Half-truths are particularly perfidious. The truth is never in the middle. A guest article by Peter Haisenko.
"The masses have never thirsted for truth. Of the facts that displease them, they turn away and prefer to idolize error ( ... )" - Gustave Le Bon
Foreword
by Suavek
Refuting insane claims is the main purpose of this Substack. The reason I rush to write here while putting my personal affairs on hold is simple. We don't know when the censorship will strike and how long we can continue to fight back against the lies. In this world gone mad, tomorrow is uncertain. The aim of this article is similar, to refute the misleading claim that evidence of lies within the freedom movement, such as the lie about "Covid", will divide this movement.
What foolishness to speak of a "hard-won consensus", as if the truth could be determined by a collection of corrupt individuals, i.e. quasi-democratically. This is what the lackeys of the perpetrators claim, who naturally want to take the lead in this movement. In many cases they were installed in this movement at an early stage, so that they were able to win a lot of sympathy with their criticism of the system. However, their job also includes claiming that "Covid" exists in order to protect the perpetrators from responsibility for their criminal actions. This claim, which they cleverly incorporate into the criticism of the system, as ordered by those above, under professional direction, is one of the most perfidious lies we can imagine. This lie has a name, and it is simply: “THE HALF TRUTH”.
Please consider this article as a kind of additional contribution to this one :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-and-dr-jonathan-engler
………………………………………………………………
A guest article by Peter Haisenko.
The laws mentioned here concern the German scope of application.
Original title, translated into English :
The truth is never in the middle
Original title in German : Die Wahrheit liegt niemals in der Mitte
Source in German : https://apolut.net/die-wahrheit-liegt-niemals-in-der-mitte-von-peter-haisenko/
The translation :
by Suavek
By Peter Haisenko
When discussing what the truth is, a cowardly way out will be taken by the person who recognizes that he cannot coherently defend his version but does not want to admit that he is wrong. He takes refuge in the phrase, “the truth probably lies in the middle . ” This must be contradicted because the truth cannot be determined democratically.
I am not entering into the discussion here as to whether there is even an absolute truth. I am of the opinion that these considerations should also form the prerequisite for not having to recognize an objective truth as such if it does not suit someone. Half-truths are also particularly perfidious. By that I mean a lie that is tied to a small, convenient truth. Churchill put it this way: “In war, the truth is so precious that it should never appear other than with a bodyguard of lies.” This statement shows that there is indeed a truth and at least Churchill knew this truth. This mixing of lies and truth is a close relative of “the truth is probably in the middle ,” if not the prerequisite for it.
Two truths can never contradict each other
This is what Galileo Galilei (1564 - 1642), Italian mathematician, philosopher and physicist, said in a letter to Pietro Castelli on December 21, 1613. So we have a measure of truth and it is universal. It also applies if one takes the truth as a function of the point of view. If the truths considered differ from each other, the viewing angles must be compared in order to be able to see that these two truths do not contradict each other. You can see this as an example in the following two pictures. But these also show that the truth cannot lie in the middle in these cases either. However, this realization requires the will of both observers to find out whether their different viewing angles can find agreement.
9 and 6 are two viewing angles of the same medal. So the truth is both 9 and 6, but not in the middle, which would be 7.5.
“If there is no truth for man, then ultimately he cannot distinguish between good and evil.” Pope Benedict XVI.
You can think whatever you want about this Pope, this statement is elementary. Conversely, it means that those who want to see the truth in the middle do not want to be able to distinguish between good and evil. Needless to say, it can only be evil that is not interested in the truth. Yes, this relegated to a gray area of indeterminacy to disguise its evilness; to put this into perspective. Anyone who is not prepared to get to the bottom of the truth, retreats into the claim that the truth lies in the middle, wants to prevent one from being able to distinguish between good and evil. This opens the door to Orwellian (1984) conditions that turn concepts into their opposite. “War is peace” and so on.
Truth, lies and violence
The real power is the silence you impose on another. If you look at how in the West, with “political correctness”, more and more language bans have made simple and clear language taboo, it is becoming increasingly difficult, even dangerous, to even say simple truths. There are already high penalties for using one's natural gender in a salutation, or one can be sued for calling an obese person fat, even though that is the objective truth. Theodor Fontane already had something to say about this in the 18th century:
“The reason people are silenced is not because they lie, but because they speak the truth. When people lie, their words can be used against them. But if they tell the truth, there is no other antidote than violence.”
This violence has been used in the Federal Republic of Germany from the beginning. Areas have been defined within which it is forbidden to even search for the truth, under pain of heavy prison sentences. I remind you of Section 130 “Incitement to Incitement”. It is precisely in these areas that it is inadmissible to accept the truth in the middle. For example, if someone claims that Hitler did not murder any Jews, then no one is allowed to say that the truth lies in the middle, i.e. three million murdered Jews. But that means that the state is in possession of the absolute truth or at least acts as if it were so. We must recognize that double standards are also applied when dealing with the truth. At one time it should lie in the middle and at another time the absolute truth is arranged. Neither one nor the other is conducive to finding the truth.
“ Fact checkers” determine the truth
The ÖRR’s “fact checkers” ( editor´s note : ÖRR is the abbreviation of German public broadcasting ) also claim this absolute truth. They decide whether someone was telling the truth. A subsequent discussion about this is not planned, simply impossible. Again, a truth is arranged and it is never in the middle. But if there is a discussion about what the truth is, things look different. If the more or less ordered “truth” is recognized as untenable, then one takes refuge in the “truth that is supposed to lie in the middle”. This means that everyone can continue to believe what they want. You can locate yourself in the entire spectrum between the “two truths” without really having to take a stand, even for yourself. At this point I remind Pope Benedict that it is then no longer possible to distinguish between good and evil; this distinction is subject to arbitrariness.
But it's not necessarily about truth or lies. Finding the truth also includes not suppressing or censoring news, truths. Why is news or opinions censored? Or even forbidden to get information wherever you want? Why, for example, is RT, Russia Today, banned from the German Internet? Theodor Fontane already knew the answer to this, see above. I also see the point in the fact that it is difficult to claim that the truth lies somewhere in the middle between the Russian view and that spread by the system media in the West. So you would admit that your own “truth” is not the only truth. As a result, violence has to be used in order to avoid even having to start the discussion about how much truth is contained in the different representations. Here too, a truth in the middle is not permitted and must not exist as soon as one side claims the sole truth for itself.
Does the “truth in the middle” create peace?
So we see that the cowardly saying that “the truth probably lies in the middle” is then applied as long as it is not a commanded truth. It is used when one side has actually recognized that its position is untenable, but does not want to admit it. How many times have I had to observe that a discussion is ended with exactly this stupid saying in order to avoid an embarrassingly precise determination of the truth, which would probably end in defeat. Most of the time, this type of termination is accepted by the other side simply to establish peace without having to humiliate the other side. Because this is also a factor with which the middle-truth claimant wants to avert the humiliation that would be inevitable if all the arguments were explored.
Now one might think that this compromise in the middle would bring peace. That's the case for the moment, but not in the long term. The question remains open as to what the truth is and so it remains an eternal source of conflict, an intentional gray area. Nor is it possible to find the truth in a democratic process. Truths cannot be voted on, although this has become common practice these days. “The vast majority of scientists agree ,” it states. Yes, according to the prevailing belief, the Earth was once a disk at the center of the universe. Until someone, yes someone, was able to prove that this was not the case and they were treated in the same way as “lateral thinkers” are today. With this in mind, I'll end with a humorous observation: Shit can't taste bad - billions of flies can't be wrong! And here too the truth cannot lie in the middle. There is a truth for flies and a truth for humans, and the latter is the relevant one for us humans.
Gustave Le Bon
Sociologist and one of the founders of mass psychology,
in his most famous work "Psychology of the Crowds" .
“The masses have never thirsted for truth.
Of the facts that displease them,
they turn away and prefer
to idolize error if it can seduce them.
Anyone who knows how to deceive them will easily become their master.
Anyone who tries to enlighten them is always their victim."
…………………………………………………………………..
Sources and notes
Thanks to the author for the right to publish the article.
+++
This article first appeared on November 5th, 2024 at
+++
Image source : mohamed_hassan / shutterstock
+++
Please recommend us and feel free to share our content on social media. You hereby have our consent to share or upload and publish our contributions to your own channels on social media and video platforms.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Afterword
by Suavek
Incorporating a lie into the truth has a long tradition and is an integral part of today's political and medical fraud. The liars know it, and they have always known it, that this trick is one of the most effective. Actually, everyone knows it. And yet today the liars are celebrated as the "resistance fighters". This is only possible because of the almost omnipresent censorship. Otherwise these liars would not have had the slightest chance of being able to gather so many idiots around them.
Oh, excuse me ! Perhaps someone can claim that the truth lies somewhere in the middle, since it can be a "regrettable error" if someone runs like a stupid ox after an (almost obvious) liar ?
Evidence for the non-existence of Covid is found in this Substack in a rarely encountered amount. However, the effectiveness of this evidence depends on you, the reader. Sharing such evidence determines whether the truth prevails in the public consciousness. That is why you are very important. As a Substack writer, I play only a minor role.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
For the most reliable information about the "Covid" scam and deceptions of the system, read Dr. Mike Yeadon's daily statements :
Here you can find Dr. Mike Yeadon and his statements :
Substack by Dr. Mike Yeadon : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
There is also a chat channel connected to the channel linked above, which is managed by his friends : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat
When searching for Dr. Yeadon's videos only two browsers are recommended :
Yandex :
and Mojeek :
Censorship is omnipresent on Google or Safari.
Many statements and videos from Dr. Mike Yeadon can also be found on Suavek's Substack, which is recommended by Dr. Yeadon on the main page of his Substack.
Both links lead to Suavek`s Substack :
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Please don't forget to make fun of the New Idiocracy :
……………………………………….
"Do you swear to tell the truth, part of the truth, or some snippet that's not especially untruthful?"
'The story you are about to hear is kind of true....'
"If the truth hurts, the hell with it."
"The problem with the truth, is it keeps conflicting with what I know."
Academy of Ideas ~ "The Manufacturing of A Mass Psychosis -Can Sanity Return to An Insane World?" ~ 16 minute graphic narrated cited video, April 2021 https://youtu.be/fdzW-S8MwbI?feature=shared
Darn, now I have to look up a new word. Perfidious.