Life as a kamikaze - The Europeans for the interests of the US financial elite. And how useful is the toxicity of mRNA for war ?

No exit on the NATO highway to the great war. By Rainer Rupp.

Jul 20, 2024

Life as a Kamikaze - The Europeans for the interests of the US financial elite

Foreword

By Suavek

How useful is mRNA for war ? An explanation as to why I changed the title of the article.

The intentionally harmful effect of mRNA technology is beyond doubt. This is not only proven by the statements published in this Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon, but also by the results of the studies before the introduction of the bioweapon, i.e. before the end of December 2020, its deceptive approval with the involvement of the NATO military and the unwillingness to remove these harmful substances from the market. There was therefore no protection of citizens from injury. The old, well-known rule of immunology speaks volumes: the immune system not only destroys the synthetic proteins expressed by the body's cells, but also those body cells that express these foreign proteins. An error in the design of the bioweapon known as a "vaccination" is therefore ruled out.

We still remember very well the order in which this substance was injected. First, the bioweapon became mandatory for medical personnel. Immediately after that, the military and police were forced to be vaccinated. Considering that the resulting brain damage makes it difficult for people to orientate themselves, this arrangement may not have been a coincidence. The "vaccinated" person could thus be degraded to a willing instrument of power, unable to question the meaning of his activity. At this point, I am thinking of micro-thrombosis in the brain, as one of the known effects of mRNA technology, and of the fact, known from the beginning, that NLP overcomes the blood-brain barrier, so that the mRNA will also cause damage to the brain. The micro-thrombosis reduces the ability to think and makes the "vaccinated" person more or less disorientated when it comes to somewhat more complicated assessments of reality. I have seen it several times how a well-educated "vaccinated" person, instead of accepting the clear results of the studies as evidence, simply said: "I don't believe that". Such brain damage caused by micro-thrombosis is often referred to as "brain fog" and thus trivialized. A fog is something that only lasts for a short time and then disappears on its own. However, thrombosis does not disappear on its own.

The article published below describes NATO's warlike plans, in which the European nations are to be abused not only financially but also as cannon fodder against their own interests in order to protect the interests of the US financial elite. The question that arises at this point is: How precisely was the mRNA damage planned if the military plans seriously assume that the Europeans will risk their lives and sacrifice their own children for the foreign interests of US high finance? Is such a calculation even possible without the brain-damaging micro-thromboses? In order to prove the perpetrator's intent, the ancient Romans already asked themselves this question : Cui bono ? ( Who benefits from this ) ?

In the article published below, Rainer Rupp explains many things that hardly anyone else has been able to put so well. Above all, he explains how the differences in interests between the international elites and the people came about. That is why I consider the article to be particularly valuable.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Original title translated : No exit on the NATO highway to the great war - Part 2. ( In German : “Keine Ausfahrt auf NATO-Schnellstraße in den großen Krieg” -Teil 2 ).

By Rainer Rupp. Published on July 19, 2024 by APOLUT : https://apolut.net/keine-ausfahrt-auf-nato-schnellstrasse-in-den-grossen-krieg-von-rainer-rupp-2/ Part 1 of this text can be found here (1)

A translation into English

A comment from Rainer Rupp

In August 1998, the private espionage and analysis service Stratfor published a lengthy report on the stunning success of US President Bush's "New World Order (NWO)". Stratfor himself was surprised that, despite the unilateralism of the USA, the NWO had quickly developed into a global hit, (quote) “a vision that was shared by a large part of the world elite” . The NWO has undoubtedly created “a new quality” in relations between capitalist states.

“All nations were now sensible” – and submissive to the USA

The success of this “New World Order ideology,” according to Stratfor, was that fundamental political disagreements between nations, that is, between the elites of the nations, had disappeared. Instead of ideological disputes, all the elites of the major nations now agreed on fundamental principles

“Market economy and civil democracy, promotion of globalized finance and markets unite”.

Accordingly, all “reasonable people,” regardless of country, agreed that economic growth and prosperity, which primarily benefited the elite, trumped all other interests. Therefore, everyone had a great interest in not disturbing this new international stability. (To explain: Stratfor is talking here about nothing other than prosperity for the elites of the US client states under the Pax Americana regime)

The only international problems facing the United States and its allies, Stratfor continued, were "rogue states" such as Iraq and North Korea, or the threat of internal instability in states such as North Korea. E.g. in Yugoslavia and Somalia due to civil war or outbreaks of international terrorism. But according to Stratfor, these were only “marginal problems” . Because

“all other nations were now sensible. “They all recognized the need to ensure that rogue states were prevented from unsettling financial markets through civil wars or the spread of terrorism.”

Since the elites of all nations “within the framework of the NWO have an equal interest in maintaining well-functioning financial markets, they were therefore also prepared to assist the USA in solving the marginal problems (see Yugoslavia, Iraq and Somalia)”. In order for the international financial markets to function optimally, the US-led NWO, according to Stratfor, gave absolute priority to the task of making the international economic system an internationally level playing field. Because if globally operating companies do not have the opportunity to act as they see fit without restrictions from tariffs, national regulations, currency restrictions and investment obstacles, profit maximization is not possible.

Therefore, this task has been delegated to a group of multilateral organizations, such as: B. the International Monetary Fund IMF, the GATT (since replaced by the World Trade Organization (WHO)), the World Bank, the OECD and, last but not least, NATO. These organizations “all serve the same purpose and they have done a very good job ,” praised Stratfor.

For the US analysis service, it was also “self-evident” that the United States, as the world's leading nation, also plays a special and crucial role in determining the missions of the UN and other multilateral organizations.

“However, since all nations now share the same fundamental interests, it follows that no rational nation will oppose U.S. leadership and decisions.”

(Note: When Stratfor speaks of “sensible nations,” this always refers to the upper leadership layers, i.e. the so-called “elites.”)

The European dimension of the NWO

The extent to which this US ideology of the NWO has found fertile ground, particularly in the EU, can be seen in the person of Robert Cooper. Cooper began his career as a senior adviser to British Prime Minister Tony Blair. From there he went to the EU and became “Director General for Foreign and Politico-Military Affairs” in the General Secretariat of the EU Council and thus had constant contact with ministers and heads of state. In this role, Cooper also significantly shaped the philosophy of “the development of European security and defense policy,” according to Wikipedia . For this he was later knighted by the Queen and showered with medals and honors by virtually all the governments of the EU member states.

Medals and honors for what? For demands like these from his first book, which were then promptly implemented in the EU, under benevolent US supervision:

“We need a new kind of imperialism, an imperialism that is compatible with human rights and cosmopolitan values: an imperialism that aims to bring order and organization.”

After the US/NATO war of aggression against Yugoslavia, which violated international law, Cooper distinguished between two types of “new imperialism” : Firstly, there is what he calls “ voluntary imperialism” , whose sponsors are the supposedly “democratic” (!) institutions of the Western world are, like the “International Monetary Fund” (IMF) or the “World Bank” .

According to Cooper, these institutions bring “help to all those states that want to voluntarily find their way back into the global economy of the international community . ” This means nothing other than that all those states that bow and are prepared to have their economic, social and societal constitution dictated to them by the undemocratic, NWO-controlled institutions IMF and World Bank need not be afraid of “humanitarian” Bombings.

However, Cooper threatens all other states that do not voluntarily submit to the NWO with “good neighborly imperialism” , meaning that “responsible” states, e.g. the USA, France, Great Britain or Germany, first impose economic and political coercive measures and then, if that has been of no use, intervene militarily to prevent instability in the global village so that the financial markets are not frightened.

As a shining example of “good neighborly imperialism,” in Kosovo in his 2002 book “The Postmodern State and the World Order.” successful “humanitarian intervention” Cooper points to NATO’s The NATO protectorate established there shows like no other example how well order and organization” . “the new colonialism” (!) can bring.

In many writings and speeches over the years, Cooper further developed the EU doctrine of “new, liberal imperialism” . when dealing with so-called problem states In doing so, he underlines “the need for double standards” . A further increase comes in his next book, “The Breaking of Nations” (in German: “ How to make nations compliant” ). There it says:

“Europeans should operate among themselves on the basis of law and common security. But outside Europe they should use the harsher methods of earlier times - violence, pre-emptive strikes, underhandedness and whatever else is necessary. Because if we are in the jungle, then we have to apply the laws of the jungle”;

im Original: “When in the jungle, one must use the laws of the jungle.”

According to another Stratfor analysis, this version of the New World Order worked very well for the US for a while. The international elites were also able to benefit from this. There were also “no notable conflicts among the elites of the nations involved”. This gave rise to the well-known phrase that “democracies do not wage wars against each other . ”

Troublemaker Russia

While the Yeltsin regime still ruled in Russia, the West saw good opportunities to draw Russia into this US-led new world order.

But then came the Russian financial collapse in 1998/99, during which there was no help from the West and the IMF and World Bank stood by and watched Russia's collapse. This inaction on the part of the West, combined with the barely concealed anticipation of Western vultures about rich prey in the form of the gigantic raw material deposit of Siberia, gave Russia's future development a decisive push in a different direction. Because it encouraged new emerging political forces in the country that did not see Russia's future in the West.

“Equal partnership” in the 1990s? What It Really Was: Clinton-Yeltsin Transcripts

In the chaos wrought by Western advisors to the Russian government in conjunction with local oligarchs, the seed emerged that became the NWO's most powerful adversary over the next 25 years. And 85 percent of the Russian population supports their President Putin. At the same time, Russia, which has resurfaced economically, morally and militarily, has proven to be an insurmountable adversary against the US-led, “rules-based order” , which is what the New World Order, which was launched in 1991, is called today. At the same time, Russia, together with its strategic partner China, has become a beacon of hope for many countries in the Global South that want to free themselves from the predatory grip of the Western neo-colonialists.

No Plan B: On the expressway to war

And now we come back to the situation in Ukraine described at the beginning. By now it should also have become clear why the political, media, scientific and military elites in Europe had and have no problem disregarding the vital interests of their own peoples, as long as they themselves are doing well and they have the backing of the friendly elites in Europe and across the Atlantic.

The most important thing for these people is the financial markets, from which they all benefit greatly. Despite the catastrophic economic situation in all countries of the collective West, the stock exchanges there are constantly reaching new highs thanks to monetary policy manipulation, which further enriches the elites, while the working population becomes increasingly poor due to the simultaneous devaluation of money.

German fantasies: defeating Russia

Thanks to their willing presstitutes, the elites still manage to fool the majority of the population into believing that they have everything under control, whether in Ukraine, in fighting inflation, in economic growth, etc. But the moment when reality lifts the veil of Lying, which tears apart manipulation and sugarcoating, is inexorably approaching.

The longer this tragic development continues, the fewer options remain to save or alleviate the situation. The West has reached its breaking point. For the first time in decades, deep fault lines are now emerging between elites in the West at both national and international levels. Realists and pragmatists want to negotiate with the Russians, while extremists like the warmongers mentioned above are flirting with a direct exchange of arms between Russia and NATO.

The current situation in Ukraine, which is being used as a battering ram by the West and is destroying itself in the process, can be outlined as follows:

First: Russia clearly had the upper hand on the battlefield from the start, whether militarily, or in terms of strategy and tactics, or in reserves, or in the level of training and morale of the soldiers, or in the support and unity of the Russian population. Ukraine has long since lost, even if it can continue fighting in self-destructive madness for some time. What is clear, however, is that Ukraine is running out of time.

Second, Ukraine's leadership, despite its weakness, remains unwilling to enter into negotiations to end the war on terms acceptable to Russia. Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly reiterated that Moscow remains open to talks in principle, but not on the basis of “wishful thinking” but based on the realities on the front lines.

The Kiev regime's lack of flexibility is not surprising. For President Vladimir Zelensky personally and at least for his core team, with defeat inevitable, there is little chance of surviving the catastrophe they have inflicted on their country. They were compliant tools of the anti-people warmongers in Washington, whose goal was and is to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia. They have all failed and will fall by the wayside.

And thirdly: at least in NATO Europe, after the failure of the Ukraine project, there is a possibility that the elites there will also fall by the wayside because they sold out the vital interests of their own peoples in support of Washington's strategy and led them into economic misery.

A collapse of the Ukrainian front will make it impossible for the Western elites to maintain their current lies. Even the most gullible sheep in the West will turn away from the ruling elites in politics and the media. The latter rightly fear the day on which the turning point of reckoning begins.

The West is destroying itself

The Western elites, in their detachment from reality, never considered that their original, wishful thinking plans to destabilize Russian society and strategically weaken the Russian military could fail. Therefore, they have no plan B. They have no way out, which is why they become more and more panic-stricken.

panic

In fact, the Western thought games and the public discussion of the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine can only be explained as panic. Plans to send Western ground troops to Ukraine fall into the same category of advanced madness, bringing us a giant step closer to the Great War. The problem is that the high-handed Western elites, in the ecstasy of their certainty of victory, have failed to plan an exit from the abyss on their highway to the great war.

Sources and notes

Parts I and II are based on the manuscript of a speech that Rainer Rupp gave on March 23, 2024 in the HoffART Theater Darmstadt. The event was organized by the regional group “NachDenkSeiten” and the “Deutscher Freidenker-Verband eV”

(1) https://apolut.net/nicht-ausfahrt-auf-nato-schnellstrasse-in-den-grossen-krieg-von-rainer-rupp/

Thanks to the author for the right to publish this post.

Original image from article by Rainer Rupp :

Image source: Tatyana Mi / Shutterstock.com

Afterword :

by Suavek

I am only unsure about one single statement in this article. Is there really no Plan B? The medical fraud has been planned and prepared in detail for over 20 years. How can we be sure that in the event of an "emergency" for the war against Russia, no special sacrifice by Europe was planned as a Plan B? In my opinion, Rainer Rupp's articles are among the best in the German-speaking world. I do not think that he will underestimate the psychopathic greed of the elites and describe their plans as halfway mindless. Perhaps he simply wanted to point out a kind of stupid arrogance on the part of the elites. However, I see serious preparations for war in Poland, Estonia, Germany and France. Typical psychopathic thinking has always been to play the "all or nothing" game, especially when the real risk is borne by others. Could this be "Plan B"? Although I am an optimist by nature, I tend to answer this question in the affirmative.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………