How is it possible to interfere medically with something so fundamental as fertility in the young and not be inflicting a range of toxic effects and mental/emotional disorders?
We observe primitive communities and snigger at their need to mutilate for ceremonial and other purposes. Then we perform our own shotgun mutilations certain to change bodily and thus mental functions far beyond what was purposed...and we call them medical procedures.
In World Revolution - The Plot Against Civilisation by Nesta Webster (1921), the author shows that the first plan for a dramatic population control program in the modern world was by the French revolutionaries. They conceived of their plan to deal with a purported over supply of labor after they had abolished many religious holidays and thus increased the working days in the year. They planned for a dramatic reduction of population similar to what the Georgia guidestones outlined. Doesn't a need to reduce the population due to an oversupply of labor sound similar to the fantasies we hear about AI replacing most workers??
Her book also shows an almost unerring similarity of concept from the first illuminati group's papers through all of the 19th century revolutionary movements. Point by point their own writings demonstrate a continuity of thought that is ignored by most historians. If you have trouble believing that a conspiracy for world government could possibly exist, you should read her book and then come back and explain to me how so many communist plans for world revolution were exactly modelled on Weishaupt's plan to destroy all kings, religions, and the family.
This is a brilliant and critical historical analysis well worth reading and deeply pondering; the author's sources are quite impeccable and he remains objective and self-critical in his deep analyses ; a great deal of his historical exposition is directly related to the state of our present day situation and how we arrived at the human condition we now find ourselves immersed in.
Wow! I’m going to spend my entire Sunday going thru all these movies and references. Takes me back to the 2001 novel by John LeCarre. , “The Constant Gardener”. Not only the greatest Love story of all time—the movie is even better, but apparently he turned down Knighthood as he desired to spend the last years of his life promoting “Causes”. (Which his government wouldn’t take kindly to.) The New World Order and Pharmacuitical Companies are examples of them. And you offer the same valuable history and information. Thanks.
If anyone doubts Kissinger's devotion to the cause of population control, recall that he oversaw the US invasion and war making on Vietnamese peasants that featured the murder of (depending on where one reads) 2 million to 6 million "rice eaters". These "planners" are totalitarian misanthropes.
I still somehow recall as a late teenager asking people a trick question, already knowing the answer. Why are people starving in India (or where ever). Invariably the response: "Because of over population", I would then recite population per square mile statistics I had memorized for a handful of capitalist market economies of the West, including among them Holland (I forget the others now). The population density of Holland and other such capitalist countries was markedly higher than in starving "over populated" economies apprasied everywhere as proper 'compassionate' and 'centrally planned' (government-run) systems. I witnessed silence and bewidlered disbelief.
China's economy is largely state-run, but quite successful. We don't know how many starvation deaths there would have been in India back then if the economy there hadn't been any government control at all. Thank you for the many thought-provoking comments. Best regards,
Thank you for your characteristically polite reply Suavek. We won’t setttle this here, but China’s economy while suffering quite a lot of state intervention and command-control “direction” (similar in some importaant ways to Mussolin’s state run fascism but Chinese not Italian)…China is a huge makrket economy. It is not laissez faire by a long ways—no such place exists today—but it is mostly a market economy. The Chinese communist party retains it rakae off and special privileges while, for the last 45 years, China’s huge population has entered for the first time in a very long time the internationla division of labor. That is why China has become nearly the largest economy in the world. Everyone is and has been hustling to make money—to innovate, copy and cheat, build, invent, make knockoffs cheaper and faster, etc. It is the incoporation of hundreds of millions into the division of labor that has raised living standards and wealth in China, and this change was brought about by a great reduction in state involvement in economic strangulation.
I tried posting the comment (well) below, in the comment section to an article in the British on-line magazine The Expose News (wait for it, this is amusing). The Expose News had just posted a SHOCKING EXPOSURE--an article announcing the lockdowns had killed more children than covid, or something. My comment submitted today was instantly blocked by "The Expose" to their readers as spam. I wrote the "editor" or whomever asking about this and await their...or maybe her...response. I think my interpretation is valid, since The Expose News again instantly blocked my subsequent 6 word (polite) message as spam. But I know why. A couple days ago, I had written a 3 or 4 paragraph explanation about non-isolation and therefore non-proof of covid (and other viruses). This was in response to more shocking...Shocking news about covid abuses. Probably my brilliant little 3 P essay had already been deep sixed. Now I am on their enemies list. (Applause line).
If any here want to annoy--no, no I mean educate--the Expose News people, feel free to submit my comment as your own to comments section of one of their annoying covid "exposes". (Oh wait, is that legal? Better check with your solicitor--lawyer). Maybe just comment as you want to. They'll have to delete those one by one...hard work for Brave Expose Warriors.
Before I get carried away with my new victim status, I admit I am not a paid subscriber to The Expose News. I just wanted to use their stupid space as a means of getting word out, which they don't like. "Fer Chrissakes, we need paying subscribers not conspiracy theorists!" But why would I pay them to spread drivel?
Anyway, Here's my Famous Comment Heard 'Round the Globe' (sorta')...The magazine web address is Theexposenews.com
"Here are some of the latest posts you need to see!" exhorts The Expose. Open Expose, and the first article displays the headline "Covid response killed more children than covid, UK Covid Inquiry hears"
This raises a question. What is a "covid death" and how do they know it was caused by "covid"? Clinically, any symptoms at all or none at all are said to be characteristic of "covid". So how do they discover covid in people? By testing with Polymerase Chain Reaction which they say looks for the presence of particular "genetic sequences" said to be contained in Sars Cov 2. Lots of people have been "tested" for covid, and many tested postive. So when one dies after having tested postive, that's a "covid death". Huge numbers tested means many postives and quite a few "covid deaths".
But how do they know what genetic seqeuences are contained in what they call sars cov 2 virus? Well, if they had a purified specimen of this thing they could extract any genetic sequences from it, just as they have done with tiny protein molecules, and bacteriophages and bacteria among other studied things. But wait: They have no pure specimen of the thing they tell us is killing people.
Surely this must be discredited as dumb bell "conspiracy theory". It just has to be. Well, read this perfectly written article by science intellectual Samantha Bailey, MD of New Zealand. She explains clearly why it is that they have never isolated Sars Cov 2 "virus", and so have never extracted from this thing any genetic sequence to test for in people. Lacking an isolated purified specimen means no one has ever proven the existence of Sars Cov 2 virus. Not corona virus....nor any other virus since none have ever been isolated!
If you do not get why isolation of some imagained virus is prerequisite to proving anything virusey, that's okay. I didn't get it either a few years ago. Just read Sam's easy to comprehend article and feel the scales being lifted from your eyes. Happy reading. Happy Day!
And another point...
How is it possible to interfere medically with something so fundamental as fertility in the young and not be inflicting a range of toxic effects and mental/emotional disorders?
We observe primitive communities and snigger at their need to mutilate for ceremonial and other purposes. Then we perform our own shotgun mutilations certain to change bodily and thus mental functions far beyond what was purposed...and we call them medical procedures.
Very astutely stated!
Beautifully made point Robert. Thank you.
In World Revolution - The Plot Against Civilisation by Nesta Webster (1921), the author shows that the first plan for a dramatic population control program in the modern world was by the French revolutionaries. They conceived of their plan to deal with a purported over supply of labor after they had abolished many religious holidays and thus increased the working days in the year. They planned for a dramatic reduction of population similar to what the Georgia guidestones outlined. Doesn't a need to reduce the population due to an oversupply of labor sound similar to the fantasies we hear about AI replacing most workers??
Her book also shows an almost unerring similarity of concept from the first illuminati group's papers through all of the 19th century revolutionary movements. Point by point their own writings demonstrate a continuity of thought that is ignored by most historians. If you have trouble believing that a conspiracy for world government could possibly exist, you should read her book and then come back and explain to me how so many communist plans for world revolution were exactly modelled on Weishaupt's plan to destroy all kings, religions, and the family.
The book is available for free on archive.org https://archive.org/details/worldrevolutionp00webs
This is a brilliant and critical historical analysis well worth reading and deeply pondering; the author's sources are quite impeccable and he remains objective and self-critical in his deep analyses ; a great deal of his historical exposition is directly related to the state of our present day situation and how we arrived at the human condition we now find ourselves immersed in.
Wow! I’m going to spend my entire Sunday going thru all these movies and references. Takes me back to the 2001 novel by John LeCarre. , “The Constant Gardener”. Not only the greatest Love story of all time—the movie is even better, but apparently he turned down Knighthood as he desired to spend the last years of his life promoting “Causes”. (Which his government wouldn’t take kindly to.) The New World Order and Pharmacuitical Companies are examples of them. And you offer the same valuable history and information. Thanks.
If anyone doubts Kissinger's devotion to the cause of population control, recall that he oversaw the US invasion and war making on Vietnamese peasants that featured the murder of (depending on where one reads) 2 million to 6 million "rice eaters". These "planners" are totalitarian misanthropes.
I still somehow recall as a late teenager asking people a trick question, already knowing the answer. Why are people starving in India (or where ever). Invariably the response: "Because of over population", I would then recite population per square mile statistics I had memorized for a handful of capitalist market economies of the West, including among them Holland (I forget the others now). The population density of Holland and other such capitalist countries was markedly higher than in starving "over populated" economies apprasied everywhere as proper 'compassionate' and 'centrally planned' (government-run) systems. I witnessed silence and bewidlered disbelief.
Hello Rider,
China's economy is largely state-run, but quite successful. We don't know how many starvation deaths there would have been in India back then if the economy there hadn't been any government control at all. Thank you for the many thought-provoking comments. Best regards,
Suavek
Thank you for your characteristically polite reply Suavek. We won’t setttle this here, but China’s economy while suffering quite a lot of state intervention and command-control “direction” (similar in some importaant ways to Mussolin’s state run fascism but Chinese not Italian)…China is a huge makrket economy. It is not laissez faire by a long ways—no such place exists today—but it is mostly a market economy. The Chinese communist party retains it rakae off and special privileges while, for the last 45 years, China’s huge population has entered for the first time in a very long time the internationla division of labor. That is why China has become nearly the largest economy in the world. Everyone is and has been hustling to make money—to innovate, copy and cheat, build, invent, make knockoffs cheaper and faster, etc. It is the incoporation of hundreds of millions into the division of labor that has raised living standards and wealth in China, and this change was brought about by a great reduction in state involvement in economic strangulation.
Like dominoes my illusions fall. Strangely even this….requires my consent.
I tried posting the comment (well) below, in the comment section to an article in the British on-line magazine The Expose News (wait for it, this is amusing). The Expose News had just posted a SHOCKING EXPOSURE--an article announcing the lockdowns had killed more children than covid, or something. My comment submitted today was instantly blocked by "The Expose" to their readers as spam. I wrote the "editor" or whomever asking about this and await their...or maybe her...response. I think my interpretation is valid, since The Expose News again instantly blocked my subsequent 6 word (polite) message as spam. But I know why. A couple days ago, I had written a 3 or 4 paragraph explanation about non-isolation and therefore non-proof of covid (and other viruses). This was in response to more shocking...Shocking news about covid abuses. Probably my brilliant little 3 P essay had already been deep sixed. Now I am on their enemies list. (Applause line).
If any here want to annoy--no, no I mean educate--the Expose News people, feel free to submit my comment as your own to comments section of one of their annoying covid "exposes". (Oh wait, is that legal? Better check with your solicitor--lawyer). Maybe just comment as you want to. They'll have to delete those one by one...hard work for Brave Expose Warriors.
Before I get carried away with my new victim status, I admit I am not a paid subscriber to The Expose News. I just wanted to use their stupid space as a means of getting word out, which they don't like. "Fer Chrissakes, we need paying subscribers not conspiracy theorists!" But why would I pay them to spread drivel?
Anyway, Here's my Famous Comment Heard 'Round the Globe' (sorta')...The magazine web address is Theexposenews.com
"Here are some of the latest posts you need to see!" exhorts The Expose. Open Expose, and the first article displays the headline "Covid response killed more children than covid, UK Covid Inquiry hears"
This raises a question. What is a "covid death" and how do they know it was caused by "covid"? Clinically, any symptoms at all or none at all are said to be characteristic of "covid". So how do they discover covid in people? By testing with Polymerase Chain Reaction which they say looks for the presence of particular "genetic sequences" said to be contained in Sars Cov 2. Lots of people have been "tested" for covid, and many tested postive. So when one dies after having tested postive, that's a "covid death". Huge numbers tested means many postives and quite a few "covid deaths".
But how do they know what genetic seqeuences are contained in what they call sars cov 2 virus? Well, if they had a purified specimen of this thing they could extract any genetic sequences from it, just as they have done with tiny protein molecules, and bacteriophages and bacteria among other studied things. But wait: They have no pure specimen of the thing they tell us is killing people.
Surely this must be discredited as dumb bell "conspiracy theory". It just has to be. Well, read this perfectly written article by science intellectual Samantha Bailey, MD of New Zealand. She explains clearly why it is that they have never isolated Sars Cov 2 "virus", and so have never extracted from this thing any genetic sequence to test for in people. Lacking an isolated purified specimen means no one has ever proven the existence of Sars Cov 2 virus. Not corona virus....nor any other virus since none have ever been isolated!
If you do not get why isolation of some imagained virus is prerequisite to proving anything virusey, that's okay. I didn't get it either a few years ago. Just read Sam's easy to comprehend article and feel the scales being lifted from your eyes. Happy reading. Happy Day!
Why Nobody Can Find a Virus – Dr Sam Bailey
God Bless You All & Your Efforts! 🙏