Covid-19, the media event, was the Trojan Horse constructed to usher in a complete transformation of our society- an endeavor of complete social control.
You're just repeating the propaganda without being able to provide any evidence. So you have no evidence at all and base your opinion on mere repetition. Not a single symptom of the sick people was unusual or different from the flu or pneumonia.
"Unusual lung damage"? "Extraordinary symptoms"? I still remember a film claiming that scientists had measured "extraordinary radiation" on the Shroud of Turin. It later turned out that this shroud was made in the 14th century AD. So much for the term "unusual".
It is a pity that you do not correctly identify and name these "unusual symptoms" and then investigate whether they also occur in influenza and common pneumonia.
"CT scans and even X-rays of some patients showed unusual lung damage"
Demonstrably false. The CT scans that were showing lung damage were nothing that hasn't been seen for decades with numerous people.
The entire "happy hypoxia" nonsense has been laid to rest. The "ground glass opacity" propaganda has also been pointed out as nothing that hasn't been seen a thousand times over.
I recognize trolls precisely by such exaggerations, generalizations, and the lack of conclusive evidence. He won't be able to troll here anymore. Back then, articles like this one were infiltrated by "commentators" claiming that "everyone in her entire extended family was suffering from a very strange, unusual illness that they had never had before." Of course, what was meant was Convid. Such exaggerations and generalizations are typical of paid trolls.
In the UK alone, approximately 15,000 people are tasked with monitoring the online narrative and steering it in the desired direction. A single troll can acquire an infinite number of nicknames with which to brainwash people online. Without permanently banning such individuals, enlightenment would be impossible. Of course, I direct this response to the other readers of this Substack.
Back in October of 2021 I became extremely sick, for two weeks. Unlike anything I had ever experienced before. I agree with you, there was no "covid". I still grapple though with what made me so ill? I feel I quit possibly was poisoned. Maybe from EMFs or shedding from the vaccines (if they actually exist)? I have a good friend who received both covid shots and two of the boosters. Maybe he shed on me? [Or possibly from a past vaccine i had received e.g. Shingrex, in late 2020, before I had woken up to them] Just weeks later (Nov 21), I started bleeding. At that time I was 58 (woman). The bleeding eventually stopped but then started up again last year in April (it's been on and off ever since). My abdomen has gotten huge! I can only assume I have cancer. I no longer trust doctors, so haven't seen one. Just going by my own research.
No, I never took any convid injections. Luckily I had awoken to the evils of vaccines by then. Really regret the Shingrex (sp?) I took. It made me bedridden for a day. I knew a women years ago, who had shingles in her right eye which caused her a lot of problems (hence why I took stupid injection, hoping to avoid such a thing). Maybe that's what did this to me? I'll never know. I'm trying some natural things but so far nothing is helping. I'm not afraid to die, just hoping if I'm lucky, I'll go in my sleep. Thank you for your response Suavek. You're doing good work.
It might be that the "troll" is basically not a clear thinker, rather than a paid misinformant.
Here is an example of muddled belief: ("...Your view is entirely right regarding those who tested "positive" and had only mild symptoms; those were probably cases of the common cold or flu (not necessarily caused by "virus")."
On one hand, this commentator leads readers to believe he has rejected or is skeptical of the existence of viruses...which he always writes as "viruses". But on the other hand, the commentator implies colds and flu may be caused by "viruses" in the comment "not necessarily caused by 'virus'".
People are often stubborn in their refusal to think again about some pet belief they've fastened onto. But on the other hand, I am certain there are paid propagandists who suggest support and/or willingness to think about the reasoning they're paid to disparage. They first "like" an article or comment they intend to marginalize and start their remarks with an expression of like mindedness, but then introducce claims that if true would invalidate the idea under their attack.
I do not know the commentator's motive or mindset, aside from evident confusion. It could be a troll or a typical muddled thinker.
Years ago I was attacked on a discussion forum supposedly dedicated to reason for trying repeatedly to expose the impossible and ridiculous official story about 911 as false. The adminstrator of the site wrote an article about me, without naming me, entitled "Please Don't Feed the Trolls". Next my comment to a site visitor who had complained of tyrannical site attitudes, in which I validated his observation, was deleted, but only for 1 day. The well known philosopher who wrote a lot of books defending reason and individual freedom and who contributed articles to that site insisted that my comment be reactivated or he'd leave. Finally, after that (brilliant and productive) philosopher died (too young), a guy who'd been a friend of mine banned me from that forum for again providing evidence that 911 was an inside job.
I had never thought of myself as a troll. I was angry about 911 and the invasion of Iraq. My numerous observations and comments seemed to others, offended by my views, as evidence of my bad intentions.
What are your assumptions based on? Can you name the numbers, locations, times, and types of toxins used? If you have no evidence for this and can't provide any further details, then this is pure propaganda. I ask you to consider that the death protocols used in hospitals for approximately eight to a maximum of twelve weeks, along with the propaganda and the hysteria it caused, were enough to create the illusion of a health threat. Furthermore, numerous treatments for the patients were postponed. Nowhere were there any symptoms of “novel diseases.” In this substack, in Dr. Yeadon's substack, and also in Prof. Rancourt's, you will find ample evidence that there was never a real health threat.
So far, no one has been able to provide any evidence for the medical purpose of these "measures." Everything was fabricated, had nothing to do with real medical science, and the official statistics were demonstrably falsified. All the evidence is freely available to you on this Substack.
Your statements in the linked articles are very insightful. I will link everything in one of the next articles by the Fraud Prevention Hotline. Thank you for the great links.
I guess what can happen with some who are highly vulnerable is that they get so scared that their immune system starts to weaken and they then become susceptible to the common cold or something else. The ambulances only started up in my area when the jabs were rolled out. The truth is so obvious now as to the scam that you’d have to be deaf dumb and blind not to see it. Evil has stared us right in the face and many simply don’t have what it takes to see it.
Karyne, when articles are particularly convincing, the trolls always come along and talk a lot without providing any conclusive evidence. Their job is to steer the narrative. After five years, people have had enough time to get to know the real evidence to distinguish it from propaganda. Those who, despite the pervasive censorship, found their way to this Substack and actively use their time to write comments have already had enough time to read the sources with truthful information. It's not particularly stupid people who could have discovered this Substack full of conclusive evidence purely by chance. If the articles are less convincing, these people don't even show up here. When they can't stop their nonsense and repeat it several times, it becomes clear why they do it: because it's their job.
Can you cite one location, I mean exact location, where you believe there was a "toxic tool" (whatever that means) that caused mass death in Spring 2020? Can you also cite "tools" used and manner of release?
Any evidence for that? Specifics? Anything?
BTW people are being mass poisoned on a daily basis in numerous ways.
I could go into any nursing home e.g. and point to volumes of "toxic tools" being used every day of the week.
"There was no pandemic ever- there is no “lab leak”- there is no “unique viral pathogen”- there is no “China Virus”- there is no “bioweapon”- There is no “There” there."
Thank you once more. Media event is a very good term. In fact 'media event anagrams to this longest single word 'dementiae'. Then there is the phrase 'I dement Eva'. As Eva means 'life' this seems very suitable.
So COVID19, a fraud to make people afraid. 'Coronavirus Disease' anagrams to
Trolls really do seek to maintain the fear don’t they.
My own rather extensive experience with , fear , is that under “ its “ influence I am unable to think. Hardly know how to cross the road safely in such a state.
Anymore, I often say, "the gain of function was not part of some fake "virus", it was the mRNA gene editing injections (bio-weapons) (being called "vaccines")."
I have also seen some people say the quiet part out loud regarding "vaccines"... several have said that *compliance* is more important than efficacy. I wish I could remember where I read it because I would include the link. Apologies.
This entire charade has *always* been about making the public comply with insanity, even when in their gut they know better and I believe the whole "gain of function lab leak" is part of that charade. Also, when they push that narrative it gives a free pass to the real weapon and those who developed and mandated it to the entire world. The mRNA gene editing injection was always the real weapon.
You're just repeating the propaganda without being able to provide any evidence. So you have no evidence at all and base your opinion on mere repetition. Not a single symptom of the sick people was unusual or different from the flu or pneumonia.
Please see this article :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-missing-flu
P.S.
"Unusual lung damage"? "Extraordinary symptoms"? I still remember a film claiming that scientists had measured "extraordinary radiation" on the Shroud of Turin. It later turned out that this shroud was made in the 14th century AD. So much for the term "unusual".
It is a pity that you do not correctly identify and name these "unusual symptoms" and then investigate whether they also occur in influenza and common pneumonia.
"CT scans and even X-rays of some patients showed unusual lung damage"
Demonstrably false. The CT scans that were showing lung damage were nothing that hasn't been seen for decades with numerous people.
The entire "happy hypoxia" nonsense has been laid to rest. The "ground glass opacity" propaganda has also been pointed out as nothing that hasn't been seen a thousand times over.
"in ERs all around the world..."
I recognize trolls precisely by such exaggerations, generalizations, and the lack of conclusive evidence. He won't be able to troll here anymore. Back then, articles like this one were infiltrated by "commentators" claiming that "everyone in her entire extended family was suffering from a very strange, unusual illness that they had never had before." Of course, what was meant was Convid. Such exaggerations and generalizations are typical of paid trolls.
In the UK alone, approximately 15,000 people are tasked with monitoring the online narrative and steering it in the desired direction. A single troll can acquire an infinite number of nicknames with which to brainwash people online. Without permanently banning such individuals, enlightenment would be impossible. Of course, I direct this response to the other readers of this Substack.
Good call. 👏👏🏻👏🏼👏🏽👏🏾👏🏿
Trolls gotta go.
Back in October of 2021 I became extremely sick, for two weeks. Unlike anything I had ever experienced before. I agree with you, there was no "covid". I still grapple though with what made me so ill? I feel I quit possibly was poisoned. Maybe from EMFs or shedding from the vaccines (if they actually exist)? I have a good friend who received both covid shots and two of the boosters. Maybe he shed on me? [Or possibly from a past vaccine i had received e.g. Shingrex, in late 2020, before I had woken up to them] Just weeks later (Nov 21), I started bleeding. At that time I was 58 (woman). The bleeding eventually stopped but then started up again last year in April (it's been on and off ever since). My abdomen has gotten huge! I can only assume I have cancer. I no longer trust doctors, so haven't seen one. Just going by my own research.
I'm sorry to hear that. Why don't you mention whether you've taken a gene injection against Convid ?
No, I never took any convid injections. Luckily I had awoken to the evils of vaccines by then. Really regret the Shingrex (sp?) I took. It made me bedridden for a day. I knew a women years ago, who had shingles in her right eye which caused her a lot of problems (hence why I took stupid injection, hoping to avoid such a thing). Maybe that's what did this to me? I'll never know. I'm trying some natural things but so far nothing is helping. I'm not afraid to die, just hoping if I'm lucky, I'll go in my sleep. Thank you for your response Suavek. You're doing good work.
Really good call Suavek….in my humble opinion.
It might be that the "troll" is basically not a clear thinker, rather than a paid misinformant.
Here is an example of muddled belief: ("...Your view is entirely right regarding those who tested "positive" and had only mild symptoms; those were probably cases of the common cold or flu (not necessarily caused by "virus")."
On one hand, this commentator leads readers to believe he has rejected or is skeptical of the existence of viruses...which he always writes as "viruses". But on the other hand, the commentator implies colds and flu may be caused by "viruses" in the comment "not necessarily caused by 'virus'".
People are often stubborn in their refusal to think again about some pet belief they've fastened onto. But on the other hand, I am certain there are paid propagandists who suggest support and/or willingness to think about the reasoning they're paid to disparage. They first "like" an article or comment they intend to marginalize and start their remarks with an expression of like mindedness, but then introducce claims that if true would invalidate the idea under their attack.
I do not know the commentator's motive or mindset, aside from evident confusion. It could be a troll or a typical muddled thinker.
Years ago I was attacked on a discussion forum supposedly dedicated to reason for trying repeatedly to expose the impossible and ridiculous official story about 911 as false. The adminstrator of the site wrote an article about me, without naming me, entitled "Please Don't Feed the Trolls". Next my comment to a site visitor who had complained of tyrannical site attitudes, in which I validated his observation, was deleted, but only for 1 day. The well known philosopher who wrote a lot of books defending reason and individual freedom and who contributed articles to that site insisted that my comment be reactivated or he'd leave. Finally, after that (brilliant and productive) philosopher died (too young), a guy who'd been a friend of mine banned me from that forum for again providing evidence that 911 was an inside job.
I had never thought of myself as a troll. I was angry about 911 and the invasion of Iraq. My numerous observations and comments seemed to others, offended by my views, as evidence of my bad intentions.
What are your assumptions based on? Can you name the numbers, locations, times, and types of toxins used? If you have no evidence for this and can't provide any further details, then this is pure propaganda. I ask you to consider that the death protocols used in hospitals for approximately eight to a maximum of twelve weeks, along with the propaganda and the hysteria it caused, were enough to create the illusion of a health threat. Furthermore, numerous treatments for the patients were postponed. Nowhere were there any symptoms of “novel diseases.” In this substack, in Dr. Yeadon's substack, and also in Prof. Rancourt's, you will find ample evidence that there was never a real health threat.
So far, no one has been able to provide any evidence for the medical purpose of these "measures." Everything was fabricated, had nothing to do with real medical science, and the official statistics were demonstrably falsified. All the evidence is freely available to you on this Substack.
Best wishes,
Suavek
I would add to this list, another good Canadian doctor: Dr. Trozzi. But, yes, the goal was and still is to enslave Western civilization.
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/breaking-the-algorithmic-lock-how
https://secure.icn.press/videos/embed/xrivAzeitc8exJb226wcGU
Dear Luc,
Your statements in the linked articles are very insightful. I will link everything in one of the next articles by the Fraud Prevention Hotline. Thank you for the great links.
Best regards,
Suavek
I guess what can happen with some who are highly vulnerable is that they get so scared that their immune system starts to weaken and they then become susceptible to the common cold or something else. The ambulances only started up in my area when the jabs were rolled out. The truth is so obvious now as to the scam that you’d have to be deaf dumb and blind not to see it. Evil has stared us right in the face and many simply don’t have what it takes to see it.
Karyne, when articles are particularly convincing, the trolls always come along and talk a lot without providing any conclusive evidence. Their job is to steer the narrative. After five years, people have had enough time to get to know the real evidence to distinguish it from propaganda. Those who, despite the pervasive censorship, found their way to this Substack and actively use their time to write comments have already had enough time to read the sources with truthful information. It's not particularly stupid people who could have discovered this Substack full of conclusive evidence purely by chance. If the articles are less convincing, these people don't even show up here. When they can't stop their nonsense and repeat it several times, it becomes clear why they do it: because it's their job.
Excellent summation. Thank you.
"Probably?"
Can you cite one location, I mean exact location, where you believe there was a "toxic tool" (whatever that means) that caused mass death in Spring 2020? Can you also cite "tools" used and manner of release?
Any evidence for that? Specifics? Anything?
BTW people are being mass poisoned on a daily basis in numerous ways.
I could go into any nursing home e.g. and point to volumes of "toxic tools" being used every day of the week.
They used to call it 'The Flu' which until 2020 killed an average of 40k people in the US every single year since they started counting.
"There was no pandemic ever- there is no “lab leak”- there is no “unique viral pathogen”- there is no “China Virus”- there is no “bioweapon”- There is no “There” there."
There is hear-hear here.
There is no unique viral pathogen becasue there are no viral or other pathogens.
Amen !
Thank you once more. Media event is a very good term. In fact 'media event anagrams to this longest single word 'dementiae'. Then there is the phrase 'I dement Eva'. As Eva means 'life' this seems very suitable.
So COVID19, a fraud to make people afraid. 'Coronavirus Disease' anagrams to
– Endorses avaricious
– Davos AI UN sorceries
Plus a whole lot more to confirm what Allen said.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/coronavirus-is-it-really-a-monster?utm_source=publication-search
The black background is hard on the eyes. 😵💫
I'm sorry. I don't think it's possible to change the background color in Substack afterward.
Boo.
Trolls really do seek to maintain the fear don’t they.
My own rather extensive experience with , fear , is that under “ its “ influence I am unable to think. Hardly know how to cross the road safely in such a state.
This is not an exaggeration .
Understanding my own fear allowed me to understand how n why the powers that wanna be , choose it as a favoured weapon.
Personally I no longer comply .
Anymore, I often say, "the gain of function was not part of some fake "virus", it was the mRNA gene editing injections (bio-weapons) (being called "vaccines")."
I have also seen some people say the quiet part out loud regarding "vaccines"... several have said that *compliance* is more important than efficacy. I wish I could remember where I read it because I would include the link. Apologies.
This entire charade has *always* been about making the public comply with insanity, even when in their gut they know better and I believe the whole "gain of function lab leak" is part of that charade. Also, when they push that narrative it gives a free pass to the real weapon and those who developed and mandated it to the entire world. The mRNA gene editing injection was always the real weapon.