The Roulette with Conventional "Vaccinations" -PART 23. Dr. Mike Yeadon links to the evidence of the uselessness and harmfulness of conventional “vaccines.” An article to share.
Dr. Mike Yeadon: I’m not “vaccine hesitant”. I’m formally certain that nobody needs any of them and that they’re variably harmful.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, October 12, 2025 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/3581
I will be seriously impressed if Florida governor DeSantis passes a law repealing the requirement that children be fully vaccinated as a condition of entry into the school system.
I would be further positively surprised if Surgeon General Ladapo issues revised guidance on childhood vaccines, viz that there’s no evidence that they help & plenty that they are injurious to your child’s health.
DeSantis is, according to Floridian friends, sponsored in the usual way & likewise compromised. Ladapo, I couldn’t say. Unquestionably reluctant to act on detailed information I presented to him in 2022, he has nevertheless steadily made himself unpopular with pro-pharma people, and for that I salute him. It’s a personally risky thing to do.
This Substack article lists & briefly describes the findings of the grand total of seven scientific articles examining the differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. The contrast is not subtle. The bulk of chronic illnesses experienced by children occurs in the vaccinated cohort.
Please take time to read this article and to share it with those you care about who have children. And anyone else, really.
Best wishes
Mike
Linked :
Florida’s autism rate set to plummet
There will be nowhere to hide if vaccine mandates are eliminated
Sep 03, 2025
https://open.substack.com/pub/jbhandley/p/floridas-autism-rate-set-to-plummet
( … )
Florida changes all that, because the number of fully unvaccinated children in the state is likely to skyrocket. And, if our community is right, the autism rate will plummet.
Before Florida, it’s been very challenging to evaluate unvaccinated children (because there are so few of them) and yet the studies that have looked have generally found very disturbing results: Unvaccinated kids are…much healthier, according to SEVEN studies that have been published in the scientific literature. Anyone in the scientific community knows that getting a study published that portrays vaccines in a negative light is nearly impossible, which means these studies likely represent a tip of the iceberg.
The first study that compared children who had received a vaccine with children that hadn’t was published in 2000. Although autism wasn’t something the study considered, it was still revealing. Titled “Effects of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis or Tetanus Vaccination on Allergies and Allergy-Related Respiratory Symptoms among Children and Adolescents in the United States,” this study from the UCLA school of public health did look specifically at the DTP vaccine to see if it might be responsible for allergies and allergy-related symptoms, such as asthma. Looking at more than thirteen thousand children, the study found that:
DTP or tetanus vaccination in US children is associated with lifetime history of asthma or other allergies and allergy-related symptoms. . . . Assuming that the estimated vaccination effect is unbiased, 50% of diagnosed asthma cases (2.93 million) in US children and adolescents would be prevented if the DTP or tetanus vaccination was not administered.
So the first study to ever compare a group that received a vaccine with a group that didn’t found a dramatic difference in rates of asthma and allergies among the vaccinated group, so much so that they thought not getting the DTP vaccine might reduce cases of asthma by 50 percent! Note that many children with autism suffer from what are known as comorbid conditions, such as asthma, allergies, and other autoimmune conditions.
( … )
………………………………………
Editor’s note: The author also links to several other studies and discusses their results. The relatively short article seems perfectly edited to me, describing only the most important points. Since I can’t copy everything here, I recommend you read the entire article. Here is only the description of the next study presented by the author. However, the article becomes increasingly interesting toward the end, because the remaining studies also contain strong evidence:
………………………………………..
“Hepatitis B Triple Series Vaccine and Developmental Disability in US Children Aged 1–9 Years,”
( https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02772240701806501?journalCode=gtec20 )
Hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in US children aged 1–9 years
Carolyn Gallagher & Melody Goodman
Pages 997-1008 | Accepted 14 Nov 2007, Published online: 13 Nov 2008
“Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life.”
Journalist David Kirby appreciated the significance of the new findings, writing in the Huffington Post:
[The study] will be among the first university-based population studies to suggest an association between a vaccine and an increased risk for autism. And that would be in direct contradiction to all those MMR and thimerosal studies that purportedly found no such link.
( … )
Full article :
https://open.substack.com/pub/jbhandley/p/floridas-autism-rate-set-to-plummet
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
This conversation attempts to clarify the following passage in the above article :
“ ( … ) The vaccinated were less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDD [neurodevelopmental disorders]. After adjustment, vaccination, male gender, and preterm birth remained significantly associated with NDD.The vaccinated were less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDD [neurodevelopmental disorders]. After adjustment, vaccination, male gender, and preterm birth remained significantly associated with NDD. ( … ).”
…………………………………………………..
Rider, October 12, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-links-to-the-clear/comment/165684272
Thank you for the excellent series of articles, including the one I have read just now re the 7 studies demonstrating much higher association of illness outcomes for vaccinated versus never vaccinated children. There is a point raised in this article that needs explanation in my opinion, from any who know.
Chidren vaccinated versus the unvaxxed had lower incidence of chicken pox (and another pox condition that I can’t spell). Of course, if one is poisoned with injections, the poisoning would show likely up in pox conditions, according to my not-that-well-informed understanding. But there is also a contrary explanation I read months ago but have now forgotten details. The broad idea was vaccination--injecting poisonous material taken from people with a particular condition--lessens the body’s response to that particular kind of poisoning. The example that was used to explain this is people who drink a lot of alchohol and also alchoholics experience reduced drunkeness per unit of alchohol intake.
If anyone knows about this in some more detail, I would appreciate readiing their remarks.
…………………………………
Suavek, October 12, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-links-to-the-clear/comment/165700113
Good evening, Rider,
You’re right, because this issue does indeed require some explanation. I suspect it’s due to biased classification of the diseases: If a doctor knows that a child has already been “vaccinated” against chickenpox, they may tend to diagnose the child’s symptoms differently, but not as chickenpox.
Best wishes,
Suavek
……………………………………
Rider, October 12, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-links-to-the-clear/comment/165703644
yes, that idea occurred to me too. Thanks Suavek.
………………………………………..
Suavek, October 13, 2025 :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-links-to-the-clear/comment/165830759
I’ve done some research and have to revise my previous assumption. The symptoms of chickenpox are so characteristic that they can hardly be confused with any other disease. The problem, therefore, is likely that chickenpox cases in children who have already been “vaccinated” against it are simply not reported and do not end up in the statistics. If this is true, then this may be a case of doctors prematurely deferring to the corrupt system. But that would be just one possibility. The simplest explanation would be that the statistics of cases considered “breakthroughs” in “vaccinated” children are manipulated, just as we saw with the “Covid” plandemic. In this case, the doctors would have nothing to do with the falsification. The distortion of the statistics could also have various, multifactorial causes. An insider can certainly say more about this than I can.
A slightly different idea that occurred to me here may sound a bit far-fetched, but the biochemical relationships are often much more complicated than one might normally think. I’m trying to go beyond the “either-or” principle here. This could be particularly advantageous in the complex biochemistry of living organisms, which is still difficult to understand :
The harmfulness of vaccines negatively impacts the immune system, especially in childhood. Some point out that this system should actually be called a detoxification system, since apart from toxins there are no other pathogenic particles that can enter the body relatively easily, against which “immunity” would be required or, even stranger, against which the body would have to be artificially “immunized”.
Whatever one calls this system, it has been well documented that the “vaccines” harm it and can cause a kind of immune deficiency/ detoxification weakness. This can hamper natural detoxification processes to such an extent that the body develops severe symptoms, and the otherwise harmless route to detoxification (e.g., via chickenpox) unfortunately no longer takes place. So, if other, more serious symptoms develop instead of chickenpox, this does not mean that the vaccine is “effective and efficient.” This is just one of the many potential answers to the puzzle, though, and only an expert can either clarify or disprove it.
From my perspective, it seems certain that all vaccines are harmful to varying degrees. Moreover, there is no positive benefit that could be offset against the harm. The statement that “a vaccine is more harmful than beneficial” is, in my opinion, false because there is no benefit at all, only harm. Everything else can only be based on a biased, incorrect statistical calculation. Given that the vaccination theory is false, it would be unexpected, and indeed very strange, that among the countless different “vaccines,” two of them could be “effective and effective.” Warmly recommended as a reminder : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/the-ultimate-trojan-horse .
Thank you for reading. Best wishes,
Suavek
…………………….
UPDATE:
On October 14, Dr. Yeadon indicated that he liked my first, previous opinion ( see the like below ). Does this mean that the second opinion/second assumption should be rejected? Unfortunately, I don’t know. Although it’s less likely, there’s still the possibility that he hasn’t read the second hypothesis yet. If I learn anything new about it, I’ll add the information here.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Dr. Mike Yeadon, September 14, 2025 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/3398
I was aware of Dr Toby Rogers but I wasn’t following his output anywhere.
So it was extremely interesting to learn a little of his background and of the important work he’s done in publicising the only good evidence there is a longitudinal study of comparative health in children who were vaccinated against those who were not.
All such studies are heavily suppressed and obviously none get funded either from the centre or from well-known, pseudo-philanthropic foundations.
The conclusions are stark. The “vaccines schedule” in USA is unquestionably not only harming our children and grandchildren but is arguably THE most important mechanism for inducing chronic illness, which then persists, often lifelong.
Because it contains many references, you can share it widely.
Anybody who won’t read it, rather than reading it & then possibly arguing about it, is a coward in my book.
Best wishes
Mike
Ps: as I am inclined to do, I have to point out that Toby Rogers speaks as if he believes that viruses are real things which are responsible for causing various diseases, which are contagious. It’s entirely possible that nobody in his network has ever tried to point him towards the unequivocal evidence that neither are true, but are a central point of the viruses, pandemic and vaccine deception.
Linked :
https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/my-opening-statement-to-the-us-senate
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
“I’m not “vaccine hesitant”. I’m formally certain that nobody needs any of them and that they’re variably harmful.”
………………………..
Dr. Mike Yeadon, September 13, 2025 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/3397
Please note the recent date on this order & what it authorises.
Now, it doesn’t suggest that informed consent isn’t required, so we’ve to assume it is, at this time.
But it’s not explicit enough for me. Obviously the entire thing is a crime, but had it said “….this order authorises the offering of treatments and prophylactic products…. I’d have been more chilled about it. It isn’t really any different than before. So, why was it deemed necessary?
I’m not “vaccine hesitant”. I’m formally certain that nobody needs any of them and that they’re variably harmful. It’s all I can do to restrain myself from telling others people I don’t know please not to take their perfect babies & small children to the doctor.
When the topic arises, I do calmly offer my opinion and suggest avenues for parental research. But people seem to fall into two camps: those who somehow already knew & those it’s impossible to tell anything to.
Best wishes
Mike
Linked :
https://substack.com/@drdonhall/note/c-154418241
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Dr. Mike Yeadon, August 2, 2025 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/3194
I can’t tell you how revolting I find this.
A casting company is seeking pregnant women, people with long term health conditions etc to film themselves having contrived exchanges about vaccinations, and are required to be enthusiastic.
If you should ever see such a brief video, know that these are not grassroots, genuinely sincere people. It’s all astroturfing.
Best wishes
Mike
Linked :
https://render.jotform.com/251953027090353
Editor’s note: Such blatant lies are particularly embarrassing for the “quack industry”. After Dr. Yeadon posted a link to this article, it was removed from the internet and is now inaccessible. This screenshot of the advertisement text, which Dr. Yeadon added to the post as a precaution, has survived:
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
UPDATE
Dr. Mike Yeadon, October 13, 2025 :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/3591
This is accurate information. Correlation is not causation but, where there is causation, there will be correlation.
Correlation (…”is not causation”) is a strong call to include or exclude a range of possible causes, not a piece of sophistry.
Best wishes
Mike
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Learning to say ‘No’.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
“Find me a vax-unvax study showing the vaccinated are healthier. Pro tip: you can’t.”
Source : https://substack.com/@drwojakmd/note/c-154286223
Editor’s note: This powerful video is being republished here, on this Substack, for the second time. This is not a mistake, but the intention.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
‘I said my first NO today...’
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
The most reliable information on the “Covid” hoax and the deceptions of the system can be found in the statements of Dr. Mike Yeadon, at the links below :
Dr. Mike Yeadon’s Substack #1 :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/
( Notes : https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/notes )
The Telegram channel of Dr. Mike Yeadon ( other Telegram channels with his name are fake ! ) :
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
A collaborative Substack by Dr. Yeadon and Suavek ( Dr. Mike Yeadon’s Substack #2 ) :
Fraud Prevention Hotline / suavek1.substack.com
DEAR FRIENDS,
The two Substacks, Dr. Yeadon’s and Suavek’s, have merged into a single, highly informative entity. The Fraud Prevention Hotline is now officially Dr. Yeadon’s Substack No. 2. You can find his statement on this at the following link :
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/my-other-substack
We urge you, if possible, to add both Substacks to your recommended list in your Substack. Thank you very much in advance,
Mike & Suavek
………………………………
The possible support goes to Suavek.
You can either do something against or for something :
History will treat Mike Yeadon, well. This I'm certain of. Thanks.
Sock it to them , Mike. They are unscrupulous traders in disease, injury and death, 100% starting at birth and by design. They are devoid of any empathy for the human misery their sick business model creates. They have done it and got away with it for too long. Now is the time to stop this aberration of science and respect for human life. End it once and for all.