Dr. Mike Yeadon and Dr. Paul Craig Roberts - Two statements on the significance of Prof. Denis Rancourt's evidence.

EMPIRE OF LIES.

Suavek

and

Dr Mike Yeadon

Jun 02, 2024

FOREWORD

Dr. Mike Yeadon, June 2, 2024 :

Source : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1408

This compilation by Suavek is particularly chilling, because it combines one of my better, and terse, chains of logic, coupled with subject matter expertise in drug design and toxicity and two other pieces, one from an experienced member of a former US presidential administration and another from an epidemiologist.

Setting aside denialism, which is understandably tempting, it’s very clear what has happened.

I have asked before for your assistance. I cannot reach new people in any number. Censorship will not permit it. I have no means to thwart it. If I did, you should deduce what would happen to me in any case. So it’s over to you. We might survive if you put effort into sharing this very widely. Otherwise, I doubt that we will. I don’t enjoy being “a doomer”. But such is my lot in life at the moment, it seems.

God bless you and your efforts, and also thank you.

Mike

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Dr. Mike Yeadon, December 31, 2023.

A statement in 2 related parts.

Part 1 / Source : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/367 :

Denis Rancourt’s short talk is going viral, because to those knowing even a little about this multi year “pandemic” (there are no genuine examples of similar pandemics, prompting me to conclude they’re all invented) his words ring so powerfully true.

It’s interesting being in some discussion groups where a number of medical doctors maintain there was a pandemic & a novel disease. I’ve long stopped believing that.

One member made their position clear by saying, of Rancourt’s talk, that “It’s gone viral because it’s true”.

Here’s a note I just shared with that group, which is surely about to disassemble itself over the impossible contradiction:

Agreed.

Let anyone who takes a different view please either:

1. Refute Rancourt’s basic analytical methods, findings and conclusions or

2. Offer an interpretation of events that squares the circle of a pandemic of a contagious & somewhat lethal pathogen, notwithstanding Rancourt’s findings.

In the absence of 1 or 2, I must stick with my position, without prejudice to other’s positions.

Like Denis, I’m a scientist and I change my opinions based on evidence and argument. I have done so on a number of occasions through this multi year event.

Meshing with Denis’s observations that there is reproducibly, in more than 100 countries, no increase in ACM (all causes mortality) until the alleged vaccines were rolled out, I have previously described in some detail how & why it was obviously intentional and designed-in to the gene-based preparations that multiple, discrete types of toxicity would occur. I was unable to predict the magnitude of the effects (because toxicity is always about dose or concentration response relationships & there was no data in prior literature to use for calibration purposes) but that harms would occur was never in doubt.

To those who might question whether those who designed & had manufactured these agents necessarily knew they were inherently toxic, I now pull rank. Having worked in the field called rational drug design or structure-based drug design for over 30 years, I know what is commonplace, everyday knowledge of my peers in big pharma and in biotech (having worked at senior level in both) & I’m certain that my peers knew perfectly well what they were doing.

That causing the body to make a non-self protein axiomatically initiates lethal autoimmune attack on every cell performing the instruction is close to Immunology 101. The ability of the immune system to distinguish self from non-self is legendary & unequivocal.

Though I don’t know where “spike protein” comes from & is immaterial for my point, causing the body to manufacture a known toxin is obviously not a good thing.

My third example of intentional toxicity is the use of lipid nanoparticle formulations. These macromolecule carriers have been known for over a decade to deposit their cargoes preferentially in ovaries of every species tested, a property confirmed by experiments conducted for the Japanese market on the Pfizer product. No one reading this can be in any doubt about the likely effect of such a formulation decision.

The extraordinary planning that must have been required to have pulled off this global assault, coupled with the timing of it rules out for me the possibility of a natural emergence of a pathogen. For reasons I’ve argued above in this thread, it’s not necessary for there to have been an additional cause of death in order to create circumstances in which the pandemic claimed could be made to stick. There are several reasons why the bad actor would be most unlikely to release or allow escape of such a pathogen (they would immediately lose control of events, which would be untypical & unacceptable to them).

Notice our leaders were never themselves frightened of interacting with people indoors, maskless, even at the claimed height of the alleged pandemic. “PartyGate” in U.K. led to resignations.

Part 2 / Source : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/368 :

Even Queen Elizabeth II attended a G7 meeting & dinner with dozens of delegates newly arrived into U.K. At 94 years of age, she would statistically have been at notably elevated risk of serious illness and death if she’d acquired the alleged virus.

I am not seeking to persuade anyone to alter their public position but I do want to make clear mine.

Perpetuating the scary virus narrative in the face of this much evidence is inadvertently aiding the perpetrators.

I wasn’t on the ground, so I’m not saying there weren’t local medical events that were most unusual. I am saying that such local events were not representative at all of the wider situation, which was of a deeply evil, highly planned event incorporating unprecedented military grade psychological operations by governments against their own citizens, accompanied by changes to treatment protocols that led to mass deaths. Knowingly meaningless PCR-based “diagnostic” methods were an important part of the deception.

This evidently is not only about injuring & killing people. There’s much evidence of coordinated damage to the economies and financial systems including the sovereign currencies of numerous countries and regions.

There’s been much talk of digital IDs & CBDCs almost everywhere, neither of which have a conceivable purpose other than as a control system. Changes in property rights laws have recently emerged in “The Great Taking”.

We should anticipate further “emergencies”. Some might be real, others mere propaganda, but still effective in driving behaviours.

I note with great concern that there have been announcements about factories to manufacture very large amounts of so-called mRNA vaccines all around the world. Several government have said that they’ve already agreed terms to acquire sufficient doses to inject every citizen a further ten times. Given all mRNA-based preparations will be toxic, it doesn’t take much imagination to evaluate what the intended end game of the perpetrators is.

Best wishes

Mike

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration, associate editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, columnist for Business Week, the Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has testified before Congress on 30 occasions. His unparalleled website, www.PaulCraigRoberts.org, has millions of visitors every year.

I read his articles with enthusiasm long before 2020. They usually didn't contain much text, but he always got to the heart of every topic. As a tireless speaker, I should have learned from him back then to use concise language. But I neglected to do so because I didn't know that I would later write articles myself, and in English at that...

Here Paul Roberts takes a clear stance on the devastating medical fraud and mass murder. His article is much more detailed and longer than usual. After all, it is a topic that can be a matter of life and death, provided you know something about it.

I would like to thank Paul Craig Roberts for permission to publish his article.

— Suavek

The “Covid Pandemic” Was an Orchestration

Paul Craig Roberts

Institute for Political Economy

July 27, 2023.

Source : https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2023/07/27/the-covid-pandemic-was-an-orchestration/

The Covid Pandemic Was an Orchestration

Paul Craig Roberts

The American Medical Establishment, a collection of corrupt enemies of human health bought and paid for by Big Pharma, continues to explain away the enormous sudden deaths and health injuries following the Covid Vax injections as “coincidences.”

Medical science knows no such thing as massive numbers of coincidences. If everything is a coincidence, there cannot be tests.

What has happened is that Big Pharma and the medical authorities on its payroll and sharing its patents, together with media flush with Big Pharma advertising funds, and politicians flush with Big Pharma campaign contributions, have created a false narrative that covers up the mass murder and health injury caused by an orchestrated “covid pandemic” in which the only people who died from Covid were infected patients denied treatment with Ivermectin and HCQ.

Treatments were prohibited. Otherwise the emergency use authorization of the deadly “vaccine” was impermissible. Emergency use of an untested vaccine requires no known effective cures. So the medical establishment declared the known cures to be “horse medicine” dangerous for human use.

With the exception of the world’s leading medical scientists, everyone else seems to accept the totally false official narrative of the “Covid pandemic.” As I have previously written, the utter insouciance, stupidity, and gullibility of Western peoples mean that they have set themselves up for the next “pandemic” already promised by Bill Gates.

It grows increasingly difficult to be optimistic that the accountability of power can be re-established.

Here is the most important article available about Covid:

There Was No Covid Pandemic. There Was Orchestrated Mass Murder.

Heed the Voice of Science, not the Voice of Propaganda

https://www.globalresearch.ca/there-was-no-pandemic-dr-denis-rancourt/5824976

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

The books of Paul Craig Roberts :

The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West (English Edition)

Disclaimer :

Permission to reprint Dr. Roberts’ columns does not imply that Dr. Roberts endorses the websites or media organizations that republish his columns or that he approves of the content of the websites, media outlets or books that republish his columns.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Prof. Denis Rancourt

There Was No Pandemic.

By Prof Denis Rancourt

Global Research, November 15, 2023

Denis Rancourt 22 June 2023.

I would like to thank both Denis Rancourt and Global for allowing me to publish this article.

— Suavek.

Source 1 / Directly in the article there is an option to automatically translate it into many languages :

https://www.globalresearch.ca/there-was-no-pandemic-dr-denis-rancourt/5824976

Source 2 / Original article on Substack by Prof. Rancourt :

https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/there-was-no-pandemic :

There Was No Pandemic

Denis Rancourt

Jul 02, 2023.

This is radical.

The essay is based on my May 17, 2023 testimony for the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) in Ottawa, Canada, my 894-page book of exhibits in support of that testimony, and our continued research.

I am an accomplished interdisciplinary scientist and physicist, and a former tenured Full Professor of physics and lead scientist, originally at the University of Ottawa.

I have written over 30 scientific reports relevant to COVID, starting April 18, 2020 for the Ontario Civil Liberties Association ( ocla.ca/covid ), and recently for a new non-profit corporation ( correlation‑canada.org/research ). Presently, all my work and interviews about COVID are documented on my website created to circumvent the barrage of censorship ( denisrancourt.ca ).

In addition to critical reviews of published science, the main data that my collaborators and I analyse is all‑cause mortality.

All-cause mortality by time (day, week, month, year, period), by jurisdiction (country, state, province, county), and by individual characteristics of the deceased (age, sex, race, living accomodations) is the most reliable data for detecting and epidemiologically characterizing events causing death, and for gauging the population-level impact of any surge or collapse in deaths from any cause.

Such data is not susceptible to reporting bias or to any bias in attributing causes of death. We have used it to detect and characterize seasonality, heat waves, earthquakes, economic collapses, wars, population aging, long-term societal development, and societal assaults such as those occurring in the COVID period, in many countries around the world, and over recent history, 1900-present.

Interestingly, none of the post-second-world-war Centers-for-Disease-Control-and-Prevention-promoted (CDC‑promoted) viral respiratory disease pandemics (1957-58, “H2N2”; 1968, “H3N2”; 2009, “H1N1 again”) can be detected in the all‑cause mortality of any country. Unlike all the other causes of death that are known to affect mortality, these so‑called pandemics did not cause any detectable increase in mortality, anywhere.

The large 1918 mortality event, which was recruited to be a textbook viral respiratory disease pandemic (“H1N1”), occurred prior to the inventions of antibiotics and the electron microscope, under horrific post-war public-sanitation and economic-stress conditions. The 1918 deaths have been proven by histopathology of preserved lung tissue to have been caused by bacterial pneumonia. This is shown in several independent and non-contested published studies.

My first report analysing all-cause mortality was published on June 2, 2020, at censorship-prone Research Gate, and was entitled “All-cause mortality during COVID-19 - No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response”. It showed that hot spots of sudden surges in all‑cause mortality occurred only in specific locations in the Northern-hemisphere Western World, which were synchronous with the March 11, 2020 declaration of a pandemic. Such synchronicity is impossible within the presumed framework of a spreading viral respiratory disease, with or without airplanes, because the calculated time from seeding to mortality surge is highly dependent on local societal circumstances, by several months to years. I attributed the excess deaths to aggressive measures and hospital treatment protocols known to have been applied suddenly at that time in those localities.

The work was pursued in greater depth with collaborators for several years and continues. We have shown repeatedly that excess mortality most often refused to cross national borders and inter-state lines. The invisible virus targets the poor and disabled and carries a passport. It also never kills until governments impose socio-economic and care-structure transformations on vulnerable groups within the domestic population.

Here are my conclusions, from our detailed studies of all-cause mortality in the COVID period, in combination with socio-economic and vaccine-rollout data:

If there had been no pandemic propaganda or coercion, and governments and the medical establishment had simply gone on with business as usual, then there would not have been any excess mortality
There was no pandemic causing excess mortality
Measures caused excess mortality
COVID-19 vaccination caused excess mortality

Regarding the vaccines, we quantified many instances in which a rapid rollout of a dose in the imposed vaccine schedule was synchronous with an otherwise unexpected peak in all-cause mortality, at times in the seasonal cycle and of magnitudes that have not previously been seen in the historic record of mortality.

In this way, we showed that the vaccination campaign in India caused the deaths of 3.7 million fragile residents. In Western countries, we quantified the average all-ages rate of death to be 1 death for every 2000 injections, to increase exponentially with age (doubling every additional 5 years of age), and to be as large as 1 death for every 100 injections for those 80 years and older. We estimated that the vaccines had killed 13 million worldwide.

If one accepts my above-numbered conclusions, and the analyses that we have performed, then there are several implications about how one perceives reality regarding what actually did and did not occur.

First, whereas epidemics of fatal infections are very real in care homes, in hospitals, and with degenerate living conditions, the viral respiratory pandemic risk promoted by the USA‑led “pandemic response” industry is not a thing. It is most likely fabricated and maintained for ulterior motives, other than saving humanity.

Second, in addition to natural events (heat waves, earthquakes, extended large-scale droughts), significant events that negatively affect mortality are large assaults against domestic populations, affecting vulnerable residents, such as:

sudden devastating economic deterioration (the Great Depression, the dust bowl, the dissolution of the Soviet Union),
war (including social-class restructuring),
imperial or economic occupation and exploitation (including large-scale exploitative land use), and
the well-documented measures and destruction applied during the COVID period.

Otherwise, in a stable society, mortality is extremely robust and is not subject to large rapid changes. There is no empirical evidence that large changes in mortality can be induced by sudden appearances of new pathogens. In the contemporary era of the dominant human species, humanity is its worst enemy, not nature.

Third, coercive measures imposed to reduce the risk of transmission (such as distancing, direction arrows, lockdown, isolation, quarantine, Plexiglas barriers, face shields and face masks, elbow bumps, etc.) are palpably unscientific; and the underlying concern itself regarding “spread” was not ever warranted and is irrational, since there is no evidence in reliable mortality data that there ever was a particularly virulent pathogen.

In fact, the very notion of “spread” during the COVID period is rigorously disproved by the temporal and spatial variations of excess all-cause mortality, everywhere that it is sufficiently quantified, worldwide. For example, the presumed virus that killed 1.3 million poor and disabled residents of the USA did not cross the more-than-thousand-kilometer land border with Canada, despite continuous and intense economic exchanges. Likewise, the presumed virus that caused synchronous mortality hotspots in March-April-May 2020 (such as in New York, Madrid region, London, Stockholm, and northern Italy) did not spread beyond those hotspots.

Interestingly, in this regard, the historical seasonal variations (12 month period) in all-cause mortality, known for more than 100 years, are inverted in the northern and southern global hemispheres, and show no evidence of “spread” whatsoever. Instead, these patterns, in a given hemisphere, show synchronous increases and decreases of mortality across the entire hemisphere. Would the “spreading” causal agent(s) always take exactly 6 months to cross into the other hemisphere, where it again causes mortality changes that are synchronous across the hemisphere? Many epidemiologists have long-ago concluded that person-to-person “contact” spreading of respiratory diseases cannot explain and is disproved by the seasonal patterns of all-cause mortality. Why the CDC et al. are not systematically ridiculed in this regard is beyond this scientist’s comprehension.

Instead, outside of extremely poor living conditions, we should look to the body of work produced by Professor Sheldon Cohen and co‑authors (USA) who established that two dominant factors control whether intentionally challenged college students become infected and the severity of the respiratory illness when they are infected:

degree of experienced psychological stress
degree of social isolation

The negative impact of experienced psychological stress on the immune system is a large current and established area of scientific study, dutifully ignored by vaccine interests, and we now know that the said impact is dramatically larger in elderly individuals, where nutrition (gut biome ecology) is an important co-factor.

Of course, I do not mean that causal agents do not exist, such as bacteria, which can cause pneumonia; nor that there are not dangerous environmental concentrations of such causal agents in proximity to fragile individuals, such as in hospitals and on clinicians’ hands, notoriously.

Fourth, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess mortality, the debate about gain-of-function research and an escaped bioweapon is irrelevant.

I do not mean that the Department of Defence (DoD) does not fund gain-of-function and bioweapon research (abroad, in particular), I do not mean that there are not many US patents for genetically modified microbial organisms having potential military applications, and I do not mean that there have not previously been impactful escapes or releases of bioweapon vectors and pathogens. For example, the Lyme disease controversy in the USA may be an example of a bioweapon leak (see Kris Newby’s 2019 book “Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons”).

Generally, for obvious reasons, any pathogen that is extremely virulent will not also be extremely contagious. There are billions of years of cumulative evolutionary pressures against the existence of any such pathogen, and that result will be deeply encoded into all lifeforms.

Furthermore, it would be suicidal for any regime to vehemently seek to create such a pathogen. Bioweapons are intended to be delivered to specific target areas, except in the science fiction wherein immunity from a bioweapon that is both extremely virulent and extremely contagious can be reliably delivered to one’s own population and soldiers.

In my view, if anything COVID is close to being a bioweapon, it is the military capacity to massively, and repeatedly, rollout individual injections, which are physical vectors for whichever substances the regime wishes to selectively inject into chosen populations, while imposing complete compliance down to one’s own body, under the cover of protecting public health.

This is the same regime that practices wars of complete nation destruction and societal annihilation, under the cover of spreading democracy and women’s rights. And I do not mean China.

Fifth, again, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess mortality, there was no need for any special treatment protocols, beyond the usual thoughtful, case-by-case, diagnostics followed by the clinician’s chosen best approach.

Instead, vicious new protocols killed patients in hotspots that applied those protocols in the first months of the declared pandemic.

This was followed in many states by imposed coercive societal measures, which were contrary to individual health: fear, panic, paranoia, induced psychological stress, social isolation, self-victimization, loss of work and volunteer activity, loss of social status, loss of employment, business bankruptcy, loss of usefulness, loss of caretakers, loss of venues and mobility, suppression of freedom of expression, etc.

Only the professional class did better, comfortably working from home, close to family, while being catered to by an army of specialised home-delivery services.

Unfortunately, the medical establishment did not limit itself to assaulting and isolating vulnerable patients in hospitals and care facilities. It also systematically withdrew normal care, and attacked physicians who refused to do so.

In virtually the entire Western World, antibiotic prescriptions were cut and maintained low by approximately 50% of the pre-COVID rates. This would have had devastating effects in the USA, in particular, where:

the CDC’s own statistics, based on death certificates, has approximately 50% of the million or so deaths associated with COVID having bacterial pneumonia as a listed comorbidity (there was a massive epidemic of bacterial pneumonia in the USA, which no one talked about)
the Southern poor states historically have much higher antibiotic prescription rates (this implies high susceptibility to bacterial pneumonia)
excess mortality during the COVID period is very strongly correlated (r = +0.86) — in fact proportional to — state-wise poverty

Sixth, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess mortality, there was no public-health reason to develop and deploy vaccines; not even if one accepted the tenuous proposition that any vaccine has ever been effective against a presumed viral respiratory disease.

Add to this that all vaccines are intrinsically dangerous and our above-described vaccine-dose fatality rate quantifications, and we must recognize that the vaccines contributed significantly to excess mortality everywhere that they were imposed.

In conclusion, the excess mortality was not caused by any particularly virulent new pathogen. COVID so-called response in-effect was a massive multi-pronged state and iatrogenic attack against populations, and against societal support structures, which caused all the excess mortality, in every jurisdiction.

It is only natural now to ask “what drove this?”, “who benefited?” and “which groups sustained permanent structural disadvantages?”

In my view, the COVID assault can only be understood in the symbiotic contexts of geopolitics and large-scale social-class transformations. Dominance and exploitation are the drivers. The failing USA-centered global hegemony and its machinations create dangerous conditions for virtually everyone.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….