Given the compelling body of evidence that vaccinations are clearly associated with various serious health conditions - asthma, allergies, autism, myocarditis, etc etc - is any work being done on the possibilities for reversing such conditions? Not just treating the symptoms with more chemicals, but reversing what caused the conditions, undoing the damage done by whatever was injected? The human body seems to have such remarkable healing capacities that, beyond understanding the association of toxic injections with adverse health conditions, one must wonder whether there may be some way to help/allow the body correct and even reverse the conditions caused by toxic exposure.
The work has been done. It’s just that too few people have heard about it and it is actively suppressed of course but I am pretty sure the elites know about it. It goes under a few different names:
This is a very long video with explanations and examples of the 5 laws. It should play with English subtitles.
This is all based on observation and healing results, very much of it from the now deceased Dr Hamer who was a successful practitioner of this approach to disease and healing.
It’s important to understand that Lanka does not have this gloomy outlook that many people will die from delayed impact from the Covid shots. He thinks that if the body is not impacted fairly quickly by the sometimes very high concentration or pulse of nanoparticles which gets into the blood stream and can overwhelm organs because of toxicity (similar to Marc Giradot’s bolus theory) - if people don’t immediately die from this, but they die later, then it is not directly due to the injections but from some trauma.
Thank you for the excellent series of articles, including the one I have read just now re the 7 studies demonstrating much higher association of illness outcomes for vaccinated versus never vaccinated children. There is a point raised in this article that needs explanation in my opinion, from any who know.
Chidren vaccinated versus the unvaxxed had lower incidence of chicken pox (and another pox condition that I can't spell). Of course, if one is poisoned with injections, the poisoning would show likely up in pox conditions, according to my not-that-well-informed understanding. But there is also a contrary explanation I read months ago but have now forgotten details. The broad idea was vaccination--injecting poisonous material taken from people with a particular condition--lessens the body's response to that particular kind of poisoning. The example that was used to explain this is people who drink a lot of alchohol and also alchoholics experience reduced drunkeness per unit of alchohol intake.
If anyone knows about this in some more detail, I would appreciate readiing their remarks.
You're right, because this issue does indeed require some explanation. I suspect it's due to biased classification of the diseases: If a doctor knows that a child has already been "vaccinated" against chickenpox, they may tend to diagnose the child's symptoms differently, but not as chickenpox.
I've done some research and have to revise my previous assumption. The symptoms of chickenpox are so characteristic that they can hardly be confused with any other disease. The problem, therefore, is likely that chickenpox cases in children who have already been "vaccinated" against it are simply not reported and do not end up in the statistics. If this is true, then this may be a case of doctors prematurely deferring to the corrupt system. But that would be just one possibility. The simplest explanation would be that the statistics of cases considered "breakthroughs" in "vaccinated" children are manipulated, just as we saw with the "Covid" plandemic. In this case, the doctors would have nothing to do with the falsification. The distortion of the statistics could also have various, multifactorial causes. An insider can certainly say more about this than I can.
A slightly different idea that occurred to me here may sound a bit far-fetched, but the biochemical relationships are often much more complicated than one might normally think. I'm trying to go beyond the "either-or" principle here. This could be particularly advantageous in the complex biochemistry of living organisms, which is still difficult to understand :
The harmfulness of vaccines negatively impacts the immune system, especially in childhood. Some point out that this system should actually be called a detoxification system, since apart from toxins there are no other pathogenic particles that can enter the body relatively easily, against which "immunity" would be required or, even stranger, against which the body would have to be artificially "immunized".
Whatever one calls this system, it has been well documented that the "vaccines" harm it and can cause a kind of immune deficiency/ detoxification weakness. This can hamper natural detoxification processes to such an extent that the body develops severe symptoms, and the otherwise harmless route to detoxification (e.g., via chickenpox) unfortunately no longer takes place. So, if other, more serious symptoms develop instead of chickenpox, this does not mean that the vaccine is "effective and efficient." This is just one of the many potential answers to the puzzle, though, and only an expert can either clarify or disprove it.
From my perspective, it seems certain that all vaccines are harmful to varying degrees. Moreover, there is no positive benefit that could be offset against the harm. The statement that "a vaccine is more harmful than beneficial" is, in my opinion, false because there is no benefit at all, only harm. Everything else can only be based on a biased, incorrect statistical calculation. Given that the vaccination theory is false, it would be unexpected, and indeed very strange, that among the countless different "vaccines," two of them could be "effective and effective." Warmly recommended as a reminder : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/the-ultimate-trojan-horse .
Almost no point in my answering, because I am speculating. Here is what I wonder about, based on someone else’s opinion that I read somewhere recently. An habitual drinker requires larger and larger doses to get drunk, as the body adopts to the toxin alchohol. It adjusts to sustain and survive despite this repeated poisoning over time. But the poisoning does have unhealthy effects other than drunkenous, so over time drunks kill themselves.
A vaccine might get the body more used to adjusting to that particular poison, or/and because pox responses are reduced by damaging the body’s ability to detoxify. Meanwhile the toxin, arsenic or whatever, not having been effectively ejected continues to inflict damage.
I don't think your speculations are pointless. Quite the opposite. As long as medical research is only funded to maximize profits and not to improve health, we are dependent on speculation. The habituation effect to a toxin that contributes to the development of a certain disease and then causes a completely different one instead of that disease sounds plausible, but I'm not the one who can confirm or refute it. If we stick with the chickenpox example, we would first need to know which components the chickenpox "vaccine" contains and which of them are related to the development of chickenpox. I find your idea interesting because it might reveal a secret of the pharmaceutical industry, if someone could skillfully confirm it: A small dose of toxin, found among the adjuvants, triggers the habituation effect in the body and shifts the spectrum of disease symptoms to other areas. In this case, it would mean that, contrary to the pharmaceutical industry's claims, the alleged adjuvants actually play the main role in the failed vaccination technology. Confirming this hypothesis would reveal the secret of the vast fraud. This could prove that no dead or living, alleged "pathogenic particles" are the components of the "vaccines," but rather that the adjuvants represent the failed mechanism of action.
It's a well-known fact that the immune system's spectrum of activity is shifted by "vaccines" (e.g., the Ig4 problem with the "Covid" pseudo-vaccine), which could support your hypothesis. The entire immune system is disrupted, so that in the case of "Covid" gene injections, VAIDS can even develop.
Incidentally, the results of the Pentagon's flu "vaccine" study could very well fit this picture. Military personnel suffered increased rates from various newly developed illnesses after the flu "vaccine," some of which were serious, but less from the flu itself.
Sock it to them , Mike. They are unscrupulous traders in disease, injury and death, 100% starting at birth and by design. They are devoid of any empathy for the human misery their sick business model creates. They have done it and got away with it for too long. Now is the time to stop this aberration of science and respect for human life. End it once and for all.
For me , the greatest challenge in waking up/ reading such documents as this , is in facing my own ignorance/participation in this destruction of my/our own children .
And yet , without our support now they do not have a chance.
It’s much easier to admit that we blew it for ourselves , but admitting that we blew it for them…our own , calls for something else entirely.
No process should be too short or too long. Being able to forgive ourselves for the past finally releases the energy previously tied to guilt, so that we have the power to make amends and "move mountains."
This is just further confirmation to me (if any were needed) of the general & deep decline in the western world across all sectors of life. Such decline, corruption, malfeasance, deliberate harm & financial fraud, are operating now at unprecedented rates. All this, alongside propagandizing & states shutting down gradually democratic processes & varied means of imposing accountability on opaque institutions. It's all in serious decline. Things are falling apart. And there are those who see this (a minority) and the majority in near total denial. This deliberate harm of children is surely one of the worst instances of this decline. I feel total admiration for Dr. Yeadon.
The last word.....'either they already know, or won't listen.' So, so sad.
History will treat Mike Yeadon, well. This I'm certain of. Thanks.
I'm so sick of seeing young blokes walking around with that peculiar stamping gait and fixed stare. Now we're allowed to be Tylenol hesitant?
Forget Tylenol, forget hesitant. Time to kick the guts out of the vax pushers...without hesitation.
Onya Mike.
Onya Robert 🤣🤣
Given the compelling body of evidence that vaccinations are clearly associated with various serious health conditions - asthma, allergies, autism, myocarditis, etc etc - is any work being done on the possibilities for reversing such conditions? Not just treating the symptoms with more chemicals, but reversing what caused the conditions, undoing the damage done by whatever was injected? The human body seems to have such remarkable healing capacities that, beyond understanding the association of toxic injections with adverse health conditions, one must wonder whether there may be some way to help/allow the body correct and even reverse the conditions caused by toxic exposure.
The work has been done. It’s just that too few people have heard about it and it is actively suppressed of course but I am pretty sure the elites know about it. It goes under a few different names:
The New German Medicine
The five laws of Biology
Body Soul Biology
Stefan Lanka talks about it here https://odysee.com/@LongXXvids:c/Lanka-interview-Aug-2025:6
This is a very long video with explanations and examples of the 5 laws. It should play with English subtitles.
This is all based on observation and healing results, very much of it from the now deceased Dr Hamer who was a successful practitioner of this approach to disease and healing.
It’s important to understand that Lanka does not have this gloomy outlook that many people will die from delayed impact from the Covid shots. He thinks that if the body is not impacted fairly quickly by the sometimes very high concentration or pulse of nanoparticles which gets into the blood stream and can overwhelm organs because of toxicity (similar to Marc Giradot’s bolus theory) - if people don’t immediately die from this, but they die later, then it is not directly due to the injections but from some trauma.
https://youtu.be/Z57uBCcOdvI
Thank you for the excellent series of articles, including the one I have read just now re the 7 studies demonstrating much higher association of illness outcomes for vaccinated versus never vaccinated children. There is a point raised in this article that needs explanation in my opinion, from any who know.
Chidren vaccinated versus the unvaxxed had lower incidence of chicken pox (and another pox condition that I can't spell). Of course, if one is poisoned with injections, the poisoning would show likely up in pox conditions, according to my not-that-well-informed understanding. But there is also a contrary explanation I read months ago but have now forgotten details. The broad idea was vaccination--injecting poisonous material taken from people with a particular condition--lessens the body's response to that particular kind of poisoning. The example that was used to explain this is people who drink a lot of alchohol and also alchoholics experience reduced drunkeness per unit of alchohol intake.
If anyone knows about this in some more detail, I would appreciate readiing their remarks.
Good evening, Rider,
You're right, because this issue does indeed require some explanation. I suspect it's due to biased classification of the diseases: If a doctor knows that a child has already been "vaccinated" against chickenpox, they may tend to diagnose the child's symptoms differently, but not as chickenpox.
Best wishes,
Suavek
yes, that idea occurred to me too. Thanks Suavek.
I've done some research and have to revise my previous assumption. The symptoms of chickenpox are so characteristic that they can hardly be confused with any other disease. The problem, therefore, is likely that chickenpox cases in children who have already been "vaccinated" against it are simply not reported and do not end up in the statistics. If this is true, then this may be a case of doctors prematurely deferring to the corrupt system. But that would be just one possibility. The simplest explanation would be that the statistics of cases considered "breakthroughs" in "vaccinated" children are manipulated, just as we saw with the "Covid" plandemic. In this case, the doctors would have nothing to do with the falsification. The distortion of the statistics could also have various, multifactorial causes. An insider can certainly say more about this than I can.
A slightly different idea that occurred to me here may sound a bit far-fetched, but the biochemical relationships are often much more complicated than one might normally think. I'm trying to go beyond the "either-or" principle here. This could be particularly advantageous in the complex biochemistry of living organisms, which is still difficult to understand :
The harmfulness of vaccines negatively impacts the immune system, especially in childhood. Some point out that this system should actually be called a detoxification system, since apart from toxins there are no other pathogenic particles that can enter the body relatively easily, against which "immunity" would be required or, even stranger, against which the body would have to be artificially "immunized".
Whatever one calls this system, it has been well documented that the "vaccines" harm it and can cause a kind of immune deficiency/ detoxification weakness. This can hamper natural detoxification processes to such an extent that the body develops severe symptoms, and the otherwise harmless route to detoxification (e.g., via chickenpox) unfortunately no longer takes place. So, if other, more serious symptoms develop instead of chickenpox, this does not mean that the vaccine is "effective and efficient." This is just one of the many potential answers to the puzzle, though, and only an expert can either clarify or disprove it.
From my perspective, it seems certain that all vaccines are harmful to varying degrees. Moreover, there is no positive benefit that could be offset against the harm. The statement that "a vaccine is more harmful than beneficial" is, in my opinion, false because there is no benefit at all, only harm. Everything else can only be based on a biased, incorrect statistical calculation. Given that the vaccination theory is false, it would be unexpected, and indeed very strange, that among the countless different "vaccines," two of them could be "effective and effective." Warmly recommended as a reminder : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/the-ultimate-trojan-horse .
Thank you for reading. Best wishes,
Suavek
Almost no point in my answering, because I am speculating. Here is what I wonder about, based on someone else’s opinion that I read somewhere recently. An habitual drinker requires larger and larger doses to get drunk, as the body adopts to the toxin alchohol. It adjusts to sustain and survive despite this repeated poisoning over time. But the poisoning does have unhealthy effects other than drunkenous, so over time drunks kill themselves.
A vaccine might get the body more used to adjusting to that particular poison, or/and because pox responses are reduced by damaging the body’s ability to detoxify. Meanwhile the toxin, arsenic or whatever, not having been effectively ejected continues to inflict damage.
Hi Rider,
I don't think your speculations are pointless. Quite the opposite. As long as medical research is only funded to maximize profits and not to improve health, we are dependent on speculation. The habituation effect to a toxin that contributes to the development of a certain disease and then causes a completely different one instead of that disease sounds plausible, but I'm not the one who can confirm or refute it. If we stick with the chickenpox example, we would first need to know which components the chickenpox "vaccine" contains and which of them are related to the development of chickenpox. I find your idea interesting because it might reveal a secret of the pharmaceutical industry, if someone could skillfully confirm it: A small dose of toxin, found among the adjuvants, triggers the habituation effect in the body and shifts the spectrum of disease symptoms to other areas. In this case, it would mean that, contrary to the pharmaceutical industry's claims, the alleged adjuvants actually play the main role in the failed vaccination technology. Confirming this hypothesis would reveal the secret of the vast fraud. This could prove that no dead or living, alleged "pathogenic particles" are the components of the "vaccines," but rather that the adjuvants represent the failed mechanism of action.
It's a well-known fact that the immune system's spectrum of activity is shifted by "vaccines" (e.g., the Ig4 problem with the "Covid" pseudo-vaccine), which could support your hypothesis. The entire immune system is disrupted, so that in the case of "Covid" gene injections, VAIDS can even develop.
Incidentally, the results of the Pentagon's flu "vaccine" study could very well fit this picture. Military personnel suffered increased rates from various newly developed illnesses after the flu "vaccine," some of which were serious, but less from the flu itself.
Best wishes,
Suavek
Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.
Sock it to them , Mike. They are unscrupulous traders in disease, injury and death, 100% starting at birth and by design. They are devoid of any empathy for the human misery their sick business model creates. They have done it and got away with it for too long. Now is the time to stop this aberration of science and respect for human life. End it once and for all.
For me , the greatest challenge in waking up/ reading such documents as this , is in facing my own ignorance/participation in this destruction of my/our own children .
And yet , without our support now they do not have a chance.
It’s much easier to admit that we blew it for ourselves , but admitting that we blew it for them…our own , calls for something else entirely.
May God grant us this .
Dear Kaylene,
No process should be too short or too long. Being able to forgive ourselves for the past finally releases the energy previously tied to guilt, so that we have the power to make amends and "move mountains."
Best wishes,
Suavek
This is just further confirmation to me (if any were needed) of the general & deep decline in the western world across all sectors of life. Such decline, corruption, malfeasance, deliberate harm & financial fraud, are operating now at unprecedented rates. All this, alongside propagandizing & states shutting down gradually democratic processes & varied means of imposing accountability on opaque institutions. It's all in serious decline. Things are falling apart. And there are those who see this (a minority) and the majority in near total denial. This deliberate harm of children is surely one of the worst instances of this decline. I feel total admiration for Dr. Yeadon.