The Age of Depopulation -PART 8 : When imagination fails to grasp the obvious intent to harm... Foreword : "On the silence of doctors" - by Dr. Mike Yeadon.
Clare Craig and her letter to Professor Lawton.
Foreword
On the silence of doctors
By Dr. Mike Yeadon, November 12, 2024 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/2068
In case anyone has doubts that the gene-based injections can cause harm, this article will help settle your mind.
Inadvertently, the article also strengthens my contention that the design choices made in forming these injections were done with the knowledge that several of these weren’t risks but certainties.
Regrettably, that seems to have passed the author by entirely.
If it’s “to carry the audience to where they can accept what they’re being told”, I wonder which decade will it be appropriate to be more direct.
Best wishes
Mike
Linked : https://open.substack.com/pub/drclarecraig/p/dear-professor-lawton
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Editor's note :
Despite the fact that this article falsely speaks of the existence of "Covid" and gives a lot of credence to the pharmaceutical industry's documents (we don't really know which synthetic proteins the administered mRNA actually encodes - everything that is not part of the self is toxic), it is a particularly insightful description of the actual harmful effects of the alleged "Covid vaccination".
When imagination fails to grasp the obvious intent to harm, then the title I chose for the article series "TOXIC BY DESIGN" is obviously not sufficient to reflect reality as it is now. That is why I am publishing this article in the article series “The Age of Depopulation”. Here, physician Dr. Clare Craig presents well-founded findings showing that almost all components of the alleged “Covid vaccination” must cause harm, which cannot be a coincidence. But she still cannot express the intention of the supranational perpetrators to harm. The reasons for the failure remain unclear to us for the time being, as her own personal matter, but I think that this is irrelevant here. To describe the mechanisms of toxicity, she has written a perfect paper that helps many people understand the situation. For this, we all owe her a particularly heartfelt, thank you. The fact that she provides her knowledge on the basis of conventional medicine and does not go beyond her academic knowledge plays no role here, in my opinion. The intention to cause harm can be proven in various ways, including by using the claims of conventional medicine dictated by the pharmaceutical companies. I call this "fighting with the enemy's weapons", which can often prove to be very effective. The most important thing, Dr. Clare Craig describes with brilliant perfection, is the toxicity mechanisms. They are quite something. The points that Dr. Clare Craig does not connect in her article can be made by the readers, even laypeople, themselves.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
A fragment of the article linked by Dr. Yeadon :
……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Dear Professor Lawton,
A letter explaining the situation you find yourself in
Photo : Dr. Clare Craig
Nov 03, 2024
“( … )
3. These “vaccines” used novel technology
“Vaccine” is a very powerful word. We are told they are “modern medical miracles” and they are almost synonymous with “safe and effective”. They are drugs like any other and should be treated on merit not as sacred cows.
a) Lipid nanoparticles
The mRNA drugs used lipid nanoparticles which were first designed as a drug delivery system in the 1990s. The first gene therapy to use RNA delivered in lipid nanoparticles was approved by the FDA in 2018. Lipid nanoparticles were specifically designed, for conventional gene therapy, to reach every part of the body and to enter the nucleus of a cell. These people need a working gene to be delivered to cells throughout their body and lipid nanoparticles were therefore optimised to be able to reach every organ. However, the pharmaceutical companies found that repeated dosing led to problems with toxicity. Because of this Novartis, Merck and Roche abandoned the platform. Katalin Karikó, vice president at BioNTech said, “I would say that mRNA is better suited for diseases where treatment for short duration is sufficiently curative, so the toxicities caused by delivery materials are less likely to occur.” Moderna and BioNTech decided to focus their technology on vaccines instead - because, they claimed, with vaccines repeated dosing is not necessary and the toxicity issues can be avoided. The irony of this is not difficult to see.
The first approved vaccines using this system were the covid vaccines. The CEO of Pfizer commented that “mRNA was a technology that had never delivered a single product until that day.” Before the covid vaccine trial there were 285 people who had been administered mRNA vaccines, all in the last few years and all in a clinical trial setting. Severe adverse events, which are reactions that cause hospitalisation, disability or are life threatening occurred in between one and twelve percent in these small trials. The primary safety concerns regard liver toxicity and inflammatory and immune reactions but these types of lipid nanoparticles can also cause direct cell death in a laboratory setting. Charged LNPs can make the energy generating centres of the cell, the mitochondria, leaky. The consequence could be cell death but where the cell survived it would struggle to produce the energy needed for normal cell function. In fact, one of Pfizer’s lipid ingredients ALC-0159, did not comply with European quality standards and MHRA did not disclose the way they had assessed its safety. The covid vaccine trials did not include a group given only LNPs so the extent of toxicity remains poorly measured.
The damage inside the cell from LNPs is of little importance if it is destined to die. However, not all LNPs contain mRNA and so not all affected cells will die. A study by McGill University and Moderan was set up in 2023 to “verify how many LNPs carry a payload such as mRNAs for vaccines.” Around 9,000 different proteins are produced in increased amounts in response to LNPs. The effect is complex but highly inflammatory with numerous neutrophils coming to the injection site - effectively internal pus. In contrast only 2,000 genes are upregulated in symptomatic covid. The quantity of LNPs in a single human dose of Moderna given intranasally is enough to kill 154 mice within 24 hours. For comparison, the dose of inhaled plutonium needed to cause the same level of death, over a 30 day period rather than 24 hours, would have to be four times as high.
( … ).”
Full article ( highly recommended ! ) :
https://open.substack.com/pub/drclarecraig/p/dear-professor-lawton
……………………………………………………………………….
The comments under the article by Dr Clare Craig :
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Jonathan Reece, November 5, 2024 :
https://drclarecraig.substack.com/p/dear-professor-lawton/comment/75619654
Your point is well taken: the information was indeed difficult to find. ... not, however, due to the efforts of many people who tried to put it out, but due to the variety of censorship techniques employed to keep it from ready view.
…………………………………
Jonathan Reece, November 5, 2024 :
https://drclarecraig.substack.com/p/dear-professor-lawton/comment/75618976
Thank YOU! Now I can stop feeling guilty about not having done a systematic exposition of the information, as you have kindly and diligently done an excellent job.
I'd like to suggest an addition to section 10 "Long COVID or long vaccine".
In Western Australia and Queensland, "islands within an island", COVID didn't arrive until 9 months AFTER THE "VACCINE", so the usual rise in all-cause mortality (etc) shortly after the "vaccine" rollout could not be attributed to the virus. See Andrew Madrey's paper.
…………………………………………………………………..
Tony, November 5, 2024 :
https://drclarecraig.substack.com/p/dear-professor-lawton/comment/75576014
Dr Craig, would it be not be clearer to say to someone like Professor Lawton that the use of TRANSFECTION (Moderna, Pfizer) and TRANSFORMATION (Astra Zeneca, J&J) in healthy humans was and is criminal?
These well known, standard lab bench technologies have been used for decades in cell culture and animal models (subsequently sacrificed) to put a FOREIGN protein where it should not be.
Regardless of protein purity, automimmunity, is an inevitablity. Surely, every other point downstream of this very basic fact is irrelavent and these methods should never be used in healthy humans?
…………………………………………………………………………………………….
Baldmichael, November 4, 2024 :
https://drclarecraig.substack.com/p/dear-professor-lawton/comment/75512489
Baldmichael's Letter from Engla…
Many thanks for this. Long covid is long vaccine and anothing else one may care to mention. People have been poisoned for a long time yet 'Doctors are baffled' still after 4 plus years of Covid nonsense.
The doctors are just plain thick as two short planks or even thicker.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/long-stupid?utm_source=publication-search
…………………………………………………………………………………………….
Roger Hall, November 13, 2024 :
https://drclarecraig.substack.com/p/dear-professor-lawton/comment/76963822
So reading this I conclude that there were well known risks relating to the technology and ingredients being used yet for what ever reason these known risks were ignored by all and sundry. I read about the failure of all the previous drugs trying to utilise mRNA technology prior to the vaccines being manufactured under this technology so my family and myself avoided the jabs and I'm not scientifically trained, so it begs the question if I as a lay person could identify the already known risks what the heck were all the highly qualified scientists at Pfizer/Moderna etc doing? If I want to make flat bread then I don't add yeast - basic cookery - and surely the same basic principles apply to drug manufacturing?
……………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, November 12, 2024 :
https://drclarecraig.substack.com/p/dear-professor-lawton/comment/76887063
I’ve said it scores of times in videos.
It’s extremely frustrating that when I go on to say this is unquestionably intentional, people change the subject, including Dr Craig.
………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, November 12, 2024 :
https://drclarecraig.substack.com/p/dear-professor-lawton/comment/76874355
None of these harms were a surprise to a number of us. Along with Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, I warned in an open letter to the head of the European Medicines Agency that numerous toxicities were readily anticipated. We hadn’t half the problems that actually occurred, but worked out why they happened in many but not all cases.
As a former research executive in Pfizer, I’ve been warning continuously for almost four years that these harms are designed in intentionally. Molecules are not assembled randomly. Every atom is included for a reason and those reasons include altering potency, longevity, ease of distribution, stability, different pharmacological properties, avoiding toxicities etc etc.
Molecules don’t enter toxicology testing let alone clinical trials without exhaustive internal review. There’s not a shadow of doubt in my mind that several inevitable toxicities were obvious to numerous senior staff in research, drug safety evaluation and early clinical research, at very least. They were to me and Dr Wodarg before mass administration began.
The open letter was censored intensely and it’s authors subject to smearing and personal censorship which continue to this day.
I was involved in “rational drug design” for over 30 years and I also am qualified in mechanistic toxicology. I offer my opinion as backed by specific training and experience which bears directly on the subject of intentionality vs bad luck.
Mistakes Were Not Made.
I do need help to make the point. I’m downcast that I’m almost the only qualified person saying it.
Best wishes
Mike
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, November 12, 2024 :
https://drclarecraig.substack.com/p/dear-professor-lawton/comment/76875343
The poor man was injured by these ghastly preparations which I’ve been warning for four years were DESIGNED INTENTIONALLY to cause precisely these harms.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, November 12, 2024 :
https://drclarecraig.substack.com/p/dear-professor-lawton/comment/76883920
The injections succeeded in their objectives, to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors.
There was no pandemic, no public health emergency, no new illness. All fraud.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
BioNTech/Pfizer and the EMA Knew the Vaccines were Toxic
Updated August 4th 2024
Jan 03, 2024
Full article :
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/biontechpfizer-and-the-ema-knew-the
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Planned Genocide
Editor`s note : This interview does not constitute proof of genocide. The real proof lies in the construction of the bioweapon called “vaccination” and in the statistical figures of excess mortality since 2021. No amount of propaganda can cover this up any more.
Michael Yon Uncovers the Truth Behind Global Chaos
"Time to call out ANY doctor/scientist/politician, even on the good-guy side of things for calling the “COVID” injections "vaccines" instead of weapons."
"Put on your big boy/big girl pants and call them what they bloody are: Weapons."
Full Interview :
https://rumble.com/v5i7sxm-michael-yon.html
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Dr. Clare Craig ( Pathologist ) shares shocking revelations of how the FDA Pfizer vaccine trial for 6 months to 4 year old children was conducted.
Video / Source :
https://substack.com/@heroarchetype/note/c-77090902
https://substack.com/@heroarchetype
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Afterword
by Suavek
Propaganda never sleeps
I will probably have to write a separate article later about the comments under Dr. Clare Craig's article. Many readers know that such articles attract an astonishing number of pharmaceutical trolls who want to portray us all in a false light. Compared to 2020/2021, the means of propaganda have become much more refined. These agents of the perpetrators also learn something over time. Many now disguise themselves as benevolent scientists who supposedly care about enlightenment. Only upon closer inspection, which unfortunately takes some time, do they turn out to be willing tools whose real interest is limited to the topic of their own salary. Because their arguments are very limited in the face of overwhelming evidence, they often appeal to the emotions of readers and operate with constant repetition of their ridiculous claims. However, this topic can only appear in one of the next articles. One thing in advance: I distrust anyone who criticizes with flimsy justifications those enlightenment figures who point to the non-existence of “Covid” and expose the entire medical fraud. These paid people regularly portray those who have blood on their hands as "heroes of enlightenment" and drag the names of the real enlightener through the mud. It is the largest information war of all time, and the perpetrators have unlimited financial means for this purpose. They are the ones who have the power to create money and can print any amount of money at the price of paper. Accordingly, the number of such paid agents is not small.
The phenomenon of trolls delving into one or two medical topics, posing as "scientists" and talking about them is a relatively new phenomenon that I have not observed in such numbers before 2024. It is not surprising that both sides can learn something over time. The propaganda tools are becoming more and more sophisticated. Only the criticism of the important enlightener remains very transparent. The flimsy arguments, without corresponding evidence, are not difficult to expose.
As the truth comes to light, more and more paid individuals are hired by the perpetrators. Sometimes you can spot these people by their exaggerated repetition of the only topic they have learned, and sometimes you can't spot them at all.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
For the most reliable information about the "Covid" scam and deceptions of the system, read Dr. Mike Yeadon's daily statements :
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr. Yeadon's videos, only two browsers are recommended:
Yandex :
and Mojeek :
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
Many statements and videos from Dr. Mike Yeadon can also be found on Suavek's Substack, which is recommended by Dr. Yeadon on the main page of his Substack.
Both links lead to Suavek`s Substack :
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Photo : Dr. Clare Craig
Defer appears to be the "theme" of the stream on the information highway.
Defer, defer, defer, defer, defer . . . .
"If you tell a lie long enough . . . . "
Goebbles Effect. Just saying.