see them with a microscope.. thus they can fabricate "bacterial infections" and as you point out even more scarily with cancer.
If your family member feels well I would reccomend staying well away from anyone with PCR tests amd a fistful of drugs.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
The website "Bird's Eye View" collects evidence of medical fraud.
On this wonderful website ( see below ), you will find the collected evidence of medical fraud since 2020. As is the case in science, some older findings contained here would normally have to be subsequently revised. Nothing is stable, and the findings and their conclusions in particular turn out to be fluid over time. One of the examples that is no longer current here concerns the "Covid" PCR test. It is now considered certain that the PCR test produces no less than 100% false results. It is not only the case that the detection technology contained in it is a fraud, but also the assignment of the test results to the respective disease is based on invented criteria that correspond less to reality than to the wishes of profit-oriented cartel medicine. "Covid" is the best example of this because it is the most understandable, because this disease never existed.
And what about PCR tests in relation to other diseases? The answer is: exactly the same. Why? Because such tests can only be used to replication the information of the biological material, but never for diagnostic purposes. The reproduced small biological fragments cannot provide any information about whether the person being tested was sick, is sick, or whether they may become sick later. But there is also another, important reason: the biological material sought may be a pure invention and not necessarily correspond to reality. Up to this point, my arguments correspond to conventional medicine.
But we can go even further and consider the existence of viruses to be entirely invented. Then the fraud appears even more monstrous. I agree with this view because I have invested enough time in this topic and have been able to get to know the deceptive mechanism of conventional medicine in this regard. However, I would like to point out that the latest fraud can also be explained on the basis of official medicine. Wherever I can, I try to argue from both sides and state that this is possible. The "Covid" fraud can be explained from several perspectives. The principles of conventional medicine can be used as arguments to prove that both the alleged "Covid" disease and the alleged "pandemic" contradict the principles of conventional medicine. However, with a worldwide "virus" fraud in the general sense (i.e. not exclusively with the alleged "SARS-CoV-2 virus"), things are somewhat different. We often lack the imagination to understand how it is possible to deceive almost all scientists for such a long time. This is why it is a topic that requires some time to understand. But wasn't it similar with the "Covid" scam? Many had to first understand the PCR test scam, and also read about the deadly hospital protocols, etc., to understand what was going on. As for "No virus", the willingness to learn the details is just as essential. Here, too, the scam can be unravelled step by step.
Sorry, I got off-topic.
The website linked below contains a link to a study in which Dr Mike Yeadon, among others, took part. Dr Yeadon will probably interpret the results contained therein somewhat differently today than he did back then. Please bear this in mind when reading. The link to the website I wrote about earlier - Bird's Eye View,- is a little further down.
The study :
Bird's Eye View
https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/farcical-fraudulent-use-of-pcr-testing
Bird's Eye View has created a wonderful website that is constantly being expanded :
Covid-19 Reporting Corruption & Fraud – Censorship & Suppression of Evidence & Testimony – Measurement and Data Integrity Issues – Misinformation & Manipulation of Reporting – Propaganda & Narrative Control
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Afterword
Paul Youngs, December 31, 2024 :
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/the-scam-started-five-years-agoso/comment/83814521
The scams started decades ago, thankfully the Convid scam was a step too far and woke millions of people up. Now they can scam all they like, they showed their hand and the game is up. It's a fight to the finish where humanity wins and the globalist cabal collapses.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
For the most reliable information about the "Covid" scam and deceptions of the system, read Dr. Mike Yeadon's daily statements :
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr. Yeadon's videos, only two browsers are recommended : Yandex and Mojeek. But you can also try other, smaller browsers, too.
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
Many statements and videos from Dr. Mike Yeadon can also be found on Suavek's Substack, which is recommended by Dr. Yeadon on the main page of his Substack.
Both links lead to Suavek`s Substack :
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Thank you Dr Yeadon for staying in the fight through much extreme difficulty, stress, new awakenings, and at times, attack. You, and very few others, helped keep me fighting these years. Much appreciation.
Being Wrong book info: https://g.co/kgs/4W6uPXn